Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-101-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From October 18, 2016 to November 28, 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- regarding the cloning efficiency but it did not affect the intergity of the study
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Phosphoric acid, mono- and di- (C16-20 - (even numbered, branched and linear)-alkyl esters
- IUPAC Name:
- Phosphoric acid, mono- and di- (C16-20 - (even numbered, branched and linear)-alkyl esters
- Reference substance name:
- Isooctadecan-1-ol
- EC Number:
- 248-470-8
- EC Name:
- Isooctadecan-1-ol
- Cas Number:
- 27458-93-1
- Molecular formula:
- C18H38O
- IUPAC Name:
- Isooctadecan-1-ol
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Phosphoric acid, mono- and bis (C16-20 branched and linear alkyl) esters
- Batch: CH 200529/001
- Composition: UVCB
- Appearance: Lightly yellow liquid
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine-kinase locus (TK-locus)
(The TK mutational system is able to detect base pair alterations, frame shift mutations and small deletions and clastogenic effect. Cells deficient in thymidine kinase (TK), due to the forward mutation (TK+/- to TK-/-) are resistant to the cytotoxic effects of the pyrimidine analogue trifluorothymidine (TFT)).
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9-mix induced by a combination of phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0 - 100 µg/L
(Since the test substance was not toxic and difficult to dissolve in aqueous solutions, the highest concentration was determined by the solubility in the culture medium) - Vehicle / solvent:
- Ethanol
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - In the first experiment, the test substance was tested up to concentrations of 100 µg/mL in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The incubation time was 3 hours. No toxicity was observed at this dose level in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at this dose level.
- In the second experiment, the test substance was again tested up to concentrations of 100 µg/mL in the absence of S9-mix. The incubation time was 24 hours. No toxicity was observed at this dose level. The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at this dose level.
Per culture 8.0E06 cells (10E06 cells/mL for 3 hour treatment) or 6.0E06 cells (1.25E05 cells/mL for 24 hour treatment) were used.
For expression of the mutant phenotype, cells were cultured for 2 days after the treatment period. During this culture period at least 4.0E06 cells (where possible) were subcultured every day in order to maintain log phase growth. Two days after the end of the treatment with the test substance, the cells were plated for determination of the cloning efficiency (CEday2) and the mutation frequency (MF). - Rationale for test conditions:
- Dose range finding test
Solubility of the test substance - Evaluation criteria:
- - Determination of the mutant colonies, calculation of the survival or viability, calculation of the mutation frequency (MF) and cloning efficiency (CEday2)
- Acceptability of the assay:
A mutation assay was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The absolute cloning efficiency of the solvent controls (CEday2) is between 65 and 120% in order to have an acceptable number of surviving cells analysed for expression of the TK mutation.
b) The spontaneous mutation frequency in the solvent control is ≥ 50 per 106 survivors and ≤ 170 per 106 survivors.
c) The suspension growth (SG) over the 2-day expression period for the solvent controls should be between 8 and 32 for the 3 hour treatment, and between 32 and 180 for the 24 hour treatment.
d) The positive control should demonstrate an absolute increase in the total mutation frequency above the spontaneous background MF (an induced MF (IMF) of at least 300E10-6). At least 40% of the IMF should be reflected in the small colony MF. And/or, the positive control should have an increase in the small colony MF of at least 150E10-6 above that seen in the concurrent solvent/control (a small colony IMF of at least 150E10-6). - Statistics:
- In addition to the criteria stated below, any increase of the mutation frequency should be evaluated for its biological relevance including comparison of the results with the historical control data range. The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWGT as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a MF of more than MF(controls) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range. A test substance is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study. A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if: none of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No severe toxicity was observed up to and including the highest tested dose level of 100 µg/mL.
In the first mutation experiment (3 hour treatment), no significant increase in the mutation frequency at the TK locus was observed after treatment with the test substance either in the absence or in the presence of S9-mix. The numbers of small and large colonies in the test substance treated cultures were comparable to the numbers of small and large colonies of the solvent controls. This result was confirmed in an independent experiment with modification in the duration of treatment. In the second mutation experiment (24 hour treatment), no significant increase in the mutation frequency at the TK locus was observed after treatment with the test substance. The numbers of small and large colonies in the test substance treated cultures were comparable to the numbers of small and large colonies of the solvent controls.
The mutation frequency found in the solvent control cultures was within the acceptability criteria of this assay and within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical negative control database. Positive control chemicals, methyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced significant increases in the mutation frequency. In addition, the mutation frequency found in the positive control cultures was within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical positive control database. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly. - Remarks on result:
- other: precipitation was observed at 100 µg/mL
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells (in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells).
- Executive summary:
An in vitro study was conducted to determine the genetic toxicity of the test substance according to OECD Guideline 490 (mouse lymphoma assay), in compliance with GLP. Two experiments were performed on mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells at the thymidine-kinase locus (TK-locus). In the first experiment, the test substance was tested up to concentrations of 100 µg/mL in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The incubation time was 3 h. No toxicity was observed at this dose level in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at this dose level. In the second experiment, the test substance was again tested up to concentrations of 100 µg/mL in the absence of S9-mix. The incubation time was 24 h. No toxicity was observed at this dose level. The test substance precipitated in the culture medium at this dose level. Per culture 8.0E06 cells (10E06 cells/mL for 3 hour treatment) or 6.0E06 cells (1.25E05 cells/mL for 24 hour treatment) were used. For expression of the mutant phenotype, cells were cultured for 2 d after the treatment period. During this culture period at least 4.0E06 cells (where possible) were subcultured every day in order to maintain log phase growth. Two days after the end of the treatment with the test substance, the cells were plated for determination of the cloning efficiency (CEday2) and the mutation frequency (MF). The determination of the mutant colonies and the calculation of the survival or viability were recorded as well. No severe toxicity was observed up to and including the highest tested dose level of 100 µg/mL. In the first mutation experiment (3-h treatment), no significant increase in the mutation frequency at the TK locus was observed after treatment with the test substance either in the absence or in the presence of S9-mix. The numbers of small and large colonies in the test substance treated cultures were comparable to the numbers of small and large colonies of the solvent controls. This result was confirmed in an independent experiment with modification in the duration of treatment. In the second mutation experiment (24 -h treatment), no significant increase in the mutation frequency at the TK locus was observed after treatment with the test substance. The numbers of small and large colonies in the test substance treated cultures were comparable to the numbers of small and large colonies of the solvent controls. The mutation frequency found in the solvent control (ethanol) cultures was within the acceptability criteria of this assay and within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical negative control database. Positive control chemicals, methyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced significant increases in the mutation frequency. In addition, the mutation frequency found in the positive control cultures was within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical positive control database. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not mutagenic in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells (Verspeek-Rip, 2017).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.