Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-406-8 | CAS number: 106-52-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from peer reviewed journal
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Treatment of Ocular Tissues Exposed to Nitrogen Mustard: Beneficial Effect of Zinc Desferrioxamine Combined with Steroids
- Author:
- Yair Morad, Eyal Banin, Edward Averbukh, Eduard Berenshtein, Alexey Obolensky and Mordechai Chevion
- Year:
- 2 005
- Bibliographic source:
- Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46:1640–1646
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To assess the extent of ocular injury caused by the test chemical in animals.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Chlormethine
- EC Number:
- 200-120-5
- EC Name:
- Chlormethine
- Cas Number:
- 51-75-2
- Molecular formula:
- C5H11Cl2N
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(2-chloroethyl)(methyl)amine
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report):2,2'-Dichloro-N-methyldiethylamine
Common name: nitrogen mustard(NM)
Molecular formula : C5H11Cl2N
Molecular weight : 156.055 g/mol
InChI: 1S/C5H11Cl2N/c1-8(4-2-6)5-3-7/h2-5H2,1H3
Subsatnce type: Organic
Physical State: Liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- A total of 56 New Zealand Albino rabbits weighing 2.5 to 3.5 kg were used. All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- other: saline
- Controls:
- other: control eyes (four additional animals, eight eyes), saline solution (instead of NM) was applied to the cornea for 5 minutes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- NM (mechlorethamine), at a concentration of 2% in saline
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 5 minutes
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Slit lamp observations were performed 24 hours after exposure and subsequently after 4,7,10,14,17,21,25,29 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- One eye in each of 52 rabbits was exposed to 2% nitrogen mustard (NM).
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: the test chemical was applied to the cornea of one eye of each animal (the experimental eye) for 5 minutes within a trephine
- % coverage:
- Type of wrap if used: NM was quickly absorbed from within the trephine with small Weck-cell sponges (Invotec International, Inc., Jacksonville, FL), followed by washing of the eye with copious amounts of normal saline
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): followed by washing of the eye with copious amounts of normal saline
- Time after start of exposure: after 5 minutes
SCORING SYSTEM:
Slit-lamp examinations were performed at 24 hours after exposure, and subsequently at days 4, 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, 25, and 29. In each examination, the following parameters were recorded:
1. Area of corneal epithelial loss (corneal erosion): The average horizontal and vertical linear dimensions of the epithelial defect as stained by locally applied fluorescein were measured with the adjustable slit lamp beam and the area computed in square millimeters.
2. Degree of corneal opacity: grade 0, clear cornea with details of iris observed clearly; grade 1, mild blurring of iris details; grade 2, moderate opacity with blurred iris crypts; and grade 3, severe corneal opacity, no iris details visible.
3. Degree of iris pigmentation: grade 0, no pigmentation; grade 1, mild; grade 2, moderate; grade 3, severe iris pigmentation.
4. Degree of corneal neo-vascularization (CNV): grade 0, no pigmentation; grade 1, mild; grade 2, moderate; grade 3, severe iris pigmentation.
Additional observations included extent of eyelid and conjunctiva swelling and injection; anterior chamber reaction; iris atrophy and, when present, hyphema, corneal ectasia, perforation, and the resultant endophthalmitis.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 day after exposure
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: Exposure to the test chemical causes severe and long lasting injury
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Exposure to NM causes severe and long-lasting injury to ocular anterior segment structures.
- Other effects:
- Injury to the conjunctiva and cornea in a saline-administered eye 1 day after exposure to 2% NM was noted. Conjunctival and corneal injury, scarring, and neo-vascularization evolved over the entire duration of the experiment (4 weeks) in such eyes. Corneal Neo- vascularization developed to various degrees in all groups after exposure to NM. An increase in Intra Ocular Pressure occurred after exposure to NM, peaking at day 4 in all study groups. Exposure to NM caused iris atrophy and pigmentation together with pupil dilation in all study groups.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- An ocular irritation study was performed to assess the level of ocular injury caused due to exposure to Nitrogen mustard. Exposure to NM causes severe and long-lasting injury to ocular anterior segment structures. Injury to the conjunctiva and cornea in a saline-administered eye 1 day after exposure to 2% NM was noted. Corneal Neo- vascularization developed to various degrees in all groups after exposure to NM. An increase in Intra Ocular Pressure occurred after exposure to NM, peaking at day 4 in all study groups. Exposure to NM caused iris atrophy and pigmentation together with pupil dilation in all study groups.
On the basis of these observations, we can consider Nitrogen mustard to be irritating to eyes. - Executive summary:
An ocular irritation study was performed to assess the level of ocular injury caused due to exposure to Nitrogen mustard (NM). A total of 52 New Zealand Albino rabbits weighing 2.5 to 3.5 kg were used. All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. One eye in each of 52 rabbits was exposed to 2% nitrogen mustard (NM).Eight eyes (four animals) that were not exposed to NM served as the control. Animals were anesthetized with ketamine HCl (Ketalar, 50mg/kg) injected intramuscularly in combination with the relaxing agent xylazine (0.5 mg/kg). Local anesthetic drops (benoxinate HCl 0.4) were administered. Briefly, NM (mechlorethamine), at a concentration of 2% in saline, was applied to the cornea of one eye of each animal (the experimental eye) for 5 minutes within a trephine. Immediately after application, NM was quickly absorbed from within the trephine with small Weck-cell sponges, followed by washing of the eye with copious amounts of normal saline. In control eyes (four additional animals, eight eyes), saline solution (instead of NM) was applied to the cornea for 5 minutes, also within the trephine. Incontrol experiments, the vehicle (saline) was used as eye drops after exposure to NM. During the experiment and follow-up, intramuscular dipyrone injections (10 mg/kg) were given to animals showing pain or distress. Slit-lamp examinations were performed at 24 hours after exposure, and subsequently at days 4, 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, 25, and 29. In each examination, the following parameters were recorded: Area of corneal epithelial loss (corneal erosion), Degree of corneal opacity, Degree of iris pigmentation, Degree of corneal neo-vascularization (CNV).
Exposure to NM causes severe and long-lasting injury to ocular anterior segment structures. Injury to the conjunctiva and cornea in a saline-administered eye 1 day after exposure to 2% NM was noted. Conjunctival and corneal injury, scarring, and neo-vascularization evolved over the entire duration of the experiment (4 weeks) in such eyes. Corneal Neo- vascularization developed to various degrees in all groups after exposure to NM. An increase in Intra Ocular Pressure occurred after exposure to NM, peaking at day 4 in all study groups. Exposure to NM caused iris atrophy and pigmentation together with pupil dilation in all study groups.
On the basis of these observations, we can consider Nitrogen mustard to be irritating to eyes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.