Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 259-370-9 | CAS number: 54839-24-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Acceptable, well documented study which meets basic scientific principles and contains sufficient detail to be able to judge the results reliable as a contribution to the understanding of the toxicity of this substance. Study examined a structural analogue chemical.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Genotoxic and/or epigenetic effects of some glycol ethers: results of different short-term tests.
- Author:
- Elias, Z., Danière, M.C., Marande, A.M., Poirot, O., Terzetti, F. & Schneider, O.
- Year:
- 1 996
- Bibliographic source:
- Occup.Hyg., 2, 187-212.
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- cited as being according to recommended standards and guidelines as stated by Heddle et al (Mutat Res, 123, 61-118, 1983) and MacGregor et al (Mutat Res, 189, 103-12, 1987)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-methoxypropan-2-ol
- EC Number:
- 203-539-1
- EC Name:
- 1-methoxypropan-2-ol
- Cas Number:
- 107-98-2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-methoxypropan-2-ol
- Reference substance name:
- 1-methoxypropano-2-ol
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-methoxypropano-2-ol
- Details on test material:
- 1-methoxypropan-2-ol is a close structural analogue of 1-ethoxypropan-2-ol, which is the major hydrolysis product of the submission substance (2-ethoxy-1-methyl ether acetate). Details for the surrogate material:
- Analytical purity: Analysed purity 99% .
- Supplied by Merck, manufacturer’s quoted purity >99%
- Impurities: peroxides 0.5-2mg/l.
A detailed justification for read across within the P series glycol ethers is attached to chapter 13 of the IUCLID dossier for this substance.
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- no data
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Hank's balanced salt solution, pH 7.2
- Amount of vehicle administered): 0.2ml - Details on exposure:
- single dose
- Post exposure period:
- Sampling times 24, 48 and 72 hours after dosing for three lowest dose groups and 24 hours for two highest dose groups.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 2500, 4000, 5000, 6000mg/kg
Basis:
other: actual dose received.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 4
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 25mg/kg
- control (positive and negative) only sampled at 24 hours
Examinations
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: dose levels tested between 12.5 and 70% of LD50
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: two femurs were removed from each animal and bone marrow flushed out. Cell suspensions were diluted in vehicle and spun in a centrifuge on to a slide. Two patches/slide and two slides/animal were made. Slides were air dried then fixed in methanol and stained with sequentially: May-Grunwald, May-Grunwald pus phosphate buffer, Giemsa in phosphate buffer before rising in phosphate buffer and drying.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes/animal scored. Ratio of PCEs to normochromic erythrocytes determined by counting 2000 erythrocytes. - Evaluation criteria:
- As described by Schmid in Hollaender "Chemical Mutagens", Plenum Press, NY, 1976
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- lethality
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results on mortality at top dose confusing as published in study. Reported that "5 animals died after 48 hour (1 males and 2 females)" . The frequency of micronucleated PCEs per 1000 cells in the vehicle control group was 0.53 0.27 and the range of means in the dose groups was from 0.11 0.10 at 2500 mg/kg bw to 0.53 0.20 at 6000 mg/kg bw, both results being in the 24 hr samples. The intermediate doses gave values between these two but there was no dose response relationship. Values at 48 hours were similar to the 24 hour control value (no 48 hour control values available. There was no clear dose related change in the PCE/NCE ratio at either the 24 h or 48 h observation times from the common, 24 h control value of 1.33 ± 0.9. There appeared to be a slight trend towards an inhibition in the division and maturation of the nucleated erythropoetic cells, as shown but the decrease in PCE/NCE ratio at 24hrs, but the values obtained at the different doses were not statistically significantly different from the control.
Detailed results
Micronucleated PCE % |
PCE/NCE ratio |
|||||
24hr | 48hr | 24hr | 48hr | |||
Vehicle | 0.53 (+/-0.27) | 1.33 (+/-0.09) | ||||
Cyclophosphamide | 9.90 (+/-1.33) | 1.27 (+/-0.07) | ||||
2500mg/kg | 0.11 (+/-0.10) | 0.54 (+/-0.28) | 1.17 (+/-0.07) | 1.30 (+/-0.07) | ||
4000mg/kg | 0.36 (+/-0.18) | 0.33 (+/-0.16)- | 1.06 (+/-0.05) | 1.22 (+/-0.09) | ||
5000mg/kg | 0.12 (+/-0.10) | 1.03 (+/-0.33) | 1.04 (+/-0.09) | 1.03 (+/-0.23) | ||
6000mg/kg | 0.97 (+/-0.39) | 0.69 (+/-0.42) | 0.96 (+/-0.14) | 0.60 (+/- 0.20) |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
methoxypropanol does not cause an increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in rats when tested up to overtly toxic doses. - Executive summary:
A reliable in vivo micronucleus induction test was performed with male and female mice at dose levels up to those causing lethality. The mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of the surrogate substance methoxypropanol dissolved in Hank's balance salt solution at doses up to 6000mg/kg bw per day before sampling at 24 and 48 hours. For the positive and negative controls, sampling was only undertaken at 24 hours. Marked lethality was seen at the top dose. There were no statistically significant increases seen in any dose group relative to the control in the number of micronucleated PCE or the PCE/NCE ratio at any time point or concentration, leading to a conclusion of a negative response. This result can be considered representative of the close structural analogue ethoxypropanol, which is in turn the rapidly created in vivo metabolite of ethoxypropyl acetate, the substance that is the subject of this dossier. On this basis, the study indicates that ethoxyypropyl acetate is not mutagenic.
Synopsis: mouse micronucleus test: negative.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.