Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 605-399-0 | CAS number: 165252-70-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Sediment toxicity
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- sediment toxicity: short-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16/02/2000 - 04/07/2000
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, not a Guideline study
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The 48-hour acute toxicity of dinotefuran to the first instar larvae of the midge Chironomus riparius was studied under static conditions for 48 hours. Larvae were exposed to the test item at nominal concentrations of 100, 46, 22, 10, 4.6, 2.2 µg/L and a blank control (0 µg/L).
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- 0 and 48 hours, stored at ~-20°C
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on sediment and application:
- Not applicable
- Test organisms (species):
- Chironomus riparius
- Details on test organisms:
- Species/strain: Chironomus riparius
Age: First instar larvae, 2-3 days old
Breeding method: Not described
Kind of food: Green alga/TetraMin® fish food : 1/1 contributing 5 mg carbon /L test solution
Amount of food: Contributing 5 mg carbon /L test solution (as TOC)
Feeding frequency: Before start of exposure
Pretreatment: Not applicable
Feeding of animals during test: None - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Type of sediment:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Exposure phase:
- total exposure duration
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- 2.5 mmol/L (of dilution water)
- Test temperature:
- 20°C
- pH:
- 7.9- 8.0
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.8 mg/L
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Ammonia:
- Not reported
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- See table below:Nominal and measured concentrations
- Details on test conditions:
- Type of test: Acute 48 hour toxicity
Renewal of test solution: No
Volume of test vessels: 100 mL
Amount/volume of sediment per vessel: None
Volume of test medium per vessel: 50 mL
Volume/animal: 10 mL
Number of animals/vessel: 5
Number of vessels/ concentration: 4
Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of TS: No
Quality/Intensity of irradiation: Light intensity 300 – 700 lux
Photoperiod: 16 hours light / 8 hours dark - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC0
- Effect conc.:
- 46 µg/L
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- and sublethal effects
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 72.1 µg/L
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- and sublethal effects
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC100
- Effect conc.:
- 100 µg/L
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- and sublethal effects
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 22 µg/L
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- and sublethal effects
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 46 µg/L
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- and sublethal effects
- Details on results:
- The analytical determined concentrations of dinotefuran in the analysed test media from the start and the end of the exposure period ranged from 92 – 98 % of the nominal concentrations. Therefore biological results are based on nominal concentrations.
After 24 hours no mortality was determined in the control or at any concentration tested. However at 100 µg/L, all larvae showed convulsions and unusual body movements.
After 48 hours 17 of 20 larvae exposed to 100 µg/L test item concentration were dead and surviving larvae showed sublethal effects like convulsions and unusual body movements. Larvae in the 46 µg/L test item concentration showed the same sublethal effect as in the 100 µg/L dose level.
The 48 hour LC50 was calculated to be 72.1 µg/L with 95 % confidence limits of 64.5 and 80.6 µg/L. The 48 hour NOEC was determined to be 22 µg/L and the 48 hour LOEC was 46 µg/L.
All test media appeared as clear solution throughout the exposure period.
See Table 1. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The survival of the larvae or symtoms of intoxication were determined by means of a binocular after 24 and 48 hours of exposure. The 48-hour LC50 and the 95% confidence limits were calculated by Moving Average Interpolation. The 24-hour LC50 of the test item could not be calculated because none of the larvae were dead at that time. The NOEC, LOEC, LC0 and LC100 were determined directly from the raw data without any data transformation.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Validity criteria of the combined guidelines are fulfilled. A clear dose response of the test item for survival could be determined.
The 48 hour LC50 was calculated to be 72.1 µg/L with 95 % confidence limits of 64.5 and 80.6 µg/L. The 48 hour NOEC was determined to be 22 µg/L and the 48 hour LOEC was 46 µg/L. - Endpoint:
- sediment toxicity: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11/10/2002 - 10/12/2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, Guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 219 (Sediment-Water Chironomid Toxicity Test Using Spiked Water)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- • 2 samples each of every application solution immediately after application
• Sediment, pore water and overlaying water samples from the 8 and 32 µg/L treatment were taken on day 0, 7 and 27
• Sediment, pore water and overlaying water samples from the control (0 µg/L) were taken on days 0 and 27
• All samples were stored frozen at ~-20°C immediately after sampling until analysis - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on sediment and application:
- Type/source: Artificial sediment according to OECD 219
Composition (% w/w): Sphagnum peat (air dried, ground to ≤ 1mm): 4 %
Kaolin clay (content of Al2O3: 36.4 5):20 %
Sand (Sihelco 36): 76 %
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3): 0.4 %
Total organic carbon (TOC): 2.0 %
pH adjustment: Yes
pH of final sediment mixture: 7.3 - Test organisms (species):
- Chironomus riparius
- Details on test organisms:
- Species/strain: Chironomus riparius
Age: 2 – 3 days (first instar larvae)
Breeding method: Similar temperature and light conditions and in the same kind of water as used in the test
Kind of food: TetraMin Hauptfutter (TETRA-Werke, D 49304 Melle, Germany)
Amount of food: Day -1 – 5: 23 mg / vessel
Day 7 – 24: 47 mg/vessel
Feeding frequency: 3 times a week
Pretreatment: Finely ground and suspended in test water
Feeding of animals during test: Yes - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Type of sediment:
- artificial sediment
- Limit test:
- no
- Duration:
- 27 d
- Exposure phase:
- total exposure duration
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- Ca2+: approx. 2.0 mmol/L (as CaCO3)
Ca2+ and Mg2+: approx 2.5 mmol/L
(of dilution water) - Test temperature:
- 19.4 – 19.8 ºC
- pH:
- 7.6 – 8.7
- Dissolved oxygen:
- ≤ 69 %
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Ammonia:
- Not reported
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- See table below:Nominal and measured concentrations
- Details on test conditions:
- Type of test: Chronic 27 days
Renewal of test solution: No
Volume of test vessels: 3 L
Amount/volume of sediment per vessel: 462 g (dry weight)
Volume of test medium per vessel: 1600 mL
Volume/animal: 80
Number of animals/vessel: 20
Number of vessels/ concentration: 4
Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of TS: No, vessels covered with a watch-glass
Aeration of dilution water: Yes
Quality/Intensity of irradiation: 640 – 860 lux
Photoperiod: 16/8 hours light/dark with a 30 min transition period - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 27 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 14.5 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- emergence rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 11.8 – 17.8
- Key result
- Duration:
- 27 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- emergence rate
- Remarks:
- and development rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 27 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- emergence rate
- Remarks:
- and development rate
- Details on results:
- The mean measured concentrations of the test item in the application solutions ranged from 92 – 95 % of the nominal concentrations.
One hour after application, the mean measured concentration of the test item in the water column corresponded to 72 and 76 % of the nominal concentrations of 8 and 32 µg/L.
Seven days after application, the mean measured concentration of the test item in the water column corresponded to 58 and 68 % of the nominal concentrations of 8 and 32 µg/L.
At the end of exposure, the mean measured concentration of the test item in the water column corresponded to 56 and 61 % of the nominal concentrations of 8 and 32 µg/L.
Test item concentrations in the pore water and sediment increased continuously throughout the exposure phase. In the 8 µg/L treatment group, measured concentrations reached a maximum of 3.5 µg/L in pore water and 1.13 µg/kg in sediment. In the 32 µg/L treatment group, measured concentrations reached a maximum of 17.1 µg/L in pore water and 5.7 µg/kg in sediment.
The correct preparation of the application solutions was confirmed. The low recoveries in the water samples 1 hour after application were presumably caused by transfer of the test item into the sediment and the pore water phase. The biological results are presented based on nominal concentrations.
Based on nominal concentrations, the 27 day EC10 for the arcsin-transformed emergence rate of pooled sexes was calculated by Probit analyses to be 4.6 µg/L (95% confidence limits 3.7 – 5.8 µg/L), the EC50 was calculated to be 14.5 µg/L (95 % confidence limits 11.8 – 17.8).
At nominal concentrations of 2, 4 and 8 µg/L there was no statistically significant difference in the development rate of male midges.
At nominal concentrations of 2, 4, 8 and 16 µg/L there was no statistically significant difference in the development rate of female midges.
At a nominal concentration of 32 µg/L no development rate could be calculated due to 0 % emergence.
The EC10 and EC50 for development rate could not be calculated due to the low inhibition rates.
The 27 day NOEC and the LOEC for development and emergence for Chironomus riparius were 4 and 8 µg/L, respectively.
See Tables 1 and 2. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- For emergence rate and development rate the arithmetic mean values (mean), standard deviation (SD), minimum and maximum (min/max) were calculated from the four replicates per treatment. The values of the emergence rates and the development rates were normally distributed and were statistically evaluated on significant differences to the control by the multivariate Williams-test after a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical evaluations were done separately for emerged males and females (development rate) and with pooled sexes (emergence rate).
The 27-day EC10 and EC50 and the 95% confidence limits of the emergence rate (pooled sexes) were calculated by Probit analyses. The 27-day ECx values and the 95% confidence limits of the development rate of the midges could not be calculated due to the low inhibitory effect up to the highest test concentration that could be evaluated. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- A clear dose response of the test item for development and emergence rate could be determined.
The 27 day NOEC and the LOEC for development and emergence for Chironomus riparius were 4 and 8 µg/L, respectively.
Based on nominal concentrations, the 27 day EC10 for the emergence rate was calculated to be 4.6 µg/L, the EC50 was calculated to be 14.5 µg/L .
Referenceopen allclose all
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal test concentration [µg/L] |
Sample [h] |
Measured Concentration [µg/L] |
100 |
0 |
94 |
48 |
92 |
|
46 |
0 |
43 |
48 |
43 |
|
22 |
0 |
22 |
48 |
22 |
|
Control |
0 |
< LOD |
48 |
< LOD |
Only samples ≥ 48 hour NOEC were analysed
Table 1: Mortality of larvae ofChironomus ripariusafter 48 hours of exposure
Nominal test item concentration [μg/L] |
No. of larvae tested |
No. dead larvae after 24 hours |
No. dead larvae after 48 hours |
Mortality after 24 hours [%] |
Mortality after 48 hours [%] |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.2 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.6 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
20 |
0 |
0* |
0 |
0 |
100 |
20 |
0* |
17** |
0 |
85 |
* all larvae showing sublethal effects, e.g. convulsion, unusual body movements
** surviving larvae showing sublethal effects, e.g. convulsion, unusual body movements
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Application solutions |
||
Nominal concentration dinotefuran [mg/L] |
Measured concentration dinotefuran [mg/L] |
Measured concentration [%] of nominal |
0.32 |
0.296 |
93 |
0.64 |
0.596 |
93 |
1.28 |
1.19 |
93 |
2.56 |
2.34 |
92 |
5.12 |
4.86 |
95 |
Water samples |
|||
Nominal concentration [µg/L] |
Sampling day [d] |
measured concentration1[µg/L] |
[% nominal] |
0 (control) |
0 |
n.d. |
n.a. |
27 |
n.d. |
n.a. |
|
8 |
0 |
5.73 |
72 |
7 |
4.66 |
58 |
|
27 |
4.50 |
56 |
|
32 |
0 |
24.3 |
76 |
7 |
21.7 |
68 |
|
27 |
19.4 |
61 |
|
Pore water samples |
|||
0 (control) |
0 |
0.286* |
n.a. |
27 |
n.d. |
n.a. |
|
8 |
0 |
0.247 |
n.a. |
7 |
2.53 |
n.a. |
|
27 |
3.50 |
n.a. |
|
32 |
0 |
1.35 |
n.a. |
7 |
10.1 |
n.a. |
|
27 |
17.1 |
n.a. |
|
Sediment samples |
|||
0 (control) |
0 |
n.d. |
n.a. |
27 |
n.d. |
n.a. |
|
8 |
0 |
0.275 |
n.a. |
7 |
0.654 |
n.a. |
|
27 |
1.13 |
n.a. |
|
32 |
0 |
0.263 |
n.a. |
7 |
2.64 |
n.a. |
|
27 |
5.67 |
n.a. |
|
1: corrected for recovery rate of spiked samples *: excluded as outlier because of absence of test item in the corresponding water and sediment samples n.d.: no test item detected n.a.: not applicable |
Table 1: Emergence rate of Chironomus riparius (males and females pooled) after 27 days of exposure
Nominal test item concentration [µg/L] |
||||||
|
Control |
2 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
32 |
sum inserted larvae / treatment |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
sum emerged midges / treatment |
76 |
77 |
74 |
69 |
30 |
0 |
% emerged midges / treatment |
95 |
96 |
93 |
86 |
38 |
0 |
emergence rate ERarc |
1.4099 |
1.4016 |
1.2971 |
1.1920 |
0.6545 |
0 |
% of control |
100 |
99.4 |
92.0 |
84.5 |
46.4 |
0 |
STAT |
- |
n.s. |
n.s. |
s |
s |
s |
ERarc: arcsin-transformed emergence rate STAT: results of a Williams t-test (α = 0.05, one-sided smaller) n.s.:mean ERarcnot significantly lower than in the control s:mean ERarcsignificantly lower than in the control |
Table 2: Development rate for males and females
Females |
||||||
Development rate / treatment [day-1) |
Nominal initial test item concentration [µg/L] |
|||||
|
control |
2 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
32 |
Mean |
0.06465 |
0.06283 |
0.06377 |
0.06495 |
0.06325 |
n.a. |
SD |
0.00336 |
0.00189 |
0.00178 |
0.00060 |
0.00209 |
n.a. |
min |
0.06120 |
0.06070 |
0.06190 |
0.06440 |
0.06100 |
n.a. |
max |
0.06810 |
0.06470 |
0.06600 |
0.06580 |
0.06600 |
n.a. |
n |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
% of control |
100 |
97.2 |
98.6 |
100.5 |
97.8 |
n.a. |
STAT |
- |
n.s. |
n.s. |
n.s. |
n.s. |
n.a. |
STAT: results of a Williams t-test (α = 0.05, one-sided smaller) n.s.mean ERarcnot significantly lower than in the control: s:mean ERarcsignificantly lower than in the control n.a.: not applicable (no midge emerged) |
||||||
|
||||||
Males |
||||||
Development rate / treatment [day-1) |
Nominal initial test item concentration [µg/L] |
|||||
|
control |
2 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
32 |
Mean |
0.07412 |
0.07360 |
0.07295 |
0.07240 |
0.07085 |
n.a. |
SD |
0.00126 |
0.00226 |
0.00234 |
0.00062 |
0.00413 |
n.a. |
min |
0.07230 |
0.07080 |
0.07120 |
0.07150 |
0.06480 |
n.a. |
max |
0.07510 |
0.07580 |
0.07640 |
0.07290 |
0.07410 |
n.a. |
n |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
% of control |
100 |
99.3 |
98.4 |
97.7 |
95.6 |
n.a. |
STAT |
- |
n.s. |
n.s. |
n.s. |
s |
n.a. |
STAT: results of a Williams t-test (α = 0.05, one-sided smaller) n.s.:mean ERarcnot significantly lower than in the control s:mean ERarcsignificantly lower than in the control n.a.: not applicable (no midge emerged) |
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.