Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-823-5 | CAS number: 1675-54-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Adsorption / desorption
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption, other
- Remarks:
- other: KOCWIN v. 2.0 prediction.
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: In domain and well documented prediction using analogues for validation.
- Justification for type of information:
- QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- KOCWIN v. 2.0 prediction.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Not applicable to QSAR.
- Type of method:
- other: KOCWIN v. 2.0 prediction.
- Media:
- other: N.A. Majority of training set data is on water-soil partitioning.
- Type:
- log Koc
- Value:
- 2.65
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR value KOCWIN Kow method.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The Log Koc is predicted as 2.65 +/- 0.7 using the Kow method in KOCWIN v. 2.0 and Kow=3.24 as input.
- Executive summary:
The KOCWIN model estimates Log Koc either from the octanol-water coefficient or from a first-order molecular connectivity index (MCI).Structural analogues as identified in the training set have been processed parallel to the unknown. The model does not define parametric or structural domain. However, the analogues identified from within the training set suggest coverage of relevant substructures present in the unknown (alkyl, benzene, epoxides).A comparison of experimental and predicted values for the analogues was performed to decide on the preferred model for the prediction. Uncertainty in the value results from the notable difference in the predicted values for Log Koc with 2.65 and 3.81 for the Log Kowbased and the MCI method, respectively. The difference can partially be explained by the lower than predicted experimental Log Kow which is used as an input value for the Log Kow method. Based on this consideration and a slightly better performance of the analogues in the Log Kow model, preference was given to value calculated with the Log Kow model.
Confidence intervals are derived based on the error histogram provided by the developer that indicate that 95% of the substances in the training dataset are predicted within +/- 0.7 units of the experimental error.
Name
SMILES(major component, 85%)
Log Koccalc
Koccalc
Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether
CC(C)(c2ccc(OCC1CO1)cc2)c4ccc(OCC3CO3)cc4
2.65 ± 0.7
445 (89–2228)
The predicted value is considered reliable for the purpose of environmental modelling and the uncertainty is comparable to the situation where experimental data for only one or a small number of different soils has been tested.
Reference
Result from the Domain assessment:
KOCWIN does not provide explicit information about applicability domain of the model. The applicability domain can be derived from the training data set and the fragments with correction. If a given unknown consist of fragments that are not aliphatic or aromatic and do not have a correction factor listed they have to be considered out of domain.
i. Parametric Domain: Not specified by developer.
Log Kow: minimum–maximum of in the training
data:
-2.11 < Log Kow<
–9.1
Experimental Kowof the unknown (column method):
3.24
MW: minimum–maximum of molecular mass in the training data:
32 < MW < 665 [g/mol]
MW of unknown: 326.4 [g/mol]
=>In domain
ii. Structural
Domain: Not specified by developer. Assessed as all
molecules with either aliphatic or aromatic structural fragment or with
a fragment with a correction factor defined for the model.
Fragments of the unknown:
- Aliphatic
- Aromatic
- Epoxy (Ether). A series of Epoxy are represented in the training set (see analogues)
=>In domain
iii. Mechanism domain: The model does not define a mechanism of partitioning. However, the dominant driving force for partitioning of the molecules in the training set is hydrophobicity. Likewise, partitioning of the unknown is driven by hydrophobicity.
=>In domain
iv. Metabolic domain: Partitioning equilibrium can only be defined for molecules that are stable in the matrix. Although the unknown can undergo hydrolysis, the process is slow and partitioning and hydrolysis will be competing process.
=>NA.
Results from the structural analogue search b. Structural analogues: The training data set and the validation data set have been searched for analogues using a sub-structural search for relevant fragments present in the unknown. Substructures that where searched are epoxides and biphenyls. From the initial list of hits all molecules with a significant degree of halogenation were removed. There is no molecule in the dataset where all relevant fragments are represented. All partial analogues identified were from the training set and required correction factors. Partial analogues identified in this procedure are listed in Table1. Experimental results and predicted values are listed in Table2.
Table1: Structural analogues identified in the training dataset.
Chemical name |
Smiles |
Analogues |
|
Epichlorohydrin |
C1(CCl)CO1 |
2,2-Bioxirane |
C1(C2CO2)CO1 |
Benzophenone |
c1(C(=O)c2ccccc2)ccccc1 |
Diphenylmethanol |
c1(C(O)c2ccccc2)ccccc1 |
Unknown: |
|
4,4'-Isopropylidenediphenol, oligomeric reaction products with 1-chloro-2,3-epoxypropane |
CC(C)(c2ccc(OCC1CO1)cc2)c4ccc(OCC3CO3)cc4 |
Table2: Experimetal data and QSAR prediction for Analogues and unknown.
Chemical name |
Log Kow |
Log Kocexp. |
Log Kocest. (MCI) |
Δ |
Log Kocest. (Kow) |
Δ |
Analogues |
|
|||||
Epichlorohydrin |
0.45a |
1.00a |
1.00 |
0.00 |
1.08 |
0.08 |
2,2-Bioxirane |
-0.28a |
0.40a |
0.40 |
0.00 |
0.59 |
0.19 |
Benzophenone |
3.18a |
2.63a |
3.06 |
0.43 |
2.88 |
0.25 |
Diphenylmethanol |
2.67a |
2.34a |
2.87 |
0.53 |
1.99 |
-0.35 |
Unknown: |
|
|||||
4,4'-Isopropylidenediphenol, oligomeric reaction products with 1-chloro-2,3-epoxypropane |
3.24b |
|
3.81 |
|
2.65 |
|
aSource:
{Schüürmann, 2006 #457}
bREACH
dossier 2010.
c. Considerations on structural analogues: For the epoxy structure, the prediction of both methods is very close to the experimental value. For the diphenyl structure, the Log Kocis overestimated by the MCI method and slightly over- and under-predicted for the Log Kow method. Based on this finding, preference is given to the LogKow method for estimating the unknown. 3.2 The uncertainty of the prediction (OECD principle 4) Uncertainty in the value results from the notable difference in the predicted values for Log Koc using the two models with 2.65 and 3.81 for the Log Kow based and the MCI method, respectively. The difference can partially be explained by the experimental Log Kow used as an input for the model which is notably lower than the Log Kow predicted using a fragment method. Based on the data presented by the developers, approx. 95% of all predictions of Log Koc for the training fall within the range of ± 0.7 of the experimental value. This can be used to define the 95% confidence interval for theKoc of the unknown. The major contribution of the uncertainty is likely to come from the variability in the soil and sediment matrixes in the experimental data and does not reflect the uncertainty of the QSAR method.
3.3 The chemical and biological mechanisms according to the model underpinning the predicted result (OECD principle 5). Not applicable. No mechanistic interpretation for the algorithm provided.
Description of key information
Log Koc = 2.65 +/- 0.7 QSAR prediction using the Kow method in KOCWIN v. 2.0 and Kow =3.24 as input.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Koc at 20 °C:
- 445
Additional information
The KOCWIN model estimates Log Koc either from the octanol-water coefficient or from a first-order molecular connectivity index (MCI). Structural analogues as identified in the training set have been processed parallel to the unknown. The model does not define parametric or structural domain. However, the analogues identified from within the training set suggest coverage of relevant substructures present in the unknown (alkyl, benzene, epoxides). A comparison of experimental and predicted values for the analogues was performed to decide on the preferred model for the prediction. Uncertainty in the value results from the notable difference in the predicted values for Log Koc with 2.65 and 3.55 for the Log Kow based and the MCI method, respectively. The difference can partially be explained by the lower than predicted experimental Log Kow which is used as an input value for the Log Kow method. Based on this consideration and a slightly better performance of the analogues in the Log Kow model, preference was given to value calculated with the Log Kow model.
Confidence intervals are derived based on the error histogram provided by the developer that indicate that 95% of the substances in the training dataset are predicted within +/- 0.7 units of the experimental error.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.