Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Particle size distribution (Granulometry)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
November 27, 2017
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The particle size distribution of the material was measured via a light scattering method using a Mastersizer 2000E with a Hydro 2000MU (A) dispersion unit v5.60 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Serial No. MAL102043). See instrument User Manual.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
Laser scattering/diffraction
Type of distribution:
volumetric distribution
Percentile:
D10
Mean:
1.611 µm
Remarks on result:
other: St. dev. not provided
Key result
Percentile:
D50
Mean:
3.439 µm
Remarks on result:
other: St. dev. not provided
Percentile:
D90
Mean:
7.309 µm
Remarks on result:
other: St. dev. not provided

100 % of calcium titanate particles were within a distribution range of 0.8 to 208.9 μm. Surface Weighted Mean (D(3,2) = 2.930 μm and Volume Weighted Mean D(4,3) = 4.916 μm.

Conclusions:
The median particle size of the sample of calcium titanate, based on a volumetric size distribution, was determined to be D(0.5) = 3.439 μm. The light scattering data demonstrates that 100 % of particles are present in a distribution range of approximately 0.8 to 208.9 μm.
Executive summary:

The particle size distribution (granulometry) of a sample of calcium titanate (non nano) was calculated using a Mastersizer 2000E with a Hydro 2000MU (A) dispersion unit v5.60 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Serial No. MAL102043). This technology uses a laser scattering technique to capture a light scattering pattern and generate a fundamental distribution of the size of particles in the sample, which is volume-based. Raw data is analysed / interpreted in line with the Fraunhofer model and Mie theory.

100 % of calcium titanate particles were found to exist in a distribution range of 0.8 to 208.9 μm, and the median particle size of the volume distribution or Mass Median Diameter (D(0.5)), which is the size in microns at which 50 % of the sample is smaller and 50 % is larger, was determined to be 3.439 μm. The Volume Weighted Mean (D(4,3)) and Surface Weighted Mean (D(3,2)) was calculated to be 2.930 and 4.916 μm, respectively. As the weighted residual was < 1 % (0.886 %), it can be decided that the calculated data was a good fit to the measurement data.

Description of key information

The particle size distribution (granulometry) of a sample of calcium titanate (non nano) was calculated using a Mastersizer 2000E with a Hydro 2000MU (A) dispersion unit v5.60 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Serial No. MAL102043). This technology uses a laser scattering technique to capture a light scattering pattern and generate a fundamental distribution of the size of particles in the sample, which is volume-based. Raw data is analysed / interpreted in line with the Fraunhofer model and Mie theory.

100 % of calcium titanate particles were found to exist in a distribution range of 0.8 to 208.9 μm, and the median particle size of the volume distribution or Mass Median Diameter (D(0.5)), which is the size in microns at which 50 % of the sample is smaller and 50 % is larger, was determined to be 3.439 μm. The Volume Weighted Mean (D(4,3)) and Surface Weighted Mean (D(3,2)) was calculated to be 2.930 and 4.916 μm, respectively. As the weighted residual was < 1 % (0.886 %), it can be decided that the calculated data was a good fit to the measurement data.

Additional information