Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 223-773-8 | CAS number: 4066-02-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Well documented bacterial reverse mutation assay, conducted not in accordance with current guideline. However, it is in accordance with OECD guideline 471 as adopted 1983-05-26. There were only four strains tested, and spacing of test concentration was greater than 10exp(1/2). However, these deficiencies are considered to be minor as the fifth strain was added to the guideline because the former common four strains may not detect certain oxidising mutagens, cross-linking agents and hydrazines. Based on the chemical structure, this mode of action is not to be expected from the test item. There was no dose-dependent and biologically relevant increase of the mutant figures to the double of the negative controls. Actually, there was no increase in the mutant frequency in any of the tester strains at all, leading to the conclusion that any variation of the testing method could not lead to the observation of any mutagenic effect.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 991
- Report date:
- 1991
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- as adopted 1983-05-26
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- B14, as set out in EEC Directive 84/449/EEC
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2'-Methylene-bis-(6-cyclohexyl-4-methylphenol)
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2'-Methylene-bis-(6-cyclohexyl-4-methylphenol)
- Reference substance name:
- Phenol, 2,2'-methylenebis(6-cyclohexyl-4-methyl)-
- IUPAC Name:
- Phenol, 2,2'-methylenebis(6-cyclohexyl-4-methyl)-
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2,2'-Methylene-bis-(6-cyclohexyl-4-methylphenol) or Phenol, 2,2'-methylenebis(6-cyclohexyl-4-methyl)-
- Substance type: pure substance
- Analytical purity: 97.2%
- Purity test date: 1990-08-22
- Lot/batch No.: H7208886 (sample No. 019900/1990)
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 1992-01-25
- Stability under test conditions: A stability test in the solvent did not detect a relevant change in the percent active ingredient.
- Storage condition of test material: refrigerator
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Target gene:
- his-
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: pKM 101 in TA100 and TA98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- induced S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 8, 40, 200, 1000, 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol (test item); DMSO (positive controls)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The used solvent was chosen out of the following solvents, in the order given: water, methanol, ethanol, acetone, DMSO, DMF, and ethylene glycol dimethylether according to information given by the internal sponsor.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- vehicle
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- other: nitrofuranthion; 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine, 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- sodium azide 10 µg/plate (only TA1535), nitrofuranthion 0.2 µg/plate (only TA100), 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine 10 µg/plate (only TA1537) / 0.5 µg/plate (only TA98), 2-aminoanthracene 3 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 sec
- Exposure duration: 48 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 48 h
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): his-negative agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 4 plates per strain, dose, ± S9
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The toxicity of the substance was assessed in three ways. The first was a gross appraisal of background growth on the plates for mutant determination. If a reduction in background growth was observed, it was indicated in the tables by the letter "b" after the mutant count. Where only a single "b", without any other values, is noted for a concentration, this "b" represents four plates with background growth. (The same applies to the signs "c", "v", "p", "n" or "%", which may also be used in the tables.) Secondly, a toxic effect of the substance was assumed when there was a marked and dose-dependent reduction in the mutant count per plate, compared to the negative controls. Thirdly, the titer was determined. Total bacterial counts were taken on two plates for each concentration studied with S9 mix. However, if an evaluation was performed only without S9 mix, the bacterial count was taken without S9 mix. - Evaluation criteria:
- A reproducible and dose-related increase in mutant counts of at least one strain is considered to be a positive result. For TA 1535, TA 100 and TA 98 this increase should be about twice the amount of negative controls, whereas for TA 1537, at least a threefold increase should be reached. Otherwise, the result is evaluated as negative. However, these guidelines may be overruled by good scientific judgement. In case of questionable results, investigations should continue, possibly with modifications, until a final evaluation is possible.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At 1000 µg/plate, the substance started to precipitate.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Doses >200 µg/plate had a weak, strain-specific bacteriotoxic effect. Nevertheless, these doses could be used for assessment up to and including 5000 µg/plate. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Testing for mutagenicity in bacteria was performed according to OECD guideline 471 as adopted 1983-05-26. Although not being conducted to recent guidelines, the test was conducted scientifically reasonable with negligible deficiencies. Also, the testing was sufficiently documented, positive and negative controls gave the appropriate response. Hence, the results can be considered as sufficiently relieable to assess the mutagenic potential of 2,2'-Methylene-bis-(6-cyclohexyl-4-methylphenol) in bacteria. A dose-dependent and biologically relevant increase of the mutant figures to the double of the negative controls could not be observed with any of the four strains used. This applied to the examinations with and without the S-9 mix. In consequence, 2,2'-Methylene-bis-(6-cyclohexyl-4-methylphenol) is considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. - Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria (OECD 471), histidine-auxotrophic strains TA1535, TA100, TA1537 and TA98 of S. typhimurium were exposed to 2,2'-Methylene-bis-(6-cyclohexyl-4-methylphenol) in ethanol at concentrations of 0, 8, 40, 200, 1000, 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation (induced S9) via plate co-incubation.
2,2'-Methylene-bis-(6-cyclohexyl-4-methylphenol) was tested up to limit concentration 5000 µg/plate. The positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains. There was no evidence or a concentration related positive response of induced mutant colonies over background.
Doses up to and including 200 µg/plate did not cause any bacteriotoxic effects: Total bacteria counts remained unchanged and no inhibition of growth was observed. At higher doses, the substance had a weak, strain-specific bacteriotoxic effect, so that this range could nevertheless be used for assessment purposes. Substance precipitation occurred at the dose 1000 µg/plate and above.
This study is classified as acceptable. This study satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline OECD 471 (as adopted 1983-05-26) for in vitro mutagenicity (bacterial reverse gene mutation) data with minor deviations from the recent Guideline.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
