Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The skin sensitization potential of 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8) was estimatedby SSS (2017) using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the six closest read across substances. 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)was predicted to be non sensitizing to the skin of female Dunkin-Hartley guinea pig.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation
Remarks:
in vivo
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and the supporting QMRF report has been attached.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other:
Version / remarks:
As mention below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Prediction is from OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3, 2017
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Not specified.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of the test material: Geranyl isobutyrate
- IUPAC name: 3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate
- Molecular formula: C14H24O2
- Molecular weight: 224.342 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
- Smiles: C(OC\C=C(\CC\C=C(/C)C)C)(C(C)C)=O
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany
- Age at study initiation: young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 401 ± 29 g
- Housing: conventional, 5 animals per cage in Makrolon Type IV
- Diet: Ssniff G 4
- Complete feed for guinea pigs (Ssniff, Spezialfutter GmbH, Soest, Germany), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70 - Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
100%
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
100%
No. of animals per dose:
20 animals
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: A preliminary test was conducted in order to establish a non-irritant test substance concentration which could be used in the main test. Amounts of 0.4 mL of test substance preparations (25, 50 and 75% (w/w) in corn oil) and the undiluted test substance were applied to the skin of 4 animals under occlusive conditions. Exposure duration was 6 h, after which the patches were removed and the areas of application were wiped off with corn oil and a cellulose swab. Dermal reactions were assessed directly after patch removal and 24 and 48 h post-application according to the Draize scoring system for erythema and edema.The mean erythema and edema scores out of all 4 animals over 6, 24 and 48 h post-application were both 0.0. Thus, no primary dermal irritation was observed on the skin of the treated animals up to a test substance concentration of 100% at any reading time point. Therefore, the main study was performed using the undiluted test substance.

MAIN STUDYA.
INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 6 h
- Test groups: test substance
- Control group: corn oil
- Site: left flank
- Frequency of applications: every 7 days
- Duration: Days 0-14- Concentrations: 100%

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 28- Exposure period: 6 h
- Test groups: test substance
- Control group: test substance
- Site: right flank
- Concentrations: 100%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 6, 24, 48 and 72 h after application of the test substance.
Challenge controls:
No data available.
Positive control substance(s):
not specified
Statistics:
No data available.
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
No skin sensitization reaction was observed.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: "Skin Sensitisation"
Estimation method: Takes mode value from the 7 nearest neighbours
Domain  logical expression:Result: In Domain

((((((((((("a" or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" )  and ("f" and ( not "g") )  )  and ("h" and ( not "i") )  )  and ("j" and ( not "k") )  )  and "l" )  and ("m" and ( not "n") )  )  and ("o" and ( not "p") )  )  and ("q" and ( not "r") )  )  and "s" )  and ("t" and ( not "u") )  )  and ("v" and "w" )  )

Domain logical expression index: "a"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Esters (Chronic toxicity) by US-EPA New Chemical Categories

Domain logical expression index: "b"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alkene AND Allyl AND Carboxylic acid ester AND Isopropyl by Organic Functional groups

Domain logical expression index: "c"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Allyl AND Carboxylic acid ester AND Isopropyl AND Overlapping groups by Organic Functional groups (nested)

Domain logical expression index: "d"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Carbon [CH] AND Aliphatic Carbon [-CH2-] AND Aliphatic Carbon [-CH3] AND Carbonyl, aliphatic attach [-C(=O)-] AND Ester, aliphatic attach [-C(=O)O] AND Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) AND Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] AND Tertiary Carbon by Organic functional groups (US EPA)

Domain logical expression index: "e"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Carbonic acid derivative AND Carboxylic acid derivative AND Carboxylic acid ester by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)

Domain logical expression index: "f"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3

Domain logical expression index: "g"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >>  Michael-type addition, quinoid structures OR AN2 >>  Michael-type addition, quinoid structures >> Quinoneimines OR AN2 >> Michael-type addition on alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds OR AN2 >> Michael-type addition on alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds >> Four- and Five-Membered Lactones OR AN2 >> Schiff base formation by aldehyde formed after metabolic activation OR AN2 >> Schiff base formation by aldehyde formed after metabolic activation >> Geminal Polyhaloalkane Derivatives OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation after aldehyde release OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation after aldehyde release >> Specific Acetate Esters OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation for aldehydes OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation for aldehydes >> Geminal Polyhaloalkane Derivatives OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation for aldehydes >> Haloalkane Derivatives with Labile Halogen OR Non-covalent interaction OR Non-covalent interaction >> DNA intercalation OR Non-covalent interaction >> DNA intercalation >> DNA Intercalators with Carboxamide Side Chain OR Radical OR Radical >> Generation of reactive oxygen species OR Radical >> Generation of reactive oxygen species >> Thiols OR Radical >> Radical mechanism by ROS formation (indirect) or direct radical attack on DNA OR Radical >> Radical mechanism by ROS formation (indirect) or direct radical attack on DNA >> Organic Peroxy Compounds OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Geminal Polyhaloalkane Derivatives OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitrophenols, Nitrophenyl Ethers and Nitrobenzoic Acids OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Single-Ring Substituted Primary Aromatic Amines OR Radical >> ROS formation after GSH depletion (indirect) OR Radical >> ROS formation after GSH depletion (indirect) >> Quinoneimines OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after carbenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after carbenium ion formation >> Specific Acetate Esters OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after diazonium or carbenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after diazonium or carbenium ion formation >> Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after metabolic nitrenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after metabolic nitrenium ion formation >> Single-Ring Substituted Primary Aromatic Amines OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation >> Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation >> Nitrophenols, Nitrophenyl Ethers and Nitrobenzoic Acids OR SN2 OR SN2 >> Acylation OR SN2 >> Acylation >> Specific Acetate Esters OR SN2 >> Acylation involving a leaving group  OR SN2 >> Acylation involving a leaving group  >> Geminal Polyhaloalkane Derivatives OR SN2 >> Acylation involving a leaving group  >> Haloalkane Derivatives with Labile Halogen OR SN2 >> Acylation involving a leaving group after metabolic activation OR SN2 >> Acylation involving a leaving group after metabolic activation >> Geminal Polyhaloalkane Derivatives OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and related >> Epoxides and Aziridines OR SN2 >> Alkylation, nucleophilic substitution at sp3-carbon atom OR SN2 >> Alkylation, nucleophilic substitution at sp3-carbon atom >> Haloalkane Derivatives with Labile Halogen OR SN2 >> Alkylation, nucleophilic substitution at sp3-carbon atom >> Sulfonates and Sulfates OR SN2 >> Alkylation, ring opening SN2 reaction OR SN2 >> Alkylation, ring opening SN2 reaction >> Four- and Five-Membered Lactones OR SN2 >> Direct acting epoxides formed after metabolic activation OR SN2 >> Direct acting epoxides formed after metabolic activation >> Quinoline Derivatives OR SN2 >> DNA alkylation OR SN2 >> DNA alkylation >> Alkylphosphates, Alkylthiophosphates and Alkylphosphonates OR SN2 >> Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 Carbon atom OR SN2 >> Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 Carbon atom >> Specific Acetate Esters OR SN2 >> Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 carbon atom after thiol (glutathione) conjugation OR SN2 >> Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 carbon atom after thiol (glutathione) conjugation >> Geminal Polyhaloalkane Derivatives OR SN2 >> SN2 at an activated carbon atom OR SN2 >> SN2 at an activated carbon atom >> Quinoline Derivatives OR SN2 >> SN2 attack on activated carbon Csp3 or Csp2 OR SN2 >> SN2 attack on activated carbon Csp3 or Csp2 >> Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3

Domain logical expression index: "h"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "i"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Isocyanates and Isothiocyanates OR Acylation >> Isocyanates and Isothiocyanates >> Isocyanates OR Acylation >> P450 Mediated Activation to Isocyanates or Isothiocyanates OR Acylation >> P450 Mediated Activation to Isocyanates or Isothiocyanates >> Benzylamines-Acylation OR Michael addition OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation of Heterocyclic Ring Systems OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation of Heterocyclic Ring Systems >> Thiophenes-Michael addition OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Alkyl phenols OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Arenes OR Michael addition >> Polarised Alkenes-Michael addition OR Michael addition >> Polarised Alkenes-Michael addition >> Alpha, beta- unsaturated esters OR Schiff base formers OR Schiff base formers >> Direct Acting Schiff Base Formers OR Schiff base formers >> Direct Acting Schiff Base Formers >> Mono aldehydes OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation >> Aliphatic tertiary amines OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic nitro OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Primary (unsaturated) heterocyclic amine OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Primary aromatic amine OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Tertiary (unsaturated) heterocyclic amine  OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Tertiary aromatic amine OR SN2 OR SN2 >> P450 Mediated Epoxidation OR SN2 >> P450 Mediated Epoxidation >> Thiophenes-SN2 by DNA binding by OECD

Domain logical expression index: "j"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non binder, non cyclic structure by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "k"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Moderate binder, OH grooup OR Non binder, impaired OH or NH2 group OR Non binder, MW>500 OR Non binder, without OH or NH2 group OR Strong binder, OH group OR Weak binder, OH group by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "l"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No superfragment by Superfragments ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "m"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Inclusion rules not met by Skin irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR

Domain logical expression index: "n"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic alpha-halogen-esters OR Esters including acrylic and methacrylic esters OR Ketones by Skin irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR

Domain logical expression index: "o"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non-Metals by Groups of elements

Domain logical expression index: "p"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Halogens by Groups of elements

Domain logical expression index: "q"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Group 14 - Carbon C AND Group 16 - Oxygen O by Chemical elements

Domain logical expression index: "r"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Group 15 - Nitrogen N OR Group 16 - Sulfur S by Chemical elements

Domain logical expression index: "s"

Similarity boundary:Target: CC(C)C(=O)OCC=C(C)CCC=C(C)C
Threshold=30%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization

Domain logical expression index: "t"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Not categorized by OECD HPV Chemical Categories

Domain logical expression index: "u"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Formic acid and formates OR Monoethylene glycol ethers by OECD HPV Chemical Categories

Domain logical expression index: "v"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= 3

Domain logical expression index: "w"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 7.73

Interpretation of results:
other: not sensitising
Conclusions:
The skin sensitization potential of 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8) was estimated by SSS (2017) using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the six closest read across substances. 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)was predicted to be non sensitizing to the skin of female Dunkin-Hartley guinea pig.
Executive summary:

The skin sensitization potential of 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8) was estimated by SSS (2017) using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the six closest read across substances. 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)was predicted to be non sensitizing to the skin of female Dunkin-Hartley guinea pig.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

Skin sensitization 

In different studies, 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)has been investigated for potential of skin sensitization to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo experiments in guinea pig and human for target chemical 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8) .The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox and Danish QSAR has also been compared with the experimental data of target chemical.

The skin sensitization potential of 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8) was estimatedby SSS (2017) using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the six closest read across substances. 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)was predicted to be non sensitizing to the skin of female Dunkin-Hartley guinea pig.

 Another prediction done using the Danish (Q) SAR Database, the skin sensitization was estimated to be negative on guinea pig and human for3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate. Using Battery algorithm model of Danish QSAR, Allergic Contact Dermatitis for 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)estimated to be not sensitizing when applied to human and guinea pig skin.

 It is further supported by experimental study conducted by D. L. J. OPDYKE (Food & Cosmt. Tox., 1975) to evaluate the skin sensitizing potential of target substance 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8) in Human. A skin sensitization study was performed in humans to assess the sensitizing potential of3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8). 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate was tested at the concentration of 10% in petrolatum in 25 human volunteers. No skin sensitizing effect was observed in any 25 human volunteers. Therefore 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)was considered to be non sensitizing in human skin.

Thus based on the above predictions on 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)andapplying weight of evidence, it can be concluded that3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate is not a skin sensitizer. Thus comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)can be considered as not classified for skin sensitization.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Thus comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, 3, 7-dimethylocta-2,6-dien-1-yl 2-methylpropanoate(2345-26-8)can be considered as not classified for skin sensitization.