Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-788-1 | CAS number: 151-21-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
48h-EC50 = 5.55 mg/L (freshwater) for Ceriodaphnia dubia (similar to OECD 202)
48h-LC50 = 3.15 mg/L (nominal concentration, marine water) for Artemia salina (acute toxicity test)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 5.55 mg/L
Marine water invertebrates
Marine water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 3.15 mg/L
Additional information
Numerous studies are available investigating the acute toxicity of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to freshwater and marine invertebrates (see table 1), since SDS is an economically important surfactant and was frequently used as reference substance in toxicity tests. The data set is comprised of several publications with acceptable quality and validity focusing on standard and non-standard species as well as one study report investigating the acute toxicity to the standard species Ceriodaphnia dubia (Lauth and Dyer 1996). The non-GLP study was performed according to an internal SOP, which is equivalent to conditions as described in OECD guideline 202. Daphnids were exposed in a flow-through system to six test concentrations (+ control) in the range of 0.38 to 101 mg/L. Mortality of daphnids was evaluated every 24 hours throughout the 48h test period. The 48h-LC50 value is determined to be 5.5 mg/L (4.28 – 7.2 mg/L). It is uncertain as to whether the LC50 is based on nominal or measured concentrations; however, the analytical verification of the test substance concentration for chronic tests also given in the publication by Dyer et al. (1997) indicate that the nominal concentrations are adequately maintained using the specific flow-through method developed. This study is considered to be the most reliable study since it was performed under flow-through conditions which enabled stable test substance concentrations and is well documented as the study was performed for regulatory purposes. Although this effect value is not the lowest observed in the data set it was used for hazard assessment since (i) this study is rated as the most comprehensive and reliable one and (ii) the remaining data set is biased because several effect values are existing in the literature for many additional (standard) species tested but always the lowest obtained value per species is listed and no averaging was performed. This was done because the data set is primarily presented to statistically assess the general susceptibility of aquatic invertebrates to SDS in comparison to fish and algae using a conservative approach. To use the effect value from Lauth and Dyer (1996) is considered to be acceptable for hazard assessment since classification and labeling as well as PNEC derivation is not based on fish acute toxicity and since this value adequately represents the toxicity (= toxic) of SDS to aquatic invertebrates (see table 1).
Based on the profound data set it can be concluded that in general marine species are equally susceptible to SDS than freshwater species Two commonly used test species used for assessing the toxicity of chemicals in the marine environment (Artemia salina and Americamysis bahia) indicate a comparable toxicity as observed for the freshwater species. For Artemia salina Zillioux et al. (1973) determined a 48h-LC50 of 3.15 mg/L. The 72h-LC50 for Americamysis bahia was determined to be 3.8 mg/L (Tatem et al. 1985).
Table 1: Acute toxicity of SDS to different freshwater and marine invertebrates. Publications showing the lowest obtained effect values for a single species are listed.
Species | Exposure time | EC/LC50 [mg/L] | marine/freshwater | Reference |
Pseudosida ramosa | 48h | 11.10 | fw | Freitas and Rocha 2012 |
Ceriodaphnia dubia | 48h | 5.55 | fw | Lauth and Dyer 1996 |
Daphnia magna | 48h | 1.80 | fw | Bishop and Perry 1981 |
Daphnia obtusa | 48h | 9.80 | fw | Rossini and Ronco 1996 |
Brachionus calyciflorus | 48h | 1.20 | fw | Radix et al. 1999 |
Daphnia pulex | 48h | 5.34 | fw | Martinez-Jeronimo and Munoz- Mejia 2007 |
Gammarus pulex | 96h | 4.10 | fw | Bluzat et al. 1976 |
Chaoborus sp. | 96h | 14.40 | fw | Bluzat et al. 1976 |
Lymnea stagnalis | 96h | 7.00 | fw | Bluzat et al. 1976 |
Daphnia ambigua | 48h | 2.44 | fw | Harmon et al. 2003 |
Cypris subglobosa | 48h | 2.05 | fw | Khangorot & Das 2009 |
Acartia lilljeborgi | 48h | 1.90 | m | Nipper et al. 1993 |
Temora stylifera | 48h | 2.63 | m | Nipper et al. 1993 |
Artemia parthenogenetica | 96h | 12.20 | m | Nunes et al. 2005 |
Moina mongolica | 72h | 3.50 | m | Zheng et al. 2006 |
Siriella armata | 96h | 8.47 | m | Perez and Beiras 2010 |
Tiburonella viscana | 48h | 3.41 | m | Melo and Nipper 2007 |
Simocephalus mixtus | 48h | 4.50 | m | Martinez-Jeronimo and Munoz-Mejia 2007 |
Corophium orientale | 96h | 8.70 | m | Picone et al. 2008 |
Nitocra spinipes | 96h | 14.40 | m | Tarkpea et al. 1986 |
Neomysis americana | 96h | 7.24 | m | Roberts et al. 1982 |
Tigriopus fulvus | 96h | 7.42 | m | Mariani et al. 2006 |
Artemia salina | 48h | 3.15 | m | Zillioux et al. 1973 |
Americamysis bahia (Mysidopsis bahia) |
72h | 3.80 | m | Tatem et al. 1985 |
Allorchestes compressa | 96h | 3.60 | m | Gulec et al. 1997 |
Mysidopsis juniae | 96h | 2.30 | m | Nipper et al. 1993 |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.