Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction products of 1-(substitutedphenyl)urea coupled with diazotated potassium sodium substituted-5-{[2-(substituted)ethyl]sulfonyl}benzenesulfonate, further condensed with 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine, further converted with disubstituted benzene-1,4-disulfonic acid in aq. sodium hydroxide
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was conducted between 12 October and 24 November 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- referenced as Method C.20 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.20 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Water samples were taken from the control and each test group for quantitative analysis. Samples of the fresh test preparations were taken from the bulk test preparations on Days 0, 5, 9, 14 and 19, and of the expired test preparations (replicates pooled) on Days 2, 7, 12, 16 and 21. Samples were stored frozen prior to analysis. Duplicate samples were taken and stored frozen for further analysis if necessary.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Remarks:
- test water
- Details on test solutions:
- RANGE-FINDING TEST:
Daphnia magna were exposed to a series of nominal concentrations of 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L.
A nominal amount of test item (100 mg) was dissolved in test water and the volume adjusted to 1 liter to give the 100 mg/L test concentration from which a series of dilutions was made to give the required test concentrations of 0.10, 1.0 and 10 mg/L. Each of the prepared concentrations was inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity
DEFINITIVE TEST:
A nominal amount of test item (400 mg) was dissolved in test water,reconstituted water (Elendt M7 medium), and the volume adjusted to 2 liters to give a 200 mg/L stock solution. A series of dilutions was made from this stock solution to give the required test concentrations of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L.
The stock solution and each of the prepared concentrations were inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity.
The concentration and stability of the test item in the test preparations were verified by chemical analysis on Days 0, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16, 19 and 21. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- The test was carried out using 1st instar Daphnia magna derived from in-house laboratory cultures.
Adult daphnia were maintained in 150 mL glass beakers containing Elendt M7 medium in a temperature controlled room at approximately 20 °C. The lighting cycle was controlled to give a 16 hours light and 8 hours darkness cycle with 20 minute dawn and dusk transition periods. Each culture was fed daily with a mixture of algal suspension (Desmodesmus subspicatus) and Tetramin® flake food suspension. Culture conditions ensured that reproduction was by parthenogenesis. Gravid adults were isolated the day before initiation of the test, such that the young daphnids produced overnight were less than 24 hours old. These young were removed from the cultures and used for testing. The diet and diluent water are considered not to contain any contaminant that would affect the integrity or outcome of the study. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- 234 to 247 mg/L CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 18 to 22 °C with a maximum deviation of ±1 °C
- pH:
- 7.7 to 8.1
- Dissolved oxygen:
- ≥7.7 mg O2/L
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Conductivity:
- No data
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- RANGE-FINDING TEST:
Nominal concentrations: 0.1, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L
DEFINITIVE TEST:
Nominal concentrations: 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L.
Analysis of the fresh and old test preparations on days 0, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16, 19 and 21 showed measured test concentrations were all near nominal therefore the test results are based on nominal test concentrations only. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 150 mL glass vessels
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed
- Fill volume: 100mL
- Aeration: The diluent water was aerated prior to use, however, the test vessels were not aerated.
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): The test preparations were renewed 3 times per week on Days 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16 and 19
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Elendt M7 medium
- Culture medium different from test medium: No
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 hours light, 8 hours darkness with 20 minute dawn and dusk transition periods
- Light intensity: Throughout the test the light intensity was observed to be in the range 522 to 771 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
On a daily basis the numbers of live and dead of the "Parental" (P1) generation, the numbers of live and dead "Filial" (F1) daphnia and the number of discarded unhatched eggs were counted. An assessment was also made of the general condition and size of the parental daphnia as compared with the controls.
Filial daphnids were considered to be dead if no sign of movement was apparent during examination. Parental daphnia which were unable to swim for approximately 15 seconds after gentle agitation (ie. immobile), were considered to be dead. An immobilization criterion for the young daphnids was considered to be inappropriate due to the large numbers of off-spring produced in the flasks.
At the end of the test, the length of each surviving parent animal was determined.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: No immobilization was observed at the test concentrations of 0.10, 10 and 100 mg/L, however, immobilization was observed at 1.0 mg/L. Sub-lethal effects of exposure were observed at the test concentration of 100 mg/L. This response was a delayed and reduced size of first brood and aborted eggs were also observed. Based on this information test concentrations of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L were selected for the definitive test.
VALIDATION CRITERIA:
For the test to be valid, the following criteria should be fulfilled:
• Mortality of parent test animals in the controls should not exceed 20% at the end of the test
• The mean number of living offspring in the control should be at least 60 per surviving adult daphnia at the end of the test
• The coefficient of variation around the mean number of living offspring produced per parent animal in the control should be equal to or less than 25%
• No ephippia are produced in the controls
• Dissolved oxygen concentration should remain greater than 3 mg O2/L throughout the test
• pH of the controls should be within the range 6 to 9 pH units and not vary by greater than 1.5 units throughout the test - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 60 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 84 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 75 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence limits: 29-85 mg/L
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 94 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence limits: 76-96 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 56 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: MATC
- Effect conc.:
- 75 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Geometric mean between NOEC and LOEC
- Details on results:
- Range-finding Test
No immobilization was observed at the test concentrations of 0.10, 10 and 100 mg/L, however, immobilization was observed at 1.0 mg/L. Sub-lethal effects of exposure were observed at the test concentration of 100 mg/L. This response was a delayed and reduced size of first brood and aborted eggs were also observed.
Based on this information test concentrations of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L were selected for the definitive test.
Chemical analysis of the test preparations on Days 0 and 2 showed test concentrations to range from 101% to 112% of the nominal concentration, indicating that the test item was stable under test conditions.
Definitive Test
Based on the results of preliminary range finding test, test concentrations of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L were selected for the definitive test.
Verification of Test Concentrations
Analysis of the fresh test preparations on days 0, 5, 9, 14 and 19 showed measured test concentrations to range from 89% to 101% of nominal concentrations. There was no significant change in the measured concentrations of the aged test preparations on days 2, 7, 12, 16 and 21, so the results are based on nominal test concentrations only.
Validation Criteria
The following validation criteria were achieved during the test
Required Actual
Control mortality <=20% 0%
Mean number of live young per surviving adult (control group) >=60 after 21 days 116
Coefficient of variation for control group <=25% 7.7%
No ephippia produced (control group) 0 produced 0 produced
Dissolved oxygen > 3 mg O2/L >=7.7 mg O2/L
pH (control group) 6 to 9 7.7 to 8.1
Variation <=1.5 0.5
Lethal Effects on the Parental Generation (P1)
Mortality (immobilization) occurred predominantly at the highest test concentration of 100 mg/L resulting in 78% mortality by Day 19. Mortality also occurred in the 10 mg/L test concentration, resulting in 10% mortality by Day 21, however due to the lack of a concentration dose response this was considered to be an inadvertent mortality. No mortalities occurred at the 18, 32 and 56 mg/L test groups throughout the test.
Sub-lethal Effects on the Parental Generation (P1)
Five of the surviving daphnia in the 100 mg/L test concentration were observed to be pale in appearance compared to the control on Day 17 of the test. Three of the pale colored daphnia were mortalities on Day 19 of the test whereas the remaining two survived to the end of the test but remained pale in color.
The daphnids at the remaining test concentrations were observed to be the same size and color as the control daphnids.
After 21 days the length of each surviving adult was determined, the results of which are given in Table 10. The reduction in daphnia length at the test concentrations of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L were -0.3%, 1.2%, 3.4%, 4.6% and 13% respectively. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences (P≥ 0.05) between the control and the 10 and 18 mg/L test groups in terms of length of the daphnids after 21 days exposure to the test item, however there was a significant difference between the control and the 32, 56 and 100 mg/L test groups.
Given that the percentage reduction in body length at 32 and 56 mg/L were less than 5% and therefore below the calculated EC10 it was considered that the observed reductions in body length although statistically significant were not necessarily biologically significant. The NOEC and LOEC for body length after 21 days are therefore considered to be 56 mg/L and 100 mg/L respectively by inspection of the data.
Effects on Reproduction
After 21 days there were no statistically significant differences between the control and the 10, 18, 32 and 56 mg/L test groups in terms of the number of live young produced per adult. The 100 mg/L test group showed a statistically significant difference from the control after 21 days in terms of producing fewer numbers of live young per adult.
Effects on the Filial Generation (F1)
Information on the effects of the test item on the F1 generation is limited, since, by study design, the young are removed soon after liberation from the brood pouch. However, an assessment made at each media renewal showed the "filial" daphnids produced by the 10 and 32 mg/L test groups were in the same general condition as the young produced by the controls over the duration of the test. The young produced by replicate 3 of the 18 mg/L test group were observed to be pale when compared to the control young on Days 16. The young produced by replicate 6 of the 56 mg/L test group were observed to be small and pale when compared to the control group on day 19 and the young produced by the 100 mg/L test group were observed to be small and pale when compared to the control group between days 17 and 21.
Young were first produced in the control test group on Day 7 of the test.
There were no unhatched eggs or dead young recorded in any of the control and treatment groups.
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration
The "Lowest Observed Effect Concentration" (LOEC) was 100 mg/L as this test group produced significantly fewer live young per adult (P<0.05) than the control group.
No Observed Effect Concentration
The "No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) was 56 mg/L as there were no significant mortalities (immobilization) observed in the parental generation (P1) and there were no significant differences (P≥0.05) in terms of the number of live young produced per adult when compared to the control after 21 days.
Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration
The "Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration" (MATC) was calculated to be 75 mg/L.
Observations on Test Item Solubility
At the start and throughout the test all control solutions were observed to be clear colorless, the 10 mg/L solutions were bright yellow, the 18 mg/L solutions were dark yellow, the 32 mg/L solutions were light orange, the 56 mg/Lsolutions were bright orange and the 100 mg/L solutions were dark orange.
95% confidence limit of Reproduction EC10: 29 - 85 mg/L
95% confidence limit of Reproduciton EC50: 76 - 96 mg/L - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical Analysis
ECx Calculations
The 21-Day ECx values for parental generation immobilization were calculated by Linear Interpolation and were determined using the ToxCalc software package (TOXCALC).
The 21-Day ECx values for reproduction and daphnia length were calculated by Probit analysis using Linear Maximum-Likelihood regression and were determined using the ToxRatPro software package (TOXRAT).
NOEC and LOEC Determinations
For the estimation of the LOEC and NOEC values for parental generation immobilization, the number of immobilized adults over the duration of the test for the control and each test group were analyzed using Fisher’s Exact Test using the ToxCalc software package (TOXCALC).
For the estimation of the LOEC and the NOEC values for reproduction, the numbers of live young produced per adult over the duration of the test for the control and each test group were compared using Williams Multiple Sequential t-test incorporating Shapiro-Wilk's test on normal distribution and Levene’s test on variance homogeneity using the ToxRatPro software package (TOXRAT).
Results from the control and each test group’s daphnia length data, determined for the surviving daphnids on termination of the test, were also compared using Williams Multiple Sequential t-test incorporating Shapiro-Wilk's test on normal distribution and Levene’s test on variance homogeneity using the ToxRatPro software package (TOXRAT).
Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration (MATC)
The MATC was calculated using the geometric mean method as follows:
MATC value = √(LOEC x NOEC)
Where:
NOEC = No Observed Effect Concentration (mg/L)
LOEC = Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (mg/L) - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Exposure of Daphnia magna to the test item resulted in significant mortalities at the concentration of 100 mg/L resulting in 78% mortality by Day 21.
The 21-Day EC50 (immobilization) value, based on nominal test concentrations, for the parental daphnia generation (P1) was calculated to be 84 mg/L.
The 21-Day EC50 (reproduction) based on nominal test concentrations was 94 mg/L with 95% confidence limits of 76 to 96 mg/L.
The "Lowest Observed Effect Concentration" (LOEC) and the "No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) for reproduction based on nominal test concentrations were 100 and 56 mg/L respectively.
The "Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration" (MATC) was calculated to be 75 mg/L. - Executive summary:
Long-term toxicity to Daphnia. The chronic toxicity of the test item was assessed in a Daphnia magna reproduction test under semi-static conditions according to OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (2012) No 211, "Daphnia magna Reproduction Test" referenced as Method C.20 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008.
Based on the results of a preliminary range-finding test, Daphnia magna were exposed (10 replicates of a single daphnid per group) to solutions of the test item at nominal concentrations of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L in Elendt M7 media for a period of 21 days.
Analysis of the fresh and old test preparations on days 0, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16, 19 and 21 showed measured test concentrations were all near nominal therefore the test results are based on nominal test concentrations only.
The numbers of live and dead adult daphnia and young daphnids (live and dead) were determined daily. The daphnia were fed daily with a mixture of algal suspension and Tetramin®flake food suspension.
Exposure of Daphnia magna to the test item gave the following results based on the nominal test concentrations:
Endpoint Concentration (mg/L) Immobilization EC10 60* Immobilization EC50 84* Reproduction EC10 75 95% confidence limits 29 - 85 Reproduction EC50 94 95% confidence limits 76 - 96 NOEC for Reproduction 56 LOEC for Reproduction 100 MATC (Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration) 75 * Not possible to determine 95% confidence limits as data did not fit available models
Reference
Summary of Findings Following the Exposure of Daphnia magna for 21 Days
Nominal Concentration (mg/L) | Percentage Survival of Parental (P1) Generation | Total Number of Live Young | Number of Live Offspring per Parent Surviving to the End of the Test | Number of Live Offspring at the End of the Test per Parent at the Start of the Test Excluding Parental Accidental or Inadvertent Mortalities |
Control | 100 | 1041 | 115.7* | 115.7 |
10 | 90 | 1272 | 136.8 | 136.8 |
18 | 100 | 1426 | 142.6 | 142.6 |
56 | 100 | 1196 | 119.6 | 119.6 |
100 | 22** | 370 | 68.0 | 41.1 |
* Results from 9 replicates. Brood from replicate 5 lost on day 13 prior to counting, therefore data from replicate removed from subsequent analysis
** Replicate 9 was an accidental mortality, therefore, concentration based on 9 replicates
Statistical Analysis
Analysis of Numbers of Live Young Produced per Adult
Results from the control and the each test group were comparedwere compared using Williams Multiple Sequential t-test incorporating Shapiro-Wilk's test on normal distribution and Levene’s test on variance homogeneity.
Mean and standard deviation values derived from the number of live young produced per surviving adult in the control and each test group were used for this analysis and are given in the table below:
Nominal Concentration (mg/L) |
Number of Live Young Produced per Adult by Day 21 |
Percentage reduction |
|
Control |
Mean |
115.7 |
- |
|
Standard Deviation |
8.9 |
|
10 |
Mean |
136.8 |
-18 |
|
Standard Deviation |
7.8 |
|
18 |
Mean |
142.6 |
-23 |
|
Standard Deviation |
13.5 |
|
32 |
Mean |
138.6 |
-20 |
|
Standard Deviation |
9.1 |
|
56 |
Mean |
119.6 |
-3.4 |
|
Standard Deviation |
13.7 |
|
100 |
Mean |
41.1 |
65 |
|
Standard Deviation |
22.2 |
|
No significant differences (P³0.05) were found between the control and 10, 18, 32 and 56 mg/L testgroups in terms of the number of live young produced per adult by Day 21 using the above methods of statistical analysis,however there was a significant difference between the control and the 100 mg/L test group.
Analysis of theDaphniaLength Data
Results from the control and the each test groupDaphnialength data, determined for the surviving daphnids on termination of the testwere comparedwere compared using Williams Multiple Sequential t-test incorporating Shapiro-Wilk's test on normal distribution and Levene’s test on variance homogeneity.
Mean and standard deviation values derived from the length of the surviving daphnids of the parental (P1) generation in the control and each test group were used for this analysis and are given in the table below:
Nominal Concentration (mg/L) |
DaphniaLengths at |
Percentage reduction |
|
Control |
Mean |
4.1 |
- |
|
Standard Deviation |
0.10 |
|
10 |
Mean |
4.1 |
-0.3 |
|
Standard Deviation |
0.07 |
|
18 |
Mean |
4.0 |
1.2 |
|
Standard Deviation |
0.07 |
|
32 |
Mean |
4.0 |
3.4 |
|
Standard Deviation |
0.10 |
|
56 |
Mean |
3.9 |
4.6 |
|
Standard Deviation |
0.08 |
|
100 |
Mean |
3.6 |
13 |
|
Standard Deviation |
0.07 |
|
No statistically significant differences (P³0.05) were found between the control and the 10 and 18 mg/L test groups in terms of length of the surviving parental daphnids on Day 21 of the test, using the above methods of statistical analyses,however there was a significant difference between the control and the 32, 56 and 100 mg/L test groups.
Given that the percentage reduction in body length at 32 and 56 mg/L were less than 5% and therefore below the calculated EC10of 82 mg/L, it was considered that the observed reductions in body length although statistically significant were not necessarily biologically significant. The NOEC and LOEC for body length after 21 days are therefore considered to be 56 mg/L and 100 mg/L respectively by inspection of the data.
Description of key information
Exposure of Daphnia magna to the test item resulted in significant mortalities at the concentration of 100 mg/L resulting in 78% mortality by Day 21.
- The 21-Day EC50 (immobilization) value, based on nominal test concentrations, for the parental daphnia generation (P1) was calculated to be 84 mg/L.
- The 21-Day EC50 (reproduction) based on nominal test concentrations was 94 mg/L with 95% confidence limits of 76 to 96 mg/L.
- The "Lowest Observed Effect Concentration" (LOEC).
- The "No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) for reproduction based on nominal test concentrations were 100 and 56 mg/L respectively.
- The "Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration" (MATC) was calculated to be 75 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 56 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.