Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1988
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
non-GLP, lack of test article purity information

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1988
Report date:
1988

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
Adopted in May 12th, 1981
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,7-dimethyloct-1-en-3-ol
EC Number:
242-358-2
EC Name:
3,7-dimethyloct-1-en-3-ol
Cas Number:
18479-49-7
Molecular formula:
C10H20O
IUPAC Name:
3,7-dimethyloct-1-en-3-ol
Test material form:
liquid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Animals were housed in fully air-conditioned rooms.
Temperature: RANGE OF 20 - 24 DEGREES CELSIUS
Relative humidity: 30 - 70%
Day/night rhythm: 12h/12h
Diet: 250 ml tap water per animal per day, 130g per animal of Kliba 341 4mm Firma Klingentalmuehle AG CH-4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
Acclimatization period: at least 8 days before the beginning of the study, same housing conditions as during the study.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 ml (unchanged)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
SINGLE APPLICATION TO THE CONJUNCTIVAL SAC OF THE RIGHT EYELID; THE SUBSTANCE WAS NOT WASHED OUT
Observation period (in vivo):
8 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
1
Details on study design:
SINGLE APPLICATION TO THE CONJUNCTIVAL SAC OF THE RIGHT EYELID; THE SUBSTANCE WAS NOT WASHED OUT.
Readings: 1, 24, 48, 72 hours and 8 days

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.7
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not reversible
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
not reversible
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not reversible
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not reversible
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The observation period was 8 days rather than 21 required by the current guideline but this was due to increasingly severe irritation progressing with time.
Following mean grades of ocular lesions were observed: Opacity =1.7 (=3 at Day 8); Iris = 0.7 (=1 at Day 8); Redness = 3.0 (=2 at Day 8); Swelling = 2.7 (=1 at Day 8).

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Executive summary:

The dose (0.1 mL of the undiluted test article) and application of the test substance were adequate. The observation period was 8 days rather than 21 required by the current guideline but this was due to increasingly severe irritation progressing with time. 1 female rabbit was used in theinitial test; a confirmatory test was unnecessary. Readings were performed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and at 8 days after the application.

Although formally the test article can be classified as Category 2 irritant (corneal opacity <3 and iritis <1.5), the symptoms worsened with time (loss of corneal tissue, pannus and suppuration were observed on Day 8) and were not expected to reverse. Therefore, it is classified as Eye Irritant - Category 1.