Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on data reported on Colipa report for similar substance, some test are available for repeated dose toxicity.
The subacute studies were used to assess the acute oral toxicity endpoint.
There is a chronic study available on similar substance performed on dogs.
The 2-year oral toxicity study, diets containing 0.37, 1.39 and 5.19 % of the tested substance respectively, were fed to groups of four dogs (two female/two male) each.

Eight animals (four per sex) were used for the concurrent control group. An interim sacrifice took place after 1 year (one animal per sex and group). Behaviour and clinical chemistry as well as macroscopic and microscopic investigations were performed. Besides some not further specified tissue effects after 1 year which were not seen after the final 2-year treatment no substance related effects were noted.

From this 2-year feeding study a NOEL of 5.19 % the tested substance in the diet can be derived which is equal to about 1500 mg/kg bw/day (assuming a feed consumption of 250 g/day and an average bodyweight of 8-9 kg).
Based on the absence of effects, the substance should be considered as not toxic for repeated oral dose toxicity.