Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 28.11.1983 to 23.01.1984
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to a test protocol that is comparable to the appropriate OECD test guideline. It was not compliant with GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- other company data
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 984
- Report date:
- 1984
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: variation of Magnusson and Kligman method
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The study was conducted in 1983. At this time the GPMT was the standard regulatory protocol and the LLNA had not been developed.
Test material
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Aminotris(methylenephosphonic acid) (CA3). No indication of
active acid concentration
No further details available in report.
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Pirbright-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Winkelmann, Borchen
- Weight at study initiation: average 430g for dosed animals, 423g for control animals
- Housing: Type 4 Makrolon cages
- Diet: Specialfeed Altromin 3022, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): ca. 23
- Humidity (%): 50-65
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 5%
Challenge
- Route:
- other: epicutaneous (need translation)
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 5%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 20
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- other: aqueous solution
- Concentration:
- 5%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 20
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 19
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 19
Any other information on results incl. tables
TEST SUBSTANCE GROUP RESPONSES
One animal died immediately after the intracutaneous application, with bleeding from the nose.
No evidence of sensitisation was observed. Necropsy findings included catarrhal enteritis, bulging stomach and cecum (indigestion), pulmonary congestion, enlarged left side of the heart. Clear structure of the liver lobules.
CONTROL GROUP RESPONSES
One animal died during the exposure.
No evidence of sensitisation was observed. After removal of patch one animal had white dots in left eye.
OTHER: The Freund’s adjuvant resulted in necrosis which resulted in scar tissue during the treatment free period of the experiment. After the Patch-test with of 48 hours general redness was seen and the injection sites were blood stained. Crust formation was present at injection sites in both the test and control animals.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- In a skin sensitisation study conducted using a protocol which was a variation of the Magnusson and Kligman method (reliability score 2), ATMP was not sensitising to the skin of guinea-pigs.
- Executive summary:
In a skin sensitisation study conducted using a protocol which was a variation of the Magnusson and Kligman method (reliability score 2), ATMP (in water) was applied to the skin of 20 Pirbright guinea-pigs, 20 additional guinea-pigs served as negative controls. One animal from the test and control group died, and the study was negative for skin sensitisation (48 and 72 hours after exposure). Further details are available in the study report, but this needs proper translation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
