Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-993-5 | CAS number: 90-43-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
Skin sensitisation
Two key studies for skin sensitisation are available for the registered substance 2-phenylphenol (OPP).
The first key study (Gilbert, K. S., 1994b and Bomhard, E. M. et al., 2002) was conducted according to the OECD Guideline 406 (Buehler Test) but with few deviations. 10 male Hartley albino guinea pigs (357 – 411 g bw) received three dermal applications of 0.4 g of OPP moistened with 0.2 mL of distilled water during the three-week induction period. This concentration of OPP was shown in a preliminary skin irritation screen to cause slight irritation. Another ten guinea pigs received a 10% solution of DER 331 epoxy resin in dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether as a positive control. Guinea pigs were challenged with 0.4 mL of a 7.5% aqueous suspension of OPP (highest non-irritating dose) two weeks after the last induction application. Five naïve animals each also received an identical challenge application with 0.4 mL of a 7.5% aqueous suspension of OPP or 0.4 mL of a 10% solution of DER 331 epoxy resin. Each induction/challenge exposure was 6 h in duration. The challenge application sites did not show any evidence of erythema in the ten animals nor did any of the naïve animals have any signs of irritation. Challenge application with the positive control caused slight to moderate erythema, considered to reflect a hypersensitivity response, at the test site on 9 of 10 animals, with no effect noted in the corresponding naïve animals. Thus, OPP is not sensitising to guinea pigs under the conditions of this test.
The second key study (Andersen, K. E., 1986 and Bomhard, E. M. et al., 2002) was conducted similar to the OECD Guideline 406 (Guinea Pig Maximization Test). The sensitising potential of seven industrial antimicrobial agents (including OPP) was evaluated using out-bred female albino guinea pigs (350-450 g). Propylene glycol was used as a vehicle. Moderately irritant concentrations were assessed in an irritancy test on a maximum of 4 guinea pigs and used for the topical inductions. For the challenge a non-irritant concentration and dilutions thereof were used. 20 guinea pigs were assigned to the test group and 20 animals were used as controls and treated with vehicle only. For challenge exposure, the control animals were challenged with the highest non-irritant challenge concentration. The concentrations in vehicle were 0.5% or 5% for the intradermal induction (Day 0) and 25% for the topical induction (Day 7), for both compounds. The challenge was done on day 21 with a 5% concentration. Blind reading of challenge reactions was done at 48 and 72 h. The Magnusson-Kligman grading scale was used to evaluate the challenge reactions. A grade 1 reaction was not regarded as sensitisation. OPP did not induce skin reactions in any of the animals tested and was therefore considered to be not sensitising to guinea pigs under the conditions of this test.
Further skin sensitisation data are available for the registered substance. A Buehler Test resulted in non-sensitising properties for OPP (Berdasco, N. M., 1991 and Bomhard, E. M. et al., 2002) and a study with 200 human volunteers revealed that OPP was not sensitising in the human patch test (Hodge, H. C. et al., 1952 and Bomhard, E. M. et al., 2002).
In conclusion, 2-phenylphenol was not sensitising to the rabbits’ skin and to humans’ skin in several studies and therefore does not meet the criteria to be classified for skin sensitisation according to EU Directive 67/548/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Migrated from Short description of key information:
GPMT, similar to OECD 406: not sensitising
Buehler Test, OECD 406: not sensitising
Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
Hazard assessment is based on information from two different studies; both were considered as key studies as both studies are reliable and of good quality, but represent different study types.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data for the registered substance, 2-phenylphenol does not meet the criteria to be classified for skin sensitisation according to EU Directive 67/548/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
No data are available for the assessment of respiratory sensitisation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.