Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-374-5 | CAS number: 1569-02-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 106 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: See justification and comments.
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 6
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 266 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 636 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The NOAEL is corrected for exposure duration and breathing rate as recommened in the guidance.
The correction is 1266 * 6/8 (hrs exposure in study versus duration of working day) * 6.7/10 (breathing rate at rest versus breathing rate at work) = 636 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on a NOAEL.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Sub-chronic to chronic default factor.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling not required for inhalation route of exposure.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional factor deemed necessary. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- Proposed factor for workers. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 500 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: See justification and comments.
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 3
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 500 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on a NOAEL
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling not required for inhalation route of exposure.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional factor deemed necessary. See detailed justification in document attached to this record. Narcosis effects not likely to differ between species.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- Proposed factor for workers. See detailed justification in document attached to this record
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 74 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: See justification and comments.
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 29
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 2 126 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on a NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- A factor of 2 is used to extrapolate from sub-chronic to chronic exposure.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 2.4
- Justification:
- Rabbit to human extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional factor deemed necessary. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 3
- Justification:
- Proposed factor for workers. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 2
- Justification:
- It is considered prudent to add a further factor of 2 to account for uncertainty of the database due to the age of the study.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
The long term DNEL is in line with the revised German MAK value from 2018. A value of 31ppm was derived as an acceptable exposure level. This was rounded down to 20ppm under the 'preferred number' system.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 127 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: See justification and comments.
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 266 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 266 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
According to the guidance on the characterisation of dose response for human health, the NOAEC should be corrected for duration of exposure by a factor of 6/24. This would be appropriate when deriving a DNEL for continuous exposure. For shorter exposures, the guidance on consumer exposure assessment states that the DNEL can be corrected back but in this case using Haber's law rather than the same linear correction. This is a scientifically flawed argument. If a DNEL for short exposures is required, it should be derived directly with a single correction rather than the double correction as stated in the guidance that effectively ends up at the same starting place for exposure but with a lower NOAEC.
In this case therefore no correction is made to the starting point and the DNEL derived here is therefore valid for consumer exposures up to 6 hours per day. For durations less than this corrections can be made using the Haber rule as follows (DNEL increased or assessment factor applied:
3hrs: 1.25
2hrs: 1.45
1hr: 1.8
0.5hr: 2.3
For durations longer than this, the DNEL should be reduced linearly:
8hrs: *0.75
24hrs: *0.25 (used for continuous exposures as would be the case for indoor air and environmental background exposures)
For a DNEL for infrequent use, see the next section on acute systemic inhalation exposure.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on a NOAEL.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Sub-chronic to chronic default factor.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling not required for inhalation route of exposure.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional factor deemed necessary. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Proposed factor for consumers. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 300 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: See justification and comments below.
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 5
- DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 500 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on a NOAEL
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling not required for inhalation route of exposure.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional factor deemed necessary. See detailed justification in document attached to this record. Narcosis effects not likely to differ between species.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Proposed factor for consumers. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 44.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: See comments and justification.
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 48
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 2 126 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on a NOAEL.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Sub-chronic to chronic default factor.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 2.4
- Justification:
- Rabbit to human extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional factor deemed necessary. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Proposed factor for consumers. See detailed justification in document attached to this record.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 2
- Justification:
- it is considered prudent to add a further factor of 2 to account for uncertainty of the database due to the age of the study.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 14 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: See justification and comments.
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
See justification and comments below
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.