Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 944-710-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study according to current guideline under GLP regulations
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 002
- Report date:
- 2002
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- pentasodium 1-amino-4-{[4-(N-methylacetamido)-2-sulfonatophenyl]amino}-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonate chloride sulfate
- EC Number:
- 944-710-7
- Molecular formula:
- not available because multi-constituent substance
- IUPAC Name:
- pentasodium 1-amino-4-{[4-(N-methylacetamido)-2-sulfonatophenyl]amino}-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracene-2-sulfonate chloride sulfate
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Netherlands B.V. Postbus 6174 NL- 5960 AD Horst I The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 7 - 12 weeks (beginning of acclimatization)
- Weight at study initiation: 14.9 g- 22.0 g (beginning of acclimatization period)
- Housing: Makrolon type-3
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: yes
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22+/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- other: ethanol:water, 7:3 (v/v))
- Concentration:
- 2.5 %, 5 % and 10 % (w/v) in ethanol:water, 7:3 (v/v).
- No. of animals per dose:
- 4
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Irritation: no
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: LLNA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
The proliferative response of lymph node cells is expressed as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute per lymph node (DPM/NODE) and as the ratio of 3HTdR into lymph node cells of test lymph nodes relative to that recorded for control lymph nodes (STIMULATION INDEX). Before DPM/NODE values were determined, mean scintillationbackground DPM was subtracted from test and control raw data.
A test item is regarded as a sensitizer in the LLNA if the following criteria are fulfilled:
- First, that exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice, as indicated by the STIMULATION INDEX.
- Second, that the data are compatible with a conventional dose response, although allowance must be made (especially at high topical concentrations) for either local toxicity or immunological suppression.
The decision to select a stimulation index of 3 as an arbitrary indication of sensitizing activity was made on the basis of investigations performed with a wide range of chemicals. - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- ALPHA-HEXYLCINNAMALDEHYDE showed an allergenic potency when tested at
concentration of 25 % (w/v).
EC3 is the estimated concentration for a STIMULATION INDEX of 3. In this study EC3 of 11.3% (w/v) was theoretically calculated with STIMULATION INDICES of 2.6 and 7.1 at test item concentrations of 10 % and 25 % (w/v).
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.1
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 2: Treatment concentration = 2.5%
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.5
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 3 test item concentration= 5 % (w/v) ;
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 4 test item concentration = 10 % (w/v)
Any other information on results incl. tables
VIABILITY / MORTALITY
No deaths occurred during the study period.
CLINICAL SIGNS
No symptoms of local toxicity at the ears of the animals and no systemic findings were observed during the study period.
BODY WEIGHTS
The body weight of the animals, recorded at the start of acclimatization period and prior to necropsy, was within the range commonly recorded for animals of this strain and age.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- In this study STIMULATION INDICES of 1.1, 0.5 and 1.0 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 2.5 %, 5 % and 10 % (w/v) in ethanol:water, 7:3 (v/v).
Based on these results, the test item was found to be a non-sensitizer when tested at the described concentrations in ethanol:water, 7:3 (v/v). - Executive summary:
In order to study a possible allergenic potential of the test item three groups of four female mice each were treated with the test item at concentrations of 2.5 %, 5 % and 10 % (w/v) in ethanol:water, 7:3 (v/v) by topical application to the dorsum of each ear lobe (left and right) on three consecutive days. A control group of four mice was treated with the vehicle (ethanol:water, 7:3 (v/v)) only. Five days after the first topical application the mice were injected intravenously into a tail vein with radio-labelled thymidine eH-methyl thymidine). Approximately five hours after intravenous injection, the mice were sacrificed, the draining auricular lymph nodes excised and pooled per group. Single cell suspensions of lymph node cells were prepared from pooled lymph nodes which were washed subsequently and incubated with trichloroacetic acid overnight. The proliferative capacity of pooled lymph node cells was determined by the incorporation of 3H-methyl thymidine measured in a 13- scintillation counter.
No test item-related clinical signs were observed.
All treated animals survived the scheduled study period.
A test item is regarded as a sensitizer in the LLNA if the exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice, as indicated by the STIMULATION INDEX (S.I.).
Group 2 test item concentration = 2.5 % (w/v); SI= 1.1
Group 3 test item concentration = 5 % (w/v) ; SI =0.5
Group 4 test item concentration = 10 % (w/v); SI = 1.0
No linear increase of S.l. in relation to the concentrations applied could be observed which might be related to the limited penetration ratio of the test item dilution.
CONCLUSION
In this study STIMULATION INDICES of 1.1, 0.5 and 1.0 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 2.5 %, 5 % and 10 % (w/v) in ethanol:water, 7:3 (v/v).
A test item is regarded as a sensitizer in the LLNA if the exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice, as indicated by the STIMULATION INDEX. Based on these criteria, the test item was found to be a non-sensitizer when tested at the described concentrations in ethanol:water, 7:3 (v/v). 10
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.