Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 291-652-7 | CAS number: 90459-11-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- other: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 8 July to 23 July, 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- study conducted on the analogue substance; the read across justification is detailed in section 13. The Reliability of the Source Study is 2 (the study was performed using 5 strains but all of Samonella typhimurium, since followed the OECD 471 of 1983, which was modified later in 1997).
- Justification for type of information:
- The read across justification is detailed in section 13.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 988
- Report date:
- 1988
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1983
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Similar Substance 02
- IUPAC Name:
- Similar Substance 02
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 10.0; 100.0; 333.3; 1000.0; and 5000.0 µg/plate
Dose selection was based on the results of the pre-experiment. The concentration range covered at least two decadic logarithms. Appropriate dose levels were selected regarding the characteristics of the test item. At least five different concentrations of the test item were tested. The highest dose level should prodece some toxic eggects. The maximum concentration is 5000 µg/plate, unless limited by toxicity or solubility of the test item.
In case the results of pre-experiment were in accordance with the these criteria, these data were reported as part of the main experiments. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water, DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- without S9, TA 1535 and TA 100
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine
- Remarks:
- without S9, TA1535, TA 1538 and TA 98
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in Agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3 - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered a mutagen if, in strain TA 100, the number of reversions is at least twice as high and in strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, and TA 98 it is at least three times higher, compared to the spontaneous reversion rate.
Also, a dose-dependent increase in the number of revertants is regarded as an indication of possibly existing mutagenic potential of the substance regardless of whether the highest dose induced the above described enhancement factors or not. - Statistics:
- No valid statistical procedure can be recommended for analysis of data from the bacterial assays at this time
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1537, TA 1538 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item induces point mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100, therefore, the test item is considered to be mutagenic in this reverse mutation (Ames) assay.
- Executive summary:
The test item was evaluated for its ability to induce point mutations by base pair change or frameshift in an in vitro bacterial cell reverse mutation assay (Ames test), according to the plate incorporation method of the OECD Guideline 471 (1983). The assay used Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100 in two independent experiments, using identical procedures, both with and without liver microsomal activation (S9). Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at five concentrations from 10.0 to 5000 µg/plate. No toxic effects occurred in any of the test groups either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation, as evidenced by a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants. The plates incubated with the test item showed normal background growth in concentrations up to 5000 ug/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used. Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls.
Up to the highest investigated dose, a significant and reproducible dose-dependent increase in revertant colony numbers was obtained in S. typhimurium strains TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100. The presence of liver microsomal activation did not influence these findings. However, the positive response in strain TA98 was not reproduced in the independent experiment in the presence of S9 mix. Positive controls showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
Therefore, the test item is considered to be mutagenic in this reverse mutation (Ames) assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.