Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-209-1 | CAS number: 68412-54-4 1 - 2.5 moles ethoxylated
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Ecotoxicological Summary
Administrative data
Hazard for aquatic organisms
Freshwater
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 0.8 µg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 10
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
- PNEC freshwater (intermittent releases):
- 1.48 µg/L
Marine water
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 0.8 µg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 10
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
- PNEC marine water (intermittent releases):
- 1.48 µg/L
STP
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC STP
- PNEC value:
- 10 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 10
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Sediment (freshwater)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 4.6 mg/kg sediment dw
- Assessment factor:
- 50
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Sediment (marine water)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 0.46 mg/kg sediment dw
- Assessment factor:
- 500
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Hazard for air
Air
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Hazard for terrestrial organisms
Soil
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no exposure of soil expected
Hazard for predators
Secondary poisoning
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no potential for bioaccumulation
Additional information
NP and NPEs have been widely studied for their endocrine mediated effects in the aquatic environment. The following section summarises some of the important data, as presented in a number of published reviews. Overall, the data suggest that NP has the highest endocrine activity and that effects decrease with increasing degree of ethoxylation. In the aquatic environment, the lowest concentrations showing effects (delayed larval development and larval deformities) were equivalent to 0.1 – 100 µg/L NP in a study with the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas by Nice HE et al.(2000). However, it was unclear whether these changes were due to endocrine disruption or other toxicity mechanisms. Most other authors reported effects only at concentrations one to several orders of magnitude higher. Regarding endocrine effects of NP on benthic organisms, not much quantitative data is available. Zulkosky AM et al. (2002) reported a 50% reduced reproduction of the estuarine species Leptocheirus plumulosus in sediment collected near the outfall of a waste water treatment plant in Jamaica Bay (New York) where the concentration of NP was determined to around 40 mg/kg dw.
EU Risk Assessment Report (RAR) (2002)
NP is cited as having estrogenic
effects based on in vitro and in vivo studies. In
vitro studies, for example tests with isolated
hepatocytes from rainbow trout, have been used to characterize the
mechanism of NP estrogenicity such as induction of vitellogenin (VTG).
NP showed competitive displacement of estrogen from its receptor site
(White R et al., 1994). NP has the highest estrogenic effects,
and these decrease with increasing degree of ethoxylation. The
estrogenic potency of NP relative to estradiol-17β is given as 0.000009
(Jobling S and Sumpter JP, 1993). Most of the available in
vivo tests indicate that estrogenic effects start to occur at
aquatic concentrations around 10 – 20 µg NP/L. In
rainbow trout exposed to NP in a flow-through system at a measured
concentration of 37 µg/L, significant reduction of the testis size and
gonadosomic index (GSI) were observed. In an independent second
experiment, the NOEC for VTG induction in rainbow trout was determined
to be 20 µg/L whereas the NOEC for GSI and testicular growth was 54 µg/L
(Jobling S et al., 1996). In a chronic test with Medaka (Oryzias
latipes) starting at hatch (duration 3 months) with nominal NP
concentrations of 10, 50 and 100 µg/L, testis-ova in male fish was
observed as of 50 µg/L (NOEC: 10 µg/L) (Gray MA and Metcalf CD, 1997).
In another long-term test with rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
where the fish were exposed to NP for 35 days from hatch to 1, 10 or 30
µg/L (observations up to 431 days after the start of the test), Ashfield et
al.(1998) reported on a significantly enhanced ovosomatic index at
30 µg/L (at this concentration body weights were also reduced) at the
end of the experiment. In a 3 week static renewal test withDaphnia
magna,significant reduction of reproduction was detected at 100 µg/L
NP (Baldwin WS et al., 1997). NP caused deformed adults and
offspring in a 30 day exposure study with Daphnia galeata mandotae already
at 10 µg/L (Shurin JB and Dodson SI, 1997).
Langston et al. (2005)
The review reports on distribution and impact of estrogens and xeno-estrogens in the aquatic environment. With respect to in vitro tests, Legler J et al. (2002a) made a comparison of the estrogenic potency of different endocrine active compounds and determined the EC50 value in the ER-CALUX assay for estradiol to be 0.0016 µg/L, whereas the corresponding value for NP was 57.3 µg/L (corresponding to a > 35,000 times lower potency). The same authors also concluded that the decrease of the polyethoxylate side chain leads to an increase in estrogenic potency. Legler et al. (2002b) however raised the point that caution is required regarding the extrapolation of the results obtained in vitro to the in vivo situation since aspects such as exogenous and endogenous binding and bioavailability have to be considered. Jobling Set al.(1996) arrived at the same conclusion comparing the in vitro and in vivo effects of NP. NP proved to have an up to 100 times higher estrogenic potency in fish as would have been expected fromin vitrodata. For these reasons, the European Scientific Committee for Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (CSTEE) recommends to put the major emphasis on in vivo tests when screening chemicals for endocrine effects (CSTEE, 1999).
In the review of Langston WJ et al. (2005), in vivo data on fish mainly stem from field studies where effects found in situ were related to NP. Different authors are cited which looked at VTG induction in fish sampled from different locations, effects which could partially be correlated with NP levels found in water (Solé M et al., 2000). Besides VTG induction, abnormal gonad development (i.e. inhibition of testicular growth) was found in rainbow trout held at sites which were contaminated by alkylphenols (Harries J et al., 1997). Lye CM et al. (1999) attributed high VTG levels and testicular abnormalities to several estrogenic alkylphenols.
Although endocrine regulation in invertebrates is different from vertebrates such as fish (various forms of hermaphrodism, moulting), there are a number of studies linking the effects of substances such as alkylphenols to invertebrate development. Comber MHI et al.(1993), Baldwin WS et al.(1995) and Zou E and Fingerman S (1997) linked the presence of NP to the inhibition of molting and growth, as well as to the inhibition of testosterone metabolism in experiments with Daphnia magna. Life history effects have been observed in the copepod Tisbe battagliai at NP concentrations of 20 µg/L (Bechmann HE, 1997). Nice et al. (2000) reported on delayed larval development and larval deformities of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas at NP concentrations of 0.1 – 100 µg/L. These authors also refer to altered sex ratio of C. gigas at NP concentrations ranging from 1 – 100 µg/L. However, it was not clear whether the effects were due to endocrine disruption or other toxicity mechanisms. In the case of other bivalves such as the Manila clamsTapes philippinarium, VTG levels measured in the haemolymph and the digestive tract of males increased at 100 and 200 µg/L NP (Matozzo V et al., 2003; Matozzo V and Marin MG, 2005). Studies on prosobranch snails (Marisa conuarietis) in which octylphenol (1 – 100 µg/L) and other xenostrogens such as bisphenol A were reported to cause the formation of „superfemales“ (Oehlmann J et al., 2000) could not be reproduced in more elaborated studies later on (at least for bisphenol A) (Forbes VE et al., 2007 a,b).
Coady et al. (2010)
In the review article of Coady K et al. (2010), a special chapter deals with so called secondary endpoint studies where the effects of NP on serum VTG concentrations, VTG gene transcription, estrogen receptor transcription, P450 enzyme activity and histological changes in liver, kidney and gonadal tissues are presented.
According
to this summary, VTG induction (including VTG mRNA) in fish could be
observed at NP concentrations ranging from 1 to 100 µg/L (Seki
et al., 2003; Larsen BK et al., 2006; Van den Belt K et
al.; 2004, Zha JM et al.,2007; Li MH and Wang ZR, 2005;
Lerner DT et al. ,2007a; Staples C et al., 2004; Kim C et
al., 2006; Zhang Z et al., 2005; Fent et al., 1999).
Effects on clams in which VTG formation is, similar to vertebrate
species, also under the control of the estrogen receptor, were also
reported: Addition of 100 to 200 µg/L NP in case of marine clams
(Matozzo V and Marin MG, 2005) or 500 µg/L NP in case of Dreisenia
polymorpha (Quinn B et al., 2006) led to the induction of VTG
in males. Regarding histopathology in fish tissues, changes in the GSI
were reported at 10 and 500 µg/L NP by Zha JM et al. (2007)
/ Van den Belt K et al. (2004) and Yang FX et al. (2006).
Balch G and Metcalf C (2006) and Zha JM et al. (2007) reported on
the formation of ova-testis as a result of exposure to 29 and 30 µg/L
NP, respectively. Previous reports were referring to 1.6 to 100 µg/L NP
causing intersex and changes of the GSI (Miles-Richardson SR et al.,
1999; Gray MA and Metcalf CD, 1997; Jobling S et al., 1996;
Staples C et al.; 2004). With respect to changes of enzyme
activities, Lerner DT et al. (2007b) observed effects such as
decreased thyroid hormone levels, decreased gill
sodium-potassium-activated ATPase activity (an enzyme considered to be
of importance for the salt secretion and osmoregulation) in Atlantic
salmon exposed to NP at 6.5 µg/L. Other enzymes which were suppressed as
a result of the exposure to NP concentrations of 30 - 5000 µg/L included
CYP1A, CYP3A and ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (Sturve J et al., 2006;
Vacaro E et al., 2005). A moult-promoting steroid hormone of
importance for invertebrates, 20-hydroxyectysone, was significantly
decreased in mysid shrimp at 30 µg/L NP (Hirano M et al.,
2009).
PNEC water
The PNEC calculations for freshwater and marine environments are based on the lowest chronic value of 7.7 µg/L (NOEC determined with NPE-1.5 for the salwater species mysid shrimp in a 28 day test). This study was selected for PNEC derivation as the test substance NPE-1.5 has a composition closely resembling that of NPEO, except that NPE-1.5 also contains 3.8% of NP.
The PNEC calculation for intermittent release was basedon the lowest available valid acute value of 148 µg/L (48 h LC50determined for Daphnia magna) and an assessment factor of 100.
Regarding endocrine disruption, the EU RAR completed in 2002 concluded that „data exist indicating toxicity at lower concentrations than the concentrations at which estrogenic effects were observed. Therefore, the calculated PNEC (of 0.33 µg/L) should be protective for estrogenic effects in fish as well.“ (EU RAR, 2002).
The review of Langston WJ et al. (2005) summarized the reported data by stating that NOECs for OP and NP are of the order of a few µg/L, although general toxicity endpoints may be lower than endocrine effects. Similarly to the EU RAR of 2002, these authors considered general toxicity effects as occurring at lower concentrations than endocrine effects.
According to Coady K et al. (2010), “(…)the current U.S. chronic WQC of 6.6 µg/L for NP appears to be sufficiently protective for freshwater communities in light of the recent literature on this substance.“
Based on the above considerations, it can be concluded that the aquatic PNECs of 0.8 µg/L (freshwater and marine water) and 1.48 µg/L (intermittent release) established for NPEO can be considered as protective also for endocrine disruption endpoints.
PNEC sediment
The PNEC calculation for freshwater and marine sediment is based onthe lowest EC10 value (231 mg/kg dw) from a study with C. riparius exposed to NP. An assessment factor of 50 was applied for freshwater and 500 for marine water.
The PNECs for sediment organisms of 4.6 mg/kg dw (4.6 µg/g dw) for freshwater and 0.46 mg/kg dw (0.46 µg/g dw) for marine species can reasonably be assumed to protect also for endocrine effects on sediment organisms in the light of the data generated by Zulkosky AM et al. (2002) showing 50% reduction of reproduction in Leptocheirus plumulosus at around 40 mg/kg dw NP.
Conclusion on classification
|
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.