Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 230-053-7 | CAS number: 6928-85-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity
LD50 was estimated to be 2775mg/kg bw when male wistar rats were exposed with 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) orally.
Acute dermal toxicity
LD50 was estimated to be 3227mg/kg bw when male and female Crl:CD®BR rats were exposed with 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) by dermal application.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 and the QMRF report has been attached.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mention below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction was done using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3, 2017
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: not specified
- Limit test:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine
- Molecular formula: C5H13N3
- Molecular weight: 115.179 g/mol
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: Liquid
- Smiles notation: N1(CCN(CC1)C)N
- InChl: 1S/C5H13N3/c1-7-2-4-8(6)5-3-7/h2-6H2,1H3 - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- No data available
- Doses:
- 2775mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Preliminary study:
- No data available
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 2 775 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50% mortality was observed
- Mortality:
- 50% mortality was observed
- Clinical signs:
- other: No data available
- Gross pathology:
- No data available
- Other findings:
- No data available
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not Classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- LD50 was estimated to be 2775mg/kg bw, when male wistar rats were exposed with 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) orally.
- Executive summary:
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine.The LD50 was estimated to be 2775 mg/kg bw. when male wistar rats were exposed with 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine orally.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: LD50
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" )
and "d" )
and ("e"
and (
not "f")
)
)
and ("g"
and (
not "h")
)
)
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and "k" )
and ("l"
and (
not "m")
)
)
and "n" )
and "o" )
and ("p"
and (
not "q")
)
)
and ("r"
and (
not "s")
)
)
and "t" )
and ("u"
and "v" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Amines by US-EPA New
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Radical OR Radical >> Radical
mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism
via ROS formation (indirect) >> Hydrazine Derivatives by DNA binding by
OASIS v.1.3 ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion
Formation OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation >> Aliphatic tertiary amines
by DNA binding by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 AND SN1 >> Iminium Ion
Formation AND SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation >> Aliphatic tertiary amines
by DNA binding by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, without OH or NH2
group by Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, impaired OH or NH2
group OR Non binder, MW>500 OR Non binder, non cyclic structure OR
Strong binder, OH group by Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein
binding by OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Direct
acylation involving a leaving group OR Acylation >> Direct acylation
involving a leaving group >> Carbamates OR Acylation >> Ester
aminolysis OR Acylation >> Ester aminolysis >> Amides OR Acylation >>
Ester aminolysis >> Dithiocarbamates OR Acylation >> Ring opening
acylation OR Acylation >> Ring opening acylation >> beta-Lactams OR SN2
OR SN2 >> Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 carbon atom OR SN2 >>
Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 carbon atom >> Sulfonates OR SN2 >> SN2
Reaction at a sp3 carbon atom OR SN2 >> SN2 Reaction at a sp3 carbon
atom >> Activated alkyl esters and thioesters by Protein binding by
OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not known precedent reproductive
and developmental toxic potential by DART scheme v.1.0
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as AhR binders.Polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) (3b-3) OR ARA inhibitors, Candesartan-like chemicals
(5c-3) OR ARA inhibitors, Candesartan-like chemicals (5c-3) >>
Candesartan-like ARA inhibitors OR Barbital and ETU, PLTU-like
derivatives (17a) OR Imidazole derivatives (13a) OR Known precedent
reproductive and developmental toxic potential OR Purine and
pyrimidine-like derivatives (7b) by DART scheme v.1.0
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Bioavailable by Lipinski Rule
Oasis ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non-Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkali Earth OR Halogens OR
Metalloids by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
CN1CCN(N)CC1
Threshold=20%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
CN1CCN(N)CC1
Threshold=40%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "p"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as (!Undefined)Group All Lipid
Solubility < 0.01 g/kg AND (!Undefined)Group CN Lipid Solubility < 0.4
g/kg by Skin irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "q"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Group All log Kow < -3.1 OR
Group All Melting Point > 200 C OR Group CN Aqueous Solubility < 0.1 g/L
OR Group CN Melting Point > 180 C OR Group CN Molecular Weight > 290
g/mol OR Group CN Vapour Pressure < 0.001 Pa by Skin
irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "r"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Inclusion rules not met by Eye
irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "s"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Pyrrolidones by Eye
irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "t"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Class 5 (Not possible to
classify according to these rules) by Acute aquatic toxicity
classification by Verhaar (Modified) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "u"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -2.15
Domain
logical expression index: "v"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= -0.869
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 775 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimicsh 2 and from QSAR Toolbox 3.3. (2017)
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 and the QMRF report has been attached.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction was done using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3, 2017
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: not specified
- Limit test:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine
- Molecular formula: C5H13N3
- Molecular weight: 115.179 g/mol
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: Liquid
- Smiles notation: N1(CCN(CC1)C)N
- InChl: 1S/C5H13N3/c1-7-2-4-8(6)5-3-7/h2-6H2,1H3 - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD®BR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- No data available
- Duration of exposure:
- No data available
- Doses:
- 3227mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 3 227 mg/kg bw
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50% mortality was observed
- Mortality:
- 50% mortality was observed
- Clinical signs:
- other: No data available
- Gross pathology:
- No data available
- Other findings:
- No data available
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not classified
- Conclusions:
- LD50 was estimated to be 3227mg/kg bw when male and female Crl:CD®BR rats were exposed with 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) by dermal application.
- Executive summary:
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute dermal toxicity was estimated 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine.The LD50 was estimated to be 3227 mg/kg bw when male and female Crl:CD®BR rats were exposed with4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine on dermal application.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: LD50
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" )
and "d" )
and ("e"
and (
not "f")
)
)
and ("g"
and (
not "h")
)
)
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and ("k"
and (
not "l")
)
)
and "m" )
and "n" )
and "o" )
and "p" )
and ("q"
and "r" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Amines by US-EPA New
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Radical OR Radical >> Radical
mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism
via ROS formation (indirect) >> Hydrazine Derivatives by DNA binding by
OASIS v.1.3 ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion
Formation OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation >> Aliphatic tertiary amines
by DNA binding by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 AND SN1 >> Iminium Ion
Formation AND SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation >> Aliphatic tertiary amines
by DNA binding by OECD ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not possible to classify
according to these rules by DPRA Cysteine peptide depletion
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as High reactive OR High reactive
>> Organic disulfides OR Moderate reactive OR Moderate reactive >>
Five-membered heterocyclic urea by DPRA Cysteine peptide depletion
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, without OH or NH2
group by Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, impaired OH or NH2
group OR Non binder, MW>500 OR Non binder, non cyclic structure by
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein
binding by OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Ester
aminolysis OR Acylation >> Ester aminolysis >> Dithiocarbamates by
Protein binding by OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not known precedent reproductive
and developmental toxic potential by DART scheme v.1.0
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Imidazole derivatives (13a) OR
Known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential by DART
scheme v.1.0
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Bioavailable by Lipinski Rule
Oasis ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
CN1CCN(N)CC1
Threshold=20%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
CN1CCN(N)CC1
Threshold=60%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "p"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
CN1CCN(N)CC1
Threshold=50%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "q"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -2.37
Domain
logical expression index: "r"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= -1.31
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 3 227 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimicsh 2 and from QSAR Toolbox 3.3. (2017)
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity
In different studies, 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4).The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies.
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine.The LD50 was estimated to be 2775 mg/kg bw.When male wistar rats were exposed with 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) orally.
In another experimental study given byU.S .National library of medicine (ChemID plusA TOXNET DATABASE.2017)on structurally similar read across substance 1 Nitrosopiperazine(5632-47-3). Acute oral toxicity study was done in rat using 1 Nitrosopiperazine(5632-47-3) by oral route. 50% mortality was observed at dose 5560mg/kg bw. Clinical signs like brain and coverings "changes in circulation (hemorrhage, thrombosis, etc.)", in liver fatty liver degeration and in lungs, thorax, or respiration acute pulmonary edema were observed in treated rats. Hence LD50 was considered to be2260mg/kg body weight. When rats were treated with 1 Nitrosopiperazine(5632-47-3) orally.
Also it is further supported by experimental study given in GESTIS substance database(institute for occupational safety and health of the German social accident insurance.2017)on structurally similar read across substance1-methylpiperazine (109-01-3).LD50 was considered to be 2560mg/kg body weight.When rats were treated with1-methylpiperazine (109-01-3)orally.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4)and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is 2775 mg/kg bw. Thus,comparing this value with the criteria of CLP 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) can be “Not classified” for acute oral toxicity.
Acute dermal toxicity
In different studies, 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rabbits for 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies.
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute dermal toxicity was estimated 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine.The LD50 was estimated to be 3227 mg/kg bw when male and female Crl:CD®BR rats were exposed with4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine on dermal application.
In another experimental study given by GESTIS substance database(institute for occupational safety and health of the German social accident insurance.2017)on structurally similar read across substance morpholine-4-carbaldehyde (4394-85-4).Acute dermal toxicity study was done in rabbit using morpholine-4-carbaldehyde (4394-85-4).No mortality was observed at dose 18300mg/kg bw .Hence LD50 was considered to be >18300mg/kg body weight on dermal application.
.Also it is further supported by experimental study givenU.S .National library of medicine (ChemID plusA TOXNET DATABASE.2017)on structurally similar read across substanceEthanol, 2.2’-(methylimino)bis- (MDEA) (105-59-9) , In dermal toxicity study,4 male New Zealand albino rabbits were treated with Ethanol, 2.2’-(methylimino)bis- (MDEA) in the concentration of 5990 mg/kg bw dermally. No mortality observed in treated rabbits. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 5990 mg/kg bw when 4 male New Zealand albino rabbits were treated with Ethanol, 2.2’-(methylimino)bis- (MDEA) (105-59-9) dermally.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is 3227 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4))can be “Not classified” for acute dermal toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies and predictions on 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is 2775 mg/kg bw by oral route and 3227 mg/kg bw by dermal application. Thus,comparing this value with the criteria of CLP 4-Methylpiperazin-1-amine (6928-85-4) can be “Not classified” for acute toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.