Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 919-949-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Eye irritation was studied in vitro in GLP complinet assays as listed below:
OECD 492: positive (Cat 1 or 2)
OECD 437: corrosive
Skin irritation was studied in vitro in GLP complinet assays as listed below:
OECD 439: positive (Cat 1 or 2)
OECD 431: negative
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The information for this endpoint study record was obtained from an experimental study. The OECD GLP criteria were met and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 439.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Justification for test system used:
- The reconstructed human epidermis model in vitro method is an accepted in vitro method to replace animal testing. The human skin RHE™ model closely mimics the biochemical and physiological properties of the upper parts of the human skin, i.e the epidermis, and has been validated by the ECV AM in 2008.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: SkinEthic™ RHE-model RHE/S/17
- Tissue batch number: 21-RHE-104
- Expiry date: June 28, 2021
- Date of initiation of testing: June 23, 2021
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37 °C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume of washing steps: 25 mL DPBS
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: none
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 hours
- Spectrophotometer: ELx800, BioTek (Instruments GmbH, Bad Friedrichshall, Germany)
- Wavelength: 570 nm
FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: OD 1.3 (OD>0.7)
- Barrier function: 7.0 h (4.0h- Morphology: Multi-layered, highly differentiated epidermis consisting of basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered Stratum corneum.
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3
CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
- N. of replicates : 3
- Method of calculation used: It is necessary to evaluate the OD due to non-specific reduction and to subtract it before calculation of the cell viability.
Non specific MTT reduction = [OD(KT) - OD(KU) / OD (neg. control)] * 100
NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 3
PREDICTION MODEL
- The test substance is considered as non-irritant to skin (UN GHS No Category) if the tissue viability after exposure and post-treatment incubation is > 50%. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent MTT non-specific colour control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 16 mg ± 2 mg per tissue
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 16 μL ± 0.5 μL per tissue
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied 16 μL ± 0.5 μL per tissue - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 42 min
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 42 h
- Number of replicates:
- 3
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- mean
- Value:
- 2.8
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
The pre-test for direct MTT-reducing capacity of the test item did not result in blue color, but a grey to black discoloration was observed. It can therefore be assumed that the test item is a direct MTT reducer, but the test item has no colorant properties.
It was not necessary to perform a test on killed controls because any MTT reduction would not change the classification since viability is already below the cut-off of 50 %.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: Yes - Interpretation of results:
- other: classification and labeling required according to UN GHS (Category 2 or 1)
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the present study, the test item is identified as requiring classification and labeling according to UN GHS (Category 2 or 1).
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The information for this endpoint study record was obtained from an experimental study. The OECD GLP criteria were met and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 431.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Remarks:
- reconstituted human epidermis (RHE)-model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: The SkinEthic RHE-model RHE/S/17 was obtained from Episkin/SkinEthic Laboratories, Lyon, France.
- Justification for test system used:
- The reconstructed human epidermis model in vitro method is an accepted in vitro method to replace animal testing. The human skin RHE™ model closely mimics the biochemical and physiological properties of the upper parts of the human skin, i.e the epidermis, and has been validated by the ECV AM in 2008.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: SkinEthic™ RHE-model RHE/S/17
- Tissue batch number: 21-RHE-138
- Expiry date: September 6, 2021
- Date of initiation of testing: September 1, 2021
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37 °C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume of washing steps: 20 mL DPBS
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: none
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 hours
- Spectrophotometer: ELx800, BioTek (Instruments GmbH, Bad Friedrichshall, Germany)
- Wavelength: 570 nm
FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: OD 1.3 (OD>0.7)
- Barrier function: > 10.0 h (4.0hFor the barrier function, the ET50 value is above 10.0 and thereby above the accepted range. However, though this acceptance criterion was not fulfilled, the quality of the membrane is considered sufficient based on the experience of the supplier.
- Morphology: Multi-layered, highly differentiated epidermis consisting of basal, spinous and granularlayers, and a multi-layered Stratum corneum.
NUMBER OF TISSUES:
The test item as well as the negative control were tested with two replicate tissues per time point (3 min and 1 hour exposure). The positive control was tested with two replicate tissues only for 1 hour. Additionally, the test item and the negative control were tested with two killed tissues per time point (3 min and 1 hour exposure), each.
Therefore, a total number of 18 tissues was used in this study. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent MTT non-specific colour control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- Solid test item: 20 ± 3 mg per tissue
Positive control: 40 ± 3 µL per tissue
Negative control: 40 ± 3 μL per tissue - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- At room temperature for 3 minutes and 1 hour.
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- MTT Assay 42 h
- Number of replicates:
- 2 replicate tissues per time point (3 min and 1 hour exposure)
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- mean, 1 h
- Value:
- 100.9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: not corrosive
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- mean, 3 min
- Value:
- 108.6
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: not corrosive
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
The pre-test for direct MTT-reducing capacity of the test item did result in blue color, i.e. the test item is a direct MTT reducer, but the test item has no colorant properties.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: Yes - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the present study, the test item is not considered to possess a corrosive potential to skin.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The information for this endpoint study record was obtained from an experimental study. The OECD GLP criteria were met and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 437.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Fresh isolated bovine eyes of cattle were used in this study.
Slaughterhouse: Odenwaldschlachthof Brensbach, 64395 Brensbach, Germany
Age of cattle: 14 - 23 months
Corneal diameter: 25 - 28 mm - Vehicle:
- other: 0.9 % sodium chloride solution
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 750 µL of the suspended test item (i.e. 150 mg/750 µL), positive or negative control were applied on the corneas.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED: 0.9% sodium chloride Solution
POSITIVE CONTROL USED: 20 % imidazole in 0.9 % sodium chloride solution
APPLICATION DOSE: 750 μL
TREATMENT METHOD: closed chamber
POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: yes, 240 min
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: at least 3 times
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: The opacity value of each individual cornea was corrected for background opacity by subtracting the initial baseline opacity reading from the post treatment opacity reading. In addition, the opacity values of both the treatment and positive control groups were corrected for the mean negative control opacity values.
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of microtiter plate reader (OD490)
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA: The decision criteria as indicated in the OECD TG 437 were used.
IVIS
<3 No Category
>3<55 No prediction can be made
>55 Category 1 - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- mean
- Value:
- 65.3
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes (IVIS = 1.0)
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes (IVIS = 96.1) - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the present study, the test item did show an eye hazard potential. The test item is inducing serious eye damage (UN GHS: Category 1).
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The information for this endpoint study record was obtained from an experimental study. The OECD GLP criteria were met and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 492.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- human
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM:
Designation: EpiOcular™ Tissue (OCL-200, OCL-212)
Lot No.: 34914
Keratinocyte strain: 4 F 118 8
Supplier: MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Solid test item: 50 mg per tissue
Negative control: 50 μL per tissue
Positive control: 50 μL per tissue - Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 6 h
- Details on study design:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 2
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED: Deionised water
POSITIVE CONTROL USED: Methyl acetate
APPLICATION DOSE: 50 mg
POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: yes, 6 h
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- At the end of the 6 hours treatment time, the positive control, negative control and the test item
were removed by extensively rinsing the tissues with pre-warmed (room temperature) DPBS.
Three clean beakers, containing a minimum of 100 mL each of DPBS were used per group.
EVALUATION OF RESULTS:
The calculation was performed with the MS-Excel-Sheet "lnVitroEyelrritation_ VOl ". The mean
OD (optical density) of the two negative control tissues as calculated. This value corresponds to
100% tissue viability in the current test. For each individual tissue treated with the test item or
the positive control the individual relative tissue viability was calculated according to the
following formula:
Viability (%) = [test item OD / mean negative control OD] * 100
Prediction Model according to OECD 492:
The test item is identified as not requiring classification and labeling according to UN GHS (No
Category) if the mean percent tissue viability is more than 60%. In this case no further testing in
other test methods is required.
If the mean percent tissue viability is less than or equal 60%, no prediction can be made. In this
case, further testing with other test methods will be required because RhCE test methods show a
certain number of false positive results and cannot resolve between UN GHS Categories 1 and 2.
Mean tissue viability > 60 % : No Category
Mean tissue viability <= 60 % - Irritation parameter:
- other: Viability
- Run / experiment:
- Mean
- Value:
- 6.3
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
The pre-test for direct MTT-reducing capacity of the test item did not result in blue color, but a
grey to black discoloration was observed. lt can therefore be assumed that the test item is a direct
MTT reducer, but the test item has no colorant properties.
ACCEPTABILITY OF THE TEST:
The study met all acceptable criteria.
Negative control OD:
Acceptable Criterion: > 0.8 and < 2.5
Result: 1.550 and 1.499
Mean viability positive control:
Acceptable Criterion: < 50 %
Result: 29.9 %
Difference of viability between the two relating tissues of a single chemical:
Acceptable Criterion: < 20 %
Result: 3.3 % (negative control), 4.3 % (positive control), 0.7 % (test item) - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the present study, no prediction can be made regarding the eye irritating
potential of the test item.
Referenceopen allclose all
The IVIS obtained after treatment with the test substance was 65.3 and, thus, higher than 55, i.e. according to OECD 437 the test item is inducing serious eye damage (UN GHS: Category 1).
No observations (e.g. tissue peeling, residual test chemical, non-uniform opacity patterns) were seen in a visually inspection of the corneas after treatment.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available experimental information, the substance needs to be classified as skin irritant (Cat 2) and for irreversible effects to the eye (Cat 1) considering the criteria outlined in the EU Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 or any updates on Classification,Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.