Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 944-710-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The bacterial mutagenicity assay (Ames) is positive, but in neither the mammalian cell HGPRT assay nor in a chromosomal aberration assay mutagenic activity was detected up to the limit dose.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1997
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study according to GLP regulation; full report available
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat Liver S-9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0 - 312,5 - 625 - 1250 - 2500 - 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- water
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-anthramine (2AM)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation;
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 min.
- Exposure duration: 48-72 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth; - Evaluation criteria:
- Treatment of results
In each experiment, for each strain and for each experimental point, the number of revertants per plate was scored. The individual results and the mean number of revertants, with the corresponding standard deviation and ratio (mutants obtained in the presence of the test substance/mutants obtained in the presence of the vehicle), are presented in a table.
Acceptance criteria
This study would be considered valid since the following criteria are fully met:
- the number of revertants in the vehicle controls is consistent with the range of our historical data (appendix 2),
- the number of revertants in the positive controls is higher than that of the vehicle controls and is consistent with the range of our historical data.
Evaluation criteria
A reproducible two-fold increase in the number of revertants compared with the vehicle controls, in any strain at any dose-level and/or evidence of a dose-relationship was considered as a positive result. Reference to historical data, or other considerations of biological relevance may also be taken into account in the evaluation of the data obtained. - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: 100g/L
- Precipitation: No
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
No relevant toxicity was noted towards all the strains used, both with and without S9 mix. - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: TA 100
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive with metabolic activation only in strain TA 100 after preincubation
The test item showed mutagenic activity in a bacterial reverse mutation test on Salmonella typhimuriumTA 100 strain, with metabolic activation and preincubation method. - Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of the test substance to induce reverse mutation in Salmonella typhimurium.
The test item was tested in two independent experiments, with or without a metabolic activation system, the S9 mix, prepared from a liver microsomal fraction (S9 fraction) of rats induced with Aroclor 1254.
A third experiment was performed with S9 mix.
The first experiment was performed according to the direct plate incorporation method. The second and the third with S9 mix were performed according to the preincubation method (60 minutes, 37C).
Five strains of bacteria Salmonella typhimurium: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 were used.
Each strain was exposed to five dose-levels of the test substance (three plates/dose-level).
After 48 to 72 hours of incubation at 37C, the revertant colonies were scored.
The test substance was dissolved in distilled water.
Results
The test substance was freely soluble in the vehicle at 54.348 mg/ml, corresponding to 50 mg of the active material/ml (purity of the commercial product: 92%). Since the test substance was freely soluble and non-toxic in the preliminary toxicity test, the highest dose-level was 5000 µg/plate, according to the criteria specified in the guidelines.
The selected treatment-levels for the mutagenicity experiments were: 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate, for all strains in the first and second experiments, except for the TA 1535 strain in the second experiment with S9 mix where the treatment-levels were: 500, 1000,2000,2500 and 5000 µg/plate.
In the third experiment, the dose-levels were: 625, 1250, 2500, 3000 and 5000 µg/plate.
Slight to strong blue coloration was observed in the Petri plates when scoring the revertants at dose-levels. This coloration did not impede the automatic counting of the bacterial colonies. No precipitate was observed at any dose-level.
No relevant toxicity was noted towards all the strains used, both with and without S9 mix.
The test substance did not induce any significant increase in the number of revertants, with S9 mix and without S9 mix, in any of the five strains using the direct plate incorporation method.
With S9 mix and the preincubation method, a significant increase in the number of revertants, in comparison to the vehicle control, was noted in the TA 100 strain, at the dose-levels of 1250 and 2500 µg/plate. In addition, a dose-related increase was observed in this strain, at all dose-levels tested, except at the highest dose-level of 5000 µg/plate where a slight toxicity could have masked the increase in the number of revertants.
A third experiment was performed under the same conditions, in order to check the reproducibility of the significant increase observed. In this third experiment, the significant induction of the number of revertants was confirmed.
The number of revertants of the vehicle and positive controls was as specified in the acceptance criteria.
The study was therefore considered as valid.
Conclusion
Under our experimental conditions, the test substance showed mutagenic activity in this bacterial reverse mutation test on Salmonella typhimuriumTA 100 strain, with metabolic activation and preincubation method.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
- Study period:
- 2000
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: very poor sample characterisation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9 mix (Aroclor)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0 - 1250 - 2500 - 5000 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- water
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4h & 20 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 24 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 5% Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method:relative total growth (viability by trypan blue exclusion)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication:Yes - Evaluation criteria:
- The toxic effects of treatment were based upon cell growth inhibition relative to the solvent-treated control and are presented for the toxicity and aberration studies. The number and types of aberrations found, the percentage of structurally and numerically damaged cells (percent aberrant cells) in the total population of cells examined, and the mean aberrations per cell was calculated and reported for each group. Chromatid and isochromatid gaps are presented in the data but are not included in the total percentage of cells with one or more aberrations or in the frequency of structural aberrations per cell.
Statistical analysis of the percent aberrant cells was performed using the Fisher's exact test. Fisher's test was used to compare pairwise the percent aberrant cells of each treatment group with that of the solvent control. In the event of a positive Fisher's test at any test article dose level, the Cochran-Armitage test was used to measure dose-responsiveness.
All conclusions were based on sound scientific basis; however, as a guide to interpretation of the data, the test article was considered to induce a positive response when the percentage of cells with aberrations is increased in a dose-responsive manner with one or more concentrations being statistically significant (p=0.05). Test articles not demonstrating a statistically significant increase in aberrations will be concluded to be negative. Negative results with metabolic activation may need to be confirmed on a case-by-case basis. In those cases where continuation of negative results is not necessary, justification will be provided.
Criteria for a Valid Test
The frequency of cells with structural chromosome aberrations in the solvent control must be within the range of the historical solvent control. The percentage of cells with chromosome aberrations in the positive control must be statistically increased (p =0.05, Fisher's exact test) relative to the solvent control - Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Full report according to Guideline and GLP regulations
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I:
without S9 mix: 30.0; 100.0*; 300.0, 1000.0, 3000.0 and 5000.0 µg/ml
with S9 mix: 30.0; 100.0*; 300.0, 1000.0, 3000.0 and 5000.0 µg/m
Experiment II:
without S9 mix: 30.0*; 300.0; 1000.0, 3000.0 and 5000.0 µg/m
with S9 mix: 30.0*; 300.0; 1000.0, 3000.0 and 5000.0 µg/ml
* not evaluated, culture not continued; - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: none /medium
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Seeding
Exponentially growing stock cultures (more than 50% confluent) were trypsinized at 37 °C for 5 minutes. Then the enzymatic digestion was stopped by adding complete culture medium and a single cell suspension was prepared. The trypsin concentration for all subculturing steps was 0.2% in Ca-Mg-free salt solution (Trypsin: Difco Laboratories, Detroit, USA).
The Ca-Mg-free salt solution was composed as follows (per litre):
NaCl 8000 mg
KCl 400mg
Glucose 1000 mg
NaHC03 350mg
Prior to the trypsin treatment the cells were rinsed with Ca-Mg-free salt solution containing 200 mg/1 EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid).
The cell suspension was seeded into plastic culture flasks (Greiner, D-72632 Frickenhausen).
Approximately 1. 5 x 1E06 (single culture) and 5 x 1E02 cells (in duplicate) were seeded in MEM with 10% FCS (complete medium) for the determination of mutation rate and toxicity, respectively (see experimental scheme).
Treatment
After 24 h the medium was replaced with serum-free medium containing the test article, either without S9 mix or with 50 µl/ml S9 mix. After 4 h this medium was replaced with complete medium following two washing steps with "saline G" .
The Saline G solution was composed as follows (per litre):
NaCl 8000 mg
KCl 400mg
Glucose 1100 mg
Na2HP04x1H20 290mg
KH2P04 150mg
the pH was adjusted to 7.2.
Experimental Scheme:
Segment a): Procedure for determination of toxicity
Segment b): Procedure for determination ofmutation rates
Day 1: Subculturing of a log-phase culture which showed an initial spontaneous mutation rate at the beginning of the experiment of 1.7 (experiment I) and 6.6 (experiment II) mutants per 10E6 cells.
a) About 500 cells in 5 ml medium/25 cm2 -plastic-flask for cloning efficiency; in duplicate per experimental point
b) About 1.5xl06 cells in 30 ml medium/175 cm2-plastic-flask for the mutagenicity test, 1 flask per experimental point
Day 2: Treatment of a) and b)
experiment I
Day 5: Subculturing ofb) in 175 cm2-plastic-flasks 1.5x106 cells in 30 ml medium/175 cm2 -plastic-flasks
experiment II
Day 6: see day 5
Day 8: Fixation and staining of colonies in a)-flasks determination of concentration-related cloning efficiency
Day 9: Subculturing ofb) in five 80 cm2-plastic-flasks containing selective medium:
mutant selection (about 3-5x105 cells/flask);
subculturing ofb) in two 25 cm2-flasks for cloning efficiency (about 500 cells/flask)
Day 16: Fixation and staining of colonies in b) - derived flasks seeded on day 9 (cloning efficiency).
Day 1 7: Fixation and staining of colonies in b) - derived flasks seeded on day 9 (mutant selection).
The cultures were incubated at 37° C in a humidified atmosphere with 4.5 % C02. The colonies were stained with 10% methylene blue in 0.01 % KOH solution (E. MERCK, D-64293 Darmstadt, F.R.G.).
The stained colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. In doubt the colony size was checked with a preparation microscope (Nikon, D-40407 Dusseldorf, F.R.G.). - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability of the Assay
The gene mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) the numbers of mutant colonies per 106 cells found in the negative and/or solvent controls fall within the laboratory historical control data range: 1 - 32 mutants/10E6 cells.
b) the positive control substances must produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies.
c) the cloning efficiency (absolute value) of the negative and/or solvent controls must exceed s0 %.
The data of this study comply with the above mentioned criteria
Evaluation of Results
A test article is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points.
A test article producing neither a concentration- related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A significant response is described as follows:
A test article is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment.
The test article is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not obsenred.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding negative control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate in the range normally found (1 - 32 mutants per 10E6 cells) a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. - Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test item did not induce gene mutations in the HPRT in V79 cells in vitro with and without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
The test article was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus using V79 cells of the Chinese hamster.
The study was performed in two independent experiments using identical procedures, both with and without liver microsomal activation.
The test article was tested with the following concentrations:
Experiment I:
without S9 mix: 30.0; 100.0*; 300.0, 1000.0, 3000.0 and 5000.0 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 30.0; 100.0*; 300.0, 1000.0, 3000.0 and 5000.0 µg/mL
Experiment II:
without S9 mix: 30.0*; 300.0; 1000.0, 3000.0 and 5000.0 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 30.0*; 300.0; 1000.0, 3000.0 and 5000.0 µg/mL
* not evaluated, culture not continued;
Up to the highest test concentration no visible precipitation occurred.
Strong toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the cloning efficiency of the cells occurred in both experiments at 5000 µg/mL without metabolic activation. In the presence of metabolic activation only slight toxic effects were observed at the maximal concentration. Up to the highest investigated concentration no relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers was observed, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation.
In the first experiment without metabolic activation unusually low numbers of spontaneous mutant colonies occurred in the solvent control due to statistical fluctuations at such small numbers. This effects results in a colony count above 3 times the number of mutant colonies of the corresponding solvent control at almost all concentrations throughout the experiment. This increase was judged to be biologically irrelevant since it is based upon the unusually low colony count of the solvent control. Furthermore, the absolute numbers of colonies are low at all concentrations of the test article and remain well within the range of the solvent controls of the experiments.
In this study in both experiments (with and without S9 mix) the range of the solvent controls was from 1.3 up to 11.8 mutants per 10E6 cells; the range of the groups treated with the test article was from 2.1up to 17.5 mutants per l0E6 cells.
EMS (0.6 mg/ml) and DMBA (3.85 µg/ml) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in induced mutant colonies.
In conclusion, it can be stated that in this mutagenicity assay and under the experimental conditions reported the test article did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells.
Referenceopen allclose all
First experiment with S9
Strain |
Dose (µg/plate) |
Revertants / Plate (Mean) |
Standard eviation |
Ratio |
TA 100 |
0 |
95 |
16 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
92 |
5 |
0,97 |
|
625 |
111 |
11 |
1,17 |
|
1250 |
112 |
8 |
1,18 |
|
2500 |
105 |
9 |
1,11 |
|
5000 |
101 |
22 |
1,07 |
|
2AM |
2286 |
94 |
24,06 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA102 |
0 |
343 |
33 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
352 |
13 |
1,03 |
|
625 |
351 |
19 |
1,02 |
|
1250 |
348 |
8 |
1,02 |
|
2500 |
359 |
25 |
1,05 |
|
5000 |
338 |
35 |
0,99 |
|
2AM |
2139 |
443 |
6,24 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA 98 |
0 |
39 |
8 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
47 |
2 |
1,21 |
|
625 |
45 |
2 |
1,15 |
|
1250 |
39 |
4 |
0,99 |
|
2500 |
46 |
5 |
1,17 |
|
5000 |
54 |
3 |
1,39 |
|
2AM |
737 |
57 |
18,9 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
0 |
18 |
6 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
21 |
5 |
1,21 |
|
625 |
26 |
2 |
1,45 |
|
1250 |
28 |
10 |
1,58 |
|
2500 |
19 |
3 |
1,06 |
|
5000 |
19 |
7 |
1,09 |
|
2AM |
278 |
65 |
15,72 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA 1537 |
0 |
19 |
8 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
24 |
4 |
1,26 |
|
625 |
19 |
5 |
0,98 |
|
1250 |
15 |
5 |
0,79 |
|
2500 |
24 |
5 |
1,22 |
|
5000 |
21 |
5 |
1,07 |
|
2AM |
95 |
11 |
4,90 |
Second experiment with S9
Strain |
Dose (µg/plate) |
Revertants / Plate (Mean) |
Standard Deviation |
Ratio |
TA 100 |
0 |
94 |
10 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
144 |
9 |
1,54 |
|
625 |
178 |
24 |
1,90 |
|
1250 |
200 |
15 |
2,13 |
|
2500 |
271 |
32 |
2,90 |
|
5000 |
168 |
4 |
1,79 |
|
2AM |
1153 |
32 |
12,31 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA102 |
0 |
365 |
27 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
423 |
19 |
1,16 |
|
625 |
403 |
5 |
1,10 |
|
1250 |
403 |
16 |
1,10 |
|
2500 |
397 |
9 |
1,09 |
|
5000 |
374 |
10 |
1,02 |
|
2AM |
2670 |
123 |
7,31 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA 98 |
0 |
39 |
4 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
49 |
8 |
1,26 |
|
625 |
54 |
6 |
1,38 |
|
1250 |
57 |
5 |
1,45 |
|
2500 |
56 |
9 |
1,44 |
|
5000 |
44 |
13 |
1,13 |
|
2AM |
1098 |
240 |
28,16 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
0 |
20 |
4 |
1,00 |
|
500 |
20 |
3 |
0,98 |
|
1000 |
19 |
5 |
0,95 |
|
2000 |
17 |
1 |
0,85 |
|
2500 |
21 |
3 |
1,02 |
|
5000 |
18 |
2 |
0,90 |
|
2AM |
214 |
9 |
10,54 |
|
|
|
|
|
TA 1537 |
0 |
16 |
2 |
1,00 |
|
312,5 |
17 |
3 |
1,02 |
|
625 |
20 |
8 |
1,24 |
|
1250 |
16 |
1 |
1,00 |
|
2500 |
14 |
6 |
0,86 |
|
5000 |
10 |
2 |
0,63 |
|
2AM |
82 |
15 |
5,02 |
Third Experiment with S9
Strain |
Dose (µg/plate) |
Revertants / Plate (Mean) |
Standard Deviation |
Ratio |
TA 100 |
0 |
146 |
8 |
1,00 |
|
625 |
244 |
7 |
1,67 |
|
1250 |
305 |
11 |
2,09 |
|
2500 |
341 |
6 |
2,34 |
|
3000 |
341 |
32 |
2,34 |
|
5000 |
309 |
46 |
2,12 |
|
2AM |
1117 |
144 |
7,65 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In an in vivo micronucleus assay no mutagenic activity was detected up to the limit dose.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- in polychromatic erythrocytes in the bone marrow
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study under GLP regulation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: RCC Ltd, Biotechnology and Animal Breeding Division; CH-4414 Füllinsdorf; Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: 8-10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males mean value 40.0 g (SD ± 3.4 g); females mean value 31.5 g (SD± 1.6 g)
- Housing: Makrolon Type I, with wire mesh top
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 24 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Water is a known inocciousstandard vehicle
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 50 to 200 mg/ mL
- Amount of vehicle: 10 ml/kg b.w - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 or 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- single
- Post exposure period:
- none
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
500 mg/mL
Basis:
other: actual injected - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg /mL
Basis:
other: actual injected - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000 mg/ mL
Basis:
other: actual injected - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): usual standard
- Route of administration: ip
- Doses / concentrations: 40 mg/kg bw. - Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow, polychromatic arythrocytes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- The animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The femora were removed, the epiphyses were cut off and the marrow was flushed out with fetal calf serum, using a syringe. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm (390 x g) for 10 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. A small drop of the resuspended cell pellet was spread on a slide. The smear was air-dried and then stained with May-Grunwald (MERCK, D-64293 Darmstadt)/Giemsa (Gurr, BDH Limited Poole, Great Britain). Cover slips were mounted with EUKITI (KINDLER, D-79110 Freiburg). At least one slide was made from each bone marrow sample.
Analysis of Cells:
Evaluation of the slides was performed using NIKON microscopes with 100x oil immersion objectives. 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were analysed per animal for micronuclei. To describe a cytotoxic effect the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes was determined in the same sample and expressed in normochromatic erythrocytes per 2000 the PCEs. The analysis was performed with coded slides.
Ten animals (5 males, 5 females) per test group were evaluated as described. - Evaluation criteria:
- The study was considered valid as the following criteria are met:
- the negative controls are in the range of our historical control data (0.03 - 0.15 %; mean = 0.086 ± 0.027 PCEs with micronuclei).
- the positive controls are in the range of our historical control data (1.0 - 2.71 %; mean = 1.653 ± 0.409 PCEs with micronuclei).
- at least 80 % of animals are evaluable
A test item is classified as mutagenic if it induces either a dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes or a statistically significant positive response for at least one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes nor a statistically significant positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
This can be confirmed by means of the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test.
However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. - Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- at 2000 mg/kg: reduction of spontaneous activity, apathy and closure of eyes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
The test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test in the bone marrow cells of the mouse. - Executive summary:
This study was performed to investigate the potential of the test item to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow of the mouse.
The test item was formulated in deionised water. Deionised water was used as vehicle control. The volume administered intraperitoneally was 10 ml/kg b.w.. 24 h and 48 h after a single administration of the test item the bone marrow cells were collected for micronuclei analysis.
Ten animals (5 males, 5 females) per test group were evaluated for the occurrence of micronuclei. 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) per animal were scored for micronuclei.
To describe a cytotoxic effect due to the treatment with the test item the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) was determined in the same sample and reported as the number of NCEs per 2000 PCEs. The following dose levels of the test item were investigated:
24 h preparation interval: 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg b.w..
48 h preparation interval: 2000 mg/kg b.w ..
The highest dose (2000 mg/kg; maximum guideline-recommended dose) was estimated by a pre-experiment to be suitable.
After treatment with the test item the number of NCEs was not substantially increased as compared to the mean value of NCEs of the vehicle control thus indicating that the test item had no cytotoxic effectiveness in the bone marrow.
In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval after administration of the test item and with any dose level used.
40 mg/kg b.w. cyclophosphamide administered intraperitoneally was used as positive control which showed a substantial increase of induced micronucleus frequency.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the study described and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the mouse. Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay.
Reference
The mean number of normochromatic erythrocytes was not increased after treatment with the test item as compared to the mean value of NCEs of the vehicle control indicating that the test item had no cytotoxic properties in the bone marrow. However, the analytics with the bone marrow samples showed that the item was bioavailable. As shown in the analytics report the bone marrow samples of the male mice contained 5.27, 5.12 and 3.75 µg and the samples of the female mice had 3.56, 6.65 and 6.27 µg of the test item one hour post treatment. The test item concentrations were comparatively lower in the bone marrow samples taken 4 hours after the treatment (test item concentrations in the bone marrow samples were 1.40, 1.30 and 0.847 µg/sample for the male mice and 0.525, 1.37 and 2.59
µg/sample in the female mice), indicating the excretion or metabolism of the test item.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Additional information from genetic toxicity in vivo:
No findings indicating mutagenic activity of the test item were detected an in vivo mouse micronucleus assay after exposure up to the limit dose.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
In vivo study selected
Justification for classification or non-classification
no classification
All in vitro and in vivo assays were negative except for the bacterial mutagenicity assay (Ames). The positive result of the Ames test was not considered a key outcome as this test is a screening assay for mutations and more failure-prone compared to the other tests performed. As a weight-of-evidence the negative results of the in-vitro HPRT and chromosome aberration assay as well as the in-vivo micronucleus test were regarded more reliable.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.