Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to microorganisms

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to microorganisms
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
The authors performed a cell multiplication inhibition test to assess if benzotrichloride is hazardous to the protozoa Entosiphon sulcatum. The methodology is explained with great detail and the study is generally well described. Thus we consider this a Klimisch 2e study as the study is well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles and is acceptable for assessment.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Bestimmung der biologischen Schadwirkung wassergefährdender Stoffe gegen Protozoen. I. Bakterienfressende Flagellaten (Modellorganismus: Entosiphon sulcatum Stein)
Author:
Bringmann G.
Year:
1978
Bibliographic source:
Z. f. Wasser- und Abwasser-Forschung, 11(6): 210-215
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Comparison of the toxicity thresholds of water pollutants to bacteria, algae, and protozoa in the cell multiplication inhibition test
Author:
Bringmann G. and Kühn R.
Year:
1980
Bibliographic source:
Water Research, 14: 231-241

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
The authors performed a cell multiplication inhibition test. Using this method the onset of the inhibition of cell multiplication under the influence of the test substance is determined.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
α,α,α-trichlorotoluene
EC Number:
202-634-5
EC Name:
α,α,α-trichlorotoluene
Cas Number:
98-07-7
Molecular formula:
C7H5Cl3
IUPAC Name:
α,α,α-trichlorotoluene
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
trichloromethylbenzene
IUPAC Name:
trichloromethylbenzene
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): benzotrichlorid

No more data available

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
no

Test solutions

Vehicle:
not specified

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Entosiphon sulcatum

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
not specified
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h

Results and discussion

Effect concentrations
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
other: toxicity threshold
Effect conc.:
56 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth inhibition
Remarks on result:
other: similar to EC5

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Conclusions:
The authors performed a cell multiplication inhibition test to assess if benzotrichloride is hazardous to the protozoa Entosiphon sulcatum. Under these testing conditions the toxicity threshold (i.e. similar to EC5) for Entosiphon sulcatum after 72h of exposure was 56 mg/L (nominal concentration).
Executive summary:

The authors performed a cell multiplication inhibition test to assess if benzotrichloride (CAS n° 98-07-7) is hazardous to the protozoa Entosiphon sulcatum. Under static conditions, Entosiphon sulcatum was exposed to a dilution series of the test substance at 25°C for 72h. Then growth inhibition was assessed using a cell counter comparing the values of the cultures with test substance to a blanc. Under these testing conditions the toxicity threshold (i.e. similar to EC5) for Entosiphon sulcatum was 56 mg/L (nominal concentration).

No data is available on the GLP status and no guideline is followed. However, the methodology used in this study is described with sufficient details and the study itself meets generally accepted scientific principles and is as such acceptable for assessment. Therefore we consider the study reliable with restrictions (klimisch 2e).