Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 944-989-5 | CAS number: 2156592-46-8
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, tris(C12-13-branched-alkyl) ester was tested in a guinea pig maximization test according to OECD Guideline 406.
30 female guinea pigs were used, 10 as control group and 20 were treated with the test material. The test material was dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 100 mg/ml for induction. During the induction phase the test group animals were first treated with 3 double intradermal injections as follows: 1st: Freud's complete adjuvant (FCA) in distilled water (1:1), 2nd: test material in distilled water, 3rd: test material in distilled water and FCA (1:1). The 10 control animals received the same pairs of injections but in the 2nd injection only sesame seed oil was used.
After 7 days of intradermal injections the test material was applied undiluted for a period of 48 hours under an occlusive dressing.The same treatment was used on the 10 control animals using only distilled water.
21 days after the beginning of treatment a challenge phase was performed by applying undiluted test material on the left side, and distilled water on the right side for 24 hours under occlusive dressings for both test group and control group animals.
24, 48 and 72 hours after the beginning of the challenge application the animals were observed for erythema and oedema. No signs of erythema or oedema were observed in any of the animals.
Therefore the test material 1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, tris(C12-13-branched-alkyl) ester can be considered as non sensitizing.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- June 1992
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions, read-across
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Test was performed before REACH was in force.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Breeding "Padre Antonio" Mariano Comense (CO), Italy
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 200 - 300 g
- Housing: in groups of ten in transparent polycarbonate cages (dimension: 590x385x200 mm)
- Diet: standard complete pellet diet supplied by MUCEDOLA ad libitum
- Water: filtered water from an automatic watering system ad libitum
- Acclimation period: one week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15
- Air changes (per hr): 25
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1992-06-02 To: 1992-06-26 - Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- distilled water
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction phase: 100 mg/ml in distilled water, undiluted (epicutaneous)
Challenge phase: undiluted - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- distilled water
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction phase: 100 mg/ml in distilled water, undiluted (epicutaneous)
Challenge phase: undiluted - No. of animals per dose:
- 20 test group
10 control group - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS: no data
MAIN STUDY
INDUCTION EXPOSURE
Group 1: 1 FCA in distilled water (1:1), 2 test material in distilled water (1:1), 3 Test material in disitilled water and FCA (1:1), topical application test material
CHALLENGE PHASE: topical application of the test material (0.5 ml for 24 h)
INDUCTION EXPOSURE
Group 2: 1 1 FCA in distilled water (1:1), 2 distilled water, 3 distilled water and FCA (1:1), topical application of sesam seed oil
CHALLENGE PHASE: topical application of the test material (0.5 ml for 24 h)
- Control group
INDUCTION EXPOSURE:
1 0.1 ml FCA in distilled water (1:1); 2 0.1 ml distilled water, 3 0.1 ml distilled water and FCA (1:1)
CHALLENGE PHASE: topical application of the test material (0.5 ml for 24 h)
- Site: subscapolar region at the back
- Frequency of applications: on days 0 (intadermal) and 7 (epicutaneous) for 48 h, CHALLENGE on day: 21
- Concentrations: 100 mg/ml in sesame seed oil (intradermal), undiluted (epicutaneous)
CHALLENGE PHASE
- Test groups: occlusive patches with 0.5 ml test substance were applied to the right flanks, occlusive patches with 0.5 ml distilled water were applied to the left flanks
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48 and 72 hours after start of challenge application - Positive control substance(s):
- not specified
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 100 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 100 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 100 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 100 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test material Cosmacol ECI can be considered as non sensitising under the conditions described.
- Executive summary:
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, tris(C12-13-branched-alkyl) ester was tested in a guinea pig maximazation test according to OECD Guideline 406.
30 female guinea pigs were used, 10 as control group and 20 were treated with the test material. The test material was dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 100 mg/ml for induction. During the induction phase the test group animals were first treated with 3 double intradermal injections as follows: 1st: Freud's complete adjuvant (FCA) in distilled water (1:1), 2nd: test material in distilled water, 3rd: test material in distilled water and FCA (1:1). The 10 control animals received the same pairs of injections but in the 2nd injection only sesame seed oil was used.
After 7 days of intradermal injections the test material was applied undiluted for a period of 48 hours under an occlusive dressing.The same treatment was used on the 10 control animals using only distilled water.
21 days after the beginning of treatment a challenge phase was performed by applying undiluted test material on the left side, and distliled water on the right side for 24 hours under occlusive dressings for both test group and control group animals.
24, 48 and 72 hours after the beginning of the challenge application the animals were observed for erythema and oedema. No signs of erythema or oedema were observed in any of the animals.
Therefore the test material 1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, tris(C12-13-branched-alkyl) ester can be considered as non sensitizing.
Reference
The evaluation after 24 hours after start of challenge showed also no signs of erythema or oedema in treated and control animals
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, tris(C12-13-branched-alkyl) ester was tested in a guinea pig maximization test according to OECD Guideline 406.
30 female guinea pigs were used, 10 as control group and 20 were treated with the test material. The test material was dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 100 mg/ml for induction. During the induction phase the test group animals were first treated with 3 double intradermal injections as follows: 1st: Freud's complete adjuvant (FCA) in distilled water (1:1), 2nd: test material in distilled water, 3rd: test material in distilled water and FCA (1:1). The 10 control animals received the same pairs of injections but in the 2nd injection only sesame seed oil was used.
After 7 days of intradermal injections the test material was applied undiluted for a period of 48 hours under an occlusive dressing.The same treatment was used on the 10 control animals using only distilled water.
21 days after the beginning of treatment a challenge phase was performed by applying undiluted test material on the left side, and distliled water on the right side for 24 hours under occlusive dressings for both test group and control group animals.
24, 48 and 72 hours after the beginning of the challenge application the animals were observed for erythema and oedema. No signs of erythema or oedema were observed in any of the animals. Therefore the test material 1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, tris(C12-13-branched-alkyl) ester can be considered as non sensitizing.
This result was supported with two studies on the analogues 1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, tri-C14-15-alkyl esters and Tri (hexyl, octyl, decyl) citrate. Also in these studies were no sensitising effects seen.
The available information demonstrates a lack of skin sensitising properties of the test material 1, 2, 3 -Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2 -hydroxy-, tris (C12 -13 -branched-alkyl) ester.
Short description of key information:
The available information demonstrates a lack of skin sensitising properties of the test material 1, 2, 3 -Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2 -hydroxy-, tris (C12 -13-branched-alkyl) ester.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Additional information:
Justification for selection of respiratory sensitisation endpoint:
It is unlikely that the substance causes respiratory sensitisation because of the structural properties, the low vapour pressure and the lack of sensitsation in the skin sensitisation studies.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available information demonstrates a lack of skin sensitising properties of the test material 1, 2, 3 -Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2 -hydroxy-, tris (C12 -13 -branched-alkyl) ester. No classification for sensitisation is indicated according to the classification, labeling and packaging (CLP) regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
