Registration Dossier

Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2 May 2012 to 11 May 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
The surface of samarium metal oxidises on contact with air to form an outer layer of samarium oxide. It is therefore considered appropriate to read across information from samarium oxide to the metal where testing on the metal is not technically possible.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: read-across target
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted on read-across material
Justification for type of information:
The surface of samarium metal oxidises on contact with air to form an outer layer of samarium oxide. It is therefore considered appropriate to read across information from samarium oxide to the metal where testing on the metal is not technically possible.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Samarium (III) oxide
EC Number:
235-043-6
EC Name:
Samarium (III) oxide
Cas Number:
12060-58-1
Molecular formula:
O3Sm2
IUPAC Name:
Samarium (III) oxide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
- Appearance: yellowish powder
- Storage conditions: room temperature (20 ± 5°C)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
As the test material is not sufficiently soluble in any acceptable vehicle for use in an Ames test, the supernatant of suspensions were used. The test material was weighed directly for all tested concentrations and suspended in sterile aqua demin. All suspensions were stirred during the test.
As no complete dissolution was possible, undissolved particles were visible on the plates.

Method

Target gene:
- Histidine requirement in the Salmonella typhimurium strains (Histidine operon).
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: S typhimurium TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, and TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
First experiment: 0, 51, 157, 498, 1497 and 5007 µg/plate (without and with activation)
Second experiment: 317, 626, 1255, 2508 and 5011 µg/plate (without and with activation)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Water
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
benzo(a)pyrene
other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (20 µg/plate) and 2-Amino-anthracene (1 µg/plate)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) and pre-incubation

EXPERIMENT 1- PLATE INCORPORATION METHOD
100 µL test material suspension, vehicle or positive control was added to 100 µL bacteria suspension and 500 µL S9 mix or 500 µL phosphate buffer (for tests with and without metabolic activation, respectively) and 2 000 µL overlay agar. The plates were closed and left to harden for a few minutes, then inverted and placed in the dark incubator at 37 °C.

EXPERIMENT 2- PRE-INCUBATION METHOD
100 µL test material suspension, vehicle or positive control was added to 100 µL bacteria suspension and 500 µL S9 mix or 500 µL phosphate buffer (for tests with and without metabolic activation, respectively) and gently vortexed in a test tube and incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes. After pre-incubation 2 000 µL overlay agar was added, the tube gently vortexed and the mixture poured onto the selective agar plate. The plates were closed and left to harden for a few minutes, then inverted and placed in the dark incubator at 37 °C.

The colonies were counted visually, the numbers were recorded.
Evaluation criteria:
A test material is considered to have mutagenic potential, if a significant, reproducible increase of revertant colonies per plate (increase factor ≥ 2) in at least one strain can be observed. A concentration-related increase over the range tested can also be taken as a sign of mutagenic activity.

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
EXPERIMENT 1
- Confirmation of the Criteria and Validity: The treatments for the sterility control and the determination of the titre did not show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range of the test laboratory. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation.
- Toxicity: No signs of toxicity towards tested strains could be observed. The background lawn was visible and the number of revertant colonies was not reduced.
- Mutagenicity: No significant increase in the number of revertant colonies in the treatments with and without metabolic activation could be observed. No concentration-related increase over the tested range was found.

Therefore, the test material was found not to be mutagenic under the sonditions of this experiment. To verify the result, a second experiment was conducted using the pre-incubation method.

EXPERIMENT 2
- Confirmation of the Criteria and Validity: The treatments for the sterility control and the determination of the titre did not show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range of the test laboratory. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation.
- Toxicity: No signs of toxicity towards tested strains could be observed. The background lawn was visible and the number of revertant colonies was not significantly reduced.
- Mutagenicity: No significant increase in the number of revertant colonies in the treatments with and without metabolic activation was observed. No concentration-related increase over the tested range was found.

The results of the second experiment confirmed the findings of the first experiment.

Any other information on results incl. tables

First Experiment:

The mean revertant values of the four replicates are presented in the following table. Concentrations of the test mateiral are stated as nominal concentrations, as suspensions had to be tested due to the poor solubility of the test material. As no complete dissolution was possible, undissolved particles were visible on the plates.

Strain     TA97a    TA98    TA100    TA102    TA1535  
Induction    -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9
 H2O  Mean 108 116 15 16 87 89 140 146 13 15
   sd 13.1 5.1 3.9 1.4 10.2 3.6 7.9 7.7 1.5 2.6
 DMSO  Mean 104 108 12 17 88 91 150 149 15 17
   sd 6.5 13.1 1.7 1.2 6.8 11.4 14.7 10.2 1.7 1.0
Positive Controls Mean  531 583 245 217 516 559 582 632 212 202
   sd 74 88 15 15 38 28 25 39 21 21
   f(I) 5.11 5.40 20.42 12.76 5.93 6.14 3.88 4.24 16.31 11.88
5007 µg/pl.  Mean 113 118 17 15 79 77 152 144 15 15
   sd 6 4 2 1 6 10 6 9 4  1
   f(I) 1.05 1.02 1.13 0.94 0.91 0.87 1.09 0.99 1.15 1.00
1497 µg/pl.  Mean 117 119 16 15 84 93 145 142 17  15
   sd 3 5 2 1 11 13 10 9 4  2
   f(I) 1.08 1.03 1.07 0.94 0.97 1.04 1.04 0.97 1.31  1.00
498 µg/pl.  Mean 120 121 16 16 77 96 148 137 16 16
   sd 2 2 2  1 8 9 5 6 3 2
   f(I) 1.11 1.04 1.07 1.00 0.89 1.08 1.06 0.94 1.23 1.07
157 µg/pl.  Mean 114 116 16 15 76 93 129 147 15 14
   sd 3 4 2 2 22 16 10 13 4 1
   f(I) 1.06 1.00 1.07 0.94 0.87 1.04 0.92 1.01 1.15 0.93
51 µg/pl.  Mean 120 113 15 16 82 84 144 133 14 14
   sd 3 5 4 1 5 6 8 12 3 1
   f(I) 1.11 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 1.03 0.91 1.08 0.93

Second Experiment:

The mean revertant values of the four replicates are presented in the following table. Concentrations of the test material are stated as nominal concentrations, as suspensions had to be tested due to the poor solubility of the test material. As no complete dissolution was possible, undissolved particles were visible on the plates.

Strain     TA97a    TA98    TA100    TA102    TA1535  
Induction    -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9
 H2O  Mean 116 106 21 20 66 83 135 137 14 14
   sd 15.9 7.5 2.5 2.3 4.3 12.0 18.3 18.2 1.3 3.0
 DMSO  Mean 112 109 15 18 70 84 138 146 14 13
   sd 3.0 6.7 2.6 2.9 9.7 5.7 9.2 4.5 2.2 3.4
Positive Controls Mean  449 301 885 824 683 617 593 692 343 232
   sd 75 38 47 53 82 98 36 67 80 8
   f(I) 4.01 2.76 59.00 45.78 10.35 7.35 4.30 4.74 24.50 17.85
5011 µg/pl.  Mean 101 103 16 17 114 102 138 134 15 16
   sd 7 7 2 4 6 7 3 15 2  2
   f(I) 0.87 0.97 0.76 0.85 1.73 1.23 1.02 0.98 1.07 1.14
2508 µg/pl.  Mean 102 101 15 19 92 100 132 141 15 16
   sd 5 12 2 2 19 4 5 2 1  3
   f(I) 0.88 0.95 0.71 0.95 1.39 1.20 0.98 1.03 1.07  1.14
1255 µg/pl.  Mean 112 96 13 18 85 100 151 146 14 14
   sd 8 4 3 2 10 7 7 9 1 3
   f(I) 0.97 0.91 0.62 0.90 1.29 1.20 1.12 1.07 1.00 1.00
626 µg/pl.  Mean 93 98 15 14 87 96 151 129 16 14
   sd 3 6 1 2 6 8 8 4 2 3
   f(I) 0.80 0.92 0.71 0.70 1.32 1.16 1.12 0.94 1.14 1.00
317 µg/pl.  Mean 97 93 15 14 84 105 136 145 16 14
   sd 4 3 2 3 11 9 6 10 2 1
   f(I) 0.84 0.88 0.71 0.70 1.27 1.27 1.01 1.06 1.14 1.00

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, the test material was considered to be non-mutagenic.
Executive summary:

The mutagenic potential of the test material was investiagted in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 471 and EU Method B.13/14, under GLP conditions using the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay.

Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535 were treated with the test material using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at five dose levels both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system.

Under the conditions of the study, the test material was considered not mutagenic. Also, the test material did not show any cytotoxicity towards the bacteria.

As no complete dissolution was possible, undissolved particles were visible on the plates. The confirmation tests of the genotype did not show any irregularities. The control of the titre was above the demanded value. The numbers of revertant colonies of the positive controls were within the range of the historical data of the laboratory and were definitely increased in comparison with the negative controls, as well as showing mutagenic potential of the diagnostic mutagens.

The findings of the study are therefore considered to be valid.