Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Flammability

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
pyrophoric solids
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because the substance is known to be stable in contact with air at room temperature for prolonged periods of time (days) and hence, the classification procedure does not need to be applied
the study does not need to be conducted because the organic substance does not contain metals or metalloids and hence, the classification procedure does not need to be applied
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING
In accordance with section 1 of REACh Annex XI, study for pyrophoric properties is deemed unnecessary based on the experience in handling, testing and use of the substance and based on the chemical structure of the known constituents of the substance that do not fall into critical categories described in ECHA guidance.
The tests performed on the substance and reported in this dossier showed that the substance clearly does not react with air. Moreover, a review of the chemical structure of the known constituents suggests that there are no chemical groups present in these constituents that would imply pyrophoric properties. Therefore, the study was considered as unnecessary.
Endpoint:
substances / mixtures which in contact with water emit flammable gases
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because the organic substance does not contain metals or metalloids and hence, the classification procedure does not need to be applied
the study does not need to be conducted because the experience in production or handling shows that the substance does not react with water, e.g. the substance is manufactured with water or washed with water
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING
In accordance with section 1 of REACh Annex XI, study for flammability if contact with water is deemed unnecessary based on the experience in handling, testing and use of the substance and based on the chemical structure of known constituents of the substance that do not fall into critical categories described in ECHA guidance.
The information from aquatic test conducted (fish/algae aquatic toxicity) showed that the substance clearly does not react with water. Moreover, a review of the chemical structure of the known constituents suggests that there are no chemical groups present that would imply flammability on contact with water. Therefore, the study was considered as unnecessary.
Endpoint:
self-heating substances / mixtures
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because the substance is completely molten at 160°C
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING:
According to the Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria, v4.1 of June 2015:

Substances or mixtures with a low melting point (< 160 °C) should not be considered for classification in this class since the melting process is endothermic and the substance-air surface is drastically reduced. However, this criterion is only applicable if the substance or mixture is completely molten up to this temperature."
Considering that the substance is described as a red to brown solid with a melting point < 160°C (see endpoint 4.2) the test is considered as NOT necessary.
Endpoint:
flammable solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 September 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
The study was conducted according to an internationally recognised method, and under GLP. The substance is considered to be adequately characterised. Therefore full validation applies.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test N.1 (Test method for readily combustible solids)
Version / remarks:
2009
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.10 (Flammability (Solids))
Version / remarks:
2008
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
GLP certificate (inspected on 13 and 14 October 2014 / signed on 08 April 2015)
Key result
Test procedure:
burning rate test: preliminary screening test
Remarks on result:
substance does not ignite and propagate combustion either by burning with flame or smouldering along 200 mm of the powder train within the 2 minutes test period

Findings

Safety Pre-Test

The test item started to melt to brown liquid and burned with an orange sooting flame.

Preliminary Screening Test

The test item melted to a brown liquid. It was observed, that the liquid burned at contact with the flame of the teclu burner. No ignition occurred within two minutes.

Results and Discussion

No ignition was observed throughout the course of the test.

The test item should be considered as not highly flammable (for EU regulations) and non-flammable solid (for UN regulations), resp.

No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome.


 

Interpretation of results:
not classified based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The test item is NOT classified as a flammable solid according to Regulation (EC) N°1272/2008 (CLP).
Executive summary:

The study was conducted according the procedure Test N.1 of the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods Manual of Tests and Criteria (GLP). The test item failed to ignite during the 2 minutes that the Bunsen flame was applied in the preliminary screening. The result of the preliminary screening test obviated the need to perform the main test.

The test item has been determined to be not highly flammable as it failed to ignite in the preliminary screening test.

Description of key information

The test item is NOT classified as a flammable solid according to Regulation (EC) N°1272/2008 (CLP) and UN GHS criteria.

Not flammable if contact with air or water (waived).

No self-heating anticipated (waived).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Flammability:
not classified

Additional information

Fully reliable GLP experimental studies are available:

Flammability of solids was evaluated according to UN N1 method, and ispresented under point 4.13. It is considered as the key study.

Based on the chemical structure and experience, no flammable properties are anticipated if contact with air or water, or no self-heating for liquids, therefore studies were deemed unnecessary.

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 (CLP) and UN Globally Harmonised System (GHS) criteria, the substance as solid did not ignite in the preliminary test, the substance is NOT classified as a flammable solid.

Based on experience and chemical structure of known constituents of the substance, no flammable properties are anticipated if contact with air or water.

Based on low melting point, no self-heating is anticipated.