Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 306-621-6 | CAS number: 97338-28-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18 Feb - 10 Jun 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Oct 2012
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- only minor deviations without effects on the integrity of the study
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Secrétariat général du GIPC-DGE-SI, Ivry-sur-Seine, CEDEX, France (24 Apr 2017)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Remarks:
- LC-MS
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: Limit concentration (old and new medium)
- Sampling method: 40 mL was sampled from each preparation at test medium renewal - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: The test item was applied as water saturated solutions. A newly saturated solution was used at each renewal of the treatment solutions. The saturation was obtained by coating approximately 1 g of quartz sand with 20 µL test item, which was then poured into a 50 mL burette and filled with M4 mineral water and allowed to stand undisturbed for approximately 1 h. The flow through pf the column was set at approximately 1 mL/min and a total volume of approximately 500 mL was collected and distributed as 40 mL aliquot volumes. The same coated quartz sand portion was used for the entire test period and successive 500 mL water saturated volumes, but each volume of saturated solution was prepared with freshly prepared M4 mineral medium.
- Controls: The control units received 40 mL of M4 mineral medium. In this case the mineral medium was used as neat, without passing through untreated quartz sand. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Planktonic crustacean
- Source: Commercial breeder and regularly sub-cultured at the testing facility in M4 mineral medium
- Age of daphnids at test start: < 24 h (not first brood, derived from a healthy stock)
- Breeding conditions: Similar to test (20 ± 2.0 °C), 16 h light (15 - 20 µE*m^-2*s^-1), 8 h dark cycle. Adult females were transferred to fresh water on the day before test initiation.
- Feeding during test: Yes
- Food type: Algal cells (Chlorella sp.)
- Amount: 0.1 - 0.2 mg Carbon/Daphnia/day
- Frequency: Three times per week or according to media changes - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Test temperature:
- 20.0 ± 2.0 °C
- pH:
- 6.8 - 8.1 (control)
6.9 7.9 (treatment) - Dissolved oxygen:
- 6.5 - 9.4 mg/L (control)
6.3 - 8.9 mg/L (treatment) - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Control and 7.0 µg/L (nominal)
Control and 5.5 - 8.1 µg/L (measured values in old medium)
Control and 5.9 - 8.8 µg/L (measured in new medium) - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 60 mL EPA glass tubes filled with 40 mL test medium
- Renewal rate of test solution: 2-3 d, i.e. on Day 0, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19, and 21
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: M4 mineral medium was freshly prepared from pure water and mineral stock solutions
- Culture medium different from test medium: Culture medium same as test medium
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Day 0, 3, 10, 17 and 21
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 h light, 8 h dark
- Light intensity: 15 - 20 µE*m^-2*s^-1
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
- Offspring: 1-2 d intervals
- Mortality
- Time to production of first brood
- Number of aborted broods
- Presence of males or ephippia
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Justification for using less concentrations than requested by guideline: A limit test was performed because the test item was poorly soluble in water.
- Range finding study: No - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- < 7 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities: No
- Mortality of control: 10% after 21 d (within acceptable range)
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: No - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- Other: The reproductive performance of the daphnids should be significantly reduced at 0.2 mg/L. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The NOEC was derived from F-variance analysis at 5%-confidence level of mean produced offspring in each treated group as compared to the control group.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- For further details please refer to “Any other information on results incl. tables”.
Reference
VALIDITY CRITERIA
The study fulfilled the validity criteria prescribed by the guideline and is thus considered valid and reliable (Table 1). Several deviations to the study plan occurred (see below), which, however, did not affect the integrity of the study.
Table 1: Validity criteria for OECD 211.
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The mortality of the parent animals in the control (femaleDaphnia) does not exceed 20% at the end of the test. |
Mortality in the controls was 10%. |
Yes |
The mean number of living offspring produced per parent animal surviving at the end of the test is ≥ 60 in the control. |
The mean number of live offspring produced in the controls was 62.8. |
Yes |
The dissolved oxygen concentration at the end of the test should be ≥ 3.0 mg/L in control and test vessels. |
The dissolved oxygen concentration at the end of the test was ≥ 3.0 mg/L in control and test vessels. |
Yes |
STUDY PLAN DEVIATIONS
Several deviations from the study plan occurred, which, however, did not alter the quality and integrity of the study. The deviations included:
1. The volume of mineral medium was reduced to 40 mL instead of 50 – 100 mL/unit because of the duration of the preparation of the water saturated stock solution. A total volume of 480 mL was the maximum volume which was possible to produce at 1 mL/min within less than 8 h prior to the treatment application and this allowed only for 40 mL/unit for a total of 11 units.
2. The daphnids were fed living cells of Chlorella sp. instead of Scenedesmus subspicatus, according to the breeding practices of the testing facility.
3. The test guidelines were revised on Oct 2012.
4. The measured test item concentrations ranged from 78.5 – 126.5% of the nominal value and were thus slightly wider than the recommend range of 80 – 120%. This was considered an acceptable deviation because outer high values were observed in two cases only, on Day 12 and on Day 14 in the new media (121.0% and 126.5% of mean value, respectively) and the outer low value only occurred at the end of the test in the old medium (78.5% of mean value).
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Single measured values ranged between 5.5 and 8.8 µg/L, which corresponds to 78.5 to 126.5% of the mean measured value (Table 2).
The stability of the test item throughout the test period was considered acceptable even though the amplitude was slightly higher than the recommended 80 – 120% interval. Outer values were only observed on Day 12 and 14 in new media and at the end of the test in old medium (Table 2).
Table 2. Measured test item concentrations
Days |
Old medium |
New medium |
||
|
measured concentration [µg/L] |
% of mean value |
measured concentration [µg/L] |
% of mean value |
0 |
- |
- |
7.8 |
112.1 |
3 |
7.6 |
109.9 |
6.6 |
95.0 |
5 |
5.9 |
85.4 |
6.9 |
98.7 |
7 |
5.5 |
79.8 |
6.1 |
87.4 |
10 |
6.7 |
96.0 |
6.2 |
89.0 |
12 |
7.9 |
114.1 |
8.4 |
121.0 |
14 |
8.1 |
116.1 |
8.8 |
126.5 |
17 |
7.2 |
104.2 |
7.9 |
113.6 |
19 |
6.1 |
88.3 |
5.9 |
84.7 |
21 |
5.5 |
78.5 |
- |
- |
BIOLOGICAL RESULTS
MORTALITY
At the end of the test, mortality was 10% in the water control (Table 3). No mortality was observed in the limit concentration. The NOEC based on mortality was > 7.0 µg/L
Table 3. Cumulative mortality [%]
|
Days |
|||||||||
0 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
10 |
12 |
14 |
17 |
19 |
21 |
|
water control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
reference treatment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
test item limit concentration |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
OFFSPRING PRODUCTION
The mean offspring produced per parent animal was 62.8 in the control with a standard deviation of 9.4 (15.3% of the mean). In the test item treatment the mean offspring per parent animal was only 26.1 with a standard deviation of 13.4 (51.5% of the mean). At a 5% confidence level, F-variance analysis showed that the reproductive performance was significantly reduced (58.4% inhibition compared to the control) (Table 4).
TIME TO PRODUCTION OF FIRST BROOD
In the water control, test item treatment and reference treatment the first brood was observed on Day 8.
CONCLUSION
No mortality was observed in the test item treatments but mean offspring per parent animal was significantly reduced. The reproductive performance was reduced by 58.5% in the test item treatment. Thus, the NOEC (21 d) for reproduction was < 7 µg/L (nominal).
Description of key information
NOEC (21 d) < 7.0 µg/L (nominal, OECD 211, D. magna)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
One study is available, in which the long-term toxicity of Isohexadecyl 12-[(1-oxooctadecyl)oxy]octadecenoate (CAS 97338-28-8) was assessed according to OECD guideline 211 and GLP.
Based on the poor water solubility of the test item, a chronic limit test with a medium renewal rate of 2 to 3 d was performed, in which the model organism Daphnia magna was exposed to a limit concentration of 7.0 µg/L test item for 21 d. The test item was applied as water saturated solutions prepared in M4 mineral medium. A newly saturated solution was used at each renewal of the treatment solutions. Saturated solutions were obtained by collecting 500 mL volumes from a flow-through (1 mL/min) burette column filled with sand quartz, which had previously been coated with test item. The same coated quartz sand portion was used for the entire test period to produce successive 500 mL water saturated aliquots of saturated test item solutions. Test item concentrations were analytically verified by HPLC-MS at every renewal in old and fresh test medium. At the end of the test, the total number of living offspring produced per live parent animal was assessed.
The calculated mean measured concentration was 7.0 µg/L with a standard deviation of 1.0 µg/L. The measured test item concentrations in old and new medium ranged between 5.5 and 8.8 µg/L, corresponding to 78.5 to 126.5% of the mean measured value. Though the amplitude of the measured test item concentrations was slightly above the recommended range of 80 to 120% of nominal, the test item was considered to be stable throughout the duration of the test. Outliers were only observed on Day 12 and 14 in new media and at test end in old medium.
After 21 d, no mortality was observed in the limit concentration treatments but the reproductive performance (mean offspring per parent animal) was significantly reduced by 58.5%, resulting in a NOEC (21 d) for reproduction of < 7.0 µg/L (nominal).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.