Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 944-461-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Oral (OECD 425): LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
Inhalation (similar to OECD 403): LC50 > 5.47 mg/L
Dermal (OECD 402): LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16 Dec 2009 - 09 Feb 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 425 (Acute Oral Toxicity: Up-and-Down Procedure)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Oct 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom, UK
- Test type:
- up-and-down procedure
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Wistar (HsdRccHan:WIST)
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Bicester, UK
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 12 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 156 - 205 g
- Fasting period before study: overnight until 3 - 4 hours after dosing
- Housing: animals were individually housed in suspended solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes and with enviromental enrichment items
- Diet: 2014 Teklad Global Rodent diet (Harlan Teklad, Bicester, UK), ad libitum
- Water: mains drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 17.5, 55 and 200 mg/mL
- Justification for choice of vehicle: arachis oil BP was used as the test substance did not dissolve in water
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL/kg bw
DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual): the test material was formulated within 2 hours of administration. No analysis was conducted to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the formulation. - Doses:
- 175, 550 and 2000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 females per dose group
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: animals were observed for mortality and clinical signs 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing, and thereafter once daily for the rest of the observation period; the body weight was recorded on Day 0 (prior to dosing), 7 and 14
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
-Other: No information was available regarding the toxicity of the test substance. Therefore, the default values for LD50 and sigma were entered into AOT425 Statistical Program. The program gave a recommended dose progression of 2000, 550, 175, 55, 17.5, 5.5 and 1.75 mg/kg bw. The first animal was dosed with 175 mg/kg bw, the second with 550 mg/kg bw and animal 3 - 5 were dosed with 2000 mg/kg bw. The animals were treated sequentially, with at least 48 hours between each one to confirm the outcome of the previously dosed animal. - Statistics:
- The mortality data was used by the statistical program to calculate an oral LD50 (the maximum likelihood method).
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No mortality occurred during the study period.
- Clinical signs:
- other: Hunched posture was observed from 2 hours after dosing on the day of dosing only in 2/3 rats administered 2000 mg/kg bw. No other clinical signs were observed during the 14-day observation period.
- Gross pathology:
- Necropsy did not reveal substance-related findings.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not classified
Reference
Table 1. Mortality and clinical signs
Dose |
Toxicological results* |
Duration of clinical signs |
Time of death |
Mortality (%) |
Females |
||||
175 |
0/0/1 |
--- |
--- |
0 |
550 |
0/0/1 |
-- |
-- |
0 |
2000 |
0/2/3 |
2 h – Day 1 |
-- |
0 |
LD50 = 2000 mg/kg bw |
* first number = number of dead animals
second number = number of animals with clinical signs
third number = number of animals used
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study, and is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VII, 8.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Few details on materials and methods were given, the individual animal data was not reported, no necropsy was performed, the airflow was not monitored, air changes per minute were not reported, the type of inhalation exposure was not specified. The requirements of the listed guideline were not available.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals (State Environmental Protection Administration of China) 2004.5
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The Guidelines for the Hazard Evaluation of New Chemical Substances (HJ/T 154-2004)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Sep 2009
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- few details on materials and methods were given, individual animal data not reported, no necropsy was performed, air changes per minute not reported, airflow was not monitored, the type of inhalation exposure not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: SPF Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
- Weight at study initiation: 252.2 ± 1.9 g (females) and 258.0 ± 4.9 g (males)
- Housing: animals were housed individually
- Diet: rodent feed (HFK BIOSCIENCE Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 25
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- inhalation: dust
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- air
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: Dynamic inhalation control system (HOPE-MED8051C), solid phase dust inhalation chamber (8051) and automatic dust dynamic control system (8051C) (Tianjin HOPE Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China); dust sampler and filter membrane (Yancheng Kebo Electron Instrument Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China)
- Exposure chamber volume: 300 L
- Source and rate of air: 4.0 m³/h
- System of generating particulates/aerosols: dust of the test substance was generated with the dust generator and entered the inhalation chamber at a rate of 2.8 mL/min.
TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: gravimetric method. Samples of the test substance were collected at 1, 2 and 3 h using a dust sampler equipped with a filter membrane that had been weight prior to sampling. The weight minus filter weight was used as the sample weight. - Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- gravimetric method
- Duration of exposure:
- 4 h
- Concentrations:
- 5 mg/L (nominal concentration)
5.47 mg/L (analytical concentration) - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: the animals were observed for mortality and clinical signs immediately after exposure, and daily thereafter for the rest of the study period; the body weight was recorded on Day 0 (prior to dosing), 7 and 14
- Necropsy of survivors performed: no - Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 5.47 mg/L air (analytical)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Mortality:
- No mortality occurred during the study period.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No clinical signs of toxicity were observed during the 14-day observation period.
- Body weight:
- The body weight gains were within the normal ranges in males and females during the whole study period.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 5 470 mg/m³ air
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study, and is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VII, 8.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 06 - 20 Jan 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Feb 1987
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.1200 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom, UK
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Wistar HsdRccHan:WIST
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Bicester, UK
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 12 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 230 - 256 g (males); 200 - 219 g (females)
- Fasting period before study: overnight until 3 - 4 hours after dosing
- Housing: during the 24-hour exposure period, animals were individually housed in suspended solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes and with enviromental enrichment items. For the period before and after exposure, animals were housed in groups of 5 by sex.
- Diet: 2014 Teklad Global Rodent diet (Harlan Teklad, Bicester, UK), ad libitum
- Water: mains drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- other: the test substance was moistened with arachis oil BP
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: back and flank of the animal
- % coverage: approximately 10
- Type of wrap if used: a piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and secured with a semi-occlusive self-adhesive bandage
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes, residual test substance was removed using cotton wool moistened with arachis oil
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg/kg bw
- For solids, paste formed: no, the test substance was moistened using arachis oil BP - Duration of exposure:
- 24 h
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- not required
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: the animals were observed for mortality and clinical signs 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hours after administration, and daily thereafter for the rest of the study period; the body weight was recorded on Day 0 (prior to dosing), 7 and 14; the test site was scored for skin irritation (erythema and edema) daily for the entire observation period
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes - Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No mortality occurred during the study period.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No treatment-related clinical signs were observed during the 14-day observation period.
- Gross pathology:
- The necropsy and gross pathology examination did not reveal any substance-related findings.
- Other findings:
- - Other observations: No erythema or edema was noted at the test site in any animal during the observation period.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study, and is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VII, 8.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity
In an acute oral toxicity study performed according to OECD guideline 425 and under GLP conditions, 175, 550 and 2000 mg/kg bw Reaction mass of 1,1'-(isopropylidene)bis[3,5-dibromo-4-(2,3-dibromo-2-methylpropoxy)benzene] and 1,3-dibromo-2-(2,3-dibromo-2-methylpropoxy)-5-{2-[3,5-dibromo-4-(2,3,3-tribromo-2-methylpropoxy)phenyl]propan-2-yl}benzene was administered via gavage to female Wistar rats (Sanders, 2010). In line with the up-and-down procedure, a maximum of 5 animals were administered increasing doses of the test substance at 48-hour intervals, until an LD50 could be derived or calculated. There was no mortality during the 14-day observation period at any dose level. Two of three rats administered 2000 mg/kg bw had a hunched posture on the dosing day from 2 hours after administration. No effect on body weight and body weight gain was observed and no findings were reported from the necropsy. The LD50 oral for female rats is considered to be > 2000 mg/kg bw.
Acute inhalation toxicity
The acute inhalation toxicity of Reaction mass of 1,1'-(isopropylidene)bis[3,5-dibromo-4-(2,3-dibromo-2-methylpropoxy)benzene] and 1,3-dibromo-2-(2,3-dibromo-2-methylpropoxy)-5-{2-[3,5-dibromo-4-(2,3,3-tribromo-2-methylpropoxy)phenyl]propan-2-yl}benzene was assessed in a study performed according to the Chinese Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals (State Environmental Protection Administration of China) 2004.5, using a protocol similar to OECD guideline 403 (Ning, 2015). 5 SPF Wistar rats/sex were administered 5.47 mg/L (analytical concentration) of the test substance (unspecified exposure type) for 4 hours. The rats were exposed to the test substance as a dust in a solid phase dust inhalation chamber (300 L volume). No mortality occurred and no clinical signs were observed during the 14-day observation period. The body weight gain was within the range that is normal for this strain and study type. No macroscopic examination was performed. The LC50 is considered to be > 5.47 mg/L (analytical concentration).
Acute dermal toxicity
An acute dermal toxicity study (limit test) was performed with Reaction mass of 1,1'-(isopropylidene)bis[3,5-dibromo-4-(2,3-dibromo-2-methylpropoxy)benzene] and 1,3-dibromo-2-(2,3-dibromo-2-methylpropoxy)-5-{2-[3,5-dibromo-4-(2,3,3-tribromo-2-methylpropoxy)phenyl]propan-2-yl}benzene according to OECD guideline 402 and under GLP conditions (Sanders, 2010). 2000 mg/kg bw of the test substance was moistened with arachis oil BP applied to the skin of 5 Wistar rats/sex/dose under a semi-occlusive dressing for 24 hours. No mortality occurred and no treatment-related clinical signs were noted during the 14-day observation period. The body weight increases were within the range expected for rats used in this type of study for 4/5 males and 2/5 females. 1/5 males showed body weight loss (< 10%) during week 2 and 3/5 females showed no body weight increase during either week 1 or week 2. No treatment-related findings were reported during the gross necropsy. There were no local skin effects at the treatment site. The LD50 dermal is considered to be > 2000 mg/kg bw.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on acute toxicity do not meet the classification criteria according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.