Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

The studies indicate that the test item is not classified as genotoxic.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
other: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From May 21, 1993 to June 25, 1993
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
The test was conducted on a similar substance. The complete justification for the read across is attached at section 13.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
The strains are derived from S. typhimurium strain LT2 and due to a mutation in the histidine locus are histidine dependent. Additionally due to the "deep rough" (rfa-minus) mutation they possess a faulty lipopolysaccharide envelope which enables substances to penetrate the cell wall more easily. A further mutation causes a reduction in the activity of an excision repair system. The latter alteration includes mutational processes in the nitrate reductase and biotin genes produced in a UV-sensitive area of the gene named "uvrB-minus". In the strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 the R-factor plasmid pKM 101 carries the ampicillin resistance marker. The strain TA 102 does not contain the uvrB"-mutation. Additionally TA 102 contains the multicopy plasmid pAQ1, which carries the hisG428 mutation and a tetracycline resistance gene. TA 102 contains the ochre mutation in hisG gene.
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
33.3, 100, 333.3, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate

Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMF
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen because of its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity for the bacteria.

Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
(concurrent untreated)
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
with S9 mix (for TA 1535 and TA 100 without metabolic activation)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
(concurrent untreated)
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine
Remarks:
with S9 mix (for TA 1537 and TA 98 without metabolic activation)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
(concurrent untreated)
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
with S9 mix (for TA 102 without metabolic activation)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
(concurrent untreated)
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Remarks:
With S9 mix (for all strains with metabolic activation)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II)

For each strain and dose level, including the controls, a minimum of three plates were used.

Experiment 1: The following materials were mixed in a test tube and poured onto the selective agar plates:
- 100 µL: Test solution at each dose level, solvent control, negative control, or reference mutagen solution (positive control),
- 500 µL: S9 mix (for test with metabolic activation) or S9 mix substitution-buffer (for test without metabolic activation),
- 100 µL: Bacteria suspension (cf. test system, pre-culture of the strains),
- 2000 µL: Overlay agar

Experiment 2: In the pre-incubation assay 100 µL test solution, 500 µL S9 mix/S9 mix substitution buffer and 100 µL bacteria suspension were mixed in a test tube and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. After pre-incubation 2.0 mL overlay agar (45°) was added to each tube. The mixture was poured on minimal agar plates. After solidification the plates were incubated upside down for at least 48 h at 37°C in the dark.
Evaluation criteria:
The generally accepted conditions for the evaluation of the results are: corresponding background growth on both negative control and test plates as well as normal range of spontaneous reversion rates. Due to international guidelines a statistical evaluation of the results is recommended. However, no evaluated statistical procedure can be recommended for analysis of data from the bacterial assays at this time.
A test substance is considered as positive if either a dose related or reproducible increase in the number of revertants or a significant and reproducible increase for at least one test concentration is induced.
A test substance producing neither a dose related and reproducible increase in the number of revertants nor a significant and reproducible positive response at any one of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A significant response is described as follows: A test substance is considered as mutagenic if in strain TA 100 and TA 102 the number of reversions is at least twice as high and in strains TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 98 it is at least three times higher as compared to the spontaneous reversion rate. Also, a dose-dependent and reproducible increase in the number of revertants is regarded as an indication of possibly existing mutagenic potential of the test substance regardless whether the highest dose induced the above described enhancement factors or not.
Statistics:
No data
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
(occurred in strain TA 1537 at 2500 and 5000 µg/plate and in strain TA 98 at 5000 µg/plate without metabolic activation, as well as at 2500 and 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation)
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
In experiment II toxic effects, evidenced by a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in strain TA 1537 at 2500 and 5000 µg/plate and in strain TA 98 at 5000 µg/plate without metabolic activation, as well as at 2500 and 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation. The plates incubated with the test substance showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used. No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed at any dose level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of significance.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.
Executive summary:

An in vitro study was performed to investigate the potential of the test substance to induce gene mutations according to OECD Guideline 471 and EU Method B.14 in compliance with GLP.

The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver metabolic activation. Experiment I was performed as a plate incorporation assay and Experiment II as a pre-incubation assay using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate at up to 5000 µg/plate.

In Experiment II, toxic effects, evidenced by a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in strain TA 1537 at 2500 and 5000 µg/plate and in strain TA 98 at 5000 µg/plate without metabolic activation, as well as at 2500 and 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation. The plates incubated with the test substance showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used. No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed at any dose level, either in the presence or absence of S9 mix.

Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008) a mutation means a permanent change in the amount or structure of the genetic material in a cell. The term ‘mutation’ applies both to heritable genetic changes that may be manifested at the phenotypic level and to the underlying DNA modifications when known (including specific base pair changes and chromosomal translocations).

The term ‘mutagenic’ and ‘mutagen’ will be used for agents giving rise to an increased occurrence of mutations in populations of cells and/or organisms.

The test substance is not capable to induce permanent mutation inside the genetic structure, therefore according to the CLP Regulation (EC n. 1272/2008) no classification is warranted.