Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-528-7 | CAS number: 142-22-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16 MAR 2020 - 03 SEPT 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 21. Jul. 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Diallyl 2,2'-oxydiethyl dicarbonate
- EC Number:
- 205-528-7
- EC Name:
- Diallyl 2,2'-oxydiethyl dicarbonate
- Cas Number:
- 142-22-3
- Molecular formula:
- C12H18O7
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-({[2-(2-{[(prop-2-en-1-yloxy)carbonyl]oxy}ethoxy)ethoxy]carbonyl}oxy)prop-1-ene
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: uvrB- (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537); rfa- (all)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9 : S9 was obtained by Trinova Biochem GmbH, Gießen (Batch nos. 4183, 4053, 4120, 4063, 4126, produced from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats which were treated with 500 mg Aroclor 1254/kg body weight intraperitoneally)
- method of preparation of S9 mix:
Phosphate buffer 22.5 mL
0.1M NADP-solution 1.0 mL
1M G6P-solution 0.125 mL
Salt solution 0.5 mL
Rat liver S9 1.0 mL
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium : 500 µL S9-mix / plate
- quality controls of S9: each batch of S9 is characterized with a mutagen that requires metabolic activation by microsomal enzymes (e.g., benzo(a)pyrene). - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Plate incorporation:
without metabolic activation: 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.15 and 0.05 µL/plate, highest as recommended in the guideline, spacing factor of 3.16 with metabolic activation: TA1535, TA1537: 1.5, 0.5, 0.15, 0.05, 0.015, 0.005, 0.0015 µL/plate and TA98, TA100, TA102: 0.5, 0.15, 0.05, 0.015, 0.005, 0.0015, 0.0005 µL/plate, lowest toxic concentration of the initial experiment will be chosen as highest concentration.
Pre-incubation:
without metabolic activation: 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.63, 0.31, 0.16, 0.08 µL/plate, highest as recommended in the guideline, spacing factor of 2 with metabolic activation: TA98, TA102, TA1535, TA1537: 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.063, 0.031, 0.016, 0.008 µL/plate, TA100: 0.15, 0.075, 0.0375, 0.0188, 0.0094, 0.0047, 0.0023 µL/plate, lowest toxic concentration of the initial experiment will be chosen as highest concentration, spacing factor of 2. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: In a non-GLP pre-test, the solubility of the test item was determined in demineralised water and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The test item is soluble at a concentration of 50 mL/L in DMSO. Based on the results of the non-GLP pre-test, DMSO will be used as solvent in the experiments.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene Diamine, 2-Amino-Anthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments: 5 (1, 1b, 1c, 2, 2b )
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added: in agar (plate incorporation) - Exp. 1; preincubation - Exp. 2
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48h
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): After incubation for 48 hours, the number of revertants is counted and the numbers for each plate are recorded.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background growth inhibition
- Rationale for test conditions:
- Lowest toxic concentration in cultures with metabolic activation of the initial experiment were chosen as highest concentration, due to OECD guideline 471 requirements at least five non-toxic concentrations were analysed
- Evaluation criteria:
- A result is considered as positive if a clear and dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the concentrations occurs in at least one tester strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
- if in the bacteria strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 the number of revertants is at least twice as high than the reversion rate of the negative controls (increase factor of at least 2)
- if in the bacteria strains TA 1535 and TA 1537 the number of revertants is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the negative controls (increase factor of at least 3).
A substance is not mutagenic if it does not meet the criteria above. If the criteria listed above are not clearly met, the results are assessed as equivocal and will be discussed. - Statistics:
- not performed
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation and time of the determination: Plates were checked for precipitation of the test item at the end of the incubation period by visual inspection: In all experiments, no precipitation of the test item Diallyl 2,2'-oxydiethyl dicarbonate was observed at any of the tested concentrations up to 5 µL/plate.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity : Yes, in the presence of metabolic activation:
Exp. 1:
5 µL/plate: TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
1.5 µL/plate: TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
0.5 µL/plate: A98, TA100, TA102, TA1537
Exp. 1c:
1.5 µL/plate: TA1535, TA1537
0.5 µL/plate: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537
0.15 µL/plate: TA102
Exp. 2:
0.5 µL/plate: TA98, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
0.25 µL/plate: TA98, TA102, TA1535
Any other information on results incl. tables
see results in tabular form in the attachment
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study it is concluded that Diallyl 2,2'-oxydiethyl dicarbonate is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 in the absence and presence of metabolic activation under the experimental conditions of the present study.
- Executive summary:
This study was performed in order to evaluate the mutagenic potential of Diallyl 2,2'-oxydiethyl dicarbonatein the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test using five strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537), based on the most recent Guideline OECD 471 and EU Method B.13/14 in compliance with GLP.
Five experiments (1, 1b, 1c, 2 and 2b) were performed in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation (±S9). The experiments 1, 1b and 1c were performed by using the plate incorporation method while for the experiments 2 and 2b the pre-incubation method was applied. Experiment 1 showed cytotoxicity in the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 with metabolic activation and was invalid for TA102 (-S9), experiment 1b was invalid for all bacterial strains due to contamination of the bacterial culture and experiment 2 was invalid for TA102 (-S9).
In the first experiment, the test item (dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) was tested up to concentrations of 5 µL/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix in the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 using the plate incorporation method.
The test item showed no precipitates on the plates at any of the concentrations. Cytotoxicity of the test item could be observed in the presence of metabolic activation, however, in the lower concentrations, no signs of toxicity could be observed.
The results of this experiment showed that none of the tested non-toxic concentrations showed a significant increase in the number of revertants in all tested strains, in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation. For TA102 (-S9) experiment 1 was invalid as the positive control did not meet the acceptance criteria. To achieve the required number of analyzable non-toxic concentrations for the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 with metabolic activation and a valid experiment for TA102 without metabolic activation, experiment 1 was repeated.
The repetition was performed with additional test item concentrations for the strains to which the test item showed a toxic effect and exactly as experiment 1 for TA102 without metabolic activation. Experiment 1b was invalid due to a contamination of the bacterial culture and the experiment 1c was performed with the following concentrations:
- TA102 (-S9): 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.15, 0.05 µL/plate
- TA1535, TA1537 (+S9): 1.5, 0.5, 0.15, 0.05, 0.015, 0.005, 0.0015 µL/plate
- TA98, TA100, TA102 (+S9): 0.5, 0.15, 0.05, 0.015, 0.005, 0.0015, 0.0005 µL/plate
The test item showed no precipitates on the plates and the bacterial background lawn was not affected at any of the test item concentrations. Some cytotoxicity was observed in the presence of metabolic activation and in the lower concentrations, no signs of toxicity could be observed.
Therefore, the number of analyzable non-toxic concentrations was sufficient. The positive control data met the acceptance criteria for all tested bacterial strains. No significant increase of the number of revertant colonies in the treatments with and without metabolic activation could be observed and the experiment 1c was assessed to be valid.
Based on the results of the first experiments (1 and 1c), the test item was tested with the following concentrations in experiment 2:
- TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537 (-S9): 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.63, 0.31, 0.16, 0.08 µL/plate
- TA98, TA102, TA1535, TA1537 (+S9): 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.063, 0.031, 0.016, 0.008 µL/plate
- TA100 (+S9): 0.15, 0.075, 0.0375, 0.0188, 0.0094, 0.0047, 0.0023 µL/plate
Experiment 2 was performed by using the pre-incubation method. The test item showed no precipitates on the plates at any of the test item concentrations. Some cytotoxicity could be observed in the presence of metabolic activation, however, the results of this experiments showed that the test item caused no increase in the number of revertants in all bacterial strains compared to the solvent control, in both the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
For TA102 without metabolic activation experiment 2 was invalid as the positive control did not meet the acceptance criteria. To achieve a valid experiment for TA102 in the absence of metabolic activationexperiment 2 was repeated under the same conditions (experiment 2b). No signs of cytotoxicity could be observed. The positive control met the acceptance criteria and thus, results obtained with the test item are valid for TA102 in the absence of metabolic activation.
The results of this experiments showed that the test item caused no increase in the number of revertants in strain TA102 in the absence of metabolic activation compared to the solvent control DMSO.
Based on the results of this study it is concluded that Diallyl 2,2'-oxydiethyl dicarbonate is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 in the presence and absence of metabolic activation under the experimental conditions of this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.