Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-962-1 | CAS number: 6864-37-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 8th December 2000 - 2nd January 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 001
- Report date:
- 2001
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- Draft June 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- Nov. 18, 1987
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- CIT
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2'-dimethyl-4,4'-methylenebis(cyclohexylamine)
- EC Number:
- 229-962-1
- EC Name:
- 2,2'-dimethyl-4,4'-methylenebis(cyclohexylamine)
- Cas Number:
- 6864-37-5
- Molecular formula:
- C15H30N2
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-[(4-amino-3-methylcyclohexyl)methyl]-2-methylcyclohexan-1-amine
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland GmbH, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 10-11 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: a mean body weight of 242 g (range: 198 g to 293 g).
- Housing: individual
- Acclimation period: 5 days
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20
- Air changes (per hr): about 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Details on exposure:
- There was a total of four groups of 25 female rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain, which received the test or control substances once a day by oral administration from day 6 to day 19 post-coitum.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- HPLC analysis
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The results of the analyses confirmed the homogeneity and concentrations of the samples of the dosage forms taken on the first day and on the last day of treatment.
- Details on mating procedure:
- Mating: females were mated at the breeder's facilities. The day of confirmed mating (detection of a vaginal plug) was designated as day 0 post-coitum.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Each animal was given the dosage forms once a day, at approximately the same time, from day 6 to day 19 post-coitum
- Frequency of treatment:
- once/day
- Duration of test:
- day 0 to day 20 post-coitum
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 45 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The doses used in this study were selected based on the results of a preliminary range finding maternal toxicity study. Groups of 10 mated female Sprague-Dawley rats received the test substance in 0.5% aqueous carboxymethylcellulose at dose levels of 0 (vehicle control group), 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg bw/d. The test substance was administered by gavage on days 6 through 19 of gestation inclusive. The animals were sacrificed on day 20 of gestation, with exception of the high dose dams; these rats were sacrificed on day 10 post coitum due to marked toxicity.
Conclusions of the dose-finding study: The test substance produced slight maternotoxic effects when administered to pregnant rats (days 6 to 19 post coitum) at a dose level of 50 mg/kg bw/d. At 100 mg/kg bw/d, marked maternotoxicity was recorded, with forestomach, stomach and liver as target organs. The 200 mg/kg bw/d dose level was dramatically toxic to the pregnant rats. All surviving dams were sacrificed in a moribund condition before schedule on day 10 post coitum.
- Rationale for animal assignment: the animals were allocated to the groups, according to a stratification procedure, so that the average body weight of each group was similar.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- Mortality
Each animal was checked for mortality or signs of morbidity:at least twice a day during treatment period, at least once a day on other days.
Clinical symptoms
Each animal was observed for clinical signs (including evidence of abortion/resorption) at approximately the same time.
Food consumption
The quantity of food consumed by each female was recorded for the following intervals: 2-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-15, 15-18 and 18-20 post-coitum.
Body weight data
The body weight of each female was recorded on days 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 20 post-coitum.
After hysterectomy, the females were subjected to a macroscopic post-mortem examination of the principal thoracic and abdominal organs.
A gross evaluation of placentas was also performed. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The weight of the gravid uterus was recorded for each pregnant female at hysterectomy (with at least one live fetus).
The ovaries and uterus of females were examined to determine:
number of corpora lutea,
number and distribution of dead and live fetuses,
number and distribution of early and late resorptions,
number and distribution of implantation sites. - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: No data
Examination of the fetuses after dissection from the uterus
Each fetus was submitted to a detailed external examination, which included the observation of all visible structures, surfaces and orifices. Dead fetuses were then discarded. The body weight of each live fetus was recorded. The live fetuses were killed by subcutaneous injection of thiopental sodium.
Soft tissue examination of the fetuses
Approximately half of the live fetuses per litter were fixed with Harrisson's fluid. A detailed soft tissue examination was performed according to a free-hand sectioning technique (Wilson technique) which included the observation of all the organs and structures of the head, neck, thorax and
abdomen.
Skeletal and cartilage examination of the fetuses
The remaining fetuses per litter were fixed in ethyl alcohol. A detailed examination of the skeleton was performed after staining with alizarin red S and alcian blue. This examination included the observation of all the bone structures and cartilage of the head, spine, rib cage, pelvis and limbs.
In particular, cartilage was specifically examined where a bony structure was altered.
Sex of fetuses
The sex of each live fetus was determined at the time of evisceration (after fixation in alcohol) or at the time of the Wilson sectioning. - Statistics:
- Mean values were compared by one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett test (mean values being considered as normally distributed and variances being considered as homogeneous).
Percentage values were compared by the Fisher exact probability test. - Indices:
- The conception rate (%) was calculated as follows:
Number of pregnant females/Number of females mated x 100
The pre-implantation loss was calculated as follows:
Number of corpora lutea - Number of implantation sites/Number of corpora lutea x 100
The post-implantation loss was calculated as follows:
Number of implantation sites - Number of live fetuses/Number of implantation sites x 100
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No substance-related clinical symptoms were observed in the control and the treated groups, the few findings occasionally observed being of no toxicological significance.
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- There were no deaths in the control and the treated groups except for one female in the 15 mg/kg/day which was found dead on day 20 of gestation prior to the terminal sacrifice. No clinical signs were observed prior to the death. Food consumption and body weight gain were slightly lower than the group mean values but still within normal range. Foamy content and dilatation of the lungs were recorded at necropsy. The reason for this death is not known but a relation to treatment with the test substance can be ruled out since this single mortality was observed in the mid-dose group
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- During the period of treatment (day 6 to day 19 post-coitum), the group mean body weight gain was similar in the control and the 5 mg/kg/day groups. In the 15 and 45 mg/kg/day treated groups, the group mean body weight gain was slightly (-8%, not statistically significant) to clearly (-13%, p<0.05) reduced during the period of treatment, with a more marked effect at the beginning (first 3 days of treatment). In these treated groups, the mean values of terminal body weight did not statistically differ from that of the control group, but were lower by -4% and -6%, respectively.
The corrected body weight gain (terminal body weight on day 20 post-coitum minus the weight of gravid uterus minus body weight on day 6 post-coitum) was minimally reduced in the 5 mg/kg/day group (-17%, not statistically significant). This finding was considered to be fortuitous because it was the only effect recorded in this group (no difference in gross body weight gain or food consumption). The corrected body weight gain was slightly (-23%, not significant) to markedly (-44%, p<0.001) reduced in the 15 and 45 mg/kg/day groups respectively. Because this effect was dose-related and correlated with a lower food consumption (in the 45 mg/kg/day group), it was considered to be related to the treatment with the test substance. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The food consumption was similar in the control and the 5 and 15 mg/kg/day groups. In the 45 mg/kg/day group, there was a notable decrease in food consumption during the treatment period (-7%, not statistically significant), with a more marked effect during the first week of treatment.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean value of gravid uterus weight was similar in the control and the treated groups, the slight fluctuations recorded correlating with the mean litter size.
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no remarkable observation in the 5 and 15 mg/kg/day treated groups. However, in the 45 mg/kg/day treated group, 6/25 females presented paleness, accentuated lobular pattern and/or whitish area on the liver. These necropsy findings might be related to the test substance administration.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no substance-related and /or biological relevant differences between the different test groups in conception rate, in the mean number of corpora lutea and implantation sites or in the pre and post-implantation losses and the number of resorptions. There was only a clearly higher number of live fetuses/dam in the 45 mg/kg/day group: 13.7 fetuses per litter on average, versus 12.6 fetuses per litter in the control group. This difference was considered to be incidental as both values are fully within the historical control range. However, the increased mean number of live fetuses/dam in the highdose group may well account for the slight delays in ossification of the fetal skeletons at this dose-level.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
Maternal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The body weight of the fetuses was similar in the control and the treated groups. Quite large variations were observed between the litters, probably because of a broad range in the time of overnight mating, but the distribution of this range was similar in all the groups.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The sex distribution was similar in the control and the treated groups.
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No malformations were observed at external examination of the fetuses from the control and the 5 and 45 mg/kg/day treated groups. In the 15 mg/kg/day, 1/293 fetuses (= 0.3% of the examined fetuses) from one out of 23 litters (= 4% of the examined litters) displayed a thread-like tail. This external malformation can be also observed occasionally in control fetuses and thus is considered to be of spontaneous occurrence.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was a low incidence of malformations in each group:
Control group: one fetus (= 0.7% of the examined fetuses) from one out of 22 litters
(= 4.5% of the examined litters) affected
-1/146 fetuses with misshapen 11th pair of ribs.
5 mg/kg/day group: two fetuses (= 1.5% of the examined fetuses) from two out of
19 litters (= 10.5% of the examined litters) affected
-2/133 fetuses with misshapen rib(s) (11th pair),
15 mg/kg/day group: two fetuses (= 1.6% of the examined fetuses) from two out of
18 litters (= 11.1 % of the examined litters) affected
-1/122 fetuses with fused ribs (4th 5th 6th right ribs); this fetus had a slightly lower body weight,
-1/122 fetuses with misshapen ribs (7th to 11th pair).
45 mg/kg/day: four fetuses (= 2.7% of the examined fetuses) from four out of 21 litters (= 19.0% of the examined litters) affected
-3/148 fetuses with misshapen rib (one to five ribs affected, unilaterally),
-1/148 fetuses with misshapen, enlarged 6th sternebra.
Statistical significance was not reached for any of the recorded skeletal malformations, either for fetal incidence, litter incidence or mean percentage of affected fetuses per litter. In addition, there was no clear dose-relationship between the dose-groups: incidence in the mid-dose group is lower than in the low-dose group for misshapen rib; incidence in the mid-dose group is higher than in the low and high-dose groups for fused ribs. Consequently, concerning fetal skeletal malformations, a relationship to treatment with the test substance was ruled out.
In the 5 and 15 mg/kg/day treated groups the incidence and nature of the fetal skeletal variations were similar to those recorded in the control group: the slight differences observed were occasional, not dose-related, and/or not statistically significant.
In addition, the values were within the range of CIT historical control data. The single exception was the incomplete ossification of the frontal bone, which was recorded at a slightly higher incidence in the 15 mg/kg/day group when compared to the contemporary controls and the historical data. However, the difference was slight and the actual control value was already slightly above the highest historical control value. Consequently, this single finding was not considered to be of toxicological significance.
In the 45 mg/kg/day treated group, there was a higher incidence of a number of skeletal variations representing incomplete ossification of skull bones and absence of ossification of 5th sternebra. The differences were greater than those recorded at lower dose-levels, and/or were occasionally outside the range of CIT historical control data. When comparing fetal incidences, statistical significance was reached for three out of five findings. The slightly increased occurrence of delays in ossification at the high dose is, however, not considered to be substance-induced for the following reasons:
-the mean number of live fetuses per litter was distinctly higher in the high-dose
group than in the concurrent control group (13.7 fetuses/dam at 45 mg/kg vs. 12.6 control fetuses/dam - see also § 4.2.2.3). It is very likely, that this is the actual cause
for the transient delays in ossification (although the mean fetal body weights are rather similar in all groups),
-statistical significance for these findings was not reached when comparing the number of affected fetuses on a per litter basis,
-moreover, the overall incidence for fetal skeletal variations was not increased in the high-dose group (93.9%) in comparison to the control group (94.5%).
Special comments on additional skeletal examinations:
A total of 16 litters, accounting for 105 fetuses were also examined for skeletal and cartilage findings. However, since the labeling of the flasks containing the fetuses was accidentally lost, it was not possible to identify which experimental group each litter belonged to. However, a global analysis showed that:
-malformation was confined to a single fetus displaying misshapen ribs (7th to 10th right ribs),
-variations were similar in nature and incidence to that recorded in the properly identified fetuses.
In conclusion, although the skeletal findings recorded in these 105 fetuses cannot be properly attributed to each of the four experimental groups, their incidence and nature did not differ from that observed in the 549 evaluated fetuses and thus do not change the final assessment which is summarized below. - Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The only soft tissue variations recorded were the dilatation of renal pelvis and/or ureter. These common variations were recorded at a similar incidence in the control and treated groups and did not suggest any treatment- or dose-relationship. In addition, the incidence was within the range of CIT historical control data for this strain of rats.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 45 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: highest dose tested
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Skeletal variations
Mean incidence of notable skeletal variations
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
5 |
15 |
45 |
Historical control range |
Interparietal: incomplete ossification |
|||||
fetal incidence (%) |
6.8 |
12.8 |
16.4* |
29.1*** |
8.7 |
affected fetuses/litter (%) |
7.0 |
12.5 |
17.7 |
29.1 |
|
Parietal: incomplete ossification |
|||||
fetal incidence (%) |
1.4 |
3.8 |
4.9 |
16.2*** |
2.7 |
affected fetuses/litter (%) |
1.6 |
3.9 |
5.1 |
16.2** |
|
Supraoccipital: incompleteossification |
|||||
fetal incidence (%) |
2.7 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
10.1* |
4.1 |
affected fetuses/litter (%) |
3.1 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
9.8 |
|
Frontal: incomplete ossification |
|||||
fetal incidence (%) |
6.8 |
2.3 |
9.0 |
13.5 |
2.2 |
affected fetuses/litter (%) |
6.3 |
2.3 |
8.4 |
12.2 |
|
5th sternebra: unossified |
|||||
fetal incidence (%) |
14.4 |
12.0 |
18.9 |
30.4** |
23.7 |
affected fetuses/litter (%) |
16.0 |
12.3 |
17.1 |
28.6 |
|
Total of skeletal variations |
|||||
fetal incidence (%) |
94.5 |
94.7 |
91.8 |
93.9 |
X |
affected fetuses/litter (%) |
94.2 |
94.6 |
91.2 |
92.8 |
*: p<0.05 **: p<0.01 ***: p<0.001 (statistics calculated using absolute values) underlined values: outside CIT historical data.
Table 2: HYSTERECTOMY DATA (Summary table)
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
|
0 |
5 |
15 |
45 |
Pregnant Females Alive at Term |
N |
25 |
24 |
23 |
24 |
with Total Resorptions |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
with all DeadFetuses |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
with Live Fetuses |
N |
25 |
24 |
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corpora Lutea |
Total |
353 |
363 |
332 |
357 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
14.1 d |
15.1 |
14.4 |
14.9 |
|
S.d. |
2.4 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implantation Sites |
Total |
322 |
330 |
299 |
336 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
12.9 d |
13.8 |
13.0 |
14.0 |
|
S.d. |
2.6 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preimplantation Loss |
Total |
31 f |
33 |
33 |
21 |
|
% |
8.8 |
9.1 |
9.9 |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fetuses |
N |
316 |
321 |
293 |
329 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
12.6 d |
13.4 |
12.7 |
13.7 |
|
S.d. |
2.7 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
Alive |
% |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Dead |
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Live Fetuses |
N |
316 f |
321 |
293 |
329 |
% of implantation sites |
|
98.1 |
97.3 |
98.0 |
97.9 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
12.6 d |
13.4 |
12.7 |
13.7 |
|
S.d. |
2.7 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dead Fetuses |
N |
0 f |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% of impantation sites |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
S.d. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorptions + Scars |
N |
6 f |
9 |
6 |
7 |
% of impantation sites |
|
1.9 |
2.7 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
0.2 d |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
S.d. |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implant Scars |
N |
0 f |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% of impantation sites |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
S.d. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorptions: early |
N |
6 f |
9 |
4 |
7 |
% of impantation sites |
|
1.9 |
2.7 |
1.3 |
2.1 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
0.2 d |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
|
S.d. |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resorptions: late |
N |
0 f |
0 |
2 |
0 |
% of impantation sites |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
0.0 d |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
S.d. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postimplantation Loss |
Total |
6 f |
9 |
6 |
7 |
% of impantation sites |
|
1.9 |
2.7 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
No. per animal |
Mean |
0.2 d |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
S.d. |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male Fetuses |
N |
157 f |
147 |
138 |
174 |
|
% |
49.7 |
45.9 |
47.1 |
52.9 |
Female Fetuses |
N |
159 f |
173 |
155 |
155 |
|
% |
50.3 |
54.1 |
52.9 |
47.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fetal Body Weight (g) |
Mean |
4.53 d |
4.72 |
4.48 |
4.49 |
|
S.d. |
0.81 |
0.88 |
0.74 |
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male Fetuses |
Mean |
4.65 d |
4.84 |
4.62 |
4.62 |
|
S.d. |
0.82 |
0.91 |
0.79 |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female Fetuses |
Mean |
4.42 d |
4.60 |
4.37 |
4.32 |
|
S.d. |
0.84 |
0.86 |
0.71 |
0.85 |
Statistical key: d=ANOVA + Dunnett-test f=Fishers exact test
15 mg/kg/day: 1/24 pregnant females died just prior to the hysterectomy
Table 3: SUMMARY OF FETAL EXTERNAL MALFORMATIONS
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
|
0 |
5 |
15 |
45 |
Litters Evaluated |
N |
25 |
24 |
23 |
24 |
Fetuses Evaluated |
N |
316 |
321 |
293 |
329 |
Live |
N |
316 |
321 |
293 |
329 |
Dead |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tail |
|||||
Litter Incidence |
N |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Fetal Incidence |
N |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREAD-LIKE TAIL |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.3 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
0.0 d |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
S.d. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL FETAL EXTERNAL MALFORMATIONS |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.3 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
0.0 d |
0.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
|
S.d. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
Statistical key: d=ANOVA + Dunnett-test f=Fishers exact test
Table 4: SUMMARY OF FETAL EXTERNAL VARIATIONS
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
|
0 |
5 |
15 |
45 |
Litters Evaluated |
N |
25 |
24 |
23 |
24 |
Fetuses Evaluated |
N |
316 |
321 |
293 |
329 |
Live |
N |
316 |
321 |
293 |
329 |
Dead |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL FETAL EXTERNAL VARIATIONS |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
S.d. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Statistical key: f=Fishers exact test
Table 5: SUMMARY OF FETAL SOFT TISSUE MALFORMATIONS
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
|
0 |
5 |
15 |
45 |
Litters Evaluated |
N |
25 |
24 |
23 |
24 |
Fetuses Evaluated |
N |
149 |
155 |
141 |
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL FETAL SOFT TISSUE MALFORMATIONS |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
S.d. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Statistical key: f=Fishers exact test
Table 6: SUMMARY OF FETAL SOFT TISSUE VARIATIONS
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
|
0 |
5 |
15 |
45 |
Litters Evaluated |
N |
25 |
24 |
23 |
24 |
Fetuses Evaluated |
N |
149 |
155 |
141 |
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
KIDNEYS |
|||||
Litter Incidence |
N |
7 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Fetal Incidence |
N |
10 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILATED RENAL FELVIS |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
10 f |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
% |
6.7 |
1.3 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
7 f |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
% |
28.0 |
8.3 |
13.0 |
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
6.1 d |
1.4 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
|
S.d. |
11.1 |
4.7 |
13.4 |
20.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
URETER |
|||||
Litter Incidence |
N |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Fetal Incidence |
N |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
|||||
DILATED URETER |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
2 f |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
% |
1.3 |
0.0 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
1 f |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
% |
4.0 |
0.0 |
8.7 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
1.1 d |
0.0 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
|
S.d. |
5.7 |
0.0 |
5.7 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL FETAL SOFT TISSUE VARIATIONS |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
10 f |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
% |
6.7 |
1.3 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
7 f |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
% |
28.0 |
8.3 |
13.0 |
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
6.1 d |
1.4 |
4.3 |
5.0 |
|
S.D. |
11.1 |
4.7 |
13.4 |
20.6 |
Statistical key: d=ANOVA + Dunnett-test f=Fishers exact test
Table 7: SUMMARY OF FETAL SKELETAL MALFORMATIONS
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
|
0 |
5 |
15 |
45 |
Litters Evaluated |
N |
22 |
19 |
18 |
21 |
Fetuses Evaluated |
N |
146 |
133 |
122 |
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
STERNEBRA |
|||||
Litter Incidence |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Fetal Incidence |
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MISSHAPEN STERNEBRA (E) |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.7 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
0.0 d |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
|
S.d. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIB |
|||||
Litter Incidence |
N |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
Fetal Incidence |
N |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
|||||
MISSHAPEN RIB |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
1 f |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
% |
0.7 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
1 f |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
% |
4.5 |
10.5 |
5.6 |
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
0.6 d |
1.5 |
0.9 |
2.4 |
|
S.d. |
3.0 |
4.7 |
3.9 |
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUSED RIBS |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
0 f |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
5.6 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
0.0 d |
0.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
|
S.D. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.6 |
0.0 |
|
|||||
TOTAL FETAL SKELETAL MALFORMATIONS |
|||||
Fetal Incidence |
N |
1 f |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
% |
0.7 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
2.7 |
Litter Incidence |
N |
1 f |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
% |
4.5 |
10.5 |
11.1 |
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affected Fetuses/Litter |
Mean% |
0.6 d |
1.5 |
1.5 |
3.4 |
|
S.D. |
3.0 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
7.2 |
Statistical key: d=ANOVA + Dunnett-test f=Fishers exact test
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.