Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-800-2 | CAS number: 9025-57-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Xylanase is not an reproductive toxicant.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 21 July 2015 to 08 January 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- The study was performed according to OECD test guideline no. 422 (1996), and in compliance with GLP. The purpose of the study was to satisfy regulatory demands because the enzyme is also used for production of food in EU.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1996
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: ca. 77 days (males); ca. 70 days (females)
- Weight on initiation of study: ca. 354-439 g (males); 213-255 g (females)
- Housing: Cages comprised of a polycarbonate body with a stainless steel mesh lid; changed at appropriate intervals. Solid (polycarbonate) bottom cages were used during the acclimatisation, gestation, littering, lactation and maturation periods. Grid bottomed cages were used during pairing. These were suspended above absorbent paper which was changed daily during pairing. Solid bottom cages contained softwood based bark-free fibre bedding, which was changed at appropriate intervals each week. Number of animals per cage: two to five animals (pre-pairing); one male and one female (pairing ); two to five animals (males after mating); one female (gestation) and one female + litter (lactation). A soft white untreated wood block and a plastic shelter were provided to each cage throughout the study (except during pairing and lactation).
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: domestic mains water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 12 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24°C
- Humidity (%): 40- 70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark / 12 hours light - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS
In advance of the formulation period the required amount of containers of test material were transferred from the freezer to refrigerated (2-8oC) storage to ensure thawing. The thawed containers were inverted ten times and gently magnetically stirred whilst aliquoting. On the day prior to formulation the required amount of aliquots was removed from frozen storage to refrigerated (2-8oC) storage to ensure thawing. On the day of formulation, the required volume of vehicle was added to the premeasured aliquot of test material. This was gently mixed using a magnetic stirrer and gentle inversion. Dosing formulations were prepared daily and administered within four hours of preparation.
ORAL ADMINISTRATION
The animals were dosed by oral administration, by gavage, using a suitably graduated syringe and a rubber catheter inserted via the mouth. The dosing volume was 10 mL/kg body weight, which was calculated from the most recently recorded scheduled body weight. The control animals were dosed with vehicle at the same volume dose as the treated groups. All animals were dosed once daily, at approximately the same time each day. - Details on mating procedure:
- Details on mating:
Pairing commenced after a minimum of two weeks of treatment. The male/female ratio was 1:1 from within the same treatment groups. Duration of pairing was up to two weeks and the animals were checked daily for evidence of mating by observation for ejected copulation plugs in cage tray and sperm in the vaginal smear. Day 0 of gestation was defined when positive evidence of mating was detected and the male and female rats were separated when mating evidence was detected. The pre-coital intervals were calculated for each female (as the time between first pairing and evidence of mating). - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The formulated samples were analysed with regard to total Nitrogen content, N-total %. The absence of nitrogen (below LOQ, i.e. <0.05% w/w) in the control samples was confirmed, demonstrating that no inadvertent cross contamination had occurred.
The total nitrogen % values for all the dose groups were within a satisfactory range to expected values, demonstrating correct preparation of the dosing formulations. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The males were dosed from two weeks before pairing until termination.
The females were dosed daily for two weeks before pairing, throughout pairing, gestation and until Day 6 of lactation. - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily during treatment period.
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 other: mg TOS/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 110.1 other: mg TOS/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 4 363.4 other: mg TOS/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 101.3 other: mg TOS/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 males and 10 females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were selected following evaluation of existing toxicological data.
- Positive control:
- Not applicable
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Animals were inspected visually at least twice daily for evidence of ill-health or reaction to treatment. Cages and cage-trays were inspected daily for evidence of ill-health amongst the occupant(s). Any deviation from normal was recorded at the time in respect of nature and severity, date and time of onset, duration and progress of the observed condition, as appropriate. During the acclimatisation period, observations of the animals and their cages were recorded at least once per day.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: F0 males were weighed before dosing on the day that treatment commenced (Week 0), weekly thereafter and on the day of necropsy. F0 females were weighed before dosing on the day that treatment commenced (Week 0), weekly before pairing, on Days 0, 6, 13 and 20 after mating, on Day 1, 4, and 7 of lactation and on the day of necropsy.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: For F0 animals, the food consumption was recorded weekly, from the day that treatment commenced, but not during the period when paired for mating (Week 3). It was recommenced for males in Week 4. For females after mating food consumption was recorded for the following periods: Days 0-5, 6-12, 13-19 after mating and Days 1-3 and 4-6 of lactation. From these records the mean weekly or daily consumption per animal (g/animal/week or g/animal/day) was calculated for each phase. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
All adult animals were euthanized by carbon dioxide asphyxiation with subsequent exsanguination.
GROSS NECROPSY
All adult animals were subject to a detailed necropsy. After a review of the history of each animal, a full macroscopic examination of the tissues was performed. All external features and orifices were examined visually. Any abnormality in the appearance or size of any organ and tissue (external and cut surface) was recorded and the required tissue samples preserved in appropriate fixative.
Necropsy of F0 males were performed after the Week 5 investigations were completed. Necropsy of the F0 females were performed on Day 7 of lactation.
HISTOPATHOLOGY
Tissue samples for histology were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin wax and sectioned at a nominal four to five micron thickness. For bilateral organs, sections of both organs were prepared. A single section was prepared from each of the remaining tissues required. For the assessment of the testes, a detailed qualitative examination was made, taking into account the tubular stages of the spermatogenic cycle. The examination was conducted in order to identify treatment related effects such as missing germ cell layers or types, retained spermatids, multinucleate or apoptotic germ cells and sloughing of spermatogenic cells in the lumen. Any cell- or stage-specificity of testicular findings was reported.
For the assessment of the ovaries a qualitative evaluation of one section from each ovary was made. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
Offspring was euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbitone.
GROSS NECROPSY
Necropsy of the F1 offspring was performed on Day 7 of age. - Reproductive indices:
- The following indices of mating performance and fertility were evaluated for each group:
- Percentage mating (%) = (Number animals mating/ Animals paired) x 100
- Conception rate (%) = (Number animals achieving pregnancy/Animal mated) x 100
- Fertility Index (%) = (Number animals achieving pregnancy/Animals pairing) x 100 - Offspring viability indices:
- The following were calculated for each litter:
- Post-implantation survival index (%) = (Total number of offspring born/Total number of uterine implantation sites) x 100
- Live birth index (%) = (Number of live offspring on Day 1 after littering/Total number of offspring born) x 100
- Viability index (%) = (Number of live offspring on Day 7/Number of live offspring on Day 1 after littering) x 100 - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The haematological investigation in Week 2 of treatment (i.e. before pairing) revealed, when compared with the controls, a small reduction of lymphocyte and large unstained cell counts in males receiving the high dose of the Xylanase. There was no similar finding in females. These findings were not adverse. The bone marrow composition was unaffected.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The biochemical examination of the blood plasma in Week 2 of treatment (i.e. before pairing) revealed, when compared with the controls, slightly but statistically significantly low creatinine concentration in males and females receiving the high dose of the Xylanase and in the females this associated in the same group with a small reduction of plasma urea concentration, though statistical significance was not attained. For creatinine concentration, only one male receiving the high dose of the Xylanase had an individual value below the concurrent control range and for females the majority of individual values for high dose animals were within the concurrent control range. For animals receiving the high dose of the Xylanase, all individual creatinine concentrations for males and females and all individual female urea concentrations were within the historic control range (90- percentile control range for creatinine was 21-37 µmol/L for males (n=100) and 28-46 µmol/L for females (n=100) and for urea was 4.2-9.0 mmol/L in females (n=100)).
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- (reproductive toxicity)
- Effect level:
- 1 101.3 other: TOS/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- haematology
- clinical biochemistry
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- reproductive function (oestrous cycle)
- reproductive performance
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded that oral administration of Xylanase to Sprague-Dawley rats at doses up to 1101.3 mg total organic substance (TOS)/kg body weight/day for 5 weeks to males and for 2 weeks before and during pairing throughout gestation and to Day 6 of lactation for females was well tolerated and did not cause any adverse change. The no observed adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for systemic and reproductive/developmental toxicity was therefore considered to be the highest (equivalent to 1101.3 mg TOS/kg body weight/day).
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was the assessment of general systemic toxic potential of Xylanase in rats, including a screen for reproductive/development effects, after once daily by oral (gavage) administration for at least five weeks.
Three groups, each comprising ten male and ten female Sprague-Dawley rats received three different doses of Xylanase. Males were treated daily for two weeks before pairing, throughout pairing and up to necropsy after a minimum of five consecutive weeks. Females were treated daily for two weeks before pairing, throughout pairing, gestation and until Day 6 of lactation. Females were allowed to litter, rear their offspring and both females and F1 offspring were killed on Day 7 of lactation. The F1 generation received no direct administration of the test substance, meaning that any exposure was in utero or via the milk. A similarly constituted control group of both sexes received the vehicle (reverse osmosis water) at the same volume dose as treated groups, 10 mL/kg body weight.
During the study, clinical condition, detailed physical examination and arena observations, sensory reactivity, grip strength, motor activity, body weight, food consumption, haematology (peripheral blood and bone marrow), blood chemistry, oestrous cycles, pre‑coital interval, mating performance, fertility, gestation length, organ weight and macroscopic pathology investigations were undertaken. Histopathology investigations were undertaken for the first five males and first five females from the control and high dose groups. The clinical condition, litter size and survival, sex ratio, body weight and macropathology for all offspring were also assessed.
General appearance and behavior, sensory reactivity responses, grip strength and motor activity were not affected by treatment, there were no deaths during the treatment period and there was no effect of treatment on bodyweight gain or on food consumption.
The haematological investigation in Week 2 indicated a small reduction of lymphocyte and large unstained cell count in males given 100% of Xylanase, batch PPQ38584, and the biochemical examination of the blood plasma indicated, at 100% Xylanase, batch PPQ38584, a small reduction of creatinine concentration in both sexes and low urea and potassium concentrations in females; these findings were not adverse. The bone marrow composition was unaffected.
There were no treatment related organ weight changes and there were no macroscopic or histopathological findings that were attributable to treatment.
Reproductive assessment demonstrated that there was no adverse effect of Xylanase on oestrous cycles, mating performance, fertility or gestation length. There was no adverse effect observed on litter size, and sex ratio and offspring survival and body weight up to Day 7 of age. There were also no treatment related macroscopic findings in the offspring.
It was concluded that oral administration of Xylanase to Sprague-Dawley rats at doses up to 1101.3 mg TOS/kg body weight/day for 5 weeks to males and for 2 weeks before and during pairing throughout gestation and to Day 6 of lactation for females was well tolerated and did not cause any adverse change. The no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for systemic and reproductive/developmental toxicity was therefore considered to be the highest dose tested (equivalent to 1101.3 mg TOS/kg body weight/day).
Reference
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 101.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Toxicological data has been generated within the enzyme producing industry during the last 40 years. Substantial documentation on the safety of the production strains has been generated, and the enzyme test materials are thoroughly characterized. High quality studies for all relevant endpoints for in vivo studies as well as in vitro studies show that industrial enzymes from well-known and well characterized production strains have very similar safety profiles across the catalytic activities. Read-across can therefore be applied for the majority of toxicological endpoints. The database can therefore be considered of high quality.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Short description of key information:
Xylanase does not affect fertility.
Justification for selection of Effect on fertility via oral route:
Toxicokinetic data together with the molecular structure of xylanase and the weight of evidence from animal studies and human exposure provides no evidence for toxicity on fertility. Further, oral administration of Xylanase to rats at doses up to 1101.3 mg TOS/kg body weight/day for 5 weeks to males and for 2 weeks before and during pairing throughout gestation and to Day 6 of lactation for females was well tolerated and did not cause any adverse change.
Justification for selection of Effect on fertility via inhalation route:
Toxicokinetic data together with the molecular structure of xylanase and the weight of evidence from animal studies and human exposure provides no evidence for toxicity on fertility.
Justification for selection of Effect on fertility via dermal route:
Toxicokinetic data together with the molecular structure of xylanase and the weight of evidence from animal studies and human exposure provides no evidence for toxicity on fertility.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Xylanase is not a teratogen.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 101.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Toxicological data has been generated within the enzyme producing industry during the last 40 years. Substantial documentation on the safety of the production strains has been generated, and the enzyme test materials are thoroughly characterized. High quality studies for all relevant endpoints for in vivo studies as well as in vitro studies show that industrial enzymes from well-known and well characterized production strains have very similar safety profiles across the catalytic activities. Read-across can therefore be applied for the majority of toxicological endpoints. The database can therefore be considered of high quality.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route:
Toxicokinetic data together with the molecular structure of xylanase and the weight of evidence from animal studies and human exposure provides no evidence for developmental toxicity. Further, oral administration of Xylanase to rats at doses up to 1101.3 mg TOS/kg body weight/day for 5 weeks to males and for 2 weeks before and during pairing throughout gestation and to Day 6 of lactation for females was well tolerated and did not cause any adverse change. There was no adverse effect observed on litter size, and sex ratio and offspring survival and body weight up to Day 7 of age. There were also no treatment related macroscopic findings in the offspring.
Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route:
Toxicokinetic data together with the molecular structure of xylanase and the weight of evidence from animal studies and human exposure provides no evidence for developmental toxicity.
Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route:
Toxicokinetic data together with the molecular structure of xylanase and the weight of evidence from animal studies and human exposure provides no evidence for developmental toxicity.
Toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Additional information
Although endocrine disrupting chemicals are a broad group of chemicals consisting of man-made and natural compounds it is unlikely that enzymes have the potential to cause endocrine disruption. The enzymatic structure is different from any endocrine disrupter known to date (ref 1). Indeed, enzymes are much larger than endocrine disrupters in general excluding mechanisms such as direct action on hormone receptors (EDSTAC (Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee, US EPA), (Ref. 2)). Due to the high biodegradability of enzymes, it is highly unlikely that they could reach target organs or sites to any significant amount or of any significant period of time. Testing of enzymes in currently available screening assays typically based on hormone receptor binding cannot be expected to provide any evidence for endocrine disruption due to the specific features of enzymes.
Data from acute and subchronic oral toxicity studies provide evidence that enzymes are of very low toxicological activity (ref. 3;4-53, 59, 60). Typically, the derived NOAEL values are significantly higher than the maximum doses applied. None of the oral toxicity studies performed by members of the consortium in the past 40 years, as well as published data from other studies revealed any effect that indicates that enzymes could have an adverse effect on the reproduction system in males or females.
Complementing the above information is data from 27 industrial studies (Novozymes, unpublished data) on fertility and/or teratogenicity and/or reproduction studies primarily in rodents but also other species like dogs and rabbits which did not identify any evidence for reproductive toxicity of enzymes. Both proteolytic and non-proteolytic enzymes have been investigated for their teratogenic and reproductive toxicity potential. Several of these studies have been published in peer reviewed articles (ref. 24;29;33;54). Enzymes have been produced and used for many years without any evidence for reproductive potential in humans. OEL for workers is set to be 60 ng/m3 to protect against respiratory sensitization. Considering that endocrine disrupting chemicals in general are a factor of 100 000 less potent than physiologically relevant hormones (ref. 55), the low worker exposure to enzymes due to rigorous application of airborne limit and very low exposure to consumers (below 15 ng/m3, which is the highest known consumer exposure and only the case when using pre-spotters (ref. 56)) and the low bioavailability together with the high biodegradability of enzymes, no reproductive toxicity effect can be expected in humans. Furthermore, enzymes have been used for decades to treat pancreatic insufficiency in both children and adults without any evidence of reproductive toxicity (ref. 57).
In conclusion, toxicokinetic data together with the enzymatic structure and the weight of evidence from animal studies and human exposure provide no evidence for reproductive toxicity of enzymes.
References
1) Whaley,D.A., Keyes,D., and Khorrami,B. (2001) Incorporation of endocrine disruption into chemical hazard scoring for pollution prevention and current list of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Drug and Chemical Toxicology an International Journal for Rapid Communication 24, 359-420
2) Hong,H., Tong,W., Fang,H., Shi,L., Xie,Q., Wu,J., Perkins,R., Walker,J.D., Branham,W., and Sheehan,D.M. (2002) Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts. Environmental Health Perspectives 110, 29-36
3) Laake,K. (1980) ENZYMIC DRUGS. Side Effects of Drugs Annual 222-225 4) Amalfitano,A., Bengur,A.R., Morse,R.P., Majure,J.M., Case,L.E., Veerling,D.L., Mackey,J., Kishnani,P., Smith,W., Vie-Wylie,A., Sullivan,J.A., Hoganson,G.E., Phillips,J.A., Schaefer,G.B., Charrow,J., Ware,R.E., Bossen,E.H., and Chen,Y.T. (2001) Recombinant human acid alpha-glucosidase enzyme therapy for infantile glycogen storage disease type II: Results of a phase I/II clinical trial. Genetics in Medicine 3, 132-138
4) Amalfitano,A., Bengur,A.R., Morse,R.P., Majure,J.M., Case,L.E., Veerling,D.L., Mackey,J., Kishnani,P., Smith,W., Vie-Wylie,A., Sullivan,J.A., Hoganson,G.E., Phillips,J.A., Schaefer,G.B., Charrow,J., Ware,R.E., Bossen,E.H., and Chen,Y.T. (2001) Recombinant human acid alpha-glucosidase enzyme therapy for infantile glycogen storage disease type II: Results of a phase I/II clinical trial. Genetics in Medicine 3, 132-138
5) Andersen,J.R., Diderichsen,B.K., Hjortkjaer,R.K., De Boer,A.S., Bootman,J., West,H., and Ashby,R. (1987) DETERMINING THE SAFETY OF MALTOGENIC AMYLASE PRODUCED BY RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY. Journal of Food Protection 50, 521-526
6) Ankel,E.G., Zirneski,J., Ring,B.J., and Holcenberg,J.S. (1984) Effect of asparaginase on cell membranes of sensitive and resistant mouse lymphoma cells. In Vitro 20, 376-384
7) Ashby,R., Hjortkjaer,R.K., Stavnsbjerg,M., Gurtler,H., Pedersen,P.B., Bootman,J., Hodson-Walker,G., Tesh,J.M., Willoughby,C.R., and Et,A. (1987) SAFETY EVALUATION OF STREPTOMYCES-MURINUS GLUCOSE ISOMERASE. Toxicology Letters (Shannon) 36, 23-36
8) Bar,A., Krul,C.A.M., Jonker,D., and de,V.N. (2004) Safety evaluation of an alpha-cyclodextrin glycosyltranferase preparation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 39, S47-S56
9) Bergman,A. and Broadmeadow,A. (1997) An overview of the safety evaluation of the Thermomyces lanuginosus xylanase enzyme (SP 628) and the Aspergillus aculeatus xylanase enzyme (SP 578). Food additives and contaminants 14, 389-398
10) Biziulevichius,G.A. and Arestov,I.G. (1997) Safety of lysosubtilin per os in mice, rabbits and calves. Veterinary research 28, 385-395
11) Brinch,D.S. and Pedersen,P.B. (2002) Toxicological studies on Laccase from Myceliophthora thermophila expressed in Aspergillus oryzae. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP 35, 296-307
12) Brinch,D.S. and Pedersen,P.B. (2002) Toxicological studies on Polyporus pinsitus laccase expressed by Aspergillus oryzae intended for use in food. Food additives and contaminants 19, 323-334
13) Broadmeadow,A., Clare,C., and De Boer,A.S. (1994) An overview of the safety evaluation of the Rhizomucor miehei lipase enzyme. Food additives and contaminants 11, 105-119
14) Broadwell,A.H., Baumann,L., and Baumann,P. (1990) The 42- and 51-kilodalton mosquitocidal proteins of Bacillus sphaericus 2362: construction of recombinants with enhanced expression and in vivo studies of processing and toxicity. Journal of bacteriology 172, 2217-2223
15) Bui,Q., Geronian,K., Gudi,R., Wagner,V., Kim,D., and Cerven,D. (2004) Safety evaluation of marmanase enzyme, produced by Bacillus lentus, intended for use in animal feed. International Journal of Toxicology 23, 398
16) Baer,A., Til,H.P., and Timonen,M. (1995) Subchronic oral toxicity study with regular and enzymatically depolymerized sodium carboxymethylcellulose in rats. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 33, 909-917
17) Cerven,D., DeGeorge,G., and Bethell,D. (2008) 28-Day repeated dose oral toxicity of recombinant human apo- lactoferrin or recombinant human lysozyme in rats. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 51, 162-167
18) Ciofalo,V., Barton,N., Kretz,K., Baird,J., Cook,M., and Shanahan,D. (2003) Safety evaluation of a phytase, expressed in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, intended for use in animal feed. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 37, 286-292
19) Coenen,T.M., Schoenmakers,A.C., and Verhagen,H. (1995) Safety evaluation of beta-glucanase derived from Trichoderma reesei: summary of toxicological data. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 33, 859-866
20) Coenen,T.M., Aughton,P., and Verhagen,H. (1997) Safety evaluation of lipase derived from Rhizopus oryzae: summary of toxicological data. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 35, 315-322
21) Coenen,T.M. and Aughton,P. (1998) Safety evaluation of amino peptidase enzyme preparation derived from Aspergillus niger. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 36, 781-789
22) Coenen,T.M., Bertens,A.M., de Hoog,S.C., and Verspeek-Rip,C.M. (2000) Safety evaluation of a lactase enzyme preparation derived from Kluyveromyces lactis. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 38, 671-677
23) Cook,M.W. and Thygesen,H.V. (2003) Safety evaluation of a hexose oxidase expressed in Hansenula polymorpha. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 41, 523-529
24) Deboer,A.S., Marshall,R., Broadmeadow,A., and Hazelden,K. (1993) Toxicological Evaluation of Acetolactate Decarboxylase. Journal of Food Protection 56, 510-517
25) Durden,D.L. and Distasio,J.A. (1981) CHARACTERIZATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ASPARAGINASE FROM ESCHERICHIA-COLI AND A GLUTAMINASE-FREE ASPARAGINASE FROM VIBRIO-SUCCINOGENES ON SPECIFIC CELL MEDIATED CYTO TOXICITY. International Journal of Cancer 27, 59-66
26) Elvig,S.G. and Pedersen,P.B. (2003) Safety evaluation of a glucanase preparation intended for use in food including a subchronic study in rats and mutagenicity studies. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 37, 11-19
27) Gao,C., Zhang,A., Lin,Y., Han,S., and Wang,L. (2007) Relationship between the domain structures of several nuclear receptors and the effect differences of environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology 2, 363-374
28) Gao,F., Jiang,Y., Zhou,G.H., and Han,Z.K. (2007) The effects of xylanase supplementation on growth, digestion, circulating hormone and metabolite levels, immunity and gut microflora in cockerels fed on wheat-based diets. British Poultry Science 48, 480-488
29) Greenough,R.J., Everett,D.J., and Stavnsbjerg,M. (1991) Safety evaluation of alkaline cellulase. Food Chem.Toxicol 29, 781-785
30) Greenough,R.J., Perry,C.J., and Stavnsbjerg,M. (1996) Safety evaluation of a lipase expressed in Aspergillus oryzae. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 34, 161-166
31) Harbak,L. and Thygesen,H.V. (2002) Safety evaluation of a xylanase expressed in Bacillus subtilis. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 40, 1-8
32) Harper,A.F., Skaggs,J.H., Veit,H.P., and Kornegay,E.T. (1999) Efficacy and safety of Novo SP938 microbial phytase supplementation of a corn-soybean meal diet fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 77, 174-175
33) Hjortkjaer,R.K., Bille-Hansen,V., Hazelden,K.P., McConville,M., McGregor,D.B., Cuthbert,J.A., Greenough,R.J., Chapman,E., Gardner,J.R., and Ashby,R. (1986) Safety evaluation of Celluclast, an acid cellulase derived from Trichoderma reesei. Food Chem.Toxicol 24, 55-63
34) Hjortkjaer,R.K., Stavnsbjerg,M., Pedersen,P.B., Heath,J., Wilson,J.A., Marshall,R.R., and Clements,J. (1993) Safety evaluation of esperase. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 31, 999-1011
35) Holcenberg,J.S., Borella,L.D., Camitta,B.M., and Ring,B.J. (1979) HUMAN PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF SUCCINYLATED ACINETOBACTER GLUTAMINASE ASPARAGINASE. Cancer Research 39, 3145-3151
36) Hytonen,M., Vanhanen,M., Keskinen,H., Tuoni,T., Tupasela,O., and Nordman,H. (1994) Pharyngeal edema caused by occupational exposure to cellulase enzyme. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 49, 782-784
37) Janer,G., Hakkert,B.C., Piersma,A.H., Vermeire,T., and Slob,W. (2007) A retrospective analysis of the added value of the rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study versus the rat subchronic toxicity study. Reproductive Toxicology 24, 103-113
38) Jensen,B.F. and Eigtved,P. (1990) Safety Aspects of Microbial Enzyme Technology, Exemplified by the Safety Assessment of An Immobilized Lipase Preparation, Lipozyme. Food Biotechnology 4, 699-725
39) Klinge,L., Straub,V., Neudorf,U., and Volt,T. (2005) Enzyme replacement therapy in classical infantile Pompe disease: Results of a ten-month follow-up study. Neuropediatrics 36, 6-11
40) Klinge,L., Straub,V., Neudorf,U., Schaper,J., Bosbach,T., G÷rlinger,K., Wallot,M., Richards,S., and Voit,T. (2005) Safety and efficacy of recombinant acid alpha-glucosidase (rhGAA) in patients with classical infantile Pompe disease: results of a phase II clinical trial. Neuromuscular disorders : NMD 15, 24-31
41) Kondo,M., Ogawa,T., Matsubara,Y., Mizutani,A., Murata,S., and Kitagawa,M. (1994) Safety evaluation of lipase G from Penicillium camembertii. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 32, 685-696
42) Kopetzki,E., Lehnert,K., and Buckel,P. (1994) Enzymes in diagnostics: Achievements and possibilities of recombinant DNA technology. Clinical Chemistry 40, 688-704
43) Kornegay,E.T., Skaggs,J.H., Denbow,D.M., Larsen,C.T., and Veit,H.P. (1999) Efficacy and safety of Novo SP938 microbial phytase supplementation of a low-P corn-soybean meal diet fed to turkeys. Poultry Science 78, 15
44) Landry,T.D., Chew,L., Davis,J.W., Frawley,N., Foley,H.H., Stelman,S.J., Thomas,J., Wolt,J., and Hanselman,D.S. (2003) Safety evaluation of an alpha-amylase enzyme preparation derived from the archaeal order Thermococcales as expressed in Pseudomonas fluorescens biovar I. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP 37, 149-168
45) Lane,R.W., Yamakoshi,J., Kikuchi,M., Mizusawa,K., Henderson,L., and Smith,M. (1997) Safety evaluation of tannase enzyme preparation derived from Aspergillus oryzae. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 35, 207-212
46) MacKenzie,K.M., Petsel,S.R., Weltman,R.H., and Zeman,N.W. (1989) Subchronic toxicity studies in dogs and in utero rats fed diets containing Bacillus stearothermophilus alpha-amylase from a natural or recombinant DNA host. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 27, 599-606
47) Modderman,J.P. and Foley,H.H. (1995) Safety evaluation of pullulanase enzyme preparation derived from Bacillus licheniformis containing the pullulanase gene from Bacillus deramificans. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 21, 375-381
48) Ohshita,K., Nakajima,Y., Yamakoshi,J., Kataoka,S., Kikuchi,M., and Pariza,M.W. (2000) Safety evaluation of yeast glutaminase. Food and Chemical Toxicology 38, 661-670
49) Olempska-Beer,Z.S., Merker,R.I., Ditto,M.D., and DiNovi,M.J. (2006) Food-processing enzymes from recombinant microorganisms--a review. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP 45, 144-158
50) Ollenschlaeger,G., Roth,E., Linkesch,W., Jansen,S., Simmel,A., and Moedder,B. (1988) ASPARAGINASE-INDUCED DERANGEMENTS OF GLUTAMINE METABOLISM THE PATHOGENETIC BASIS FOR SOME DRUG-RELATED SIDE EFFECTS. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 18, 512-516
51) Otamiri,T. (1989) Phospholipase C-mediated intestinal mucosal damage is ameliorated by quinacrine. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 27, 399-402
52) Zhang,Z.B., Kornegay,E.T., Radcliffe,J.S., Denbow,D.M., Veit,H.P., and Larsen,C.T. (2000) Comparison of genetically engineered microbial and plant phytase for young broilers. Poultry Science 79, 709-717
53) Zhang,Z.B., Kornegay,E.T., Radcliffe,J.S., Wilson,J.H., Veit,H.P., and Fontenot,J.P. (2000) Comparison of phytase from genetically engineered Aspergillus and canola in weanling pig diets. Journal of Animal Science 78, 2868-2878
54) Stavnsbjerg,M., Hjortkjaer,R.K., Billehansen,V., Jensen,B.F., Greenough,R.J., McConville,M., Holmstroem,M., and Hazelden,K.P. (1986) Toxicological Safety Evaluation of A Bacillus-Acidopullulyticus Pullulanase. Journal of Food Protection 49, 146-153
55) Harvey,P.W. and Johnson,I. (2002) Approaches to the assessment of toxicity data with endpoints related to endocrine disruption. Journal of Applied Toxicology 22, 241-247
56) US SDA. Risk assessment guidance for enzyme-containing products. 2005. Washington, Soap and Detergent Association.
57) Barak,A., Dulitzki,M., Efrati,O., Augarten,A., Szeinberg,A., Reichert,N., Modan,D., Weiss,B., Miller,M., Katzanelson,D., and Yahav,Y. (2005) Pregnancies and outcome in women with cystic fibrosis. Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ 7, 95-98
58) D.A. Basketter, C. Broekhuizen, M. Fieldsend, S. Kirkwood, R. Mascarenhas, K. Maurer, C. Pedersen, C. Rodriguez & H.E. Schiff: Defining occupational and consumer exposure limits for enzyme protein respiratory allergens under REACH, Toxicology 268: 165-170, 2010.
59) Basketter D., Berg N., Broekhuizen C., Fieldsend M., Kirkwood S., Kluin C., Mathieu S. and Rodriguez C.Enzymes in Cleaning Products: An Overview of Toxicological Properties and Risk Assessment/Management. 2012a. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol, 64/1: 117-123
60) Basketter D.; N. Berg; F. Kruszewski; K. Sarlo; B. Concoby. The Toxicology and Immunology of Detergent Enzymes. 2012b. J. Immunotox., 9, 320-326.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Xylanase is not classified as it is not a reproductive toxicant (for further justification see discussion above).
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.