Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06 September 2016 - 08 November 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
Version / remarks:
1993
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium 2-bromoethanesulphonate
EC Number:
224-244-4
EC Name:
Sodium 2-bromoethanesulphonate
Cas Number:
4263-52-9
Molecular formula:
C2H5BrO3S.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium 2-bromoethanesulphonate
Test material form:
solid

Method

Target gene:
his/trp
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Remarks:
uvrA
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix from Aroclor 1254 induced male Wistar rat liver
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
The test material concentrations used were selected according to the EEC, OECD and Japanese guidelines for this test system. A maximum concentration of 5000 µg/plate was selected, in order that initial treatments were performed up to the maximum recommended concentration according to current regulatory guidelines (OECD, 1997).
1st series: 5.0, 15.8, 50, 158, 500, 1580, 5000 µg/plate, with or without 10% S9 mix
2nd series: 50, 500, 1580, 2810, 5000 µg/plate, with or without 30% S9 mix
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Solubility properties of the test item, non-toxicity to bacteria.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
sodium azide
other: Daunomycin DAUN, 1 µg/plate; 2-Aminoanthracene 2-AA, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 µg/plate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 2 -3 days

SELECTION AGENT: via medium

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2, 3 parallel plates were used for each concentration step of the lest material and the positive controls. Twice as many solvent control plates were used for each bacterial strain.

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The presence of a background lawn of non-reverlant cells was checked for each plate.
Evaluation criteria:
The assessment of test material-induced effects is dependent on the number of spontaneous revertants of each bacterial strain (solvent controls) and the increase in the number of revertants at the test material concentration which shows the highest number of colonies. The following criteria, based upon the historical controls of the laboratory and statistical considerations, are established. All further results, ranging between "no" and "clear", are assessed as "weak increases".

Interpretations:
A test material was to be defined as negative or non-mutagenic in this assay if
• the assay was to be considered valid, and
• "no" or "weak increases" occurred in the test series performed ("weak increases" randomly occur due to experimental variation)
For valid data, the test material was considered to be positive or mutagenic if:
• a dose dependent (over at least two test material concentrations) increase in the number of revertants was induced, the maximal effect was a "clear increase", and the effects were reproduced at similar concentration levels in the same test system, or
• "clear increases" occurred at least at one test material concentration, higher concentrations showed strong precipitation or cytotoxicity, and the effects were reproduced at the same concentration level in the same test system.
In general two series of experiments must be performed. However, there was no requirement for verification of a clear positive response.
Results which only partially satisfied the above criteria were dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Biological relevance was taken into account, for example consistency of response within and between concentrations and (where applicable) between experiments.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

Results 1st series:

Metabolic Activation

Test Material

Conc. [µg/plate]

Revertants per plate (mean ± SD)

TA98

TA100

TA1535

TA1537

E.coli

Without Activation

H2O

 

34 ± 4

117 ± 11

29 ± 3

31 ± 8

37 ± 7

Test substance

5.0

36 ± 10

119 ± 23

26 ± 7

28 ± 6

39 ± 3

15.8

28 ± 7

114 ± 11

28 ± 5

29 ± 6

31 ± 7

50.0

36 ± 6

121 ± 17

27 ± 10

31 ± 1

43 ± 16

158

31 ± 6

112 ± 11

29 ± 8

32 ± 4

38 ± 6

500

23 ± 2

126 ± 9

26 ± 7

30 ± 6

31 ± 5

1580

26 ± 6

120 ± 11

26 ± 3

35 ± 7

37 ± 8

5000

31 ± 3

106 ± 8

31 ± 4

30 ± 4

38 ± 9

DAUN

1.0

360 ± 9

 

 

 

 

NaN3

2.0

 

1505 ± 132

974 ± 36

 

 

9-AA

50.0

 

 

 

783 ± 317

 

NQO

2.0

 

 

 

 

1769 ± 101

With Activation

H2O

 

34 ± 8

148 ± 12

28 ± 7

35 ± 1

45 ± 5

Test Substance

5.0

30 ± 2

137 ± 4

20 ± 3

35 ± 6

56 ± 4

15.8

39 ± 3

144 ± 15

21 ± 1

30 ± 5

39 ± 12

50.0

34 ± 10

136 ± 7

29 ± 12

27 ± 1

44 ± 1

158

35 ± 4

134 ± 11

32 ± 6

28 ± 8

41 ± 4

500

37 ± 1

141 ± 14

33 ± 11

29 ± 6

46 ± 7

1580

29 ± 3

134 ± 14

37 ± 3

34 ± 1

41 ± 2

5000

34 ± 13

148 ± 6

25 ± 3

29 ± 4

38 ± 4

2-AA

2.0

340 ± 10

1178 ± 103

 

 

 

5.0

 

 

245 ± 20

415 ± 33

 

10.0

 

 

 

 

378 ± 15

Results 2nd series:

Metabolic Activation

Test Material

Conc. [µg/plate]

Revertants per plate (mean ± SD)

TA98

TA100

TA1535

TA1537

E.coli

Without Activation

H2O

 

24 ± 6

132 ± 8

26 ± 8

28 ± 4

35 ± 11

Test substance

50.0

27 ± 4

122 ± 10

34 ± 9

30 ± 6

32 ± 10

500

30 ± 8

120 ± 22

29 ± 8

26 ± 5

33 ± 4

1580

28 ± 6

122 ± 14

28 ± 6

28 ± 2

40 ± 3

2810

34 ± 5

136 ± 11

28 ± 4

28 ± 7

28 ± 4

5000

23 ± 5

115 ± 5

32 ± 5

26 ± 10

32 ± 5

DAUN

1.0

159 ± 36

 

 

 

 

NaN3

2.0

 

1537 ± 76

927 ± 41

 

 

9-AA

50.0

 

 

 

1482 ± 257

 

NQO

2.0

 

 

 

 

1741 ± 112

With Activation

H2O

 

31 ± 5

137 ± 16

28 ± 7

32 ± 8

40 ± 9

Test Substance

50.0

27 ± 7

135 ± 11

21 ± 3

35 ± 1

45 ± 17

500

22 ± 2

149 ± 6

29 ± 5

37 ± 8

36 ± 12

1580

28 ± 9

125 ± 22

24 ± 4

36 ± 3

42 ± 3

2810

29 ± 6

131 ± 21

31 ± 2

39 ± 4

42 ± 3

5000

22 ± 6

131 ± 2

23 ± 2

33 ± 6

37 ± 2

2-AA

2.0

176 ± 8

 

 

 

 

5.0

 

19970 ± 61

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

164 ± 5

390 ± 13

181 ± 9

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In an in vitro bacterial reverse mutagenicity assay (AMES) according to OECD Guideline 471, the test item did not show a mutagenic potential.
Executive summary:

In an in vitro bacterial reverse mutagenicity assay (AMES) according to OECD Guideline 471, the mutagenic potential of the test item was determined. The assay was performed in Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from Aroclor 1254-pretreated male Wistar rats was used. In this study, two experimental series were performed. In the two series with S9 mix, 10% S9 mix were used in the 1st (test item: 5.0, 15.8, 50, 158, 500, 1580, 5000 µg/plate), and 30% S9 in the 2nd series (test item: 50, 500, 1580, 2810, 5000 µg/plate), respectively.

Vehicle and positive control treatments were included for all strains. The mean numbers of revertant colonies all fell within acceptable ranges for vehicle control treatments, and were clearly elevated by positive control treatments, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used. Following test substance treatments of all the tester strains in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no relevant increases in revertanl numbers were observed. It is concluded that with and without addition of S9 mix the test substance was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions.