Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 305-632-3 | CAS number: 94891-32-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- experimental data of read across substances
- Justification for type of information:
- Data for the target chemical is summarized based on the structurally similar read across chemicals
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE report is based on two biodegradation studies as-
1., 2. and 3. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material : Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes
- Molecular formula : C18H11NO8S2.Al
- Molecular weight : 460.39 g/mol
- Smiles notation : O=C1c2ccccc2C(=O)C1=C1C=Cc2cc3c4cc2N{-}1.[Al]{3+}(.O{-}S3(=O)=O).O{-}S4(=O)=O
- Substance type : Organic
- Physical state : Solid - Oxygen conditions:
- other: 1. and 2. aerobic, 3. no data
- Inoculum or test system:
- other: 1. and 2. mixture of domestic waste water, surface soil and soil samples , 3. activated sludge (adaptation not specified)
- Details on inoculum:
- 1. and 2. Mixed Inoculum Preparation (In-House): Domestic waste water, surface soil and soil samples from polluted sites receiving predominantly domestic waste was collected and were mixed to get diluted suspension. The inoculum was kept aerobic until being used for experiment by supplying organic and inorganic sources required by micro flora to sustain at controlled laboratory conditions. This gave the bacterial count as 107to 108 CFU/ml. At the regular interval microbial plating was also performed on agar to confirm the vitality and CFU count of microorganism.
3. No data - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 45 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (1)
- Initial conc.:
- 16 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (2)
- Based on:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- (3)
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- other: BOD and ThOD
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- DOC removal
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- test mat. analysis
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- other: HPLC
- Details on study design:
- 1.
TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: OECD mineral medium was used for the study
- Test temperature: 20°C
- Continuous darkness: Yes
- Other: The water used in this study is deionized water.
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: The apparatus used in this study is Respirometer BOD Sensor System (Code: F102B0133; non-automatic pressure measurement sensor system) and Respirometric incubator (FOC 120i)) by VELP Scientifica.
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: it contains only test inoculum
- Procedure control: contains reference compound and inoculum
2.
TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: OECD mineral medium was used for the study
- Test temperature: 20°C
- Continuous darkness: Yes
- Other: The water used in this study is deionized water.
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: The apparatus used in this study is Respirometer flasks.
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: it contains only test inoculum
- Procedure control: contains reference compound and inoculum
TEST METHOD:
The test system contained an inoculum blank (control), a procedure control (reference item), and a test suspension (test item) in duplicate.
Apparatus: The apparatus used in this study is Respirometer BOD Sensor System (Code: F102B0133; non-automatic pressure measurement sensor system) and Respirometric incubator (FOC 120i)) by VELP Scientifica.
Prior to setting up the experiment, all glassware were washed with hot water, rinsed with 0.1N HCL to remove any residual organic carbon and then with deionized water. All glassware were inspected to ensure cleanliness & then finally oven dried.
3. No data - Reference substance:
- other: Sodium Benzoate
- Remarks:
- (1) and (2)
- Reference substance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- (3)
- Test performance:
- 1. No data
2.
1. Respirometer flasks were allowed to reach the desired temperature at 200C.The test item was taken at a concentration of 16 mg/L in mineral medium. The reference item chosen was Sodium benzoate with a concentration of 30 mg/L in the mineral medium was directly added to the Respirometer Flask according the volume of mineral media taken.
2. The Respirometer Flasks of test item & reference item were filled with 250 ml and 250ml of mineral media, respectively. Test suspension volume was decided by considering the available information on biodegradability of that test item.
3. All the Respirometer Flasks were inoculated with prepared mixed inoculum at the concentration of 10ml/L. This concentration gave the bacterial CFU/ml as 107to 108.
4. The initial pH of the test medium was 7.0. The pH of all test vessels was measured at 28th day.
5. 2-4 pellets of KOH was added in the alkali holder, which acts as CO2 absorber.
6. The respirometric sensors containing the KOH pellets were tightly and carefully screwed on each of the Respirometer Flasks. The sensors were reset by deleting old recorded data and choosing the appropriate scale (The sensor gives the oxygen consumption values in mgO2/l).
7. Respirometer Flask were kept in the respirometer incubator at constant temperature of 20 ± 1°C for 28 days.
8. Every day oxygen consumption (mg O2/l) into the each bottle was recorded. Temperature and stirring condition were checked regularly.
3. No data - Parameter:
- other: BOD and ThOD
- Value:
- 1.754
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Other details not known
- Parameter:
- other: BOD and ThOD
- Value:
- 12.807
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Other details not known
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 3
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Degr.: 3, 1, 5 (mean 3) %
- Parameter:
- % degradation (DOC removal)
- Value:
- 3
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Degr.: 3, 5, 2 (mean 3) %
- Parameter:
- % degradation (test mat. analysis)
- Remarks:
- and HPLC
- Value:
- 3
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Degr.: 5, 6, -3 (mean 3) %
- Details on results:
- 1.The oxygen consumed by the test systems was corrected for oxygen consumption occurring in the blank test systems.TheBOD Values (mgO2/mg) and percent biodegradation results for each test system arereported in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The BOD28 value of test chemical was observed to be 0.022 mgO2/mg. ThoD was determined by calculation as 1.267 mgO2/mg. % Degradation was calculated using the values of BOD and ThOD for test item and was found to be 1.754%. The % degradation of procedure control (Sodium Benzoate) was also calculated using BOD & ThOD and was found to be 74.074%. The mean BOD values (mg O2/l) in control on 28th day was 9 mg O2/l, thereby fulfilling the control validity criteria (i.e., The oxygen consumption of the inoculum blank is normally 20-30 mg O2/l and should not be greater than 60 mg/l in 28 days). Degradation of Sodium Benzoate exceeds 50.050 %after 7 days and 68.068 % after 14 days. The activity of the inoculums is thus verified and the test can be considered as valid.
2. The oxygen consumed by the test systems wascorrected for oxygen consumption occurring in the blank test systems.TheBOD Values (mgO2/mg) and percent biodegradation results for each test system arereported in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The BOD28 value of test chemical was observed to be 0.188 mgO2/mg. ThoD was determined by calculation as 1.464 mgO2/mg. % Degradation was calculated using the values of BOD and ThOD for test item and was found to be 12.807%. The % degradation of procedure control (Sodium Benzoate) was also calculated using BOD & ThOD and was found to be 74.04%. The mean BOD values(mg O2/l) in control on 28th day was 9mg O2/l, thereby fulfilling the control validity criteria (i.e., The oxygen consumption of the inoculum blank is normally 20-30 mg O2/l and should not be greater than 60 mg/l in 28 days). Degradation of Sodium Benzoate exceeds 48.04%after 7 days and 70.07% after 14 days. The activity of the inoculums is thus verified and the test can be considered as valid.
3. O2 uptake: Inoculum blank 5.7 mg, (Activated sludge + test substance) 7.2 mg.
Test substance undergoes 3% degradation by using O2 consumption, DOC removal, Test mat. analysis and HPLC parameter in 28 days. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- On the basis of the experimental studies of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemical and applying the weight of evidence approach, the percentage degradation of the test chemical Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes can be expected to be range from 1.754 to 12.807%, respectively in 28 days. Thus, based on this, test chemical Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes is considered to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
- Executive summary:
Data available for the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the biodegradability of the test chemical Aluminum, 2 -(1,3 -dihydro-1,3 -dioxo-2H-inden-2 -ylidene)-1,2 -dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes. The studies are as mentioned below:
28-days Manometric respirometry testfollowing the OECD guideline 301F to determine the ready biodegradability of the test chemical. The test system included control, test item and reference item. The concentration of test and reference item ( Sodium Benzoate) chosen for both the study was 30 mg/L, while that of inoculum was 10 ml/l. ThOD (Theoretical oxygen demand) of test and reference item was determined by calculation. % Degradation was calculated using the values of BOD and ThOD for test item and reference item. The BOD28 value of test chemical was observed to be 0.022 mgO2sup>/mg. ThOD was calculated as 1.267 mgO2/mg. Accordingly, the % degradation of the test item after 28 days of incubation at 20 ± 1°C according to manometric respirometry test was determined to be 1.754 %.Based on the results, the test item, under the test conditions, was considered to be not readily biodegradable at 20 ± 1°C over a period of 28 days.
Another 28-days Manometric respirometry test following the OECD guideline 301F was conducted for determining the ready biodegradability of the test chemical. The test system included control, test item and reference item. The concentration of test and reference item ( Sodium Benzoate) chosen for both the study was 30 mg/L, while that of inoculum was 10 ml/l. ThOD (Theoretical oxygen demand) of test and reference item was determined by calculation. % Degradation was calculated using the values of BOD and ThOD for test item and reference item. The BOD28 value of test chemical was observed to be 0.188 mgO2sup>/mg. ThOD was calculated as 1.464 mgO2/mg. Accordingly, the % degradation of the test item after 28 days of incubation at 20 ± 1°C according to manometric respirometry test was determined to be 12.807 %.Based on the results, the test item, under the test conditions, was considered to be not readily biodegradable at 20± 1°C over a period of 28 days.
Additional biodegradation study was conducted for 28 days for evaluating the percentage biodegradability of test substance. The study was performed according to other guideline "Biodegradation test of a chemical substance using a microorganism etc." provided in "the Notice on the Test Method Concerning New Chemical Substances". Activated sludge was used as a test inoculum for the study. O2 uptake: Inoculum blank 5.7 mg, (Activated sludge + test substance) 7.2 m.DOC removal was corrected by purity and adsorption of activated sludge and HPLC degradation was corrected by adsorption of activated sludge, because the recovery rate was 83 % in (activated sludge + test substance) system.The percentage degradation of test substance was determined to be 3% by using O2 consumption, DOC removal, Test mat. analysis and HPLC parameter in 28 days.Thus, based on percentage degradation, test chemical is considered to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
On the basis of the experimental studies of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemical and applying the weight of evidence approach, the percentage degradation of the test chemical Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes can be expected to be range from 1.754 to 12.807%, respectively in 28 days. Thus, based on this, test chemical Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes is considered to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
Reference
1.
Table:BOD28, ThOD and % Biodegradation Values
Method details |
BOD28 (mgO2/mg) |
ThOD (mgO2/mg) |
% Biodegradation |
pH 0th Day |
pH 28th Day |
Test Item |
0.022 |
1.267 |
1.754 |
7.5 |
7.85 |
Reference Item |
1.233 |
1.665 |
74.074 |
7.0 |
8.02 |
2.
OBSERVATIONSAND CALCULATIONS:
Mean respirometric values (oxygen consumed mg O2/l) from day 1 to 28 were recorded inTable 1from Respirometer BOD Sensor system. The amount of oxygen taken up by the microbial population during biodegradation of the test item was corrected for uptake by the inoculum blank (Control) and BODwas calculated accordingly and represented inTable 2. The percent degradation of day 1 to 28 were calculated and represented inTable 3. ThOD, BOD28and % Degradation of both reference and the test item, calculated using the formula given in OECD guideline 301 F Manometric Respirometry Test,are summarized in Table 4. The detailed calculations of the same are given in Annex 4 and Annex 5.
TABLE 1
MEAN RESPIROMETRIC VALUES(oxygen consumed mg O2/l)
No. of Days |
Inoculum Blank (Control) |
Test Suspension |
Procedure Control (Reference Item) |
1 |
4 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
18 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
23 |
4 |
9 |
7 |
28 |
5 |
9 |
7 |
29 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
29 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
31 |
8 |
9 |
7 |
32 |
9 |
7 |
6 |
32 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
34 |
11 |
9 |
6 |
37 |
12 |
9 |
6 |
40 |
13 |
7 |
7 |
40 |
14 |
7 |
7 |
41 |
15 |
7 |
7 |
42 |
16 |
9 |
7 |
43 |
17 |
9 |
9 |
45 |
18 |
9 |
9 |
45 |
19 |
9 |
9 |
46 |
20 |
9 |
10 |
46 |
21 |
9 |
9 |
46 |
22 |
7 |
10 |
45 |
23 |
9 |
10 |
45 |
24 |
9 |
10 |
46 |
25 |
9 |
10 |
46 |
26 |
9 |
12 |
46 |
27 |
9 |
12 |
46 |
28 |
9 |
12 |
46 |
TABLE 2
BOD values (mgO2/mg)
No. of Days |
Test Suspension |
Procedure Control (Reference Item) |
1 |
0 |
0.267 |
2 |
0 |
0.4 |
3 |
-0.063 |
0.533 |
4 |
-0.125 |
0.633 |
5 |
-0.125 |
0.667 |
6 |
-0.188 |
0.733 |
7 |
-0.063 |
0.8 |
8 |
-0.125 |
0.767 |
9 |
-0.063 |
0.833 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
-0.188 |
0.933 |
12 |
-0.188 |
1.033 |
13 |
0 |
1.1 |
14 |
0 |
1.133 |
15 |
0 |
1.167 |
16 |
0 |
1.2 |
17 |
0 |
1.2 |
18 |
0 |
1.2 |
19 |
0 |
1.233 |
20 |
0.063 |
1.233 |
21 |
0 |
1.233 |
22 |
0.188 |
1.267 |
23 |
0.063 |
1.2 |
24 |
0.063 |
1.233 |
25 |
0.063 |
1.233 |
26 |
0.188 |
1.233 |
27 |
0.188 |
1.233 |
28 |
0.188 |
1.233 |
TABLE 3
PERCENT BIODEGRDATION RESULTS
No. of Days |
Test Suspension |
Procedure Control (Reference Item) |
1 |
0 |
16.016 |
2 |
0 |
24.024 |
3 |
-4.269 |
32.032 |
4 |
-8.538 |
38.038 |
5 |
-8.538 |
40.04 |
6 |
-12.807 |
44.044 |
7 |
-4.269 |
48.048 |
8 |
-8.538 |
46.046 |
9 |
-4.269 |
50.05 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
-12.807 |
56.056 |
12 |
-12.807 |
62.062 |
13 |
0 |
66.066 |
14 |
0 |
68.068 |
15 |
0 |
70.07 |
16 |
0 |
72.072 |
17 |
0 |
72.072 |
18 |
0 |
72.072 |
19 |
0 |
74.074 |
20 |
4.269 |
74.074 |
21 |
0 |
74.074 |
22 |
12.807 |
76.076 |
23 |
4.269 |
72.072 |
24 |
4.269 |
74.074 |
25 |
4.269 |
74.074 |
26 |
12.807 |
74.074 |
27 |
12.807 |
74.074 |
28 |
12.807 |
74.074 |
Table 4
BOD28, THOD AND % BIODEGRADATION VALUES
Method details |
BOD28(mgO2/mg) |
ThOD (mgO2/mg) |
% Biodegradation |
Test Item |
0.188 mgO2/mg |
1.464 mgO2/mg |
12.807 % |
Reference Item |
1.233 mgO2/mg |
1.665 mgO2/mg |
74.04 % |
TABLE 5
pH OF RESPIROMETER FLASK
Respirometer Flask |
pH on 0thDay |
pH on 28thDay |
Test Suspension B1 |
7.5 |
7.85 |
B2 |
7.5 |
7.85 |
Procedure Control B1 |
7.0 |
8.11 |
B2 |
7.0 |
8.11 |
3.
DOC removal was corrected by purity and adsorption of activated sludge and HPLC degradation was corrected by adsorption of activated sludge, because the recovery rate was 83 % in (activated sludge + test substance) system.
Description of key information
On the basis of the experimental studies of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemical and applying the weight of evidence approach, the percentage degradation of the test chemical Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes can be expected to be range from 1.754 to 12.807%, respectively in 28 days. Thus, based on this, test chemical Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes is considered to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
Additional information
Data available for the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the biodegradability of the test chemicalAluminum, 2 -(1,3 -dihydro-1,3 -dioxo-2H-inden-2 -ylidene)-1,2 -dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes.The studies are as mentioned below:
28-days Manometric respirometry testfollowing the OECD guideline 301F to determine the ready biodegradability of the test chemical. The test system included control, test item and reference item. The concentration of test and reference item ( Sodium Benzoate) chosen for both the study was 30 mg/L, while that of inoculum was 10 ml/l. ThOD (Theoretical oxygen demand) of test and reference item was determined by calculation. % Degradation was calculated using the values of BOD and ThOD for test item and reference item. The BOD28 value of test chemical was observed to be 0.022 mgO2sup>/mg. ThOD was calculated as 1.267 mgO2/mg. Accordingly, the % degradation of the test item after 28 days of incubation at 20 ± 1°C according to manometric respirometry test was determined to be 1.754 %.Based on the results, the test item, under the test conditions, was considered to be not readily biodegradable at 20 ± 1°C over a period of 28 days.
Another 28-days Manometric respirometry test following the OECD guideline 301F was conducted for determining the ready biodegradability of the test chemical. The test system included control, test item and reference item. The concentration of test and reference item ( Sodium Benzoate) chosen for both the study was 30 mg/L, while that of inoculum was 10 ml/l. ThOD (Theoretical oxygen demand) of test and reference item was determined by calculation. % Degradation was calculated using the values of BOD and ThOD for test item and reference item. The BOD28 value of test chemical was observed to be 0.188 mgO2sup>/mg. ThOD was calculated as 1.464 mgO2/mg. Accordingly, the % degradation of the test item after 28 days of incubation at 20 ± 1°C according to manometric respirometry test was determined to be 12.807 %.Based on the results, the test item, under the test conditions, was considered to be not readily biodegradable at 20± 1°C over a period of 28 days.
Additional biodegradation study was conducted for 28 days for evaluating the percentage biodegradability of test substance. The study was performed according to other guideline "Biodegradation test of a chemical substance using a microorganism etc." provided in "the Notice on the Test Method Concerning New Chemical Substances". Activated sludge was used as a test inoculum for the study. O2 uptake: Inoculum blank 5.7 mg, (Activated sludge + test substance) 7.2 m.DOC removal was corrected by purity and adsorption of activated sludge and HPLC degradation was corrected by adsorption of activated sludge, because the recovery rate was 83 % in (activated sludge + test substance) system.The percentage degradation of test substance was determined to be 3% by using O2 consumption, DOC removal, Test mat. analysis and HPLC parameter in 28 days.Thus, based on percentage degradation, test chemical is considered to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
On the basis of the experimental studies of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemical and applying the weight of evidence approach, the percentage degradation of the test chemical Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes can be expected to be range from 1.754 to 12.807%, respectively in 28 days. Thus, based on this, test chemical Aluminum, 2-(1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-inden-2-ylidene)-1,2-dihydro-6,7-quinolinedisulfonate complexes is considered to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.