Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 442-730-6 | CAS number: 35132-93-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 02 JUL 2002 to 04 JUL 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1984
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.2 (Acute Toxicity for Daphnia)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- pH-value in water 13-14
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - All treatment groups and control
- Sampling: from freshly prepared media after 0 and 24h and from old media after 24 and 48h
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: not reported - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Stock solution: 238 mg/L, prepared with dilution water
- Dispersion treatment: Agitation
- Equipement:
Dispersion treatment: Rotating Shaker 3040, GFL, Centrifuge ZK 364, ZIRBUS
CONTROL (pH)
- Four replicates of the highest concentration level were tested as pH-control. The stock solution (pH-value = 9.39) was adjusted with 1 N HCL to pH 7.05 (0 h) and 7.04 (24 h).
CONTROL
- Dilution water without test item tested under the same conditions as the test groups. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flea
- Strain/clone: Daphnia magna STRAUS (Clone 5)
- Source: Institut für Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene des Bundesgesundheitsamtes, Berlin, FRG
- Feeding during test: no
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 2h before test start
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): yes
- Culture: In 2-3 L glass vessels with approximatively 1.8 L culture medium, at 21 °C (temperatures of 20-25 °C were tolerated), in an incubator
- Culture medium: Culture medium Elendt M4, according to Elendt (1990), modified to a total hardness of 160 to 180 mg CaCO3/L
- Type and amount of food: mix of Desmodesmus subspicatus and Chlorella vulgaris, with an algae cell density of > 10^6 cells/mL.
- Feeding frequency: 5-7 time per week ad libitum
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): not reported
METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF EARLY INSTARS OR OTHER LIFE STAGES:
2 to 24 h old daphnids were used for the preliminary and definitive test. Daphnids had been obtained by removing the mother animals twice within 22 h. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- 251 - 254 CaCO3 [mg/L] (min - max)
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 1 °C
- pH:
- Treatment groups: 7.77 - 9.39 (min - max)
Ph-control: 7.04 - 7.30 (min - max) - Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.77 - 8.58 mgO2/L (min - max)
- Conductivity:
- 679 - 680 [µS/cm] (min - max)
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 100 - 50 - 25 - 12.6 - 6.3 mg a.i./L (238 - 119 - 60 - 30 - 15 mg/L test item)
Measured concentrations: see any other information on results. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Glass beakers (5 cm ID x 8 cm H), 50 mL
- Fill volume: 20 mL
- Aeration: not reported
- Renewal rate of test solution: The water was renewed after 24 h.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per pH control (replicates): 4
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: according to EEC 92/69 L383A C.2 (Annex)
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Prior to test start pH-value, dissolved oxygen concentration, conductivity, total hardness and temperature of the dilution water were measured. In the fresh media (0 h and 24 h) the water parameters (pH value, oxygen concentration) were measured in one additional replicate per concentration and control. In the old media (24 h and 48 h) the water parameters were measured in all replicates per concentration and control. The room temperature was recorded throughout the test with a thermohygrograph.
- Equipement:
Oxygen: Oximeter, Oxi 530 (WTW)
pH value: pH-Meter inoLab pH Level 1 (WTVV)
Temperature: Hygro-thermograph (LuFFT)
Water hardness: Spectrophotometer, Cadas 100 LPG 158 (DR. LANGE)
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no, but pH controls were run in parallel: Four replicates of the highest concentration level were tested as pH-control. The stock solution (pH-value = 9.39) was adjusted with 1 N HCL to pH 7.05 (0 h) and 7.04 (24 h).
- Photoperiod: 16h illumination
- Light intensity: diffuse light, max. 20 µmol/m^2*s (corresponding to 1200 lx)
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Immobility: in all groups after 24 h and 48 h
- Equipement:
Fluorescence of algae Chlorophyll-Fluorometer (KLEINFELD)
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: yes/no
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 4 concentration levels of the test item ranging from 0.238 to 238 mg/L
- pH control: a pH-control (238 mg/L) was prepared because the pH-value of the stock solution was > 8.6.
- Spacing factor: 10
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: yes
TEST PERFORMANCE
The definitive study was performed with 5 concentration levels of the test item ranging from 15 to 238 mg/L set up in a geometric series with a factor of 2.0 under semi-static conditions to enable the determination of immobilization after 24 and 48 hours. In addition a pH-control (238 ring/L) was prepared. The water was renewed after 24 h. 2 to 24 h old daphnids were used for the preliminary and definitive test. They had been obtained by removing the mother animals twice within 22 h. The daphnids had been acclimatized to the dilution water 2 h before test started under test conditions. Control replicates without test item were tested under the same conditions as the test groups. In the preliminary and in the definitive test the immobilisation of the daphnids was observed after 24 and 48 hours of exposure. Water parameters were measured at begin and after 24 h (new media) and at 24 h and 48 h (old media). - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other: adjusted to pH 7
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other: asjusted to pH 7
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 8.9 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 28.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other: CI 95%: 20.6 - 39.5
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC100
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- A summary table of results is provided in 'any other information on results'. After 24 hours of exposure, immobilisation was only observed in the two highest treatment groups. After 48 hours, no effect of immobilisation was recorded in the lowest treatment group, the control and the pH-control (pH-neutralised treatment group containing 100 mg a.i./L). Observed immobilisation effects occurred in a dose-dependent manner. The derived 48h-EC50 was 28.6 mg a.i./ L (CI 95%: 20.6 - 39.5) and 48h-EC10 was 8.9 mg a.i./L. No effect was observed at 100 mg a.i./L, neutralised to pH 7. Therefore, 48h-EC50 with pH 7 was > 100 mg a.i./L. See justification in Overall remarks for using the adjusted test concentration as valid effect concentration.
The mean recovery rate for measure concentrations was > 80 %, except for the lowest concentration. Effect concentrations were based on nominal concentrations. The test item was clearly dissolved in all concentration levels throughout exposure. The pH-value varied by slightly more than 1.5 units in the treatment groups and laid in the exactable range of 7.04 - 9.39 (guideline indicates the pH should be in the range of 6 to 9). The pH increased with increasing test concentrations.
Validity cirteria
The validity criteria were fulfilled:
• In the control group no Daphnia were immobilised or trapped on the surface of the water.
• The dissolved O2 concentration was > 5.21 mg/L (60 % of the air saturation value at the temperature used).
• The EC50-value after 24 h of the reference item was in the range of 1.0 to 2.5 mg/L.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - The reference item is routinely tested in order to check test system and test conditions (once per month).
- Test concentrations: 0.58 - 1.0 - 1.8 - 3.2 - 5.8 mg/L
- Range of validity: 1.0 mg/L < EC50 (24 h) < 2.5 mg/L
The percentage immobility for the reference item was determined after 24 h. The EC100 value was determined directly from the test results. The EC10 and EC50 with 95 % confidence interval (Cl) was determined in a probability network by interpolation according to standard procedures.
- EC- values after 24 h of the reference item in [mg/L]: EC10: 0.6; EC50: 1.4 (Cl 1.1-1.8); EC100: 3.2
The EC50 - value of reference item potassium dichromate after 24 h was within the prescribed concentration range of 1.0 - 2.5 mg/L of validity criteria according to AQS: DIN Guideline 38412 L 30. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- EC100-values were deduced directly from the dose-response-relationship after 24 and 48 h. There was no mathematical calculation. EC10 and EC50-values were calculated via probit analysis. Probits according to WEBER (1986). Calculation of the confidence intervals was carried out using standard procedures according to BREITIG & TÜMPLING (1982). Calculations were carried out using software SigmaPlot rel. 2000 (2000), SPSS CORPORATION.
BREITIG G. & TÜMPLING W. (1982): Methoden der Wasseruntersuchungen Bd.II, VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena
WEBER E. (1986): Grundriß der biologischen Statistik, 9. Auflage - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (adopted 1984, 2004)
- Conclusions:
- No effect was observed at 100 mg a.i./L, neutralised to pH 7 and therefore the 48h-EC50, adjusted to pH 7 > 100 mg a.i./L.
- Executive summary:
The acute immobilisation of the test substance was determined according to OECD 202 (1984) and in compliance with GLP. The study was conducted under semi-static conditions over a duration of 48 hours. Twenty test organisms were exposed in groups of five to each test concentration (nominal: 6.3 - 12.6 - 25 - 50 - 100 mg a.i./L), pH control (100 mg a.i./L, neutralised to pH7) and control. The test concentrations and control were analytically verified via analysis of dissolved organic carbon (DOC, acc. to DIN Guideline 28409, part 3). The mean recovery rate was 91 %.
After 24 hours of exposure, immobilisation was only observed in the two highest treatment groups. After 48 hours, no effect of immobilisation was recorded in the lowest treatment group, the control and the pH-control (pH-neutralised treatment group containing 100 mg a.i./L). Observed immobilisation effects occurred in a dose-dependent manner. The derived 48h-EC50 was 28.6 mg a.i./ L (CI 95%: 20.6 - 39.5) and 48h-EC10 was 8.9 mg a.i./L. No effect was observed at 100 mg a.i./L, neutralised to pH 7. The mean recovery rate for measured concentrations was > 80 %, except for the lowest test concentration. Effect concentrations were based on nominal concentrations (RL2).
The test item was clearly dissolved in all concentration levels throughout exposure. The pH-value varied by slightly more than 1.5 units in the treatment groups and was in the acceptable range of 7.04 - 9.39 (guideline indicates the pH should be in the range of 6 to 9), which is related to the alkaline characteristics of the test substance. In fact, the pH increased with increasing test concentrations. Therefore, observed effects of immobilisation are very likely linked to pH-effect rather than inherent toxicity of the test substance. The assumption is supported by the pH-control at 100 mg a.i./L adjusted to pH 7, where no immobilisation of daphnids occurred during 48 hours. According to OECD 23 and ECHA guidance R.7b, pH should be adjusted to lie within the specified range for the test using a suitable buffer, where the substance itself causes a change to the pH of the test medium. This is the case for the test substance. Therefore, the valid 48h-EC50 for the immobilisation of Daphnia magna was considered > 100 mg a.i./L.
The test was considered reliable and adequate for the environmental hazard assessment for aquatic organisms. The validity critera of the guideline were fulfilled (OECD 202 adopted 1984, 2004).
Reference
Percentage of Daphnids Incapable of Swimming after 24 and 48 h of Exposure (n = 20)
Test item [mg/L] | Test duration [h] | ||||||||||
24 | 48 | ||||||||||
[mg test item/L] | [mg a.i./L] | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | MV | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | MV |
238 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 60 | 70 |
119 | 50 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 60 | 100 | 60 | 80 | 75 |
60 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 20 | 60 | 40 | 40 |
30 | 12.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
15 | 6.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
238 (neutralized) |
100 (neutralized) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MV = Mean value
DOC - Analysis of New (0, 24 h) and Old Media (24, 48 h)
Test item | Theoretical DOC |
DOC [mg/L] | ||||||||
start | end | |||||||||
[mg test item/L] | [mg a.i./L] | [mg/L] | 0 h | 24 h | Mean | RR [%] | 24 h | 48 h | Mean | RR [%] |
238 | 100 | 76.6 | 71.7 | 71.9 | 71.8 | 94 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 94 |
119 | 50 | 38.3 | 37 | 36.1 | 36.6 | 96 | 39.9 | 36 | 38 | 99 |
60 | 25 | 19.15 | 20.5 | 17.2 | 18.9 | 99 | 20 | 17 | 18.5 | 97 |
30 | 12.6 | 9.58 | 9 | 7.7 | 8.4 | 88 | 9.22 | 7.7 | 8.5 | 89 |
15 | 6.3 | 4.79 | 4.2 | 3 | 3.6 | 75 | 4.11 | 3 | 3.6 | 75 |
238 (neutralized) |
100 (neutralized) |
76.6 | 72.4 | 72.9 | 72.7 | 95 | 72 | 72.8 | 72.4 | 95 |
Control | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
RR = Recovery rate (calculated from mean value minus control)
Description of key information
No effect observed at 100 mg a.i./L, adjusted to pH 7; 48h-EC50 (Daphnia magna, immobilisation) > 100 mg a.i./ L (nominal) ( OECD 202, 2002)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A reliable key study is available for the acute immobilisation of the test substance to Daphnia magna (RL1). Acute immobilisation of the test substance to Daphnia magna was determined according to OECD 202 (1984) and in compliance with GLP. The study was conducted under semi-static conditions over a duration of 48 hours. Twenty test organisms were exposed in groups of five to each test concentration (nominal: 6.3 - 12.6 - 25 - 50 - 100 mg a.i./L ), pH-control (100 mg a.i./L, adjusted to pH 7) and control. Test concentrations were analytically verified. After 48 hours, no effect of immobilisation was recorded in the lowest treatment group, the control and the pH-control. The derived 48h-EC50 was 28.6 mg a.i./ L (nominal) and 48h-EC10 was 8.9 mg a.i./L (nominal). No effect was observed at 100 mg a.i./L, neutralised to pH 7. The pH-value varied by slightly more than 1.5 units in the treatment groups and was in the acceptable range of 7.04 - 9.39 (guideline indicates the pH should be in the range of 6 to 9), which is related to the alkaline characteristics of the test substance. Observed effects of immobilisation are linked to pH-effect rather than inherent toxicity of the test substance. The assumption is supported by the pH control at 100 mg a.i./L and pH 7, where no immobilisation of daphnids occurred during 48 hours. According to OECD 23 and ECHA guidance R.7b, pH should be adjusted to lie within the specified range for the test using a suitable buffer, where the substance itself causes a change to the pH of the test medium. This is the case for the test substance. Therefore, the valid 48h-EC50 for the immobilisation of Daphnia magna was considered > 100 mg a.i./L (nominal). The test was considered reliable and adequate for the environmental hazard assessment for aquatic organisms. The validity criteria of the guideline were fulfilled.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.