Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

An acute oral LD50 was determined to be > 2000 mg/kg bw in rats. 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2015-11-02 to 2015-11-26
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Experimental study according to guideline and GLP
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
2001
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Version / remarks:
2002
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japan MAFF Testing Guideline of 12 Nosan No. 8147
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Bioassay Labor für biologische Analytik GmbH, 69120 Heidelberg
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Wiga GmbH, Germany
- Age at study initiation: approx. 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 180 - 188 g
- Fasting period before study: Feed was withdrawn from the animals at least 16 hours before administration, but water was available ad libitum.
- Housing: Single, Makrolon cage type III
- Diet: ad libitum, VRF1(P) from SDS Special Diets Services, 67122 Altrip, Germany
- Water: ad libitum, tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°C ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30 – 70
- Air changes (per hr): Approx. 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
A single application of undiluted test substance was done.

CLASS METHOD
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: By request of the sponsor a starting dose of 2000 mg/kg bw was chosen in the first step with 3 female animals. Because no mortality occurred, 2000 mg/kg bw were administered to another group of 3 female animals in the second step.
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
Volume: 2.46 mL/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6 in two groups
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Individual body weights shortly before administration (day 0), weekly thereafter and on the last day of observation. Clinical signs for each animal were recorded several times on the day of administration and at least once during each workday thereafter.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight
Statistics:
Calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2003 and checked with a calculator.
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred.
Clinical signs:
No clinical signs were observed during clinical examination.
Body weight:
The body weights of the animals increased within the normal range throughout the study period with one exception in the first 2000 mg/kg bw test group. This animal showed a normal increase of body weight during the first week, but revealed a marginal loss of body weight during the second week. As the affected animal showed neither clinical signs nor a change in behavior during the second observation week, the observed marginal loss of body weight was considered to be unspecific.
Gross pathology:
There were no macroscopic pathological findings in all animals.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Experimental study according to guideline and GLP.

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Acute toxicity

Oral

An acute oral toxicity study with the test substance was conducted in rats according to OECD TG 423. Female animals (6) received 2000 mg/kg bw one time via gavage and were observed for 14 days. No mortality occurred and no clinical signs and pathological changes were observed. The body weights of the animals increased within the normal range throughout the study period with one exception in the first 2000 mg/kg bw test group. This animal showed a normal increase of body weight during the first week, but revealed a marginal loss of body weight during the second week. As the affected animal showed neither clinical signs nor a change in behavior during the second observation week, the observed marginal loss of body weight was considered to be unspecific. Due to those observations the acute oral LD50 was determined to be > 2000 mg/kg bw in rats. Therefore the test substance is considered to be not classified for acute oral toxicity according to CLP. 


Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
The study is considered reliable.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Acute oral toxicity

Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008

The available experimental test data is reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the seventh time in Regulation (EC) No 2015/1221. As a result the substance is considered to be not classified for acute oral toxicity.