Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 214-478-5 | CAS number: 1132-61-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 September - 30 October 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP - Guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Report date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- (Landesamt für Umweltschutz und Gewerbeaufsicht , Rheinallee 97-101 , D-55118 Mainz , Germany)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-morpholinopropanesulphonic acid
- EC Number:
- 214-478-5
- EC Name:
- 4-morpholinopropanesulphonic acid
- Cas Number:
- 1132-61-2
- Molecular formula:
- C7H15NO4S
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-morpholin-4-ylpropane-1-sulfonic acid
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): MOPS HIGH PURITY
- Composition of test material : 3-(N-Morpholino)-propane sulfonic acid
- Substance type: white powder
- Analytical purity: 100,3%
- Purity test date : not stated
- Lot/batch No.: 1190567/006
- Expiration date of the lot/batch : 2004-08-31
- Storage condition of test material: stored in a closed polyethylene vessel at room temperature and kept away from ignition sources.
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- TA97a: hisD6610, TA 98: hisD3052 TA 100 und TA 1535 hisG46, TA102:hisG428, TA97, TA98 and TA100 contain uvrB; TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA102 contain pKM 101 and rfa.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 ; produced from the livers of male Wistar rats which were treated with 80 mg Phenobarbital/kg body weight intraperitoneally and, on the following day, with 80 mg bNaphthoflavon/kg body weight orally.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment : 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.15 and 0.05 mg/plate (Plate incorporation method)
Second experiment : 5, 2.5 and 1.25 mg/plate (pre-incubation method) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent used: deionised water
- Justification for choice of solvent : deionised water was chosen as solvent, because the test item was completely soluble, and this solvent doesn’t have any effects on the viability of the bacteria or the number of spontaneous revertants.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine ; 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- See -Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables- for details
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Bacteria :
12 hours before the start of each experiment, a stock culture of each strain was thawed and placed into a culture flask containing 70 ml nutrient broth. The flasks were incubated at 37°C for 12 hours.
Description of the Method
Preparations :
In the days before each test, the media and solutions were prepared. Two days before the test, the plates were sterilized and the first batches poured. On the day before the test, the remaining plates were poured. On the day of the test, the overnight cultures were checked for growth. The incubation chamber was heated to 37°C. The water bath and the heating block were turned to 45°C. The table surface was disinfected. The S9 mix was freshly prepared and stored at 0°C.
Test Data
First Experiment :
date of treatment : Sep. 30th, 2003
concentrations tested : 5 / 1,5 / 0,5 / 0,15 / 0,05 mg/plate
incubation time : 48 hours
incubation temperature : 37°C
tester strains : TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535
method : Plate incorporation method
Second Experiment
date of treatment : Oct. 28th, 2003
concentrations tested : 5 / 2,5 / 1,25 mg/plate
incubation time : 48 hours
incubation temperature : 37°C
tester strains : TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535
method : pre-incubation method
Description of the Method
Plate incorporation method :
Per strain and dose, four plates with and four plates without S9 mix were used. 10 ml of the test solution of the appropriate concentration were membrane filtrated into sterile vessels. Top agar basis was melted in a microwave oven, after melting, 10 ml of histidin-biotin-solution 0,5 mMol per 100 ml basis was added and the bottle was placed in the water bath at 45°C. 0,1 ml of the appropriate solution of the test item were given into a sterile tube. After mixing with 2 ml Top-Agar, 0,1 ml overnight culture of the respective strain and 0,5 ml phosphate buffer (only for treatments without S9) or 0,5 ml S9 mix were added. The mixture was gently vortexed, then poured on a minimal glucose plate and evenly distributed, using a Drigalski
spatula. The plates were closed, covered with brown paper and left to harden for a few minutes,then inverted and placed in the dark incubator at 37°C.
Pre-incubation method
Per strain and dose, four plates with and four plates without S9 mix were used. 10 ml of the test solution of the appropriate concentration were membrane filtrated into sterile vessels. Top agar basis was melted in a microwave oven, after melting, 10 ml of histidin-biotin-solution 0,5 mMol per 100 ml basis was added and the bottle was placed in the water bath at 45°C. 0,1 ml of the appropriate solution of the test item were given into a sterile tube. After mixing with 0,1 ml overnight culture of the respective strain, 0,5 ml phosphate buffer (only for treatments without S9) or 0,5 ml S9 mix were added. The mixture was incubated in a incubation chamber at 37°C for 20 minutes. During this time the vessels were aerated through careful shaking. Then 2 ml top agar were added. The mixture was vortexed gently, then poured on a minimal glucose plate and evenly distributed, using a Drigalski spatula. The plates were closed,covered with brown paper and left to harden for a few minutes,then inverted and placed in the dark incubator at 37°C.
References
Genotype Confirmation
-Histidine requirement : Each strain was streaked on a biotin and a histidin-biotin-plate, using a sterilized wire loop.
-Ampicilline-Resistance (pKM 101) resp. ampicilline-tetracycline-resistance (pAQ1) The strains were streaked on ampicilline agar, TA102 on ampicilline-tetracycline agar. TA1535 was taking the function of control strain, since it is not ampicilline resistant.
-UV-sensitivity (uvrB) : Two plates were streaked with the five strains, and one half of the plate covered with aluminium foil so that one half of each streak was protected against light. The plates were irradiated for 8 seconds with a germicidal lamp (254 nm, 30W), keeping a distance of 33 cm. Incubation over night at 37°C followed.
-Crystal violet sensitivity (deep rough) : For each strain, two plates were used. 0,1 ml of bacteria suspension were mixed with 2 ml Top-Agar and poured on nutrient agar. Sterile paper discs (9 mm diameter), each soaked with 10 μl of crystal violet solution (0,1%) were placed into the middle of each plate, followed by incubation over night.
-Spontaneous revertants : Four replicates, with/without S9, for each solvent which was used in the test.
-Determination of Titre : The titre was determined by dilution of the overnight culture using sodium chloride solution and placing 0,1 ml on maximal-soft agar. It should give a density of 109 cells/ml (at the least).
-Sterility Control : Performed analogously to the test with solvent only and S9 (without adding bacteria) on top agar.
-Toxicity Control : Each strain was incubated with the maximum dose of the test item on maximal soft agar.
-Positive Controls : Using diagnostic mutagens, four replicates were prepared. The stock solutions of the substances were diluted to effect an application volume of 0,1 ml/plate. - Evaluation criteria:
- The colonies were counted by eye, the numbers were recorded. A spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel®) was used to calculate mean values and standard deviations as well as the increase factor of revertant induction.
A test item is considered to have mutagenic potential, if a significant, reproducible increase of revertant colonies per plate (increase factor ≥ 2) in at least one strain can be observed. A concentration-related increase over the range tested can also be taken as a sign of mutagenic activity.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
FINDINGS
First Experiment
Confirmation of the criteria :
The treatments for the confirmation of the genotype, the sterility control and the determination of the titre didn’t show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range of the test laboratory. All positive controls (diagnostic mutagenes) showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation.
Solubility and Toxicity :
The test item was dissolved in deionised water. A stock solution containing 50 g/L was prepared. No signs of toxicity towards the tested strains could be observed. The determined values for the toxicity control were in the range of the titre. The background lawn was visible and the number of revertant colonies was not reduced.
Mutagenicity :
No significant increase of the number of revertant colonies in the treatments with and without metabolic activation could be observed. No concentration-related increase over the tested range was found.
Therefore the test item is stated as not mutagenic under the test conditions.
Survey of the findings
strain | 97a | 98 | 100 | 102 | 1535 | ||||||
induction | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | |
water | mean | 83 | 66 | 19 | 23 | 144 | 145 | 144 | 131 | 14 | 17 |
sd | 43,3 | 52,2 | 11,8 | 3,5 | 17 | 11 | 28,1 | 29,1 | 7,2 | 5,0 | |
DMSO | mean | 78 | 112 | 18 | 21 | 126 | 130 | 123 | 134 | 12 | 11 |
sd | 66,9 | 24,5 | 2,2 | 4,5 | 4 | 26 | 6,8 | 12,4 | 2,8 | 3,9 | |
pos. contr. | mean | 924 | 560 | 1038 | 70 | 633 | 754 | 656 | 717 | 590 | 439 |
sd | 103 | 126 | 221 | 25 | 163 | 256 | 32 | 184 | 76,1 | 49 | |
f(l) | 11,9 | 5,0 | 57,7 | 3,4 | 4,4 | 5,8 | 5,3 | 5,4 | 42,9 | 40,8 | |
5 mg/pl. | mean | 79 | 116 | 13 | 16 | 136 | 148 | 129 | 141 | 12 | 12 |
sd | 86 | 78 | 5 | 7 | 28 | 18 | 11 | 13 | 2 | 4 | |
f(l) | 0,95 | 1,75 | 0,69 | 0,70 | 0,94 | 1,02 | 0,90 | 1,07 | 0,89 | 0,70 | |
1,5mg/pl. | mean | 61 | 62 | 16 | 13 | 121 | 104 | 101 | 81 | 10 | 13 |
sd | 50 | 48 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 20 | 11 | 10 | 6 | 2 | |
f(l) | 0,73 | 0,94 | 0,83 | 0,58 | 0,84 | 0,72 | 0,70 | 0,62 | 0,73 | 0,77 | |
0,5 mg/pl. | mean | 91 | 52 | 14 | 13 | 129 | 83 | 102 | 65 | 14 | 18 |
sd | 11 | 53 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | |
f(l) | 1,10 | 0,78 | 0,73 | 0,59 | 0,90 | 0,57 | 0,71 | 0,49 | 1,00 | 1,03 | |
0,15 mg/pl. | mean | 73 | 59 | 18 | 16 | 71 | 74 | 107 | 57 | 11 | 12 |
sd | 37 | 39 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 11 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 1 | |
f(l) | 0,88 | 0,90 | 0,95 | 0,69 | 0,49 | 0,51 | 0,74 | 0,43 | 0,76 | 0,67 | |
0,05 mg/pl. | mean | 90 | 87 | 15 | 16 | 127 | 101 | 117 | 72 | 14 | 16 |
sd | 17 | 24 | 2 | 5 | 41 | 21 | 11 | 17 | 2 | 4 | |
f(l) | 1,08 | 1,32 | 0,75 | 0,72 | 0,88 | 0,70 | 0,82 | 0,54 | 1,02 | 0,90 |
Second Experiment
Confirmation of the Criteria :
The treatments for the confirmation of the genotype, the sterility control and the determination of the titre didn’t show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range of the test laboratory. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation.
Solubility and Toxicity :
The test item was dissolved in deionised water. A stock solution containing 50 g/L was prepared. No signs of toxicity towards the tested strains could be observed. The determined values for the toxicity control were in the range of the titre. The background lawn was visible and the number of revertant colonies was not significantly reduced.
Mutagenicity :
No significant increase of the number of revertant colonies in the treatments with and without metabolic activation was observed. No concentration-related increase over the tested range was found.
Therefore the test item is stated as not mutagenic under the test conditions.
Survey of the findings
strain | 97a | 98 | 100 | 102 | 1535 | ||||||
induction | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | |
water | mean | 149 | 117 | 10 | 11 | 131 | 120 | 128 | 119 | 10 | 10 |
sd | 55,1 | 67,9 | 2,1 | 2,6 | 22 | 18 | 16,8 | 7,5 | 2,6 | 2,2 | |
DMSO | mean | 93 | 118 | 9 | 11 | 93 | 96 | 119 | 116 | 8 | 11 |
sd | 67,8 | 18,6 | 2,5 | 4,1 | 28 | 6 | 36,8 | 11,9 | 1,7 | 2,6 | |
pos. contr. | mean | 571 | 721 | 604 | 61 | 948 | 575 | 847 | 678 | 1014 | 223 |
sd | 275 | 198 | 121 | 6 | 153 | 236 | 62 | 173 | 157 | 11 | |
f(l) | 6,17 | 6,14 | 65,3 | 5,40 | 7,24 | 5,98 | 7,12 | 5,84 | 98,9 | 19,8 | |
5 mg/pl. | mean | 93 | 110 | 6 | 8 | 122 | 129 | 131 | 121 | 12 | 9 |
sd | 44 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 6 | 2 | |
f(l) | 0,62 | 0,94 | 0,64 | 0,74 | 0,93 | 1,08 | 1,02 | 1,02 | 1,20 | 0,85 | |
2,5mg/pl. | mean | 112 | 103 | 7 | 10 | 98 | 120 | 135 | 111 | 11 | 9 |
sd | 30 | 64 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 9 | 35 | 9 | 2 | 2 | |
f(l) | 0,75 | 0,88 | 0,74 | 0,95 | 0,75 | 1,00 | 1,05 | 0,93 | 1,02 | 0,85 | |
1,25 mg/pl. | mean | 108 | 71 | 7 | 8 | 97 | 95 | 102 | 94 | 8 | 10 |
sd | 49 | 70 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 2 | |
f(l) | 0,72 | 0,60 | 0,69 | 0,76 | 0,74 | 0,79 | 0,80 | 0,79 | 0,78 | 0,95 |
Detailed data in the attached full study report .
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The study was performed according to the OECD TG471 without deviations and therefore considered to be of the highest quality (reliability Klimisch 1). The validity criteria of the test system are fulfilled. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains , with any dose of the test material , either with or without metabolic activation . The test material was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. - Executive summary:
The test substance MOPS high purity was investigated according to OECD TG471 for its potential to cause gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535). Two valid experiments were performed. In the first experiment five concentrations of the test item, dissolved in deionized water (from 5 to 0,05 mg/plate) were used. Five genetically manipulated strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535) were exposed to the test item both in the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation system (S9) for 48 hours, using the plate incorporation method. None of the concentrations caused an increase of the revertants in the tested strains. The test item didn't show any mutagenic effects in the first experiment. No signs of toxicity towards the bacteria could be observed. The treatments for the confirmation of the genotype, the sterility control and the determination of the titre didn't show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation.
To verify the results of the first experiment, a second experiment was performed, using three concentrations of the test item (5 to 1,25 mg/plate) and a modification in study performance (pre-incubation method). The test item didn't show mutagenic effects in the second experiment. No signs of toxicity towards the bacteria could be observed. The treatments for the confirmation of the genotype, the sterility control and the determination of the titre didn't show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation. Under the conditions of the test, the test item didn't show mutagenic effects towards Salmonella typhimurium, strains TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535. Therefore, no concentration-effect relationship could be determined.
Therefore the test item MOPS high purity can be stated as not mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.