Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-418-9 | CAS number: 10149-98-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: screening tests
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- The supporting QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 C (Ready Biodegradability: Modified MITI Test (I))
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The data is predicted using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logKow as the primary descriptor.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (IUPAC name): 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid
- Molecular formula : C18H16N4O12S3
- Molecular weight : 576.538 g/mol
- Smiles notation : O=C(O)C1=NN(C(=O)[C@@H]1\N=N\c1ccc(S(=O)(=O)CCOS(=O)(=O)O)cc1)c1ccc(S(=O)(=O)O)cc1
- InChl : 1S/C18H16N4O12S3/c23-17-15(16(18(24)25)21-22(17)12-3-7-14(8-4-12)36(28,29)30)20-19-11-1-5-13(6-2-11)35(26,27)10-9-34-37(31,32)33/h1-8,15H,9-10H2,(H,24,25)(H,28,29,30)(H,31,32,33)/b20-19+
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- other: Microorganisms
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Based on:
- not specified
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- other: BOD
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: BOD
- Value:
- 4.137
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Other details not known
- Details on results:
- Test substance undergoes 4.137% degradation by BOD in 28 days.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid was estimated to be not readily biodegradable in water.
- Executive summary:
Biodegradability of 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (CAS no. 10149 -98 -1) is predicted using QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logKow as the primary descriptor. Test substance undergoes 4.137% degradation by BOD in 28 days. Thus, based on percentage degradation, the test chemical 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid was estimated to be not readily biodegradable in water.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: BOD
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 8 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" )
and "f" )
and "g" )
and ("h"
and (
not "i")
)
)
and ("j"
and (
not "k")
)
)
and ("l"
and (
not "m")
)
)
and ("n"
and "o" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Vinyl Sulfones by US-EPA New
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acid moiety OR Amides OR
Hydrazines by Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Direct
Acylation Involving a Leaving group OR Acylation >> Direct Acylation
Involving a Leaving group >> Acetates OR SN2 OR SN2 >> SN2 reaction at
sp3 carbon atom OR SN2 >> SN2 reaction at sp3 carbon atom >> Alkyl diazo
by Protein binding by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Schiff base formation OR Schiff
base formation >> Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones derivatives OR Schiff
base formation >> Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones derivatives >>
Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3 ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion
formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo OR SN1 >>
Nitrenium Ion formation >> Unsaturated heterocyclic azo by DNA binding
by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as days - weeks by Biodeg primary
(Biowin 4) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Does NOT Biodegrade Fast by
Biodeg probability (Biowin 1) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not categorized by Repeated dose
(HESS)
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Benzene/ Naphthalene sulfonic
acids (Less susceptible) Rank C OR Hydrazines (Hemolytic anemia with
methemoglobinemia) Rank B OR Hydrazines (Hepatotoxicity) Rank C by
Repeated dose (HESS)
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic compound AND Carbonic
acid derivative AND Carboxylic acid derivative AND Heterocyclic compound
AND Sulfonic acid AND Sulfonic acid derivative AND Sulfuric acid
derivative AND Sulfuric acid monoester by Organic functional groups,
Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acetal OR Alkyl chloride OR
Alkyl fluoride OR Alkyl halide by Organic functional groups, Norbert
Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH]
AND Aliphatic Carbon [CH] AND Aliphatic Carbon [-CH2-] AND Aliphatic
Nitrogen, one aromatic attach [-N] AND Amide, aliphatic attach [-C(=O)N]
AND Amino, aliphatic attach [-N<] AND Amino-carbonyl compound
[NCC(=O)-C] AND Aromatic Carbon [C] AND Azo [-N=N-] AND Azomethine,
aliphatic attach [-N=C] AND Carbonyl, aliphatic attach [-C(=O)-] AND
Carbonyl, olefinic attach [-C(=O)-] AND Hydrazine [>N-N<] AND Hydroxy,
sulfur attach [-OH] AND Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) AND
Nitrogen, two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] AND Olefinic carbon [=CH- or
=C<] AND Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} AND Sulfate, linear [-O-SO2-O-] AND
Sulfinic acid [-S(=O)OH] AND Sulfite, linear [-OS(=O)O-] AND Sulfonate,
aromatic attach [-SO2-O] AND Sulfonic [SO2(-OH)-O] by Organic functional
groups (US EPA)
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as -CO-N-CO five member ring (not
pyrroledione) OR Cyclic ester by Organic functional groups (US EPA)
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of Molecular weight which is >= 218
Da
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of Molecular weight which is <= 605
Da
Description of key information
Biodegradability of 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (CAS no. 10149 -98 -1) is predicted using QSAR toolbox version 3.3 (2017) with logKow as the primary descriptor. Test substance undergoes 4.137% degradation by BOD in 28 days. Thus, based on percentage degradation, the test chemical 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid was estimated to be not readily biodegradable in water.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
Additional information
Various predicted data for the target compound 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (CAS No. 10149-98-1) and supporting weight of evidence studies for its structurally similar read across substance were reviewed for the biodegradation end point which are summarized as below:
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logKow as the primary descriptor, percentage biodegradability of test chemical4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid(CAS No. 10149-98-1) was estimated.Test substance undergoes 4.137% degradation by BOD in 28 days. Thus, based on percentage degradation, the test chemical4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acidwas estimated to be not readily biodegradable in water.
In another prediction using the Estimation Programs Interface Suite (EPI suite, 2017), the biodegradation potential of the test compound,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid(CAS No. 10149-98-1) in the presence of mixed populations of environmental microorganisms was estimated.The biodegradability of the substance was calculated using seven different models such as Linear Model, Non-Linear Model, Ultimate Biodegradation Timeframe, Primary Biodegradation Timeframe, MITI Linear Model, MITI Non-Linear Model and Anaerobic Model (called as Biowin 1-7, respectively) of the BIOWIN v4.10 software. The results indicate that chemical4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acidis expected to be not readily biodegradable.
In a supporting weight of evidence study from peer reviewed journal (Yasuhide TONOGAI et. al; 1978) for the read across chemical Trisodium 5-hydroxy-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-4-(4-sulphophenylazo)pyrazole-3-carboxylate (CAS no. 1934-21-0),biodegradation study was conducted under aerobic conditions for evaluating the percentage biodegradability of read across substance Trisodium 5-hydroxy-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-4-(4-sulphophenylazo)pyrazole-3-carboxylate (CAS no. 1934-21-0). Activated sludge was used as a test inoculum obtained from the municipal sewage treatment plant, Nakahama, Osaka. The return sludge was acclimated to the synthetic sewage for a week or longer, and it was used for the aerobic and anaerobic decomposition experiments. Synthetic sewage was prepared by dissolving Glucose, peptone and potassium dihydrogen phosphate, 30g each, in 1 liter water and the pH was adjusted to pH 7.0 with sodium hydroxide. Concentration of inoculum used for the study was3000 mg/l. Percentage degradation of chemical was determined by measuring the absorbance (test material analysis), oxygen uptake and BOD parameter. For the aerobic decomposition of dyes with sludge, 250 ml of O.03 M dye solution was added to 750ml of sludge (MLSS ca, 3,000 ppm), and bubbled with air sufficiently at 20°C. 5ml sample was taken out once a day. After sampling 5ml of synthetic sewage was added to the mixture. Each sample was filtered through filter paper and diluted twenty times prior to the spectrophotometric measurement at the absorption maximum within the visible range. The decrease of dyes concentration was expressed in terms of percent to the initial absorption whereas measurement oxygen uptake by sludge involve 2.0 ml of sludge, 0.2 ml of 1,000 ppm dye solution, and O.2 ml of 20% potassium hydroxide were pipetted into the vessel, the side arm and central well, respectively. The sludge and the dye solution were mixed and the vessel was shaken at 25"C. The oxygen uptake was measured. The oxygen uptake by sludge alone was subtracted from the dye addition. For determining the BOD values, test chemical solutions (10, 20 and 40 ppm) were prepared with the seeded dilution water and kept at 20°C. The dissolved oxygen contents were then measured by using a dissolved oxygen meter. The percentage degradation of test chemical Trisodium 5-hydroxy-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-4-(4-sulphophenylazo)pyrazole-3-carboxylatewas determined to be 20% in 10 days by using the test material analysis parameter. From the oxygen uptake by Warburg’s manometer, the low activity of the sludge to dye was obtained and by using the dissolved oxygen meter, the dissolved oxygen contents on the 5th day were essentially the same to initial ones. Thus, based on percentage degradation, the chemical Trisodium 5-hydroxy-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-4-(4-sulphophenylazo)pyrazole-3-carboxylatewas considered to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
Another biodegradation study was conducted for evaluating the percentage biodegradation of the same read across chemical C. I. Acid Yellow 23 (CAS no. 1934-21-0) (from peer reviewed journal Glenn M. Shaul et. al; 1991 and secondary source Glenn M. Shaul et. al; 1988). The study was carried out in pilot activated sludge process system using several wastewater and mixed liquor at a temperature of 21-25°C and pH range of 7.0-8.0, respectively. Mass balance calculations were made to determine the amount of the dye compound in the waste activated sludge (WAS) and in the activated sludge effluent (ASE). Activated sludge was used as test inoculum for the study. Test chemical conc. used for the study was 1 and 5 mg/l, respectively. Screened raw wastewater from the Greater Cincinnati Mill Creek Sewage Treatment Plant was used as the influent (INF) to three pilot-scale activated sludge biological treatment systems (two experimental and one control) operated in parallel. Each system consisted of a primary clarifier (33 L), complete-mix aeration basin (200 L), and a secondary clarifier (32 L). Each water soluble dye was dosed as commercial product to the screened raw wastewater for the two experimental systems operated in parallel at targeted active ingredient doses of 1 and 5 mg/L of influent flow (low and high spike systems, respectively).All systems were operated for at least three times. All samples were 24 hr composites made up of 6 grab samples collected every 4 hr and stored at 4°C study. The possible removal mechanisms for a dye compound in the ASP system include adsorption, biodegradation, chemical transformation, photodegradation, and air stripping. Dye analytical recovery studies were conducted by dosing the purified dye compound into organic-free water, influent wastewater, and mixed liquor. These studies were run in duplicate and each recovery study was repeated at least once to ensure that the dye compound could be extracted. Purified dye standards were analytically prepared from the commercial dye product by repeated recrystallization. The INF, primary effluent (PE), and ASE were filtered, and the filtrate was passed through a column packed with resin. The filter paper and resin were soaked in an ammonia-acetonitrile solution and then Soxhlet extracted with ammonia-acetonitrile. The extract was concentrated and brought up to 50 mL volume with a methanol/dimethylformamide solution. The mixed liquor (ML) samples were separated into two components, the filtrate or soluble (SOL) fraction and the residue (RES) fraction. The SOL fraction was processed similar to the INF, PE, and ASE samples. The RES fraction and the filter paper were processed similar to these samples but the resin adsorption step was omitted. All extracted samples were analyzed by HPLC with an ultraviolet-visible detector. Total suspended solids (TSS) analyses were also performed on the INF, PE, ML, and ASE samples. Percentage recovery of chemical C. I. Acid Yellow 23was determined to be 103-107%,thus, it appeared that little or no chemical transformation occurred for test chemical because of contact with the variable wastewater and/or sludge matrix under these conditions. Also it was evaluated that the chemical C. I. Acid Yellow 23 was adsorbed at a level of˂1% on the ML solids, indicating that the compound was substantially untreated by the activated sludge process (ASP). Thus, based on %recovery of test chemical, chemical C. I. Acid Yellow 23 was can be considered to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
On the basis of above results for target chemical 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (from OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and EPI suite, 2017) and for its read across substance (from peer reviewed journals and secondary source), it can be concluded that the test substance 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-4-[[4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-1-(4-sulphophenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid can be expected to be not readily biodegradable in nature.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.