Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-338-6 | CAS number: 94-49-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei))
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals B.V, Batch: 10000005282
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 December 2021
- Purity test date: 99.4%
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: In the dark at room temperature (15 - 25°C) - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- On preparation 3 x 1 mL samples of each ethylene dibenzoate test solution and the water and solvent controls were taken and placed into vials. One vial was sent for analysis of test substance concentration.
After soil treatment 3 x 30 g sample of each ethylene dibenzoate test rate and the water and solvent controls were taken and placed into amber glass jars, 1 x 30 g was sent for analysis of test substance concentration.
On Day 7 3 x 30 g soil samples were taken from replicate 5 of each ethylene dibenzoate test rate and replicate 9 of the water and solvent controls and placed into glass jars; 1 x 30 g of each was sent for analysis of test substance concentration. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- The treatments were prepared as follows:
Treatment Rate
(mg a.i/kg dry soil) Amount of test item used (mg) Final volume of
acetone (mL) mg a.i./mL (nominal)
1000 4426.54 20 220
555.6 2459.2 20 122.22
308.6 1366.2 20 67.90
171.5 759.0 20 37.72
95.3 421.7 20 20.96
52.9 234.3 20 11.64
29.4 130.1 20 6.47
16.3 72.3 20 3.59
Prior to treatment the initial moisture content of the soil was determined as 22.09% and the maximum water holding capacity (MWHC) as 66.64%. A moisture content equivalent to 55% of the MWHC was selected as providing suitable conditions for earthworm development. The soil was not pre-moistened as the moisture content was greater than 27.5% of the MWHC. The volume required to achieve 55% of the maximum water holding capacity was calculated as 482.05 mL water/3200 g dry ISO earthworm soil.
The test item (14.545 mL from each prepared solution) was placed over 72.75 g of dry sand, the treated sand was then left to allow the solvent to evaporate. After evaporation of the solvent the treated sand was placed into 3818.06 g of moist soil (equivalent to 3127.25 g dry soil) and mixed, 482.05 mL of RO water was then added to bring the soil moisture content to 55% MWHC. The treated soil was then mixed using an electric mixer.
For the water and solvent controls 783.33 mL RO water was mixed into a 5081.79 g soil dry weight equivalent of moist soil with 118.21 g of untreated dry sand for the water control and acetone (14.545 mL) treated sand for the solvent control to bring the soil to 55% of the MWHC. - Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- Earthworms (Eisenia fetida) and dried rabbit manure were purchased from a reputable supplier of laboratory livestock. Prior to study start the worms were maintained in animal manure and fed regularly. Details of the suppliers are recorded only in the raw data to maintain supplier confidentiality.
Selection of adult worms for both the acute range finder and the reproduction study was based primarily on individual weights falling within the specified weight range of 300 – 600 mg at the start of the treatment period. Prior to treatment for the definitive phase, the batch of worms was inspected for reproductive maturity, i.e. production of egg cocoons or presence of a clitellum, the presence of which confirmed suitability for use.
Approximately 24 hours prior to study starts adult worms were transferred to untreated artificial soil. - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 56 d
- Test temperature:
- Minimum and maximum ambient temperatures were recorded daily throughout the study, with a range of 18.1 – 20.7°C
- pH:
- 6.8 - 7.3
- Moisture:
- Moisture content was recorded at Day 1 and Day 56. A container of soil was maintained under identical conditions to the test containers and was used as a guide for maintaining the moisture content of the test containers throughout the study. At termination, group replicate mean moisture content values were found to be approximately 34.55 to 38.02%, equivalent to 51.88 – 57.09% MWHC.
- Details on test conditions:
- The definitve study was conducted in plastic containers measuring approximately 11 x 17 x 5 cm, each covered with a fitted lid.
Prior to application selected worms were rinsed in reverse osmosis water, blotted dry and individually weighed before being reweighed in replicates of ten.
After application, ca 683.26 g of moist soil (equivalent to 500 g dry soil at 55% of the maximum water holding capacity) was transferred into each of ten replicate containers for the water control, solvent control, six replicate containers for each ethylene dibenzoate treatment rate and eight replicate containers for the toxic reference.
Dried rabbit manure was used as food. One day after application of the test item, 5 g of dried manure was uniformly distributed onto the surface of the soil in each test container and wetted with 5 mL of reverse osmosis water. Worms at each treatment rate were fed weekly in a similar way if two or more replicates per rate were assessed as having consumed 50% or more of the food. The quantity of water given was based on the amount of water loss from the moisture control box each week.
After four weeks (after removal of adult worms), the juvenile worms were fed by carefully mixing 5 g of food (dried manure) into the substrate of each container. Juvenile worms were not fed further during the four-week rearing period. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Analysis of the concentrations of ethylene dibenzoate in the application treatment solutions confirmed nominal levels of the test substance were within applied limits ± 20% for all treatment groups, confirming accurate formulation. The nominal concentrations of treatment solutions were 220, 122.22, 67.90,37.72, 20.96, 11.64, 6.47 and 3.59.
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Ringer (active ingredient carbendazim) at 5 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
- Key result
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 555.6 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Remarks:
- Not sufficient dose response relationship.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- Not sufficient dose response relationship.
- Details on results:
- The study was considered valid as there was ≤ 10% adult mortality at four weeks and ≥30 juveniles had been produced in each water control replicate by the end of the test with the coefficient of variation of reproduction ≤ 30%.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The application of the toxic reference Ringer (carbendazim) at 5 mg a.i./kg dry soil resulted in substantial and unequivocal toxic effects.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The NOEC for the number of juvenile worms on Day 56 was 555.6 mg a.i./kg dry soil. The EC50for the number of juveniles at Day 56 could not be established as there was not a sufficient dose response relationship.
The NOEC for mortality and mean body weight on Day 28 was 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil. The EC50s could not be established as there was not a sufficient dose response relationship.
The study was considered valid as there was ≤ 10% adult mortality at four weeks and ≥30 juveniles had been produced in each water control replicate by the end of the test with the coefficient of variation of reproduction ≤ 30%. In addition application of the toxic reference Ringer (carbendazim) at 5 mg a.i./kg dry soil resulted in substantial and unequivocal toxic effects. - Executive summary:
In the reproduction studyadult mortality of 0, 0, 2.5, 0, 2.5, 0, 0 and 2.5% was recorded at rates of 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6, 555.6 and 1000 mg a.i/kg dry soil respectively. No mortality was recorded in the water control with 2.5% in the solvent control and 8.8% in the toxic reference.
The LC50for the mortality on Day 28 could not be established as there was not a sufficient dose response relationship.
The NOEC for mortality on Day 28 was 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
There were no statistically significant adverse effects on mean bodyweights between the solvent control group and ethylene dibenzoate treated groups. The 5 mg a.i./kg dry soil Ringer (carbendazim) treated group had significantly lower body weight than the water control group (p<0.001).
The EC50for the mean body weight of the adult earthworms at Day 28 could not be established as there was not a sufficient dose response relationship.
The NOEC for mean bodyweight on Day 28 was 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
The coefficient of variation of the number of juveniles in the solvent control group was 8.5%.
The 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil ethylene dibenzoate treated group had significantly fewer juveniles than the solvent control group. The 5 mg a.i.kg/dry soil Ringer (carbendazim) treated group had significantly fewer juveniles than the water control group.
The EC50for the number of juveniles at Day 56 could not be established as there was not a sufficient dose response relationship.
The NOEC for the number of juvenile worms on Day 56 was 555.6 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
The study was considered valid as there was ≤ 10% adult mortality at four weeks and ≥30 juveniles had been produced in each water control replicate by the end of the test with the coefficient of variation of reproduction ≤ 30%. In addition application of the toxic reference Ringer (carbendazim) at 5 mg a.i./kg dry soil resulted in substantial and unequivocal toxic effects.
Reference
Description of key information
An earthworm reproduction study according to OECD 222 under GLP was performed.
Eisenia fetida was exposed to a series of concentrations: 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6, 555.6 and 1000 mg a.i/kg dry soil. Water and solvent control groups of 80 worms were maintained in untreated soil to act as negative controls. A positive control group, 80 worms, was treated with Ringer (active ingredient carbendazim) at 5 mg a.i./kg dry soil. Adult worms were removed from the soil four weeks after treatment and the juvenile worms reared for a further four weeks.
The LC50 for the mortality on Day 28 could not be established as there was not a sufficient dose response relationship. The NOEC for mortality on Day 28 was 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
There were no statistically significant adverse effects on mean body weights between the solvent control group and ethylene dibenzoate treated groups. The EC50 for the mean body weight of the adult earthworms at Day 28 could not be established as there was not a sufficient dose response relationship. The NOEC for mean bodyweight on Day 28 was 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
The 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil ethylene dibenzoate treated group had significantly fewer juveniles than the solvent control group. The EC50 for the number of juveniles at Day 56 could not be established as there was not a sufficient dose response relationship. The NOEC for the number of juvenile worms on Day 56 was 555.6 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
The study was considered valid as there was ≤10% adult mortality at four weeks and ≥ 30 juveniles had been produced in each water control replicate by the end of the test with the coefficient of variation of reproduction ≤ 30%. In addition application of the toxic reference Ringer (carbendazim) at 5 mg a.i./kg dry soil resulted in substantial and unequivocal toxic effects.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for soil macroorganisms:
- 555.6 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.