Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-122-3 | CAS number: 106185-75-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From April 19 to June 15, 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study following OECD guideline 476 with minor deviations: 3 test concentrations were based on one replicate only as flask contents were lost during expression period and in experiment 1, no concentration gave 10-20% relative survival.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3 test concentrations were based on one replicate only as flask contents were lost during expression period and in experiment 1, no concentration gave 10-20% relative survival.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase, TK +/- locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Source of cells: Dr Donald Clive, Burroughs Wellcome Co. Cells
- Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 medium
RPMI A: Penicillin (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), amphotericin B (2.5 μg/mL) and pluronic acid (0.5 mg/mL)
RPMI 10: Horse serum (heat inactivated, 10% v/v), penicillin (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), amphotericin B (2.5 μg/mL) and pluronic acid (0.5 mg/mL)
RPMI 20: Horse serum (heat inactivated, 20% v/v), penicillin (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and amphotericin B (2.5 μg/mL)
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: Yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: No data
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: Yes; each batch was purged of TK- mutants - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 2% S9 fraction of Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range-finder experiment: 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 μg/mL (with and without S-9)
Main study:
- Experiment 1: without S-9: 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 μg/mL; with S-9: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 μg/mL
- Experiment 2: without S-9: 0, 10, 20, 25, 30, 35, 37.5, 40, 42.5, 45 and 50 μg/mL; with S-9: 0, 10, 20, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 and 75 μg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Test material was soluble in anhydrous analytical grade DMSO at concentrations up to at least 269.29 mg/mL - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 2 or 3 µg/mL
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.10 or 0.15 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 hours, 37 ± 1 ºC
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days, 37 ± 1 ºC in a humidified incubator gassed with 5 % v/v CO2 in air
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 12 days, 37 ± 1 ºC in a humidified incubator gassed with 5 % v/v CO2 in air
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine (6TG)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicates (single cultures only used for positive control treatments and range-finding experiment)
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 20000 cells/well plated for survival, viability and 6TG resistance
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Cloning efficiency
OTHER: Cell viability was identified by eye using background illumination and counted; cell densities were determined using a coulter counter - Evaluation criteria:
- For valid data, the test article was considered to induce forward mutation at the hprt locus in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells if:
1. The mutant frequency at one or more concentrations was significantly greater than that of the negative control (p ≤ 0.05)
2. There was a significant concentration-relationship as indicated by the linear trend analysis (p ≤ 0.05)
3. The effects described above were reproducible.
Results that only partially satisfied the assessment criteria described above were considered on a case-by-case basis. - Statistics:
- The experimental data was analysed using UKEMS recommended statistical guidelines
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- The highest concentrations to give >10% Relative Survival were 25 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and 50 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, which gave 66% and 61% relative survival, respectively.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No
- Effects of osmolality: No
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data; solubility limit in the culture medium: 84.1 to 168.3 μg/mL
- Precipitation: Yes; upon addition of the test article to the cultures, precipitate was observed at the highest four concentrations tested in the absence and presence of S-9 (50 to 400 µg/mL).
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Six concentrations were tested in the absence and presence of S-9 ranging from 12.5 to 400 µg/mL (limited by solubility in culture medium).
- Precipitation was observed precipitate was observed at the highest four concentrations tested in the absence and presence of S 9 (50 to 400 µg/mL).
- The highest concentrations to give >10% Relative Survival were 25 µg/mL in the absence of S-9 and 50 µg/mL in the presence of S-9, which gave 66% and 61% Relative Survival, respectively.
- See table 1 for more details
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Yes - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: TK+/- (3.7.2C) cells
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
The test item is not considered as mutagenic in L5178Y cells and should not be classified as mutagen according to Directive 67/548/EEC and CLP Regulation (EC) n° 1272/2008. - Executive summary:
In an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test performed according to OECD guideline 476, in compliance with GLP, mouse lymphoma L5178Y TK+/- (3.7.2C) cells were exposed to the test item in DMSO at concentrations of 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 μg/mL in RPMI 1640 medium with and without 2% S-9 metabolic activation for a preliminary cytotoxicity test.
In the main test, two experiments were performed at the following concentrations:
- Experiment 1: without S-9: 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 μg/mL; with S-9: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 μg/mL
- Experiment 2: without S-9: 0, 10, 20, 25, 30, 35, 37.5, 40, 42.5, 45 and 50 μg/mL; with S-9: 0, 10, 20, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 and 75 μg/mL.
Mutant frequencies in negative control cultures fell within normal ranges and clear increases in mutation were induced by the positive control chemicals 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (without S-9) and benzo(a)pyrene (with S-9). In the absence and presence of S-9 in Experiment 1 and in the presence of S-9 in Experiment 2, there were no significant increases in mutant frequency at any concentration analysed. For Experiment 2 in the absence of S-9, significant increase in mutant frequency was noted at a single intermediate concentration.
As the response is not concentration related, there is no linear trend and the response is not well reproduced, this increase was not considered as biologically relevant. Therefore, the test item is not considered as mutagenic in L5178Y cells and should not be classified as mutagen according to Directive 67/548/EEC and CLP Regulation (EC) n° 1272/2008.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From May 11 to December 22, 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP study performed according to OECD guideline 473 with minor deviations: no data about purity and certificate of analysis of the test substance; evaluation criteria not reported; no information regarding mycoplasma contamination and karyotype stability check
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no data about purity and certificate of analysis of the test substance; evaluation criteria not reported; no information regarding mycoplasma contamination and karyotype stability check
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Source of cell lines: Huntingdon Research Centre
- Type and identity of media: Hams F12 Medium (Flow Laboratories, UK) with 5% foetal calf serum, 2mM L-glutamine and 50 µg/mL gentamicin
- Culture conditions: Cells were cultured in test media in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37 °C.
- Properly maintained: Yes; normally subcultured every 2 to 3 days. For long-term preservation, stocks of the cells were stored frozen in culture medium containing 10% v/v DMSO in sealed ampoules in liquid nitrogen. Sterilisation was achieved either by autoclaving at 15 Ib/sq.in. for 20 minutes or by filtration through a 0.22 µm pore size membrane. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 10% S9 fraction of rat liver supplemented with co-factors
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Cytotoxicity test: 1.0, 2.1, 4.6, 9.9, 21.0, 46 or 100 µg/mL
Cytogenetic test:
- Without S9: 0.63, 2.0, 6.3 or 20 µg/mL
- With S9: 1.46, 4.6, 14.6 or 46 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: DMSO had been identified as solvent of choice based on a previous bacterial mutation study (PI870203). Based on the solubility and precipitation of the test substance in DMSO, 100 µg/mL was selected as the highest tested dose. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO (1% v/v)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 20 µg/mL
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO (1% v/v)
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 25 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: In medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6 hours with S9 and 18 hours without S9
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 18-24 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colchicine (0.5 µg/mL)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 5% Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicates
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1000 cells/dose for toxicity test, 200 cells/dose (100 cells/replicate) for cytogenicity experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Mitotic index; cells were exposed to Chandanol at concentrations of 1.0, 2.1, 4.6, 9.9, 21, 46 or 100 µg/mL in the absence and presence of S9 and the number of dividing nuclei per 1000 nuclei per dose were examined microscopically to calculate the mitotic index. - Evaluation criteria:
- No data
- Statistics:
- Criteria for scoring chromosome aberrations followed the recommendations of the UKEMS (1983).
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at ≥ 21 µg/mL (without S9); at 100 µg/mL (with S9)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Solubility or precipitation: Based on the solubility and precipitation of the test substance in DMSO, 100 µg/mL was selected as the highest tested dose in the cytogenetic test.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Cells were exposed to Chandanol at concentrations of 1.0, 2.1, 4.6, 9.9, 21, 46 or 100 µg/mL in the absence and presence of S9 and the number of dividing nuclei per 1000 nuclei per dose were examined microscopically to calculate the mitotic index. Cytotoxicity was observed at or above 21 µg/mL without S9 and at 100 µg/mL with S9. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The test item did not induce chromosome aberrations in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells with and without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
In an in vitro chromosome aberration test performed according to OECD guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to the test item. In a first experiment, cells were exposed to the test item at concentrations of 1.0, 2.1, 4.6, 9.9, 21, 46 or 100 µg/mL in the absence and presence of S9 (10% S9 fraction of rat liver supplemented with co-factors). From the results of this cytotoxicity test, the test item was tested at 0.63, 2.0, 6.3 or 20 µg/mL without S9 and at 1.46, 4.6, 14.6 or 46 µg/mL with S9. Treatment was for 6 hours with S9 and 18 hours without S9.
Positive controls (methylmethanesulfonate at 25 µg/mL without S9 and cyclophosphamide at 20 µg/mL with S9) induced the appropriate response. Chromosome aberrations were not induced over background at any tested concentrations in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
Therefore, the test item did not induce chromosome aberrations in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells with and without metabolic activation.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From June 20 to July 12, 2007
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted similarly to OECD Guideline 471 with minor deviations: no certificate of analysis of test substance; only duplicate cultures used /dose
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no certificate of analysis of test substance; only duplicate cultures used /dose
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 10% S9 fraction of male SD rat liver induced with phenobarbital and 5, 6-benzoflavone and supplemented with Cofactor I® (Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd.)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range-finding test 1 (all 5 strains): 0.305, 1.22, 4.88, 19.5, 78.1, 313, 1250 or 5000 µg/plate with or without S9 mix
Range-finding test 2 (all 4 Salmonella strains): 0.610, 1.22, 2.44, 4.88, 9.77 or 19.5 µg/plate without S9 mix
Main test:
- Without S9 (all 4 Salmonella strains): 0.610, 1.22, 2.44, 4.88, 9.77 or 19.5 µg/plate
- Without S9 (WP2 uvrA) or with S9 (all 5 strains): 2.44, 4.88, 9.77, 19.5, 39.1 or 78.1 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Test substance was soluble and stable in DMSO at 50 mg/mL but insoluble in distilled water - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide (TA 100, TA 98 and WP2 uvrA); sodium azide (TA 1535); 2-methoxy-6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethyl)-aminopropylamino]acridine.2HCI (TA 1537)
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes at 37 ± 0.5 °C
- Exposure duration: 48 hours at 37 ± 0.5 °C
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicates (for test substance and positive control groups) or triplicates (for negative control group)
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 10^9 cells/mL - Evaluation criteria:
- - Test substance was judged to be positive when the number of revertant colonies increased to twice or more that in the negative control in a concentration-dependent manner and also the reproducibility of the test results was obtained.
- In all other cases, it was judged to be negative. - Statistics:
- None
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see table 1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see table 1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see table 1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see table 1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Yes; in the range-finding test-1, precipitation was observed at 1250 µg/plate or more without S9 mix and at 5000 µg/plate or more with S9 mix.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Range-finding test-1:
- Number of revertant colonies in the test substance treatment groups was less than twice that in the solvent control
- Precipitation was observed at 1250 µg/plate or more without S9 mix and at 5000 µg/plate or more with S9 mix.
- Bacterial growth inhibition was observed at 19.5 µg/plate or more in TA100, TA1535, TA98 and TA1537 without S9 mix, at 78.1 µg/plate or more in WP2uvrA without S9 mix and at 78.1 µg/plate or more in all test strains with S9 mix.
Range-finding test-2:
- Number of revertant colonies in the test substance treatment groups was less than twice that in the solvent control in TA100, TA1535, TA98 and TA1537 without S9 mix
- Number of revertant colonies was increased nearly twice in TA1537
- Bacterial growth inhibition was observed at 19.5 µg/plate in all test strains
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Yes; numbers of revertant colonies in the negative control and the positive controls were within the range of the historical data (December, 2006 - May, 2007)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: In the range-finding test-1, complete cytotoxicity was observed at 78.1 µg/plate or more in TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 without S9 mix, at 313 µg/plate or more in TA98 without S9 mix and at 313 µg/plate or more in TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 with S9 mix - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results::
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The test item is not considered as mutagenic in S. typhimurium strains (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA 98) and Escherichia coli strain (WP2 uvrA) according to the criteria of Directive 67/548/EEC and CLP Regulation (EC) n° 1272/2008. - Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, performed similarly to the OECD guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, strains of S. typhimurium (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA 98) and one Escherichia coli strain (WP2 uvrA) were exposed to the test item at concentrations of 0, 0.305, 1.22, 4.88, 19.5, 78.1, 313, 1250 or 5000 µg/plate in both the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation (10% S9 fraction of male SD rat liver induced with phenobarbital and 5, 6-benzoflavone) according to the pre-incubation method for the first range finding test.
In the second range finding test, all four Salmonella test strains were exposed to the test item at concentrations of 0.610, 1.22, 2.44, 4.88, 9.77 or 19.5 µg/plate without S9 mix.
In the main test, experiment was performed at the following concentration according to the pre-incubation method:
- without S9 (all four Salmonella test strains) at 0.610, 1.22, 2.44, 4.88, 9.77 or 19.5 µg/plate;
- without S9 (WP2 uvrA) or with S9 (all 5 strains) at 2.44, 4.88, 9.77, 19.5, 39.1 or 78.1 µg/plate.
In the range finding test, precipitation of the test substance was observed at 1250 µg/plate or more without S9 mix and at 5000 µg/plate with S9 mix. Cytotoxicity was observed at 78.1 µg/plate or more in TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 without S9 mix, at 313 µg/plate or more in TA98 without S9 mix and at 313 µg/plate or more in TA100, TA1535 and TA1537with S9 mix. The positive and negative (vehicle) controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains. The test item showed no substantial increases in revertant colony numbers over control count obtained with any of the tester strains at any concentrations in either presence or absence of S9 mix.
Therefore, the test item is not considered as mutagenic in bacteria according to the criteria of Directive 67/548/EEC and CLP Regulation (EC) n° 1272/2008.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: RS values - range-finder experiment
Treatment (µg/mL) |
-S-9 %RS |
+S-9 %RS |
0 |
100 |
100 |
12.5 |
100 |
112 |
25 |
66 |
92 |
50 P |
0 |
61 |
100 P |
NP |
0 |
% RS: Percentage Relative Survival
P: Precipitation observed at time of treatment
NP: Not plated for viability due to excessive toxicity
Table 2: Summary of mutation data
Experiment 1: (3 hour treatment in the absence and presence of S-9)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
-S-9 |
Treatment (µg/mL) |
+S-9 |
||||||
|
%RS |
MF§ |
|
%RS |
MF§ |
||||
0 |
|
100 |
6.51 |
|
0 |
|
100 |
4.96 |
|
10 |
|
97 |
4.91 |
NS |
10 |
|
92 |
3.37 |
NS |
15 |
|
90 |
3.61 |
NS |
20 |
|
78 |
3.89 |
NS |
20 |
|
91 |
5.68 |
NS |
30 |
|
72 |
5.39 |
NS |
30 |
|
64 |
7.11 |
NS |
40 |
|
52 |
5.15 |
NS |
35 |
|
55 |
4.84 |
NS |
50 |
P |
27 |
2.51 |
NS |
40 |
|
32 |
2.73 |
NS |
60 |
P |
32! |
4.55 |
NS |
45 |
|
7 |
4.44 |
NS |
70 |
P |
4 |
5.67 |
NS |
Linear trend |
NS |
Linear trend |
NS |
||||||
NQO |
|
|
|
|
B[a]P |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
70 |
17.73 |
|
2 |
|
85 |
17.87 |
|
0.15 |
|
64 |
62.76 |
|
3 |
|
26 |
47.67 |
|
Experiment 2: (3 hour treatment in the absence and presence of S-9)
Treatment (µg/mL) |
-S-9 |
Treatment (µg/mL) |
+S-9 |
||||||||
|
%RS |
MF§ |
|
%RS |
MF§ |
||||||
0 |
|
100 |
0.74 |
|
0 |
|
100 |
6.83! |
|
||
10 |
|
117 |
1.21 |
NS |
20 |
|
106 |
1.59 |
NS |
||
20 |
|
100 |
1.74 |
NS |
40 |
|
89 |
2.56 |
NS |
||
30 |
|
67 |
4.70 |
* |
50 |
|
71 |
3.32 |
NS |
||
35 |
|
54 |
0.68 |
NS |
55 |
|
77 |
2.23 |
NS |
||
37.5 |
|
36 |
1.58 |
NS |
60 |
|
60 |
1.07! |
NS |
||
40 |
|
23 |
1.01 |
NS |
65 |
P |
65 |
0.70 |
NS |
||
42.5 |
|
11 |
4.17 |
NS |
70 |
P |
25 |
2.03 |
NS |
||
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
P |
10 |
1.32 |
NS |
||
Linear trend |
NS |
Linear trend |
NS |
||||||||
NQO |
|
|
|
|
B[a]P |
|
|
|
|
||
0.1 |
|
70 |
21.29 |
|
2 |
|
45 |
24.82 |
|
||
0.15 |
|
55 |
22.80 |
|
3 |
|
47 |
27.60 |
|
§: 6‑TG resistant mutants/106 viable cells 7 days after treatment
%RS: Percent relative survival adjusted by post treatment cell counts
NS: Not significant
*: Comparison of each treatment with control: Dunnett's test (one-sided), significant at 5% level
!: Based on one replicate only as flask contents lost during expression period
P: Precipitation observed at time of treatment
Table 1: Mitotic indices of chandanol with and without metabolic activation
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Without metabolic activation |
With metabolic activation |
||
Mitotic index |
% of control |
Mitotic index |
% of control |
|
Control |
14 |
- |
15 |
- |
100.0 |
toxic |
|
toxic |
|
46.0 |
toxic |
|
7 |
47 |
21.0 |
14* |
100 |
12 |
80 |
9.9 |
14 |
100 |
10 |
67 |
4.6 |
8 |
57 |
13 |
87 |
2.1 |
12 |
86 |
21 |
140 |
1.0 |
14 |
100 |
14 |
93 |
* number of cells greatly reduced; Mitotic index = no. of mitoses per 1000 cells scored
Table 2: Cytogenetics assay of Chandanol with CHO cells in the absence of exogenous metabolism (replicates A and B combined)
Dose |
Number of divisions |
Normal |
Chromatid |
Isochromatid |
Chromatid exchange |
Chromosome exchange |
Fragments |
M.A. |
Aberrant divisions |
Frequency of aberrations |
||
Gap |
Break |
Gap |
Break |
|||||||||
Control DMSO |
200 |
186 |
8 |
2 |
_ |
1 |
_ |
_ |
2 pr+1 |
_ |
7 |
7 (3) |
200 |
183 |
6 |
1 |
_ |
2 |
1 |
_ |
8 pr |
_ |
9 |
9 (6) |
|
0.63 |
200 |
182 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
_ |
3 pr+2 |
_ |
9 |
10 (6) |
2 |
200 |
185 |
6 |
2 |
_ |
2 |
_ |
1 |
4 pr |
_ |
8 |
8 (5) |
6.3 |
200 |
184 |
5 |
2 |
_ |
6 |
_ |
2 |
3 pr |
_ |
8 |
9 (7) |
20 |
200 |
177 |
9 |
_ |
2 |
3 |
_ |
|
8 pr+2 |
_ |
12 |
12 (8) |
MMS (25 µg/mL) |
197 |
122 |
40 |
25 |
9 |
13 |
7 |
2 |
8 pr+1 |
_ |
38 |
53 (33) |
Table 3: Cytogenetics assay of Chandanol with CHO cells in the presence of exogenous metabolism (replicates A and B combined)
Dose |
Number of divisions |
Normal |
Chromatid |
Isochromatid |
Chromatid exchange |
Chromosome exchange |
Fragments |
M.A. |
Aberrant divisions |
Frequency of aberrations |
||
Gap |
Break |
Gap |
Break |
|||||||||
Control DMSO |
200 |
191 |
4 |
1 |
_ |
_ |
_ |
1 |
3 pr |
_ |
5 |
5 (3) |
200 |
189 |
9 |
1 |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
2 pr |
_ |
6 |
6 (2) |
|
1.46 |
200 |
192 |
7 |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
1 pr |
_ |
4 |
4 (1) |
4.6 |
200 |
186 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
|
1 |
_ |
4 pr+1 |
_ |
7 |
8 (6) |
14.6 |
200 |
183 |
11 |
3 |
_ |
1 |
1 |
_ |
2 pr |
_ |
9 |
9 (4) |
46 |
200 |
180 |
12 |
2 |
_ |
_ |
2 |
_ |
3 pr+1 |
_ |
10 |
10 (4) |
CP (20 µg/mL) |
200 |
41 |
53 |
60 |
16 |
25 |
99 |
_ |
40 pr+13 |
12 |
77 |
206 (176) |
MMS = Methyl methane sulphonate; CP = Cyclophosphamide
*per 100 divisions to nearest whole numbers;
M.A. Multiple aberrations assigned nominal score of 5
Table 1: Results of the main test
With or without S9 mix |
Test substance dose (µg/plate) |
Number of revertant colonies per plate |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
|
Mean |
|
Mean |
|
Mean |
|
Mean |
|
Mean |
||
Without S9 mix |
Negative control |
151 |
142 |
8 |
10 |
37 |
43 |
22 |
19 |
8 |
10 |
144 |
13 |
49 |
20 |
11 |
|||||||
130 |
8 |
44 |
14 |
11 |
|||||||
0.61 |
123 |
122 |
13 |
11 |
|
|
26 |
23 |
11 |
11 |
|
120 |
8 |
20 |
11 |
||||||||
1.22 |
146 |
136 |
11 |
8 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
15 |
13 |
|
126 |
5 |
21 |
11 |
||||||||
2.44 |
138 |
143 |
10 |
10 |
36 |
38 |
28 |
28 |
15 |
12 |
|
148 |
10 |
40 |
27 |
8 |
|||||||
4.88 |
130 |
139 |
7 |
8 |
41 |
41 |
25 |
28 |
16 |
18 |
|
148 |
8 |
41 |
31 |
20 |
|||||||
9.77 |
104 |
126 |
14 |
15 |
50 |
42 |
21 |
22 |
12 |
12 |
|
148 |
15 |
33 |
22 |
12 |
|||||||
19.5 |
78* |
66 |
3* |
4 |
43 |
37 |
21* |
19 |
0* |
2 |
|
53* |
5* |
31 |
16* |
4* |
|||||||
39.1 |
- |
|
- |
|
20* |
16 |
- |
|
- |
|
|
12* |
|||||||||||
78.1 |
- |
|
- |
|
20* |
22 |
- |
|
- |
|
|
23* |
|||||||||||
With S9 mix |
Negative control |
118 |
116 |
8 |
10 |
40 |
39 |
47 |
41 |
29 |
32 |
112 |
10 |
31 |
41 |
31 |
|||||||
117 |
12 |
47 |
34 |
37 |
|||||||
2.44 |
152 |
144 |
12 |
9 |
44 |
39 |
31 |
37 |
29 |
35 |
|
135 |
6 |
34 |
42 |
40 |
|||||||
4.88 |
134 |
128 |
11 |
12 |
47 |
49 |
38 |
32 |
28 |
29 |
|
122 |
12 |
50 |
26 |
29 |
|||||||
9.77 |
142 |
145 |
10 |
8 |
55 |
48 |
36 |
36 |
23 |
19 |
|
147 |
5 |
41 |
36 |
15 |
|||||||
19.5 |
141 |
148 |
11 |
12 |
41 |
44 |
35 |
39 |
30 |
29 |
|
134 |
12 |
47 |
42 |
28 |
|||||||
39.1 |
153 |
147 |
11 |
12 |
42 |
41 |
35 |
35 |
23 |
20 |
|
141 |
13 |
40 |
34 |
16 |
|||||||
78.1 |
101* |
90 |
5* |
4 |
24* |
27 |
23* |
28 |
8* |
7 |
|
79* |
3* |
29* |
32* |
5* |
|||||||
Positive control without S9 mix |
Chemical |
AF-2 |
NaN3 |
AF-2 |
AF-3 |
ICR-191 |
|||||
Dose (µg/plate) |
0.01 |
0.5 |
|
0.01 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
||
Number of revertant colonies/plate |
770 |
756 |
626 |
620 |
502 |
479 |
627 |
628 |
1682 |
1720 |
|
742 |
613 |
455 |
629 |
1757 |
|||||||
Positive control with S9 mix |
Chemical |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
|||||
Dose (µg/plate) |
1 |
2 |
10 |
0.5 |
2 |
||||||
Number of revertant colonies/plate |
1050 |
1025 |
239 |
236 |
863 |
866 |
498 |
502 |
239 |
215 |
|
1000 |
233 |
868 |
505 |
191 |
*: Bacterial growth inhibition was observed.
AF-2: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
NaN3: Sodium azide
ICR-191: 2-Methoxy-6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethyl)-aminopropylamino ]acridine.2HCI
2AA: 2-Aminoanthracene
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In two reverse gene mutation assays in bacteria, performed similarly to the OECD guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, the test item was negative in S. typhimuriumstrains (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA 98) and in Escherichia colistrain (WP2 uvrA-) in presence and absence of metabolic activation, up to limit or cytotoxic concentrations.
The test item was also negative in presence and absence of metabolic activation in a chromosome aberration test performed in CHO cells performed according to OECD guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP.
The test item was also negative in presence and absence of metabolic activation in a gene mutation test (HPRT) in MLA L5178Y tk+/- cells performed according to OECD guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Several in vitro studies were used to complete this endpoint: two Ames tests, chromosome aberration test in CHO cells and gene mutation test (HPRT) in MLA L5178Y tk+/- cells.
Short description of key information:
The registered substance was negative in two Ames tests, in a chromosome aberration test in CHO cells and in a gene mutation test (HPRT) in MLA L5178Y tk+/- cells.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
As the test item is negative in two Ames tests, in a chromosome aberration test in CHO cells and in a gene mutation test (HPRT) in MLA L5178Y tk+/- cells, it is not classified according to Directive 67/548/EEC and CLP Regulation (EC) n° 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.