Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 241-602-5 | CAS number: 17625-03-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD “GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON THE BOVINE CORNEAL OPACITY AND PERMEABILITY (BCOP) AND ISOLATED CHICKEN EYE (ICE) TEST METHODS: COLLECTION OF TISSUES FOR HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND COLLECTION OF DATA ON NON-SEVERE IRRITANTS”; Series No. 160, 25. Oct. 2011
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium hydrogen m-sulphonatobenzoate
- EC Number:
- 241-602-5
- EC Name:
- Sodium hydrogen m-sulphonatobenzoate
- Cas Number:
- 17625-03-5
- Molecular formula:
- C7H6O5S.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium 3-sulfobenzoate
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- White crystalline powder.
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test Item
Designation in Test Facility: 17042002G
Date of Receipt: 20. Apr. 2017
Condition at Receipt: Room temperature, in proper conditions
Specification
Batch no. 170103
Appearance White crystalline powder
Composition Sodium 3-Sulfobenzoate
Purity > 99.0% (Titration with NaOH, Glass indicating electrode, Calomel reference electrode)
Homogeneity totally homogeneous
Expiry date Jan. 2019
Storage Room Temperature (20 ± 5°C), keep away from humidity
CAS No. 17625-03-5
EINECS-No. 241-602-5
Chemical Class not stated
Volatility not applicable
pH-value weakly acidic
Stability H2O: 96h; EtOH: unknown; acetone: unknown; CH3CN: unknown; DMSO: unknown
Solubility H2O: >1 g/L; EtOH: unknown; acetone: unknown; CH3CN: unknown; DMSO: unknown
Safety Precautions
For handling, information given in the MSDS will be observed.
Storage
The test item will be stored in the test facility in a closed vessel at room temperature (20±5°C).
Preparation
The test item is a solid substance. It was tested directly.
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: Fresh bovine corneas
- Strain:
- other: Bos primigenius Taurus
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The BCOP test method uses isolated corneas from the eyes of cattle which are freshly slaughtered in the slaughterhouse Müller Fleisch GmbH, Enzstr. 2-4, 75217 Birkenfeld, Germany. The cattle were between 12 and 60 months old.
The eyes are removed as soon as possible after death of the cattle and immersed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution in a suitable cooled container. Then, they are transported to the laboratory within max. 4 hours where they are immediately used for the test.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The following amounts of the test item were tested neat and applied directly on the cornea using a weighing funnel:
Tissue 1 amount 342.7 mg
Tissue 2 amount 347.2 mg
Tissue 3 amount 359.2 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Open Chamber Method
Exposure time on the corneas is 4 hours ± 5 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. After thorough rinsing with cMEM with phenol red and final rinsing with cMEM without phenol red, both chambers are filled with cMEM without phenol red, and the final illuminance value of each cornea is recorded at once.
Permeability Test
After the recording of the final opacity value, the cMEM without phenol red is removed from the front chamber, and 1 mL sodium fluorescein solution is added to the front chamber for the detection of permeability of the corneas.
For the open chamber method, a sodium fluorescein solution with a concentration of 5 mg/mL is used.
The chambers are then closed again and incubated for 90 ± 5 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. After incubation, the content of the posterior chamber is thoroughly mixed. Then, its optical density at 492 ± 2 nm is measured with the spectrophotometer. - Observation period (in vivo):
- -
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- The test item was incubated on the cornea for 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item, opacity and permeability values were measured.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- For each treatment group (negative control solution, test item and positive control solution), three replicates were used.
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
After having carefully cleaned and sterilised the corneal holders, they are kept in the incubation chamber at 32 ± 1 °C.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
After arrival of the corneas, they are examined and only corneas which are free from defects are used.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
For each treatment group (negative control solution, test item and positive control solution), three replicates were used.
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED
HBSS- solution: Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) 10-fold concentrated, diluted in demin. water (1:10)
POSITIVE CONTROL USED
Imidazole C3H4N2, CAS-No. 288-32-4, dissolved in HBSS solution, 20% solution (200 g/L)
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
The following amounts of the test item were tested neat and applied directly on the cornea using a weighing funnel:
Tissue 1 amount 342.7 mg
Tissue 2 amount 347.2 mg
Tissue 3 amount 359.2 mg
The test item was incubated on the cornea for 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item, opacity and permeability values were measured.
TREATMENT METHOD: Open Chamber Method
Calculation of Opacity
The change of opacity value of each treated cornea with test item, positive control and negative control was calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading for each cornea.
The average change in opacity of the negative control cornea was calculated and this value was subtracted from the change in opacity of each treated cornea with test item and positive control to obtain a corrected opacity.
Calculation of Permeability
The corrected OD492 value of each cornea treated with test item and positive control was calculated by subtracting the mean negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea.
The mean OD492 value for each treatment group (test item, positive control and negative control) was determined by averaging the final corrected OD492 values of the treated corneas for one treatment group.
Calculation of IVIS (In Vitro Irritancy Score)
The IVIS of each replicate of the negative control was calculated from the following equation:
IVIS = opacity difference + (15 x corrected OD492 value)
The IVIS of each replicate of the positive control and of the test item were calculated from the following equation:
IVIS = (opacity difference – mean opacity difference of the negative control) + [15 x (OD492 – mean OD492 of the negative control)]
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Tissue 1
- Value:
- 303.38
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Tissue 2
- Value:
- 307.55
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Tissue 3
- Value:
- 416.57
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Mean IVIS
- Value:
- 342.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- mean score 0.94
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- mean score 117.12
Any other information on results incl. tables
Opacity and Permeability Values
The illuminance (unit: LUX) values which were measured before and after exposure are given in the following table:
Table. Illuminance Values
Parameter |
Negative Control |
Test Item |
Positive Control |
||||||
(I) Measured values before exposure |
1020 |
997 |
985 |
972 |
985 |
999 |
953 |
973 |
1013 |
(I) Measured values after exposure |
989 |
966 |
975 |
122 |
121 |
92 |
336 |
282 |
373 |
The values in the following tables present the calculated opacity values, according to evaluation:
Table. Opacity Values Negative Control
Parameter |
Negative Control |
||
Opacity before exposure |
1.81 |
2.76 |
3.28 |
Opacity after exposure |
3.11 |
4.12 |
3.72 |
Opacity Difference |
1.29 |
1.35 |
0.44 |
Mean Opacity Difference |
1.03 |
Table. Opacity Values Test Item and Positive Control
Parameter |
Test Item |
Positive Control |
||||
Opacity before exposure |
3.85 |
3.28 |
2.68 |
4.71 |
3.81 |
2.10 |
Opacity |
305.31 |
308.16 |
417.72 |
85.75 |
109.72 |
73.33 |
Opacity |
301.46 |
304.88 |
415.04 |
81.04 |
105.91 |
71.24 |
Opacity corrected |
300.43 |
303.85 |
414.01 |
80.01 |
104.89 |
70.21 |
Mean Opacity Difference |
339.43 |
85.03 |
For the permeability measurement, three replicates for each treatment group were measured three times. cMEM without phenol red was measured as blank value as well. The optical density values at 492 nm are given in the following tables:
Table. Optical density at 492 nm of Blank
Parameter |
cMEM without phenol red |
1. Measurement |
0.069 |
2. Measurement |
0.070 |
3. Measurement |
0.074 |
Mean |
0.071 |
Table. Optical density at 492 nm of Negative Control, Test Item and Positive Control
Parameter |
Negative Control |
Test Item |
Positive Control |
||||||
1. Measurement |
0.059 |
0.077 |
0.053 |
0.259 |
0.311 |
0.237 |
0.477 |
0.428 |
0.575 |
2. Measurement |
0.058 |
0.084 |
0.054 |
0.263 |
0.312 |
0.235 |
0.470 |
0.429 |
0.580 |
3. Measurement |
0.064 |
0.086 |
0.054 |
0.264 |
0.314 |
0.236 |
0.504 |
0.427 |
0.589 |
|
|||||||||
1. Measurement - blank |
-0.0120 |
0.0060 |
-0.0180 |
0.1880 |
0.2400 |
0.1660 |
0.4060 |
0.3570 |
0.5040 |
2. Measurement - blank |
-0.0130 |
0.0130 |
-0.0170 |
0.1920 |
0.2410 |
0.1640 |
0.3990 |
0.3580 |
0.5090 |
3. Measurement - blank |
-0.0070 |
0.0150 |
-0.0170 |
0.1930 |
0.2430 |
0.1650 |
0.4330 |
0.3560 |
0.5180 |
|
|||||||||
Mean of each replicate |
-0.0107 |
0.0113 |
-0.0173 |
0.1910 |
0.2413 |
0.1650 |
0.4127 |
0.3570 |
0.5103 |
Mean of the three replicates |
-0.0056 |
-- |
-- |
||||||
Corrected |
-- |
-- |
-- |
0.1966 |
0.2469 |
0.1706 |
2.0689 |
1.7906 |
2.5572 |
* Note: All values for the positive control were obtained by measurement of a fivefold diluted solution and multiplication of the absorbances with factor 5.
IVIS Values
The calculated IVIS for each replicate and the corresponding means are presented in the following table:
Table. IVIS
Test Group |
IVIS |
Mean IVIS |
Relative Standard Deviation IVIS |
Negative Control |
1.13 |
0.94 |
73.28% |
1.52 |
|||
0.18 |
|||
Test Item |
303.38 |
342.50 |
18.74% |
307.55 |
|||
416.57 |
|||
Positive Control solution |
111.04 |
117.12 |
10.87% |
131.74 |
|||
108.57 |
Note: the high relative standard deviation of the IVIS of negative control is due to mathematical reasons, as the respective means are very small.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The test item sodium 3-sulfobenzoate induced serious eye damage on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) is 342.50.
The experiment is considered as sufficient for the classification of the test item, because all three replicates of the test item lead to the same assessment for the test item. - Executive summary:
Evaluation of sodium 3-sulfobenzoate in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Test Method has been performed following OECD Guideline 437 and EU Method 8.47. The study was performed to assess corneal damage potential of sodium 3-sulfobenzoate by quantitative measurements of changes in opacity and permeability in a bovine cornea.
The test item sodium 3-sulfobenzoate was brought onto the cornea of a bovine eye which previously had been incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for 1 hour and whose opacity had been determined. The test item was incubated on the cornea for 4 hours at 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item, opacity and permeability values were measured.
The test item was tested pure. Under the conditions of this test, the test item sodium 3-sulfobenzoate induced serious eye damage on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated IVIS (in vitro irritancy score) is 342.50.
According to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Jul. 2013), a substance with an IVIS > 55 induces serious eye damage, that should be classified as UN GHS Category I. The negative control (HBSS) and the positive control (20% imidazole solution) have met the validity criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.