Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 605-399-0 | CAS number: 165252-70-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 27/09/2001 - 08/02/2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, Guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 002
- Report date:
- 2002
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (RS)-1-methyl-2-nitro-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl)guanidine
- EC Number:
- 605-399-0
- Cas Number:
- 165252-70-0
- Molecular formula:
- C7H14N4O3
- IUPAC Name:
- (RS)-1-methyl-2-nitro-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl)guanidine
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- powder
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Mycoplasma-free tk+/-
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 and 2:
0 (saline), 400, 800, 1200, 1600 and 2022 µg/mL
Both with and without metabolic activation.
See Table 1. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: saline
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- saline diluted 10-fold in the treatment medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- as above
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (without S9) benz(a)pyrene (with S9)
- Positive control substance:
- other: as above
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Dinotefuran was dissolved in saline, under subdued lighting conditions, immediately prior to assay to give the required concentration. Stock solutions were filter-sterilised and further dilutions were made using saline. The dinotefuran solutions were protected from light and used within 2 hours of preparation. No change in osmolality occurred at the highest concentration tested.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The test article was considered to be mutagenic if all the following criteria were met:
• the assay was valid
• the mutant frequency at one or more doses was significantly greater than that of the negative control (p<0.05)
• there was a significant dose-relationship as indicated by the linear trend analysis (p<0.05). - Statistics:
- Statistical significance of mutant frequencies (total wells with clones) was carried out according to the UKEMS guidelines. Thus the control log mutant frequency (LMF) was compared with the LMF from each treatment concentration based on Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons, and secondly the data was checked for a linear trend in mutant frequency with treatment concentration using weighted regression. The test for linear trend is one-tailed, therefore negative trend was not considered significant. These tests required the calculation of the heterogeneity factore to obtain a modified estimate of variance.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Genotoxicity without metabolic activation:
Experiment 1:
No: relative survival at 2022µg/mL was 102.68 without activation.
Experiment 2:
No: relative survival at 2022µg/mL was 76.16 without metabolic activation.
See Table 3
Genotoxicity with metabolic activation:
Experiment 1:
No: relative survival at 2022µg/mL was 118.06% with metabolic activation.
Experiment 2:
No: relative survival at 2022µg/mL was 100.28% with metabolic activation.
See Table 3
Cytotoxicity:
No: no statistically significant increases in mutation frequency occurred at any dose level in the absence or presence of metabolic activation in either independent experiment. The proportion of small colony mutants for the solvent controls without and with metabolic activation ranged from 38 to 41% in experiment 1 and from 52 to 55% in experiment 2. Marked increases in the numbers of both small and large colony mutants occurred in response to both positive control materials.
Analysis of dinotefuran formulations demonstrated achieved concentrations within 100 ± 10% of nominal concentrations. The assay acceptance criteria were met and the study is considered valid.
See Table 2. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Dose levels in two preliminary studies and main assay
Study |
Dose levels ofdinotefuranused (µg/mL) |
||||||||
Cytotoxicity ± S9, 3h |
62.5 |
125 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
2022 |
|
|
|
Cytotoxicity-S9, 24h |
7.81 |
15.63 |
31.25 |
62.5 |
125 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
2022 |
Experiment 1 in main assay ± S9, 3h |
400 |
800 |
1200 |
1600 |
2022 |
|
|
|
|
Experiment 2 inmain assay-S9, 24h; +S9, 3h |
400 |
800 |
1200 |
1600 |
2022 |
|
|
|
|
Table 2: Summary of relative survival in the cytotoxicity range-finding study
Compound |
Dose level |
Relative survival (%): |
||
|
(µg/mL) |
3-hour exposure (-S9) |
3-hour exposure (+S9) |
24-hour exposure (-S9) |
DMSO |
0 |
= 100 |
= 100 |
= 100 |
Dinotefuran |
7.81 |
- |
- |
150.17 |
|
15.63 |
- |
- |
122.63 |
|
31.25 |
- |
- |
116.22 |
|
62.5 |
47.60 |
58.55 |
101.05 |
|
125 |
103.20 |
72.40 |
111.20 |
|
250 |
97.81 |
82.08 |
109.29 |
|
500 |
93.43 |
94.94 |
133.42 |
|
1000 |
132.27 |
66.25 |
97.63 |
|
2022 |
87.00 |
70.00 |
109.58 |
- not assayed
Table 3: Relative survival and mutant frequency – main experiments
Concn. |
Experiment 1 |
|||||
(mg/mL) |
3-hr exposure (-S9) |
3-hr exposure (+S9) |
||||
|
%RSa |
RTGb |
MFc |
%RSa |
RTGb |
MFc |
0 |
= 100 |
1.00 |
67.92 |
= 100 |
1.00 |
81.65 |
400 |
100.42 |
0.87 |
70.05 |
103.94 |
1.11 |
80.01 |
800 |
98.63 |
1.06 |
70.70 |
116.66 |
1.18 |
54.15 |
1200 |
112.29 |
1.12 |
60.56 |
105.90 |
1.12 |
64.32 |
1600 |
103.08 |
0.99 |
85.24 |
105.69 |
1.14 |
68.82 |
2022 |
102.68 |
0.91 |
81.84 |
118.06 |
1.03 |
61.05 |
NQO 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.04 |
102.70 94.13 - - |
0.85 0.54 - - |
149.24 337.64 - - |
- - - - |
- - - - |
- - - - |
BP 2.0 3.0 |
- - |
- - |
- - |
91.27 81.81 |
0.76 0.69 |
365.23 525.10 |
|
Experiment 2 |
|||||
|
24-hr exposure (-S9) |
3-hr exposure (+S9) |
||||
|
%RSa |
RTGb |
MFc |
%RSa |
RTGb |
MFc |
0 |
= 100 |
1.00 |
72.69 |
= 100 |
|
101.87 |
400 |
96.10 |
1.04 |
61.05 |
105.89 |
|
78.81 |
800 |
88.13 |
0.99 |
62.01 |
112.71 |
|
82.82 |
1200 |
83.95 |
1.09 |
85.11 |
116.11 |
|
129.05 |
1600 |
107.55 |
1.01 |
56.23 |
101.87 |
|
105.00 |
2022 |
76.16 |
0.94 |
82.33 |
100.28 |
|
107.68 |
NQO 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.04 |
- - 61.06 55.07 |
- - 0.84 0.92 |
- - 194.58 196.02 |
- - - - |
- - - - |
- - - - |
BP 2.0 3.0 |
- - |
- - |
- - |
102.04 62.54 |
0.58 0.41 |
423.87 606.07 |
a% relative survival adjusted by post-treatment cell count;
brelative total growth;
c5-TFT resistant mutants/106viable cells 2 days after treatment;
- not assayed
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results :negative
In both experiments relative survival at 2022µg/mL was at least 76.16 % with and without metabolic activation. No statistically significant increases in mutation frequency occurred at any dose level in the absence or presence of metabolic activation in either independent experiment. Marked increases in the numbers of both small and large colony mutants occurred in response to both positive control materials.
It was concluded that dinotefuran technical and/or metabolites does not induce mutation at the tk locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells at concentrations up to 10mM, and is considered not mutagenic in this test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.