Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-788-1 | CAS number: 151-21-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
NOEC (7d) = 0.88 mg/L (measured) for reproduction of Ceriodaphnia dubia (EPA-600/489/001)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 0.88 mg/L
Additional information
Several studies investigating the long-term toxicity of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to different aquatic invertebrate species as well as supporting chronic studies with several saltwater invertebrates are available (see Table 1).
A non-GLP, 7-day reproduction toxicity test with Ceriodaphnia dubia performed according to EPA-600/489/001 guideline is used as key study (Lauth and Dyer 1996). Daphnids were exposed under flow-through conditions to five test concentrations up to 8 mg/L. Analytical check of test concentration proved that the nominal concentrations were in agreement with the measured ones. Mortality and reproduction were evaluated daily. The 7d NOEC value for reproduction is determined to be 0.88 mg/L based on the measured concentration.
This result is supported by various additional publications investigating the long-term toxicity of sodium dodecyl sulfate to aquatic freshwater invertebrates:
LeBlanc (1982) performed a non-GLP, 40-day chronic toxicity test with Daphnia magna. The test organism was exposed to test substance concentrations up to 8 mg/L (nominal concentration) over four consecutive generations under semi-static conditions. No special guideline was followed. Offspring daphnids of less than 24 hours of age were collected after 10 days of exposure to the test substance and exposed for another 10 days. This procedure was repeated three times. The overall NOEC ranged from 2 to 4 mg/L based on nominal concentrations. Results of yet another long-term toxicity test with Daphnia magna was reported by Radix et al. (1999). The study was performed according to OECD guideline 202, part II under semi-static conditions (daily renewal) with analytical confirmation of the test substance concentration. The 21d NOEC value for reproduction is determined to be 3.2 mg/L based on the measured concentration.
Freitas & Rocha (2012) investigated the long-term toxicity of the freshwater cladoceran species Pseudosida ramosa to SDS using OECD guideline 211. SDS concentrations from 0.25 to 4 mg/L were tested under semi-static conditions. The 21d NOEC value is determined to be 1 mg/L based on the nominal concentration.
The long-term toxicity of SDS on the reproduction of Hydra attenuata was tested in a chronic toxicity test under semi-static conditions (Bode et al. 1978). The budding rate (number of buds between two feedings) was measured over an exposure time of 21 days. SDS concentrations from 5.76 to 576 mg/L were tested. A NOEC value of 5.76 mg/L is determined based on the nominal concentrations.
The reproduction inhibition of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus was tested in a 2d full life cycle test (Radix et al. 1999). An 2d-EC10 value is determined to be 0.98 mg/L.
Table 1: NOEC values from chronic toxicity tests of aquatic invertebrates with sodium dodecyl sulfate
Species |
Exposure time [d] |
Endpoint |
NOEC [mg/L] |
Reference |
freshwater |
||||
Ceriodaphnia dubia |
7 |
reproduction |
0.88 |
Lauth & Dyer 1996 |
Daphnia magna |
21 |
reproduction |
3.2 |
Radix et al. 1999 |
Daphnia magna |
40 |
mortality |
2-4 |
LeBlanc 1982 |
Pseudosida ramosa |
21 |
reproduction |
1 |
Freitas & Rocha 2012 |
Hydra attenuata |
21 |
reproduction |
5.76 |
Bode et al. 1978 |
Brachionus calyciflorus |
2 |
reproduction |
0.98 |
Radix et al. 1999 |
saltwater |
||||
Mysidopsis intii |
7 |
growth |
1.41* |
Harmon & Langdon 1996 |
Holmesimysis costata |
7 |
mortality |
1.41* |
Harmon &Langdon 1996 |
* NOEC was converted from MATC according to ECHA guidance R.10. The most sensitive age class and endpoint is given
In addition, two chronic toxicity tests with saltwater species are available which similarly support the NOEC value of the key study:
7-day chronic toxicity tests according to EPA/600/4-87/028 guideline were performed with Mysidopsis intii and Holmesimysis costata (Harmon & Langdon 1996). Preliminary range-finding experiments were carried out to determine appropriate nominal test item concentrations of 1.58, 2.51, 3.97, 6.3 and 10 mg/L. The tests were performed under semi-static conditions. Different aged test organisms were tested and different endpoints measured. For Mysidopsis intii 0-7 d old mysids turned out to be the most sensitive age class and growth the most sensitive endpoint resulting in a 7d MATC value of 1.99 mg/L. The 7d NOEC value, converted from MATC according to ECHA guidance R.10, is determined to be 1.41 mg/L. For Holmesimysis costata a MATC value of 1.99 mg/L and a corresponding NOEC value of 1.41 mg/L were measured for mortality.
Based on this data set the NOEC value of 0.88 mg/L from Ceriodaphnia dubia observed in the key study was used for the hazard assessment because:
(1) it is the lowest NOEC value of all invertebrate species tested and
(2) the test is considered to be of high relevance and reliability. This assumption is based on the fact that many details about the test is available and also other alkyl sulfate homologues were tested with the same test design and organism resulting in a good comparability of the long-term toxicity of the alkyl sulfate category members to aquatic invertebrates.
References
Bode H et al. 1978. Biological effects of surfactants, III Hydra as a highly sensitive assessment animal. Environ Pollut 17: 175-185
ECHA. 2008. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.10: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment (May 2008), Helsinki, Finland
Freitas EC and Rocha O. 2012. Acute and chronic effects of atrazine and sodium dodecyl sulfate on the tropical freshwater cladoceranPseudosisa ramosa. Ecotoxicology 21: 1347-1357
Harmon VL and Langdon CJ. 1996. A 7-d toxicity test for marine pollutants using the pacific mysid Mysidopsis intii. 1. Protocoll evaluation. Environ Toxicol Chem 15(10): 1824-1830
LeBlanc GA. 1982. Laboratory investigation into the development of resistance of Daphnia magna (Straus) to environmental pollutants. Environ Pollut A 27(4): 309-322
Radix P et al. 1999. Comparison of Brachionus calciflorus 2-d and Microtox chronic 22-h tests with Daphnia magna 21-d test for the chronic toxicity assessment of chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(10): 2178-2185
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.