Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
water solubility
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The test item was filled directly into a HPLC column, Due to the poor solubility of the test item, the concentrations of the collected fractions could not be determined more precisely, as they lie close to or below the limit of quantification of the TOC.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
column elution method

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
bis(11-methyldodecyl) ((((1,3-phenylenebis(methylene)bis(azanediyl))bis(carbonyl) bis(azanediyl))bis(4-methyl-3,1-phenylene) dicarbamate
Cas Number:
865536-03-4
Molecular formula:
C52H80N6O6
IUPAC Name:
bis(11-methyldodecyl) ((((1,3-phenylenebis(methylene)bis(azanediyl))bis(carbonyl) bis(azanediyl))bis(4-methyl-3,1-phenylene) dicarbamate
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
bis(11-methyldodecyl)(4-methyl-1,3-phenylene)dicarbamate
Molecular formula:
C35H62N2O4
IUPAC Name:
bis(11-methyldodecyl)(4-methyl-1,3-phenylene)dicarbamate
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
11-methyldodecyl (3-(3-(3-(aminomethyl)benzyl)ureido)-4-methylphenyl)carbamate
Molecular formula:
C30H46N4O3
IUPAC Name:
11-methyldodecyl (3-(3-(3-(aminomethyl)benzyl)ureido)-4-methylphenyl)carbamate
Constituent 4
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,1'-(4-methyl-1,3-phenylene)bis(3-(3-(aminomethyl)benzyl)urea)
Molecular formula:
C25H30N6O2
IUPAC Name:
1,1'-(4-methyl-1,3-phenylene)bis(3-(3-(aminomethyl)benzyl)urea)
Test material form:
solid

Results and discussion

Water solubility
Key result
Water solubility:
< 0.943 mg/L
Conc. based on:
other: DOC values
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
ca. 6
Details on results:
The measurements of both flow rates were included in the calculation of the mean.
Table 8.4-a Results
Flow Rate Mean Concentration
(mg/L)
Standard
Deviation
Total Mean
(mg/L)
Total Standard Deviation
24.56 0.7454 0.70755 12.45 0.5635 0.5460 0.6545 0.59842
The carbon content of the test item is 70.55 %. Therefore, the mean of all measurement
corresponds to 0.9428 mg/L test item.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
All samples showed very poor correspondence, because the solubility of the test item lies
to close the LOQ of the DOC. Therefore no precise values could be measured and the
solubility is stated as 0.9428 mg/L (mean of all measurements).
Before applying measurement using DOC, multiple attempts were made to perform a different
way of analysis. No suitable solvent could be found: The test item is insoluble in
methanol, methanol/water 65/35, acetonitrile, ethylacetate, dichloromethane, dimethylformamide,
octane and toluene. Therefore, after consultation with the sponsor, measurement
using DOC determination was chosen.
No significant impact on the assessment of the test item’s behaviour in the environment is
expected from the remaining uncertainty in water solubility.
Executive summary:

In a preliminary study, the solubility of the test item in water was estimated as < 10 mg/L.

As the test item is insoluble in all common solvents, it was not possible to coat diatomaceous

earth. Therefore, the test item was filled as pure solid into a HPLC column.

A flow rate of 24.56 mL/h was set. After discarding the volumes which were collected over

night, fractions were collected and measured. A second run with a flow rate of 12.45 mL/h

was performed likewise. For each run, seven consecutive fractions were collected and analysed.

The measured DOC values showed poor correspondence, because they lay close to the

LOQ of the determination. Therefore, no precise solubility can be determined and the result

was stated as :

< 0.9428 mg/L at 20 ± 0.5 oC

< 0.09428 * 10-6 kg/L (SI units)

(mean of all DOC measurements; content of carbon in test item: 70.55%)