Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-023-8 | CAS number: 50-28-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
No studies are available for Estradiol and therefore, all data presented are based on the result of a literature search (references are stated in the tables). Estradiol and its esters were tested in mice, rats, hamsters and guinea-pigs by oral and subcutaneous administration. Administration to mice increased the incidences of several tumors including mammary, uterine or renal tumors. In rats, there was an increased incidence of mammary and/or pituitary tumours and an increased incidence of hepatocellular adenomas in males. In hamsters, a high incidence of malignant kidney tumours occurred in intact and castrated males and in ovariectomized females, but not in intact females. In guinea-pigs, diffuse fibromyomatous uterine and abdominal lesions were observed. A report of the IARC Working Group stated that a number of studies, utilizing a variety of designs, have shown a consistent, strongly positive association between exposure to a number of oestrogenic substances and risk of endometrial cancer in human, with evidence of positive dose-response relationships both for strength of medication and duration of use. Users of postmenopausal estrogen therapy had no excess risk for cancers at other sites. The evidence for the carcinogenicity of postmenopausal combined estrogen-progestogen therapy was deemed to be limited.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Justification for classification or non-classification
The following self classification for estradiol is recommended according to Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 (CLP) :
Carc. 2 (H351)
The classification is in accordance with German legislation for classification of estrogenic steroid hormones. The German Committee on Hazardous Substances (AGS) recommended for estrogenic steroid hormones classification as:
Toxicity to reproduction - Fertility: Category 1A
Toxicity to reproduction - Development: Category 2
Carcinogenicity: Category 2
See Technical Rule for Hazardous Substances 905; elaborated by the German Committee on Hazardous Substances (AGS) and published by the German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, version: 19.04.2016, only available in German,URLhttp://www.baua.de/de/Themen-von-A-Z/Gefahrstoffe/TRGS/Begruendungen- 905-906.html.
The associated documentation and justification for grouping steroid hormones and their classification was published in 09/1999. Estradiol is mentioned in attachment 2 on page 16.
Additional information
A registration of estradiol was already submitted earlier and is public available on the ECHA website. Chapter 7, which is still valid from today's perspective, was amended to fulfill the current information requirements. Consequently the migrated data (IUCLID 5 to IUCLID 6) was kept unchanged and only modified if there was a need for further information and/or to pass the technical completeness check (TCC).
Animal data
Test system | Substance | Application | Test concentration | End point/Effect | Literature |
C3H/HeJ mice, female | Estradiol | Oral | 0.015, 0.15, or 0.75 mg/kg bw/d from week 6 to week 110. Sacrified after 52 weeks | Preneoplastic and neoplastic findings in mice sacrificed after up to 104 weeks on the estrogenic diets. High doses of estradiol increased the incidence of adenosis but did not affect the incidence of ovarian tubular adenomas. After 66- 91 weeks of treatment, high doses of estradiol also increased the incidence of mammary gland hyperplastic alveolar nodules | Highman et al., 1980. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol., 4, 81-95 as cited by Toxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. |
C3H/HeJ mice | 17ß- Estradiol | In drinking- water | 0.5 mg/l for 1 y | 17ß-Estradiol caused tumours | Welsch,1976. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Suppl. 1, 161-175as cited by Toxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. |
B6C3F1 mice, both sexes | Catechol Estrogens | intraperitoneal injection | Treatment on days 12-15 after birth, monitored for 18 months | Estrone-3,4-quinone was significantly carcinogenic in the livers of male mice. It was also highly toxic, as most of the mice died from unknown causes shortly after treatment. Estrone was protective against liver tumour formation in this system, and few tumours were induced in female mice | Cavalieri et al., 1997. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 10937-10942 as cited by Toxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. |
Syrian hamsters, male | Estradiol | subcutaneous implantation | 25 mg, sacrified after 175 d | Renal tumours in 4/5 animals | Liehr et al., 1986 J. Steroid Biochem., 24, 353-356as cited by Toxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. |
Syrian hamsters, male, castrated | Estradiol | subcutaneous implantation | released 100-210 µg/d for 9 months | Renal tumour incidence: 75-100%, | Li et al., 1983. Cancer Res., 43, 5200-5204356 as cited by Toxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. |
Syrian hamsters, male, castrated | various steroidal and non- steroidal estrogens | Subcutan implantation | Release rate: 110 µg/d for 9 months | Good correlation among the hormonal parameters progesterone receptor induction and serum prolactin and relative estrogenic potency (estrogen receptor binding) in hamster kidney. All animals trested with estradiol developed renal tumours. | Li et al., 1995. Cancer Res., 55, 4347-4351 as cited by Toxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. |
Syrian hamsters, male, castrated | Estradiol | subcutaneous pellets | Release rate: Estradiol, 96 µg/d for 8 months | tumour incidence of 100%, completely abolished by concurrent treatment with ethinylestradiol | Li et al., 1998 Carcinogenesis, 19, 471-477 as cited by Toxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. |
Syrian hamsters, male, Orchiectomized | Estradiol | Implants every three months | 20 mg | Renal-cell dysplasia and infiltrating and non-infiltrating renal carcinoma were observed. | Goldfarb & Pugh, 1990. Cancer Res., 50, 113¿119 as cited by IARC Monographs, Volume 72, Hormonal Contraception and Post-Menopausal Hormonal Therapy, 1999. |
Rat, male and female | Combinations of various estrogens and progestogens | Diet | | Increased incidence of hepatocellular Adenomas in males | Schuppler. & Gunzel, 1979. Arch. Toxicol., Suppl. 2, 181¿195 as cited by IARC Monographs, Volume 72, Hormonal Contraception and Post-Menopausal Hormonal Therapy, 1999. |
Sprague- Dawley rats, female | mestranol + norethynodrel | Diet | 100 µg + 25 mg for nine months (daily intakes of 0.02¿ 0.03 and 0.5¿0.75 mg/kg bw.) | A statistically significant increase in the number of altered g-glutamyl Transpeptidase- positive hepatic foci was observed | Yager & Yager, 1980. Cancer Res., 40, 3680¿3685 as cited by IARC Monographs, Volume 72, Hormonal Contraception and Post-Menopausal Hormonal Therapy, 1999. |
Fischer 344 rats, female | Estradiol dipropionate | Subcutaneous injection | 5 mg once every two weeks for 13 weeks | Pituitary adenomas and carcinomas were observed. | Satoh et al., 1997 Toxicol. Pathol., 25, 462¿469 as cited by IARC Monographs, Volume 72, Hormonal Contraception and Post-Menopausal Hormonal Therapy, 1999. |
ACI rats | Estradiol | Subcutaneous implantation | 27.5 mg (crystalline estradiol) | rapid development of palpable mammary tumours (carcinomas, 100% of the animals), which were first observed 99 days after treatment | Shull et al., 1997. Carcinogenesis, 18, 1595¿1601 as cited by IARC Monographs, Volume 72, Hormonal Contraception and Post-Menopausal Hormonal Therapy, 1999. |
Guinea-pigs | Estradiol, Estradiol 3- benzoate | Subcutaneous injection | 20-80 µg
3 times a week | Multiple tumors, described as fibromas and fibromyomas | Lipschütz et al., 1938. C.R. Soc. Biol. 130, 9-11 as cited by IARC Monographs, Volume 72, Hormonal Contraception and Post-Menopausal Hormonal Therapy, 1999. |
Nonhuman | 17ß- Estradiol |
|
| In vivo carcinogenicity studies
Positive | Panel Report: EMICBACK/67174 ; Mutat. Res. 185:1-195,1987 as cited by GENETOX database, Beta- Estradiol, last update 1998 |
Human data
End point/Effect | Literature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grady et al., 1995. Obstet. Gynecol., 85, 304-313 as cited by Toxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It was determined that there is sufficient evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of postmenopausal estrogen therapy, largely based on the clear evidence and substantial strength of the association with risk for endometrial cancer. The rise and fall of incidence of endometrial cancer in several areas of the USA was compatible with trends in estrogen use. The association with breast cancer is weak but consistent with biological mechanisms such as the adverse effects of delay in age at menopause and obesity in postmenopausal women. Users of postmenopausal estrogen therapy had no excess risk for cancers at other sites. The evidence for the carcinogenicity of postmenopausal combined estrogen-progestogen therapy was deemed to be limited. | IARC Working Group, 1999 as cited byToxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It was determined that there was sufficient evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of combined oral contraceptives. Conversely, the evidence for the carcinogenicity of progestogen-only contraceptives was deemed inadequate. It is impossible to infer whether the association between breast cancer and use of combined oral contraceptives is due to earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in users, to the biological effects of contraceptives, or to a combination. | IARC Working Group, 1999 as cited byToxicological Evaluation of certain Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. WHO Food Additives Series: 43, prepared by the Fifty-second meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), 2000. |
Determination of the estrogen and estrogen metabolite profiles in prospectively collected serum from post-menopausal women with and without breast cancer who reported no use of exogenous hormones at the time of blood collection. There was a statistically significant association of unconjugated estradiol, unconjugated estrone, conjugated estrone, and many estrogen metabolites with an increased beast cancer risk. Three metabolic pathway ratios were identified that were associated with the risk of breast cancer even after adjustment for circulating levels of unconjugated estradiol: the ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to parent estrogens, the ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to the 16-hydroxylation pathway, and the ratio of 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols to 4-hydroxylation pathway methylated catechols. The ratio of the 2-hydroxylation pathway to parent estrogens was associated with a statistically significantly decreased risk of breast cancer after adjustment for unconjugated estradiol. Compared with estrogens and other estrogen metabolites, 2-hydroxylation pathway catechols have relatively low affinities for estrogen receptors and are rapidly cleared from circulation. Thus, 2-hydroxylation may result in a decrease in bioavailable estrogens and reduced estrogen receptor–mediated signaling in the breast. the ratio of catechols to methylated catechols in the 4-hydroxylation pathway was associated with statistically significantly increased risk of breast cancer. Catechols in both the 2- and 4-hydroxylation pathways can be oxidized to form quinones; these reactive electrophiles can then react with DNA to form a variety of adducts. Methylation of the catechols prevents their conversion to reactive quinones. Whereas the most common DNA adducts derived from 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols are depurinating and highly mutagenic, most of those derived from 2-hydroxylation pathway catechols are stable and can be repaired with little error; this difference may explain why 2-hydroxylation pathway catechols are not potent carcinogens in animal models of estrogen-mediated cancers and why their ratio to the corresponding methylated catechols was not statistically significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer in this study. The results point to three estrogen-related factors that may contribute to breast cancer pathogenesis in postmenopausal women: the quantity of available estrogens, the extent of 2-hydroxylation of parent estrogens, and the extent of methylation of 4-hydroxylation pathway catechols.
| Fuhrmann B.J. et al., 2012, J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:326–339, Estrogen Metabolism and Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women |
Published findings on breast cancer risk associated with different types of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) are inconsistent, with limited information on long-term effects. The authors bring together the epidemiological evidence, published and unpublished, on these associations, and review the relevant randomised evidence. Every MHT type, except vaginal oestrogens, was associated with excess breast cancer risks, which increased steadily with duration of use and were greater for oestrogen-progestagen than oestrogen-only preparations. The oestrogen-progestagen risks during years 5–14 were greater with daily than with less frequent progestagen use. For a given preparation, the RRs during years 5–14 of current use were much greater for oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours than for oestrogen-receptor-negative tumours, were similar for women starting MHT at ages 40–44, 45–49, 50–54, and 55–59 years, and were attenuated by starting after age 60 years or by adiposity (with little risk from oestrogen-only MHT in women who were obese). After ceasing MHT, some excess risk persisted for more than 10 years; its magnitude depended on the duration of previous use, with little excess following less than 1 year of MHT use. Interpretation: for women of average weight in developed countries, 5 years of MHT, starting at age 50 years, would increase breast cancer incidence at ages 50–69 years by about one in every 50 users of oestrogen plus daily progestagen preparations; one in every 70 users of oestrogen plus intermittent progestagen preparations; and one in every 200 users of oestrogen-only preparations. The corresponding excesses from 10 years of MHT would be about twice as great. Among postmenopausal women in western countries, ER+ breast cancer accounts for about three-quarters of all breast cancer cases and deaths, and post menopausal oestrogenic activity is a strong determinant of the incidence of ER+ breast cancer. Among postmenopausal women, the incidence of ER+ breast cancer correlates with age at menopause 9 and with blood oestrogen levels, and randomised trials have shown that the incidence of ER+ breast cancer can be greatly reduced by anti-oestrogen drugs such as an aromatase inhibitor, or tamoxifen. MHT use is associated with much greater proportional increases in ER+ than ER– disease. Moreover, the excess breast cancer risks in MHT users are strongly duration dependent. Although MHT users differ in various ways from non-users, these biologically plausible findings suggest that the excess of ER+ breast cancer associated with MHT use, which accounts for most of the overall excess of breast cancer associated with MHT use, is largely causal (ie, that some years of MHT use, starting at around the time of the menopause, increases the probability of developing ER+ breast cancer among otherwise similar women of the same age). In Sum, an increase in the risk of developing breast cancer after MHT use was provided, however, this increase is dependent on several factors such as type of MHT, duration of MHT, start of MHT and time after last use. Further, elevation of risk was also dependent on BMI. The lowest risk excess among the MHT users were found in oestrogen-only users, especially in obese women. | Lancet 2019; 394: 1159–68, Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)