Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-965-5 | CAS number: 85005-32-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Key study: Test method OECD 473. GLP study. Based on a read-across from an analogue substance, the substance "Fatty acids, C14 -22, ethylene esters, bisulfited, sodium salts" is not considered clastogenic in the chromosome aberration test.
Key study: Test method according to OECD 471. GLP Study. Based on a read-across from an analogue substance, the substance "Fatty acids, C14 -22, ethylene esters, bisulfited, sodium salts" is not considered mutagenic in the Ames test to different strains of bacteria.
Key study: Test method according to OECD 490. GLP Study. Based on a read-across from an analogue substance, the substance "Fatty acids, C14 -22, ethylene esters, bisulfited, sodium salts" is not considered mutagenic to mammallian cells in vitro.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- March 17 - April 23 2010
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read-across from an analogue substance for which a guideline study (Klimish =1) is available.
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
See attached reporting format. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Conclusions:
- Based on the read-across approach from the analogue substance Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salts, the subtance of registration Fatty acids, C14-22, ethlylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts was determined to be non-mutagenic to bacteria in the Ames test.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro Ames test was conducted with the analogue substance Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salts according to OECD guideline 471 under GLP conditions. The test substance did not exhibited mutagenic potential to S. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA100, TA98 and E. coli WP2uvr A with and without metabolic activation. Based on the read-across approach, Fatty acids, C14 -22, ethylene esters, bisulfited sodium salts can be considered not mutagenic to bacteria under the conditions described in the assay.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29 March to 16 July 2010
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read-across from an analogue substance for which a guideline study (Klimish =1) is available.
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
See attached reporting format. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Conclusions:
- Based on the read-across approach from the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salts", it was concluded that the substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethtlene esters, bisuflited, sodium salts" was not clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
- Executive summary:
An in-vitro chromosome aberration test was performed with the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salts" in accordance with OECD Guideline 473 under GLP conditions. The analogue
did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, in either of two separate experiments, using dose ranges that included a dose level that was limited by the lowest precipitating dose level in the preliminary toxicity test.
The test material was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro. Based on the read-across approach from the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salts", it was concluded that the substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethtlene esters, bisuflited, sodium salts" was not clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 August to 04 October 2010
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Read-across from an analogue substance for which a guideline study (Klimish =1) is available.
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
See attached reporting format. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a read-across from an analogue substance.
- Conclusions:
- Based on the read-across approach from the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salts", the substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited, sodium salts" was considered to be non-mutagenic to mammallian cells under the experimental conditions described.
- Executive summary:
An in-vitro mutation test using Mouse Lymphoma L5178Y Cells was performed with the analogue substance "Rape oil, bisulfited, sodium salt" in accordance with OECD Guideline 476. The test substance did not demonstrate mutagenic potential in this in vitro cell mutation assay. Based on these results, the read-across approach was applied and the substance "Fatty acids, C14-22, ethylene esters, bisulfited, sodium salts" was determined to be non-mutagenic in the in vitro cell mutation assay, under the experimental conditions described.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the read-across approach, the substance was concluded to be non-mutagenic to bacteria (Ames test) neither to mammalian cells (Mouse Lymphoma Assay) and was also determined to be non-clastogenic (Chromosome aberration test) to human lymphocytes cultured in vitro. Based on these information, the substance is not classified for genotoxicity according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.