Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 435-790-1 | CAS number: 297730-93-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Ecotoxicological Summary
Administrative data
Hazard for aquatic organisms
Freshwater
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 0.008 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 1 000
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Marine water
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 0.001 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 10 000
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
STP
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC STP
- PNEC value:
- 1 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 10
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Sediment (freshwater)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 0.006 mg/kg sediment dw
- Extrapolation method:
- sensitivity distribution
Sediment (marine water)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 0.001 mg/kg sediment dw
- Extrapolation method:
- sensitivity distribution
Hazard for air
Air
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC air
- PNEC value:
- 0 mg/m³
Hazard for terrestrial organisms
Soil
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC soil
- PNEC value:
- 0.01 mg/kg soil dw
- Assessment factor:
- 100
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Hazard for predators
Secondary poisoning
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no potential for bioaccumulation
Additional information
CAS# 297730-93-9:
Using available aquatic toxicity data, the PNECs were calculated to be 0.01 mg/L for Freshwater and 0.001 mg/L for Marine Water. For the Freshwater and Marine water PNECs, only one test result was available; a 96-hour acute toxicity study with Oryzias latipes. A conservative assessment factor was applied to the results of this study of 1000 for Freshwater and 10000 for Marine Water. For the STP PNEC, a NOEC was available for activated sludge respiration inhibition. An assessment factor of 10 was applied to the NOEC to derive a PNEC for STP of 10 mg/L. No test results were available for Sediment or Marine Sediment organisms; therefore the EPM method with the Freshwater and Marine PNECs was used to derive sediment PNECs. Koc was determined in a laboratory study to be 75800 L/kg. The log Kow is 6.0, indicating a further adjustment factor of 10. The PNECs for Sediment and Marine Sediment were calculated to be 7.6 mg/kg dw and 0.76 mg/kg dw, respectively. For Grassland and Agricultural soil, no testing results were available. The EPM method with the Freshwater PNEC was used to derive soil PNECs. Using the laboratory-derived Koc, the PNEC for Grassland and Agricultural soil was determined to be 0.89 mg/kg after adjustment. CAS# 297730-93-9 was found to be not readily biodegradable and the log Kow > 3.0. However, based on the log octanol-air partition coefficient (log Koa) of 1.72 and the lack of exposure to aquatic systems based on the low water solubility and high vapor pressure, bioaccumulation in the food chain is not expected. Therefore, the PNEC oral is not applicable. There is no intermittent release of CAS# 297730-93-9.
Trifluoroacetic acid (CAS# 76-05-1):
Using available aquatic toxicity data(1, 2) PNECs were calculated to be 0.0064 mg/L for freshwater and 0.00064 mg/L for marine water. Acute results were available for three taxonomic groups. For the calculation of the Freshwater PNEC a 72-hour ErC50 value of 6.4 mg/L was obtained from a study with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Chronic studies were not conducted. Therefore, an AF of 1000 was applied to the algae ErC50, which is the lowest of the acute EC/LC50 values. One study was avaliable on toxicity to marine organisms. The marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum 72-hr ErC50 was reported as > 97.5 mg TFA/L. The freshwater alga P. subcapitata was found to be more sensitive, therefore an additional factor of 10 was applied to the Freshwater PNEC to derive the Marine Water PNEC. For the STP PNEC, a NOEC of 10 mg/L was available for respiration inhibition in an aerobic soil microcosm study(3). An assessment factor of 10 was applied to the NOEC to derive a PNEC of 1.0 mg/L for STP. No test results for FW Sediment were available. PNEC was extrapolated using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) with the freshwater PNEC. PNECsed = (0.783 + (0.0217 x Koc)) x PNECfreshwater, where the Koc was 0.023 and the freshwater PNEC was 0.0064 mg/L. PNEC converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 4.6 = PNEC of 0.023 mg/kg dry wt. No test results for Marine Sediment were available. PNEC was extrapolated using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) with the marine PNEC. PNECmarinesed = (0.783 + (0.0217 x Koc)) x PNECmarinewater, where the Koc was 0.023 and the marine PNEC was 0.00064 mg/L. PNEC converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 4.6 = PNEC of 0.0023 mg/kg dry wt. No experimental data available for air. As this study is not a standard information requirement in REACH and there is no indication from the CSA on the need to investigate further the atmospheric compartment, no PNEC air was derived. Multiple studies of long-term toxicity to plants were available, but plants were the only trophic level evaluated (1). Therefore an application factor of 100 was applied to the most sensitive long-term study result (0.83 mg/kg dry weight in soil), to derive a PNECsoil of 0.0083 mg/kg. TFA is expected to remain in the soil water and not sorb to soil. Plants exposed hydroponically showed more sensitivity than those where soil was dosed. PNEC was also determined using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) and the freshwater PNEC: PNECsoil = (0.174 + (0.0104 x Koc)) x PNECwater, where the Koc was 0.023 and the freshwater PNEC was 0.0064 mg/L. This value was then converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 1.13 = PNEC of 0.0013 mg/kg dry weight. The PNEC derived using the equilibrium method was lower than that derived using application factors. Because this value was the lesser of the two and because TFA is expected to remain in the soil water, the PNEC derived with the EPM method, 0.0013 mg/kg dw, will be the definitive value. TFA is not readily biodegradable. However, Bioconcentration was evaluated using TFA uptake data from several aquatic studies and terrestrial plant studies (1). BCF values ranged from 1.0 - 43. It is thought that uptake into terrestrial plants is in part due to translocation of dissolved TFA in the tissue water(1). None of these studies demonstrated that TFA would be considered bioaccumulative. In addition, the log Kow was reported to be -2.1. Therefore, bioaccumulation of TFA in terrestrial or aquatic organisms is not expected and secondary poisoning does not need to be considered further in this assessment.
(1)Boutonnet (Ed.), 1999. Environmental Risk Assessment of Trifluoroacetic Acid. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 59-124.
(2) Mark L. Hanson, Keith R. Solomon. Haloacetic acids in the aquatic environment.Part I: macrophyte toxicity. Environmental Pollution 130 (2004) 371-383
(3) Benesch, J.A. et al., 2002. Investigation of effects of trifluoroacetate on vernal pool ecosystems. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 640-647.
Perfluorobutyric acid (CAS# 375-22-4):
Using available aquatic toxicity data, the freshwater PNEC was found to be 2.6 mg/L and the marine PNEC 0.26 mg/L. Acute results from testing perfluorobutyric acid were available for 12 species in at least three taxonomic groups and chronic for three species in two taxonomic groups. As per R.10, Table R.10-4 footnote (d): one can reduce the AF to 10 in cases where it is possible to determine with high probability that the most sensitive species has been examined, i.e. that a further long-term result (e.g. EC10 or NOEC) from a different taxonomic group would not be lower than the data already available. This is also appropriate because perfluorobutyric acid does not bioaccumulate (BCF reported as < 3 - 6 at the 0.02 mg/L exposure and < 28 at the 0.2 mg/L exposure in a BCF test with carp). P. subcapitata has an ErC50 nearly one order of magnitude lower than and a NOEC more than one order of magnitude lower than all other organisms tested, including the green alga C. vulgaris. This extreme sensitivity of P. subcapitata has been seen with other small chain pefluorinated acids (i.e. trifluoroacetic acid). An AF of 10 will be taken in this case due to the evidence from the large data set for this substance and the evidence for testing with trifluoroacetic acid. For the calculation of the Freshwater PNEC a 72-hour ErC10 value of 26 mg/L was obtained from a study with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. An AF of 10 was applied to this algae ErC10. There is no additional data available on marine taxonomic groups. An additional factor of 10 was applied to the Freshwater PNEC to derive the Marine Water PNEC. For the STP PNEC, a NOEC of 1000 mg/L was available for activated sludge respiration inhibition. An assessment factor of 10 was applied to the NOEC to derive a PNEC of 100 mg/L for STP. No test results for freshwater sediment were available. PNEC was extrapolated using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) with the freshwater PNEC. PNECsed = (0.783 + (0.0217 x Koc)) x PNECfreshwater, where the Koc was 1.0 L/kg and the freshwater PNEC was 2.6 mg/L. PNEC converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 4.6 = PNEC of 9.61 mg/kg dry wt. No test results for Marine Sediment were available. PNEC was extrapolated using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) with the marine PNEC. PNECmarinesed = (0.783 + (0.0217 x Koc)) x PNECmarinewater, where the Koc was 1.0 L/kg and the marine PNEC was 0.26 mg/L. PNEC converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 4.6 = PNEC of 0.961 mg/kg dry wt. No experimental data available on air. As this study is not a standard information requirement in REACH and there is no indication from the CSA on the need to investigate further the atmospheric compartment, no PNEC was derived. No test results for Soil were available. PNEC was extrapolated using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) including the freshwater PNEC, PNECsoil = (0.174 + (0.0104 x Koc)) x PNECwater, where the Koc was 1.0 L/kg and the freshwater PNEC was 2.6 mg/L. PNEC converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 1.13 = PNEC of 0.541 mg/kg dry weight. Although PFBA is not readily biodegradable, the bioconcentration factor was found to be < 28 in a laboratory study with fish. This substance is not considered bioaccumulative. Therefore, the PNEC oral is not applicable and was not derived.
Hydrogen fluoride (CAS# 7664-39-3):
Using available aquatic toxicity data (1) PNECs were calculated to be 0.4 mg/L for freshwater and 0.04 mg/L for marine water. Acute and chronic results were available for three taxonomic groups. For the calculation of the Freshwater PNEC a 21-day LC05 (equivalent to NOEC) of 4.0 mg/L was obtained from a study with Oncorhynchus mykiss. Therefore, an AF of 10 was applied to the fish NOEC, which is the lowest of the three long-term NOECs. Although there are acute data available for marine species, there are no chronic data and there is acute data available for only one additional taxa (mollusk). Therefore, the PNEC derived from the most sensitive chronic study conducted in freshwater is divided by 10 to derive the marine PNEC. For the STP PNEC, a NOEC of 510 mg/L was available for activated sludge respiration inhibition. An assessment factor of 10 was applied to the NOEC to derive a PNEC of 51 mg/L for STP. No test results for FW Sediment were available. PNEC was extrapolated using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) with the freshwater PNEC. PNECsed = (0.783 + (0.0217 x Koc)) x PNECfreshwater, where the Koc was 0.063 and the freshwater PNEC was 0.4 mg/L. PNEC converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 4.6 = PNEC of 1.44 mg/kg dry wt. No test results for Marine Sediment were available. PNEC was extrapolated using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM) with the marine PNEC. PNECmarinesed = (0.783 + (0.0217 x Koc)) x PNECmarinewater, where the Koc was 0.063 and the marine PNEC was 0.04 mg/L. PNEC converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 4.6 = PNEC of 0.144 mg/kg dry wt. A large data set of fumigation studies with vegetation was evaluated. Data from studies with a 7-month exposure period were used to derive the PNECair. The lowest value calculated as protective of vegetation was 0.2 ug/m³. Because of the large data set and the long exposure period, no application factor was applied to this protective value to derive the PNEC of 0.2 ug/m³. A great number of soil studies were available. Data from the most sensitive endpoints from long-term studies from three trophic levels were evaluated. An application factor of 10 was applied to the most sensitive NOEC of 106 mg/kg for soil microbe NO3 mineralization. PNEC converted to dry weight: (PNEC mg/kg ww) x 1.13 = PNEC of 12 mg/kg dry weight. HF is an inorganic acid and thus not considered PBT by the REACh criteria. Because this substance is an inorganic acid, and because the Kow value indicates low bioconcentration potential, secondary poisoning is not relevant. Log Kow = -1.4.
(1) European Chemicals Bureau European Union Risk Assessment: Hydrogen Fluoride, 2001.
Conclusion on classification
CAS# 297730-93-9:
CLP: Aquatic acute: Not classified - conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
M-factor acute: N/A
Aquatic Chronic 4
M-factor chronic: N/A
Ozone Depletion: CAS# 297730-93-9 is not listed in the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. It does not contain reactive halogens (chlorine or bromine) that could play a role in ozone depletion. It is not hazardous to the ozone layer. Conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
Trifluoroacetic acid degradation product (CAS# 76-05-1):
CLP: Aquatic acute: Not classified - conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
M-factor acute: N/A
Aquatic Chronic 3
M-factor chronic: N/A
Ozone Depletion: Trifluoroacetic acid is not listed in the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. It does not contain reactive halogens (chlorine or bromine) that could play a role in ozone depletion. TFA is not hazardous to the ozone layer. Conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
Perfluorobutyric acid degradation product (CAS# 375-22-4):
CLP: Aquatic acute: Not classified - conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
M-factor: N/A
Aquatic chronic: Not classified - conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
M-factor: N/A
Ozone depletion: Perfluorobutyric acid is not listed in the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. It does not contain reactive halogens (chlorine or bromine) that could play a role in ozone depletion. HF is not hazardous to the ozone layer. Conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
Hydrogen fluoride degradation product (CAS# 7664-39-3):
CLP: Aquatic acute: Not classified - conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
M factor acute: N/A
Aquatic chronic: Not classified - conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
Ozone Depletion: HF is not listed in the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. It does not contain reactive halogens (chlorine or bromine) that could play a role in ozone depletion. HF is not hazardous to the ozone layer. Conclusive although not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.