Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Not skin corrosive, not eye corrosive

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Skin irritation

According to the interpretation of results and prediction model given in the OECD 431, a substance shall be considered as Non corrosive if the Mean cell viability is ≥ 50 % after 3 min exposure AND ≥ 15 % after 60 min exposure

 

The percentage of mean cell viability for treated cells resulted to be ≥ 50 % both after 3 minutes and after 60 minutes of exposure ( 105.1% and 122.5 % respectively), therefore the target substance shall be considered as non corrosive for skin.

 

Eye irritation

According to the classification scale for irritant effect of ICCVAM-Recommended Test Method Protocol, a substance shall be classified as Irritant if the Irritation Grade (N) is greater than 9, if 5 ≤ N < 9, the substance is considered as mildly irritant.

The Irritation Grade of the tested parent substance #1 is 6.8, therefore the substance is Mildly Irritant.

Based on the test results, the substance does not requires classification for serious eye damage. According to the ECHA Guidance R7.a, the HET-CAM test method were not sufficiently accurate for regulatory use especially for Category 2 chemicals, to make a final conclusion on their validity. Considering the test results, the variable evaluation of irritant categories, the false positive rate of the HET-CAM test and the chemical nature of the substance no conclusion on the eye irritation classification is reachable.