Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 612-032-8 | CAS number: 6080-58-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Read-across with Li2CO3:
Lithium carbonate was found non-sensitizing when topically applied to guinea pigs in a study according to OECD 406 and EU method B.6.
Read-across with citric acid:
Citric acid has been shown to be safe when ingested or applied to skin in cosmetics.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1993-10-18 to 1993-11-11
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1981
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1987
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 81-6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1984
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- NA
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- A valid skin sensitisation study according to OECD guideline 406 with lithium carbonate is available and additionally an LLNA study with the read-across substance Sodium dihydrogenorthophosphate.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: HRP, Inc., Denver, PA
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 301 g - 379 g
- Housing: individually housed in suspended polycarbonate cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, Purina Guinea Pig Chow 5025
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, fresh tap water
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18.9°C - 23.3 °C
- Humidity (%): 37 % - 89 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours fluorescent light/ 12 hours dark - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: ethanol, acetone
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.3 g undiluted test material
- Day(s)/duration:
- Once weekly until a total of three applications/ 6 h
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: ethanol, acetone
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.3 g undiluted test material
- No. of animals per dose:
- Test group: 20 (10 male, 10 female)
Positive control group: 10 (5 male, 5 female)
Challenge group: 10 (5 male, 5 female) - Details on study design:
- The test material (0.3 g) was applied undiluted to each of 20 Hill Top Chambers®. In addition, 0.3 g test material plus 0.3 mL of 0.15 % DNCB in 80 % ethanol was applied to the test sites (left shoulder), and secured with hypoallergenic tape. Each animal was then wrapped with an elastic, plastic-lined bandage.
Six hours later, the bandage and chambers were removed and the test sites were wiped with clean gauze moistened with methanol. The test sites were then rinsed with tap water. The guinea pigs were dosed in this manner once weekly until a total of three applications had been administered. Following a 14 day rest period, the guinea pigs were challenged on a virgin site on the right shoulder in the manner described above. - Challenge controls:
- An additional 10 naive animals each received 0.3 g of the test material for comparison.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNCB)
- Positive control results:
- Animals in the positive control group had slight erythema and edema following the initial induction application and all but one had well defined to moderate erythema and slight to mild edema following challenge.
No irritation was noted on any of the test or challenge control animals at any time during the study. - Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: challenge group
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: challenge group
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance and 0.3 mL of 0.15 % DNCB in 80 % ethanol
- No. with + reactions:
- 10
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance and 0.3 mL of 0.15 % DNCB in 80 % ethanol
- No. with + reactions:
- 10
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: positive control challenge
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance and 0.3 mL of 0.15 % DNCB in 80 % ethanol
- No. with + reactions:
- 10
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: positive control challenge
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance and 0.3 mL of 0.15 % DNCB in 80 % ethanol
- No. with + reactions:
- 10
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, the test material is non-sensitising when topically applied to Hartley guinea pigs. Based on this result, it can be assumed that lithium carbonate is not a sensitiser.
- Executive summary:
A skin sensitisation test in Hartley guinea pigs was performed according to OECD 406 and EU method B.6. Lithium carbonate Pharmaceutical Grade (0.30 g) was applied undiluted topically to the left shoulders (previously clipped free of hair) of 10 male and 10 female Hartley guinea pigs. The test material was left in contact with the skin for approximately six hours. The animals received three induction treatments one week apart. A concurrent positive control group of 10 animals was treated in a similar manner with DNCB (0.15 % weight/volume). 14 days after the third induction treatment, the animals were challenged with the test material at a virgin skin site. An additional 5 male and 5 female naive animals received 0.30 g of the undiluted test material (challenge control group). The positive control group was challenged with DNCB. Observations for skin reactions were recorded at initiation and termination. All animals remained healthy and gained weight during the study. No skin reactions were noted on any of the test or challenge control animals at any time during the study. Animals in the positive control group had slight erythema and edema following the initial induction application and all but one had well defined to moderate erythema and slight to mild edema following challenge. Under the conditions of this study, the test material is non-sensitising when topically applied to Hartley guinea pigs.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to attached "Read-across justification" in section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on Li2CO3 (FMC, Albemarle 1994)
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: challenge group
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on Li2CO3 (FMC, Albemarle 1994)
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on Li2CO3 (FMC, Albemarle 1994)
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: challenge group
- Dose level:
- 0.3 g test substance
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on Li2CO3 (FMC, Albemarle 1994)
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Referenceopen allclose all
The challenge results for erythema are summarized below:
Erythema Scoresa |
||||||||
Group |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Incidenceb |
Severityc |
Test Material |
(24hr) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0/20 |
0 |
|
(48hr) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0/20 |
0 |
Challenge Control |
(24hr) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0/10 |
0 |
|
(48hr) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0/10 |
0 |
Positive Control |
(24hr) |
0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
9/10 |
2.7 |
|
(48hr) |
0 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
9/10 |
2.3 |
a: Number animals exhibiting each score.
b: Number animals having scores greater than 1/ Total number animals challenged
c: Sum of (Number animals exhibiting each score x score)/ Total number animals challenged
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
A skin sensitisation study with lithium citrate tetrahydrate is not available. Thus, read-across with lihtium carbonate was performed to cover this endpoint.
Read-across with Lithium carbonate (FMC, Albemarle, I93-1801 1993)
A skin sensitisation test in Hartley guinea pigs was performed according to OECD 406 and EU method B.6 (Buehler test). Lithium carbonate Pharmaceutical Grade (0.30 g) was applied undiluted topically to the left shoulders (previously clipped free of hair) of 10 male and 10 female Hartley guinea pigs. The test material was left in contact with the skin for approximately six hours. The animals received three induction treatments one week apart. A concurrent positive control group of 10 animals was treated in a similar manner with DNCB (0.15 % weight/volume). 14 days after the third induction treatment, the animals were challenged with the test material at a virgin skin site. An additional 5 male and 5 female naive animals received 0.30 g of the undiluted test material (challenge control group). The positive control group was challenged with DNCB. Observations for skin reactions were recorded at initiation and termination. All animals remained healthy and gained weight during the study. No skin reactions were noted on any of the test or challenge control animals at any time during the study. Animals in the positive control group had slight erythema and edema following the initial induction application and all but one had well defined to moderate erythema and slight to mild edema following challenge. Under the conditions of this study, the test material is non-sensitizing when topically applied to Hartley guinea pigs.
Thus, based on the results obtained with lithium carbonate, the target substance is not considered to be classified and labelled with respect to skin sensitisation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP).
Skin sensitisation potential of citric acid
It is expected that the chemical species of interest by assessing the skin sensitisation potential of the target substance, lithium citrate tetrahydrate, is the lithium moiety and therefore read-across with citric acid was not considered necessary based on the reasons described below.
Citric acid is a naturally occurring constituent of plants and animal tissue and appears as an intermediate in the krebs cycle in every eukaryote cell. Approximately 2 kg of citric acid are formed and metabolized every day in humans (OECD SIDS, 2001).
Furthermore, citric acid has a wide dispersive use, as it is reported to be added to processed food and beverages, used in pharmaceutical industries and in household cleaners as well as in special technical applications. Citric acid is listed as generally recognized safe (GRAS) direct food additive by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and citrate-containing ingredients are allowed as active ingredients, at a maximum daily dosage of 8 g, inantacid over-the-counter (OTC) products (21CFR331.11).
Additionally, citric acid is used in the cosmetic industry as chelating agent, pH adjuster, or fragrance ingredient. According to the Tentative Safety Assessment of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (2011) citric acid is used in almost every category of cosmetic products. 6795 uses are reported in the Tentative Safety Assessment Report at concentrations up to 4% in leave-on formulations, 10% in rinse-off formulations, and 39% in products diluted for (bath) use.
Thus, based on these uses, consumers are directly exposed to citric acid. Citric acid has been shown to be safe for ingestion and the substance is widely used in cosmetic products, which includes a skin application, the sensitisation potential of the substance is seen as low. The OECD SIDS Initial Assessment Report for citric acid also concluded that ‘genuine sensitisation to citric acid seems to be a rare phenomenon’.
References:
OECD SIDS (2001): Citric acid CAS 77-92-9, SIDS Initial Assessment Report for 11th SIAM (Orlando, Fla., January 2001)
Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (2011):Tentative Safety Assessment.Citric Acid, Inorganic Citrate Salts and Alkyl Citrate Esters As Used in Cosmetics
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available (further information necessary)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008:
The available experimental test
data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on available data on skin
sensitisation, the test item is not classified according to Regulation
(EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the tenth time in Regulation
(EU) No 2017/776.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.