Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-175-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Amines, C10-C14-tert-alkyl
- EC Number:
- 701-175-2
- Cas Number:
- 68955-53-3
- Molecular formula:
- C10H23N to C14H31N
- IUPAC Name:
- Amines, C10-C14-tert-alkyl
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): PRIMENE 81-R
- Physical state: liquid
- Lot/batch No.: 804554082
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- HGPRT
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: The cells were routinely maintained in Ham's F-12 nutrient mix (GIBCO, Grand Island, New York) supplemented with 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 minutes), dialyzed fetal bovine serum (GIBCO), antibiotics and antimycotics (penicillin G, 100 units/ml; streptomycin sulfate, 0.1 mg/ml; fungizone, 25 µg/ml; GIBCO) and an additional 2 mM L-glutamine (GIBCO).
The selection medium used for the detection of HGPRT- mutants was Ham's F-12 nutrient mix without hypoxanthine, supplemented with 10 µM 6 thioguanine (GIBCO) and 5% serum and the above-mentioned antibiotics.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 liver homogenates prepared from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Assay
0 (solvent control), 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 18.75, 25, 37.5, 50, 75, and 100 µg/ml
Initial Mutagenicity Assay
100, 110, and 120 µg/ml
Confirmatory Mutagenicity Assay
50 to 110 µg/ml in the absence of S9 and 50 to 160 µg/ml in the presence of S9
Repeat Confirmatory Mutagenicity Assay in the Presence of S9
0 (solvent control), 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, and 250 µg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: appropriate to dissolve the test material
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Ethyl methanesulfonate was used as the positive control for the non-activation system (without S9 factor). The positive control for assays performed with S9 (activation system) was 20-methylcholanthrene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: Cells in logarithmic growth phase were trypsinized and placed in medium containing 5% serum at a standard density of 3.0 x 106 cells/T-75 flask approximately 24 hours prior to treatment.
- Exposure duration: 4 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 4 hours
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): methanol/crystal violet
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1 x 10e6 surviving cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: ability of the treated cells to form colonies - Evaluation criteria:
- For an assay to be acceptable, the mutant frequency in positive controls should have been significantly higher than the solvent controls. An additional criteria, was that the mutant frequency in the solvent controls should have been within reasonable limits of the laboratory historical control values and literature values. The test chemical was considered positive if it induced a statistically significant, dose related, reproducible increase in mutant frequency. The final interpretation of the data took into consideration such factors as the mutant frequency and cloning efficiencies in the solvent controls.
- Statistics:
- The frequency of mutants per 106 clonable cells was statistically evaluated using a weighted analysis of variance; weights were derived from the inverse of the mutation frequency variance. The actual plate counts are assumed to follow a Poisson distribution therefore the mean plate count was used as an estimate of variance (Kirkland, 1989).
If the analysis of variance was significant at alpha = 0.05, a Dunnett's t-test was conducted (Winer, 1971), comparing each treated group and the positive control to the solvent control (alpha = 0.05, one-sided). Linear dose-related trend tests were performed if any of the pairwise comparisons of test material with the solvent control yielded significant differences.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: none
- Effects of osmolality: none
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The treated cultures in the absence of S9 showed toxicity with relative cell survival (RCS) values ranging from 7.7 to 108.6%. In the presence of S9 activation, moderate to no toxicity was observed with RCS values ranging from 34.1 to 102.0%. Based upon the results of this assay, concentration levels of 0 (solvent control), 25, 50, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 µg/ml were selected for the initial gene mutation assay in the absence of S9 and 0 (solvent control), 25, 50, 80, 100, 110, 120, 130, and 140 µg/ml in the presence of S9.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: were within the range of the laboratory historical background
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: In order to achieve the guideline stated acceptable level of cytotoxicity (10-20% survival compared to the solvent control) in the presence of S9 a third gene mutation assay was performed. Concentration levels in this assay were 0 (solvent control), 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, and 250 µg/ml. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative
The results of the in vitro Chinese hamster ovary cell/hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyl transferase (CHO/HGPRT) forward gene mutation assay with the test material indicate that under the conditions of this study, the test article was non-mutagenic when evaluated in the absence or presence of an externally supplied metabolic activation (S9) system. - Executive summary:
The test material was evaluated in the in vitro Chinese hamster ovary cell/hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyl transferase (CHO/HGPRT) forward gene mutation assay. The genotoxic potential of the test material was assessed in two independent assays in the absence of an externally supplied metabolic activation (S9) and three independent assays in the presence of S9. The concentrations ranged from 25 to 120 µg/ml in the absence of S9 and from 25 to 250 µg/ml in the presence of S9. The highest concentration was based on the cytotoxicity of the test material to the cells. The adequacy of the experimental conditions for detection of induced mutation was confirmed by employing positive control chemicals, ethyl methanesulfonate for assays in the absence of S9 and 20-methylcholanthrene for assays in the presence of S9. Solvent control cultures were treated with the solvent used to dissolve the test material (i.e.ethanol). The results of thisin vitro CHO/HGPRT forward gene mutation assay with the test material indicate that under the conditions of this study, the test article was non-mutagenic when evaluated in the absence or presence of S9.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.