Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 262-538-4 | CAS number: 60958-41-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the reproductive toxicity was estimated for 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) . NOAEL was estimated to be 865.47mg/kg bw. When male and female wistar rats were exposed with 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) orally.
Thus, based on the predictions on 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) and its functionaly similar read across substance FD & C RED NO. 40(25956-17-6). It was considered that NOAEL value betwwen 865.4 -1000mg/kg bw . Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to reproduction
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 and the QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction was done using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3, 2017
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- No data available
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: p-[4,5-dihydro-4-[[2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]azo]-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H-pyrazol-1-yl] benzenesulphonic acid or Reactive Yellow 15 free acid
- IUPAC name: 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid
- Molecular formula: C20H22N4O11S3
- Molecular weight: 590.609 g/mol
- Smiles : O=S(=O)(OCCS(=O)(=O)c1c(cc(\N=N\[C@@H]2C(=O)N(c3ccc(S(=O)(=O)O)cc3)N=C2C)c(OC)c1)C)O
- Inchl: 1S/C20H22N4O11S3/c1-12-10-16(17(34-3)11-18(12)36(26,27)9-8-35-38(31,32)33)21-22-19-13(2)23-24(20(19)25)14-4-6-15(7-5-14)37 (28,29)30/h4-7,10-11,19H,8-9H2,1-3H3,(H,28,29,30)(H,31,32,33)/b22-21+
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- No data available
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other:
- Details on exposure:
- No data available
- Details on mating procedure:
- No data available
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 40 to 55 days males: 2 weeks premating and during matingfemales: 2 weeks premating, during mating, gestation and 4 days lactation
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily, 7 days/week
- Details on study schedule:
- No data available
- Dose / conc.:
- 865.47 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Positive control:
- No data available
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- No data available
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- No data available
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- No data available
- Litter observations:
- No data available
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- No data available
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- No data available
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Reproductive indices:
- No data available
- Offspring viability indices:
- No data available
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 865.47 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other: no effects observed on reproductive performance
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 865.47 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Remarks on result:
- other: No developmental toxic effects was observed
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In reproductive toxicity study, NOAEL was estimated to be 865.47mg/kg bw. When male and female wistar rats were exposed with 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) orally.
- Executive summary:
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the reproductive toxicity was estimated for 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0), NOAEL was estimated to be 865.47mg/kg bw. When male and female wistar rats were exposed with 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) orally.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: NOAEL
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 7 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" )
and ("f"
and (
not "g")
)
)
and "h" )
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and ("k"
and "l" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Vinyl Sulfones by US-EPA New
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Schiff base formation AND Schiff
base formation >> Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones derivatives AND Schiff
base formation >> Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones derivatives >>
Pyrazolones and Pyrazolidinones by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acid moiety OR Amides OR
Hydrazines by Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Direct
Acylation Involving a Leaving group OR Acylation >> Direct Acylation
Involving a Leaving group >> Acetates OR SN2 OR SN2 >> SN2 reaction at
sp3 carbon atom OR SN2 >> SN2 reaction at sp3 carbon atom >> Alkyl diazo
by Protein binding by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion
formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo OR SN1 >>
Nitrenium Ion formation >> Unsaturated heterocyclic azo by DNA binding
by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not classified by Oncologic
Primary Classification
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Anhydride Type Compounds OR
Aromatic Amine Type Compounds OR Arylazo Type Compounds OR Halogenated
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Type Compounds OR Phenol Type Compounds by
Oncologic Primary Classification
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes AND Aryl AND Azo
AND Ether AND Pyrazolone AND Sulfate AND Sulfone AND Sulfonic acid AND
Unsaturated heterocyclic amine AND Unsaturated heterocyclic fragment by
Organic Functional groups ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non-Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Metalloids by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -5.49
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 6.4
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 865.47 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimicsh 2 and from QSAR Toolbox 3.3. (2017)
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Reproductive toxicity
In different studies, 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) has been investigated for reproductive toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0).The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies performed on structurally similar read across substance.
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the reproductive toxicity was estimated for 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) NOAEL was estimated to be 865.47mg/kg bw. When male and female wistar rats were exposed with 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) orally.
It is supported by experimental study conducted by T. F. X. COLLINS, T. N. BLACK, J. J. WELSH and L. H. BROWN (Fd Chem. Toxic. Vol. 27, No. 11, pp. 707-713. 1989)on functionally similar read across substance FD & C RED NO. 40 (25956-17-6).The reproductive and developmental toxicity study of FD & C RED NO. 40(25956-17-6) was performed on male and female Osborne-Mendel rats. The test material was dissolved in distilled water (w/v). Fresh solutions were prepared daily. The dose concentration of 0, 30, 75, 150, 300, 600 or 1000mg/kg/day was administered by oral gavage route in volume 1ml/100g body weight .On mating days , two females were randomly mated with one male at approximately 4.30pm. The following morning, a vaginal smear was obtained from each female to determine whether copulation had taken place. Sperm positive dams were considered to be at day 0 of gestation. 42-43 female/dose groups were used. All the animals were observed for signs of toxicity. The rats were weighed daily and food consumption was measured weekly. Water intake was not measured. On day 20 of gestation, the females were examined for gross abnormalities for the last time before being killed by CO, asphyxiation. Caesarean sections were performed. Corpora lutea were counted. The uterus was opened and examined in situ. The uterine positions of all implantation sites were noted and their condition (early or late resorptions, living or dead foetuses) was determined. Each live foetus was promptly weighed, sexed and examined for gross external malformations, and the crown-rump length was measured. Any foetus that weighed less than 70% of the average weight of the concurrent male or female controls was considered to be a runt. Approximately one-half of the foetuses were fixed in alcohol, stained with Alizarin Red S and examined under a dissecting microscope for all skeletal variations. The remaining half of the foetuses were fixed in Bouin's solution, serially sectioned by razor blade and examined under a dissecting microscope for internal variations of the soft tissues.
No unusual behaviours were observed in the animals during the study. The external maternal findings were unremarkable. One female in the group given 300mg/kg died at day 12 of gestation as a result of gavage difficulties unrelated to dosage. Initial body weight at day 0 and maternal body-weight gain during gestation were similar in all groups. Mean food consumption on days 0-7, 7-14, 14 -20 and 0-20 by the treated animals was similar to that of the control animals. The pregnancy rate ranged from 85.71 to 95.35% with no evidence of dose correlation.
The mean numbers of corpora lutea and implants per female were similar in all groups. No litters were totally resorbed. The mean number of viable foetuses per female was similar in all groups. The number of viable male foetuses was increased over the control value in the groups given 30 and 1000mg/kg, but because of the lack of relation to dosage, these increases were considered to be random. The number of viable female foetuses was not affected in any group. The number of early deaths per litter and the number of early plus late deaths per litter were greatest in the 600 mg/kg group, but these appeared to be random occurrences. The percentage of females with at least one resorption was similar in all groups. The percentage of females given 600mg/kg that had at least two resorptions was significantly greater than the percentage in the control females, but there was no dose related effect in the percentage of females with at least two resorptions. Mean foetal weights of males and females and crown rump lengths were similar in all groups. The number of litters with runts was similar in all groups. Aside from haemorrhages present in foetuses in all groups in similar numbers, there were no other external variations in any of the dosed groups. Two foetuses had multiple anomalies: one foetus from the control group had a club foot, a short tail and four digits on the hind legs, and one foetus from the 150-mg/kg group had exencephalus and hydrocephalus. Three foetuses in a single litter of a female given 75 mg/kg were oedematous. No dose-related increase in sternebral variations was seen among the foetuses with reduced ossification, bipartite, missing, malaligned or fused sternebrae,nor in the numbers of litters containing these foetuses. The incidence of specific skeletal variations was similar in all groups of foetuses, except for a significant increase in the incidence of 14th rib bud in foetuses from the 300 mg/kg group which was considered to be a random occurrence. Hence the NOAEL was considered to be 1000mg/kg bw as no effects on reproductive performance and developmental of fetus was observed, when Osborne-Mendel male and female rats were treated with FD & C RED NO. 40(25956-17-6) orally in 20 days.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) and its functionaly similar read across substance FD & C RED NO. 40(25956-17-6). It was considered that no adverse effects on reproductive parameter were observed. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation 4-{4-[(E)-2-{2-methoxy-5-methyl-4-[2-(sulfooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl]-3-methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl} benzene-1-sulfonic acid (60958-41-0) cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.